Attachment_4_-_PPQ.pdf

PDF 405 KB Posted

Attached to
Industrial Hygiene Cleaning Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA5004-17-R-0003
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Pacific Air Forces

About this file

Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Industrial Hygiene Cleaning Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment_P00002.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Answers.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Attendance_Sheet.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
CHPP_Site_Visit_-_Signed.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
FA5004-17-R-0003.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_Performance_Work_Statement.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_PPQ_Cover_Page.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

For Official Use Only

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire – Attachment 4

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 5

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire – Attachment 4

For Official Use Only Page 2 of 5

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other

Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire – Attachment 4

For Official Use Only Page 3 of 5

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

The Contractor: E V S M U N/A

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire – Attachment 4

For Official Use Only Page 4 of 5

The Contractor: E V S M U N/A

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

12. Was responsive to contract changes.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

13. Provided adequate project supervision.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

14. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

15. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

16. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

17. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire – Attachment 4

For Official Use Only Page 5 of 5

Additional remarks:

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

354th Contracting Squadron

Attn: SrA Sadie Lambert

2310 Central Ave, Suite 3

Eielson AFB, AK 99702

FAX to: (907) 377-2389

E-Mail to: sadie.lambert@us.af.mil and nicholas.muche@us.af.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .