FA4855-15-R-0006.pdf

27 SOCONS/CC

110 E ALISON AVE, BLDG 600

CANNON AFB NM 88103-5321

(575) 784-2321

(575) 784-4791

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

11. DELIVERY FOR FOB

RFQ

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

IFB RFP

CODE

SEE ADDENDUM

BLOCK IS MARKED

DESTINATION UNLESS

12. DISCOUNT TERMS

(No Collect Calls)

32.5

13b. RATING

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

X

CODE

FA4855-15-R-0006 20-Feb-2015

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

575-784-6530

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

12:00 AM 13 Mar 2015

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER) 31c. DATE SIGNED

ADDENDA X ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

22. UNIT 23. UNIT PRICE 24. AMOUNT21. QUANTITY

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

UNRESTRICTED

FAX: NAICS:

TEL:

CODE 18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BYOFFEROR

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TEL.

FA4855

SIZE STD:

9. ISSUED BY

FACILITY

CODE

17a.CONTRACTOR/

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

15. DELIVER TO CODE F1L3H4 16. ADMINISTERED BY

27 SOCAMXS/CCR

TSGT BRANDON TALBERT

BLDG 164 RM 111

CANNON AFB NM 88103

TEL: 575-784-4922 FAX:

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

STEVE M. NORIEGA

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

1 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.X

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

SEE SCHEDULE

488190

TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND DELIVER ALL ITEMS

SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY ADDITIONAL SHEETS

SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED HEREIN.

SB

HUBZONE SB

SET ASIDE: 100 % FOR

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

F1L2H24213A001

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

TEL: EMAIL:

1 COPIES

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

.OFFER DATED YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN 29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REFERENCE

X

8(A)

SVC-DISABLED VET-OWNED SB

EMERGING SB

X

X

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

SEE SCHEDULE

19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES 21. QUANTITY 22. UNIT 24. AMOUNT

PAGE 2 OF

23. UNIT PRICE

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005) BACK

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

FA4855-15-R-0006

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 12 Months Transient Alert Maintenance Services

FFP

Contractor shall provide all necessary plant, labor, tools, parts, materials, equipment, facilities, transportation, and all other essentials necessary to perform operation of the Transient Aircraft Maintenance Service (TAMS) at Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The performance period is 1Apr 15 - 31 Mar 16. Services will include all applicable State, Federal, and Local taxes.

FOB: Destination

MFR PART NR: J015-TA-AIR-CRFT

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: F1L2H24213A001

SIGNAL CODE: A

NET AMT

0002 250 Hours Emergency/Special Events/Overtime

FFP

In accordance with PWS 1.5.3, 1.6.4 and 4.5.3. Hourly pay is not per worker but for total hourly work performed ouside of normal duty hours listed in PWS 4.5.1.

Services will include all applicable State, Federal, and Local taxes.

FOB: Destination

MFR PART NR: J015-TA-AIR-CRFT

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: F1L2H24213A001

1001 12 Months OPTION Transient Alert Maintenance Services

FFP

Contractor shall provide all necessary plant, labor, tools, parts, materials, equipment, facilities, transportation, and all other essentials necessary to perform operation of the Transient Aircraft Maintenance Service (TAMS) at Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The performance period is 1 Apr 16 - 31 Mar 17. Services will include all applicable State, Federal, and Local taxes.

FOB: Destination

MFR PART NR: J015-TA-AIR-CRFT

1002 250 Hours OPTION Emergency/Special Events/Overtime

FFP

In accordance with PWS 1.5.3, 1.6.4 and 4.5.3. Hourly pay is not per worker but for total hourly work performed ouside of normal duty hours listed in PWS 4.5.1.

Services will include all applicable State, Federal, and Local taxes.

FOB: Destination

2001 12 Months OPTION Transient Alert Maintenance Services

FFP

Contractor shall provide all necessary plant, labor, tools, parts, materials, equipment, facilities, transportation, and all other essentials necessary to perform operation of the Transient Aircraft Maintenance Service (TAMS) at Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The performance period is 1 Apr 17 - 31 Mar 18. Services will include all applicable State, Federal, and Local taxes.

FOB: Destination

2002 250 Hours OPTION Emergency/Special Events/Overtime

FFP

In accordance with PWS 1.5.3, 1.6.4 and 4.5.3. Hourly pay is not per worker but for total hourly work performed ouside of normal duty hours listed in PWS 4.5.1.

Services will include all applicable State, Federal, and Local taxes.

FOB: Destination

3001 12 Months OPTION Transient Alert Maintenance Services

FFP

Contractor shall provide all necessary plant, labor, tools, parts, materials, equipment, facilities, transportation, and all other essentials necessary to perform operation of the Transient Aircraft Maintenance Service (TAMS) at Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The performance period is 1 Apr 18 - 31 Mar 19. Services will include all applicable State, Federal, and Local taxes.

FOB: Destination

3002 250 Hours OPTION Emergency/Special Events/Overtime

FFP

In accordance with PWS 1.5.3, 1.6.4 and 4.5.3. Hourly pay is not per worker but for total hourly work performed ouside of normal duty hours listed in PWS 4.5.1.

Services will include all applicable State, Federal, and Local taxes.

FOB: Destination

4001 12 Months OPTION Transient Alert Maintenance Services

FFP

Contractor shall provide all necessary plant, labor, tools, parts, materials, equipment, facilities, transportation, and all other essentials necessary to perform operation of the Transient Aircraft Maintenance Service (TAMS) at Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The performance period is 1 Apr 19 - 31 Mar 20. Services will include all applicable State, Federal, and Local taxes.

FOB: Destination

4002 250 Hours OPTION Emergency/Special Events/Overtime

FFP

In accordance with PWS 1.5.3, 1.6.4 and 4.5.3. Hourly pay is not per worker but for total hourly work performed ouside of normal duty hours listed in PWS 4.5.1.

Services will include all applicable State, Federal, and Local taxes.

FOB: Destination

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government 0002 Destination Government Destination Government

1001 Destination Government Destination Government 1002 Destination Government Destination Government 2001 Destination Government Destination Government 2002 Destination Government Destination Government 3001 Destination Government Destination Government 3002 Destination Government Destination Government 4001 Destination Government Destination Government 4002 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

0001 POP 01-APR-2015 TO

31-MAR-2016

N/A 27 SOCAMXS/CCR

TSGT BRANDON TALBERT

BLDG 164 RM 111

CANNON AFB NM 88103

575-784-4922 FOB: Destination

F1L3H4

0002 POP 01-APR-2015 TO

31-MAR-2016

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1001 POP 01-APR-2016 TO

31-MAR-2017

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1002 POP 01-APR-2016 TO

31-MAR-2017

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2001 POP 01-APR-2017 TO

31-MAR-2018

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2002 POP 01-APR-2017 TO

31-MAR-2018

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3001 POP 01-APR-2018 TO

31-MAR-2019

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3002 POP 01-APR-2018 TO

31-MAR-2019

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4001 POP 01-APR-2019 TO

31-MAR-2020

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4002 POP 01-APR-2019 TO

31-MAR-2020

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

RECAP

CLIN UNIT COST TOTAL CLIN COST TOTAL YEAR COST

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENTS

1. Performance Work Statement

2. DOL Wage Determination 05-2517 Rev-19

3. Past Performance Questionnaire

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.202-1 Definitions NOV 2013 52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement

To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights

APR 2014

52.204-7 System for Award Management JUL 2013 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance JUL 2013 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting NOV 2014 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance NOV 2014 52.209-7 Information Regarding Responsibility Matters JUL 2013 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Items APR 2014 52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items MAY 2014 52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.222-41 Service Contract Labor Standards MAY 2014 52.222-55 Minimum Wages Under Executive Order 13658 DEC 2014 52.225-25 Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain

Activities or Transactions Relating to Iran-- Representation and Certifications.

DEC 2012

52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997 52.229-3 Federal, State And Local Taxes FEB 2013 52.232-23 Assignment Of Claims MAY 2014 52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

DEC 2013

52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004

52.245-1 Government Property APR 2012 52.245-2 Government Property Installation Operation Services APR 2012 52.245-9 Use And Charges APR 2012 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

NOV 2011

252.204-7004 Alt A System for Award Management Alternate A FEB 2014 252.204-7012 Safeguarding of Unclassified Controlled Technical

Information

NOV 2013

252.204-7015 Disclosure of Information to Litigation Support Contractors FEB 2014 252.205-7000 Provision Of Information To Cooperative Agreement Holders DEC 1991 252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving

Reports

JUN 2012

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012 252.245-7002 Reporting Loss of Government Property APR 2012 5352.242-90001 Requirements for Ktrs Requesting Base Entry JUL 2002

52.212-1 ADDENDUM

Paragraph (c) is tailored as follows: “The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.”

PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

A. To ensure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The proposal shall consist of three (3) separate parts; Part I – Price Proposal, Part II

– Technical Capability and Part III – Past Performance Information.

B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional data will be requested. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit cost and pricing data to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price.

C. Documents submitted in response to this solicitation must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the solicitation (Item Numbers) and Performance Work Statement (PWS), and government standards and regulations pertaining to the PWS.

2. Instructions as stated in this provision addendum and the evaluation factors for award.

D. Specific Instructions:

1. PART I – PRICE PROPOSAL – Submit original and one (1) copy electronically.

(a) Complete blocks 12, 17a, and 30a, b, and c of the SF1449. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the SOLICITATION, with attachments. The SOLICITATION constitutes the model contract.

(b) Insert proposed unit and extended prices in the Pricing Schedule. The extended amount must equal the whole dollar unit price multiplied by the number of units. The proposal(s) must be submitted for a base period plus four (4) Option Years. Provide a price for CLINs 0001 and 0002 for the base period of performance and CLINs X001 and X002 for all (4) option years. Fill in the “RECAP” section in the solicitation.

(c) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions incorporated into the solicitation by full text and return along with the proposal and addendums.

2. PART II – TECHNICAL – Submit original and one (1) copy electronically.

Offerors shall not simply restate Performance Work Statement (PWS) requirements, but shall include their technical capabilities in fulfilling requirements. Offerors will include:

(i) Subfactor 1 – Transient Aircraft Management Plan: Plans must show how the contractor plans to perform the requirements as outlined in paragraphs 1.1 through 1.6 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

(ii) Subfactor 2 – Quality Control Plan: Provide a quality control plan that addresses the specific methodology for ensuring the requirements of the PWS are accomplished. Reference PWS section 4.3.

Technical rating is either “acceptable,” or “unacceptable”. Only those offers whose technical proposals are rated “acceptable” will be considered.

3. PART III – PAST PERFORMANCE – Limited to no more than five (5) pages per contract listed.

References that are recent and relevant are desired. Submit original plus one (1) copy electronically.

(a) Contracts Performed and/or Completed in the Past Six (6) Years: Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for same or similar type contract. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc.

(b) Past performance Reference List: Provide a list of no more than ten (10), of the most recent and relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the last Six (6) years. Each referenced contract will include the following information:

a. Complete name of Government agency, commercial firm, or other organization

b. Complete address

c. Contract number or other reference

d. Date of contract

e. Estimated contract price

f. Contracting or purchasing point of contact

g. Location of work

h. Description of contract work

i. Current status of contract

(c) PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE: Each offeror shall send out Past Performance Questionnaires to each of the offerors past performance references, to each of the Points of Contact identified in the contracts listed in the contractor’s Past Performance Information.

The responsibility to send out Past Performance Questionnaires rests solely with each offeror-

IT SHALL NOT BE DELEGATED TO ANY OTHER ENTITY.

1. Complete Section A, General Information, of the Past Performance Questionnaire

(Attachment 3) and mail or email the attached Past Performance Questionnaire to all past performance references listed in the contractor’s Past Performance Information.

Evaluators are only allowed to use the Attachment 3, Past Performance Questionnaire.

Altered or substituted questionnaires will not be evaluated. Offerors are responsible to ensure questionaires are transmitted to their references, and to indicate which references the questionnaire was sent to.

2. Once the Past Performance Questionnaires are completed by the evaluator’s POCs, the information contained in the Questionnaires shall be considered source selection sensitive and not released to you, the offeror. Questionnaires shall be sent directly to the Government.

3. Past Performance Questionnaires are to be completed and sent directly to the Government by the evaluator completing the Questionnaire. It is the sole responsibility of the offeror to track the submission of Past Performance Questionnaires and ensure that the Government receives them NO LATER THAN THE DUE DATE AND TIME ESTABLISHED IN THIS RFP FOR PROPOSAL SUBMISSION. It is also the sole responsibility of the offeror to inform the evaluators of any extensions the Government approves to the date and time proposals are due to be submitted.

4. The evaluator shall e-mail questionnaires to the attention of MSgt Steve Noriega (575- 784-2415) at steve.noriega@us.af.mil and SrA David Valenzuela (575-784-6184) at david.valenzuela@us.af.mil. If the questionnaires cannot be e-mailed, mail the questionnaire to: 27 Special Operations Contracting Squadron/AFLT, ATTENTION:

MSgt Steve Noriega or SrA David Valenzuela, 110 E. Alison Ave, Bldg. 600, Cannon

AFB, NM 88103.

5. If the offeror claims there is no past performance, then that status must be identified to the contracting officer, MSgt Steve Noriega at steve.noriega@us.af.mil, not later than the date/time proposals are due from all offerors.

4. Format for proposal Parts II and III shall be as follows:

(a) The proposals will be 8 1/2” x 11” paper except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17”.

(b) A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information.

(c) Typing shall not be less than 12 pitch.

(d) Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required.

(e) Microsoft Word or Adobe PDF format is acceptable

General Information

INFORMATION REGARDING SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL: Whether submitted electronically or hand delivered the proposal and SF 1449 must be signed by an authorized company official and be received no later than the due date listed on the 1449. Hand carried proposals must be delivered to the 27 SOCONS Command Section Front Office located at 27 Special Operations Contracting Squadron, 110 East Alison Ave, Bldg. 600, Cannon AFB, NM 88103. Electronic submissions can be e-mailed to SrA David Valenzuela at david.valenzuela@us.af.mil and MSgt Steve Noriega at steve.noriega@us.af.mil.

Offerors are cautioned that the size limit for electronic proposals is 10 MB. If the offeror chooses to submit electronically, the government will not be responsible for any non-receipt of the offer, or any failure of the offeror to verify receipt of the e-mailed offer.

Amendments, if issued, must be signed by an authorized company official and submitted. The sealed envelope or package used to submit your proposal must show the time and date specified for receipt, the solicitation number, and the name and address of the offeror.

Offerors are cautioned that Cannon AFB, NM has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. SOME DELAY SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED WHEN HANDCARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at the bid depository PRIOR to the time specified for receipt. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f) “Late submission, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers.”

FEDERAL HOLIDAYS: The following Federal Legal Holidays are observed by this base:

New Year’s Day 1 January Martin Luther King’s Birthday Third Monday in January Presidents Day Third Monday in February Memorial Day Last Monday in May Independence Day 4 July Labor Day First Monday in September Columbus Day Second Monday in October Veterans Day 11 November Thanksgiving Day Fourth Thursday in November Christmas Day 25 December

** A site visit will be conducted upon request. Contractors shall e-mail SrA David Valenzuela at david.valenzuela@us.af.mil and MSgt Steve Noriega at steve.noriega@us.af.mil to request a site visit.

(End of Addendum)

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Past performance and technical when combined is significantly more important than price.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

52.212-2 EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (ADDENDUM)

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: The basis for award will be a past performance/technical capability and price tradoff, this allows for a tradeoff between past performance/technical capability and price and allows the government to accept other than the lowest price proposal to achieve a best-value contract award. Competing offerors’ recent, within the past six (6) years, and relevant past performance history and technical approach will be evaluated on a basis significantly more important than price. By submission of its offer in accordance with the instructions provided in clause FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors, the offeror accedes to the terms of this model contract and all such offers shall be treated equally except for their prices and performance records. Proposals that are unrealistic in terms of technical acceptability or price may be rejected at any time during the evaluation process. Offerors are cautioned to follow the detailed instructions fully and carefully, as the Government reserves the right to make an award based on initial offers received, without discussion of such offers. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

A. Price Evaluation: Proposals shall be ranked in order of price from lowest to highest. Then, the lowest priced proposal shall be evaluated, including any option prices. Each offeror’ s price will be evaluated for completeness and reasonableness. Unrealistically low proposed costs/prices may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that either the offeror does not understand the requirement or the offeror has made an unrealistic proposal. The Government will evaluate the Option to Extend Services under FAR Clause 52.217-8 by adding one-half of the offeror's final option period prices to the offeror's total price. Thus, the offeror's total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the base period and all option periods. Offerors are required only to price the base year and option period. Offerors shall not submit a price for the potential one-half extension of services period.

B. Technical Evaluation: The Government’s technical evaluation team shall evaluate offeror’s technical capability (Part II – Technical Capability) on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. Any factor/subfactor evaluated as “unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, unawardable.

Only those proposals with a rating of “acceptable” will be considered for award. However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion. The term “technical” as used herein, refers to non-price factors other than past performance. IAW DoD Source Selection Procedures, paragraph A.2.1.1, Table A-1, the Government will use the following table to assess the contractor’s technical acceptability:

Table A-1. Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The following Technical Capability sub factors will be evaluated:

(i) Subfactor 1 – Transient Aircraft Management Plan:The offeror will receive an acceptable rating for the factor if the Management and Control Plan demonstrates a clear understanding of the PWS sections 1.1 through 1.6 and adheres to the instructions provided in provision 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items (Addendum). The approach shall, to the maximum extent practicable, outline and describe actual methods proposed to meet the requirements of the contract. Emphasis shall be placed on paragraph 1.1.9, 1.1.11, 1.1.12 and 1.1.15.

(ii) Subfactor 2 – Quality Control Plan: The offeror will receive an acceptable rating for the factor if the written approach demonstrates a clear understanding of the PWS section 4.3 and adheres to the instructions provided in provision 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items (Addendum). The approach shall, to the maximum extent practicable, outline and describe actual methods proposed to meet the requirements of the contract.

The lowest priced proposal will be the first proposal to move onto the technical evaluation. If the lowest priced proposal recieves an acceptable technical rating it will move onto the past performance evaluation.

If the lowest priced proposal does not receive the acceptable technical rating then the next lowest priced proposal will move onto the technical evaluation. This process will continue until a proposal is rated acceptable.

C. Past Performance Evaluation: The Government’s past performance evaluation team shall evaluate the proposals past performance (Part III – Past Performance) and past performance information independently obtained by the past performance team (CPARS PIPRS) by assigning one of the ratings described below. The past performance team shall independantly seek recent and relevant performance information based on the references provided by the offeror and the completed questionnaires submitted to this office (Attachment 3) to evaluate in addition to the past perforamnce provided by the offeror. The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment rating of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, or Unknown Confidence as defined in DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table 5, Performance Confidence Assessments. Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will be considered as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror. Offerors with no relevant past or present performance history or the offeror’s performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned shall receive the rating “Unknown Confidence”, meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably.

(a) The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to assess the degree of confidence the Government has in the offeror’s ability to supply services described in the solicitation that meet users’ needs, based on the offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance. The past performance evaluation team will conduct recency and relevancy assessments as described below when reviewing each offeror’s demonstrated record of performance. In evaluating past performance, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation and to seek information on higher priced offerors if none of the lower priced offerors receive a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment rating.

(b) Recency Assessment. An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past six (6) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

(c) Relevancy Assessment. The Government will evaluate all recent performance information to determine how closely the services performed under those contracts relate to this requirement. For each recent reference and/or past performance questionnaire (Attachment 3) reviewed, the relevance of the work performed will be assessed using the following ratings:

TABLE 4- PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATINGS

Rating Description

Very Relevant A very relevant contract is a government or commercial contract in which the offeror has performed services that are the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities to those identified in this solicitaion. Specifically, the offeror shall have experience with ALL of the following types of services as described in the PWS:

Transient Aircraft Management

Emergency Services

Special Events Services

Arrival Services

Processing Services

Departure Services

Tool Control program

HAZMAT program

Relevant A relevant contract is a government or commercial contract in which the offeror has performed services that are the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities to those identified in this solicitation.

Specifically, the offeror shall have experience with Transient Aircraft Management, Emergency Services, Special Events Services and at least four of the following types of services as described in the PWS:

• Arrival Services

• Processing Services

• Departure Services

• Tool Control program

• HAZMAT program

Somewhat Relevant A somewhat relevant contract is a government or commercial contract in which the offeror has performed services that are the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities to those identified in this solicitation. Specifically, the offeror shall have experience with Transient Aircraft Management, Emergency Services, Special Events Services and at least two of the following types of services as described in the PWS:

• Arrival Services

• Processing Services

• Departure Services

• Tool Control program

• HAZMAT program

Not Relevant Any contract effort that does not meet the above descriptions.

D. If the technically acceptable offeror with the lowest price is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence”, that offeror represents the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

E. If the lowest priced offeror is not judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment or until all offerors are evaluated. The Source Selection Authority shall make an integrated assessment best value award decision if award is not made to lowest priced offeror.

F. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in the proposal preparation instructions to permit a meaningful assessment of past performance. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

G. If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. If the offeror’s proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the Final Proposal Revision are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror’s proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award.

(End of Addendum)

52.204-17 OWNERSHIP OF CONTROL OF OFFEROR (NOV 2014)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--

Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code means—

(1) An identifier assigned to entities located in the United States or its outlying areas by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Contractor and Government Entity (CAGE) Branch to identify a commercial or government entity, or

(2) An identifier assigned by a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) or by the NATO Support Agency (NSPA) to entities located outside the United States and its outlying areas that the DLA Contractor and Government Entity (CAGE) Branch records and maintains in the CAGE master file. This type of code is known as an NCAGE code.

Highest-level owner means the entity that owns or controls an immediate owner of the offeror, or that owns or controls one or more entities that control an immediate owner of the offeror. No entity owns or exercises control of the highest level owner.

TABLE 5- PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS

Rating Description

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

LIMITED CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NO CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE

(NEUTRAL)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Immediate owner means an entity, other than the offeror, that has direct control of the offeror. Indicators of control include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following: Ownership or interlocking management, identity of interests among family members, shared facilities and equipment, and the common use of employees.

(b) The Offeror represents that it [ ___ ] has or [ ___ ] does not have an immediate owner. If the Offeror has more than one immediate owner (such as a joint venture), then the Offeror shall respond to paragraph (c) and if applicable, paragraph (d) of this provision for each participant in the joint venture.

(c) If the Offeror indicates ``has'' in paragraph (b) of this provision, enter the following information:

Immediate owner CAGE code:

Immediate owner legal name: ___

(Do not use a ``doing business as'' name)

Is the immediate owner owned or controlled by another entity?:

[ ___ ] Yes or [ ___ ] No.

(d) If the Offeror indicates ``yes'' in paragraph (c) of this provision, indicating that the immediate owner is owned or controlled by another entity, then enter the following information:

Highest-level owner CAGE code:

Highest-level owner legal name:

(Do not use a ``doing business as'' name)

52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (APR 2010)

(a)(1) The Offeror certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that-

(i) The Offeror and/or any of its Principals-

(A) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any Federal agency;

(B) Have ( ) have not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property (if offeror checks “have”, the offeror shall also see 52.209-7, if included in this solicitation); and

(C) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with, commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this provision.; and

(D) Have , have not , within a three-year period preceding this offer, been notified of any delinquent Federal taxes in an amount that exceeds $3,000 for which the liability remains unsatisfied.

(1) Federal taxes are considered delinquent if both of the following criteria apply:

(i) The tax liability is finally determined. The liability is finally determined if it has been assessed. A liability is not finally determined if there is a pending administrative or judicial challenge. In the case of a judicial challenge to the liability, the liability is not finally determined until all judicial appeal rights have been exhausted.

(ii) The taxpayer is delinquent in making payment. A taxpayer is delinquent if the taxpayer has failed to pay the tax liability when full payment was due and required. A taxpayer is not delinquent in cases where enforced collection action is precluded.

(2) Examples. (i) The taxpayer has received a statutory notice of deficiency, under I.R.C. Sec. 6212, which entitles the taxpayer to seek Tax Court review of a proposed tax deficiency. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek Tax Court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(ii) The IRS has filed a notice of Federal tax lien with respect to an assessed tax liability, and the taxpayer has been issued a notice under I.R.C. Sec. 6320 entitling the taxpayer to request a hearing with the IRS Office of Appeals contesting the lien filing, and to further appeal to the Tax Court if the IRS determines to sustain the lien filing. In the course of the hearing, the taxpayer is entitled to contest the underlying tax liability because the taxpayer has had no prior opportunity to contest the liability. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek tax court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(iii) The taxpayer has entered into an installment agreement pursuant to I.R.C. Sec. 6159. The taxpayer is making timely payments and is in full compliance with the agreement terms. The taxpayer is not delinquent because the taxpayer is not currently required to make full payment.

(iv) The taxpayer has filed for bankruptcy protection. The taxpayer is not delinquent because enforced collection action is stayed under 11 U.S.C. 362 (the Bankruptcy Code).

(ii) The Offeror has ( ) has not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, had one or more contracts terminated for default by any Federal agency.

(2) Principal, for the purposes of this certification, means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager;

head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The Offeror shall provide immediate written notice to the Contracting Officer if, at any time prior to contract award, the Offeror learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

(c) A certification that any of the items in paragraph (a) of this provision exists will not necessarily result in withholding of an award under this solicitation. However, the certification will be considered in connection with a determination of the Offeror's responsibility. Failure of the Offeror to furnish a certification or provide such additional information as requested by the Contracting Officer may render the Offeror nonresponsible.

(d) Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by paragraph (a) of this provision. The knowledge and information of an Offeror is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

(e) The certification in paragraph (a) of this provision is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making award. If it is later determined that the Offeror knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Government, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract resulting from this solicitation for default.

52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (JULY 2013)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--

Administrative proceeding means a non-judicial process that is adjudicatory in nature in order to make a determination of fault or liability (e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Proceedings, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings, and Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings). This includes administrative proceedings at the Federal and State level but only in connection with performance of a Federal contract or grant. It does not include agency actions such as contract audits, site visits, corrective plans, or inspection of deliverables.

Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than $10,000,000 means--

(1) The total value of all current, active contracts and grants, including all priced options; and

(2) The total value of all current, active orders including all priced options under indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity, 8(a), or requirements contracts (including task and delivery and multiple-award Schedules).

Principal means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager; head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The offeror ( ) has ( ) does not have current active Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than $10,000,000.

(c) If the offeror checked “has” in paragraph (b) of this provision, the offeror represents, by submission of this offer, that the information it has entered in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) is current, accurate, and complete as of the date of submission of this offer with regard to the following information:

(1) Whether the offeror, and/or any of its principals, has or has not, within the last five years, in connection with the award to or performance by the offeror of a Federal contract or grant, been the subject of a proceeding, at the Federal or State level that resulted in any of the following dispositions:

(i) In a criminal proceeding, a conviction.

(ii) In a civil proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in the payment of a monetary fine, penalty, reimbursement, restitution, or damages of $5,000 or more.

(iii) In an administrative proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in--

(A) The payment of a monetary fine or penalty of $5,000 or more; or

(B) The payment of a reimbursement, restitution, or damages in excess of $100,000.

(iv) In a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding, a disposition of the matter by consent or compromise with an acknowledgment of fault by the Contractor if the proceeding could have led to any of the outcomes specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), or (c)(1)(iii) of this provision.

(2) If the offeror has been involved in the last five years in any of the occurrences listed in (c)(1) of this provision, whether the offeror has provided the requested information with regard to each occurrence.

(d) The offeror shall post the information in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(iv) of this provision in FAPIIS as required through maintaining an active registration in the System for Award Management database via https://www.acquisition.gov (see 52.204-7).

52.212-3 OFFEROR REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (DEC 2014)

The Offeror shall complete only paragraph (b) of this provision if the Offeror has completed the annual representations and certification electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) Web site accessed through http://www.acquisition.gov. If the Offeror has not completed the annual representations and certifications electronically, the Offeror shall complete only paragraphs (c) through (p) of this provision.

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision --

“Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) Concern” means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent directly and unconditionally owned by, and the management and daily business operations of which are controlled by, one or more women who are citizens of the United States and who are economically disadvantaged in accordance with 13 CFR part 127. It automatically qualifies as a women-owned small business eligible under the WOSB Program.

"Forced or indentured child labor" means all work or service-

(1) Exacted from any person under the age of 18 under the menace of any penalty for its nonperformance and for which the worker does not offer himself voluntarily; or

(2) Performed by any person under the age of 18 pursuant to a contract the enforcement of which can be accomplished by process or penalties.

Highest-level owner means the entity that owns or controls an immediate owner of the offeror, or that owns or controls one or more entities that control an immediate owner of the offeror. No entity owns or exercises control of the highest level owner.

Immediate owner means an entity, other than the offeror, that has direct control of the offeror. Indicators of control include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following: Ownership or interlocking management, identity of interests among family members, shared facilities and equipment, and the common use of employees.

Inverted domestic corporation means a foreign incorporated entity that meets the definition of an inverted domestic corporation under 6 U.S.C. 395(b), applied in accordance with the rules and definitions of 6 U.S.C. 395(c).

Manufactured end product means any end product in Federal Supply Classes (FSC) 1000-9999, except--

(1) FSC 5510, Lumber and Related Basic Wood Materials;

(2) Federal Supply Group (FSG) 87, Agricultural Supplies;

(3) FSG 88, Live Animals;

(4) FSG 89, Food and Related Consumables;

(5) FSC 9410, Crude Grades of Plant Materials;

(6) FSC 9430, Miscellaneous Crude Animal Products, Inedible;

(7) FSC 9440, Miscellaneous Crude Agricultural and Forestry Products;

(8) FSC 9610, Ores;

(9) FSC 9620, Minerals, Natural and Synthetic; and

(10) FSC 9630, Additive Metal Materials.

Place of manufacture means the place where an end product is assembled out of components, or otherwise made or processed from raw materials into the finished product that is to be provided to the Government. If a product is disassembled and reassembled, the place of reassembly is not the place of manufacture.

Restricted business operations means business operations in Sudan that include power production activities, mineral extraction activities, oil-related activities, or the production of military…