Amendment_0001 _FA4830-16-R-0011-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to :

1. Revise Attachment 3 Contractor Information;

2. Revise MDY ADM - 1 to include:

a. Increase Technical Volume page number from 15 pages to 25 pages;

b. Revised Qualif ication Documentation and Facility Clearance Documentation;

c. Revised Past Performance Requirement and;

d. Changed 1(c)iii from Attachment 5 to Attachment 3.

4. Revised Attachment 4 Pricing Schedule;

5. Revised MDY ADM - 2 to include:

a. Revised Past Performance Evaluation, Qualif ication Documents, Facility Clearance, and Price Evaluation.

6. Revised Attachment 1 - 41, 71, 347 PWS dated 10 August 2016.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 11-Aug-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA4830-16-R-0011

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

19-Jul-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

11-Aug-2016

CODE

23 CONTRACTING SQUADRON - FA4830

4380B ALABAMA RD, BLDG 932

MOODY AFB GA 31699-1794

FA4830 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA4830-16-R-0011

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been modified:

MDY 02-26 REQUIRED INSURANCE (JAN 2015)

(IAW FAR 28.306(b) and FAR 28.307)

Reference contract clause FAR 52.228-5, “Insurance—Work on a Government Installation” the Contractor shall, at its own expense, procure and thereafter maintain the following kinds of insurance with respect to performance under the contract.

a. Workmen's Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance as required by law except that if this contract is to be performed in a State which does not require or permit private insurance, then compliance with the statutory or administrative requirements in any such State will be satisfactory. The required Workmen's Compensation insurance shall extend to cover employer's liability for accidental bodily injury or death and for occupational disease with a minimum liability limit of $100,000.

b. General Liability Insurance. Bodily injury liability insurance, in the minimum limits of $500,000 per occurrence shall be required on the comprehensive form of policy.

c. Automobile Liability Insurance. This insurance shall be required on the comprehensive form of policy and shall provide bodily injury liability and property damage liability covering the operation of all automobiles used in connection with the performance of the contract. At least the minimum limits of $200,000 per person and $500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and $20,000 per occurrence for property damage shall be required

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Attachment 1 – 41st RQS, 71st RQS, 347th OSS Performance Work Statement (PWS)

63 10-AUG-2016

Attachment 2 Attachment 2 – Reserved for Awardee’s Essential Service Plan

Attachment 3 Attachment 3 - Contractor Information

1 11-AUG-2016

Attachment 4 Attachment 4 - Pricing Schedule

4 11-AUG-2016

Attachment 5 Attachment 5 - Insurance Certification

1 10-JUN-2016

Attachment 6 Attachment 6 - SF LLL (Disclosure of Lobbying Activities)

2 01-JUL-1997

Attachment 7 Attachment 7 - DD 254 2 01-DEC-1999

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

5352.215-9000 FACILITY CLEARANCE (MAY 1996)

The offeror must possess a facility clearance equal to the highest classification stated on the Contract Security Classification Specification (DD Form 254) attached to this solicitation.

MDY ADM-1 ADDENDUM TO PROVISION (MAR 2015) FAR 52.212-1,

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (APR 2014)

I. GENERAL. These instructions prescribe the format of the proposal and describe the approach for the development and presentation of proposal data. These instructions are designed to ensure the submission of necessary information and to provide for the understanding and comprehensive evaluation of proposals. Carefully review this section and its relationship to Section M prior to commencing proposal preparation. All solicitation amendments must be acknowledged in accordance with, FAR 52.212-1, Instruction to Offerors—Commercial Items.

(a) Proposals will be accepted electronically, only. The proposal must be completed and sent to the following email addresses; allison.lewis.2@us.af.mil and 23CONS.LGCB@us.af.mil . The subject line of the email will contain the solicitation number (FA4830-16-R-0011) and your company name. If it is necessary to send more than one email, the subject line of the email will contain the solicitation number, the company name, and the sequential order of the email, and the total of emails to be received. For example, an offeror who would be sending two emails in response to the request for proposal would have the following subject lines.

FA4830-16-R-0011, Your Company Name, Email 1 of 2 FA4830-16-R-0011, Your Company Name, Email 2 of 2

(b) The proposal and all required attachments must be received at both of the above email addresses PRIOR to the close date and time of the solicitation.

(c) The Offeror's proposal shall consist of two (2) separate volumes:

(1) Volume 1(a), all requirements outlined in the solicitation to include the following:

i. Completed the "Offeror" portion of the Standard Form 1449 with offerors information in block 17a including CAGE code in “CODE” block. An official having the authority to contractually bind the company must sign and date the SF 1449 in accordance with FAR 4.102. The signed copy of the 1449 mailto:allison.lewis.2@us.af.mil mailto:23CONS.LGCB@us.af.mil must bear an original signature. Review FAR 4.102 for the correct signatures for individuals, partnerships, corporations, joint ventures and agents.

ii. Completed provisions in Section K of this solicitation (completed provisions should include those that are not in S.A.M. for your company and provisions that are only applicable to this solicitation).

iii. Information required on the Contractor Information sheet at Attachment 3.

iv. Standard Form LLL at Attachment 6

v. Completed Insurance Certification at Attachment 5.

vi. DD 254 at Attachment 7 is to be included in an offerors proposal submission. Offerors are required to complete boxes 6 a, b, and c and 7 a, b, and c(if using a subcontractor).

vii. Signed copies of all Amendments to this solicitation.

(2) Volume 1(b), Price/Cost:

Section B – Complete Attachment 4, Pricing Schedule. NOTE: Ensure a dollar value is entered, rounded to two decimal places, under “UNIT PRICE”, multiplied by the “QUANTITY” and the total, rounded to two decimal places, entered under “AMOUNT”, as seen in the following example. DO NOT PROVIDE PRICING FOR CLINs 0006, 1006, 2006, 3006, and 4006. These CLINS are for information purposes only. These CLINs will be evaluated at the amount identified by the government in the CLIN description. CLINs 0007, 1007, 2007, 3007, and 4007: The amount the offeror would charge the Government for overtime hours for the five positions reflected in the PWS must be reflected in the offers pricing for these CLINs.

UNIT

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNITS PRICE AMOUNT

0001 41 RQS Training Manager 12.00 Months $XX.XX $XXX.XX 0002 71 RQS Training Manager 12.00 Months $XX.XX $XXX.XX

(3) Volume 2 (a), Past Performance Information:

i. Past Performance: The offeror may submit evidence of recent and relevant contracts performed for unit support services. A maximum of three (3) contracts may be submitted.

More than three (3) contracts will not be evaluated from the past performance information submitted by the offeror. Contracts will be evaluated in the order the offeror list them. For the purpose of this solicitation, recency is performance occurring within the last five years from the period of the solicitation release date. For the purpose of this solicitation, relevancy is defined as performance of support services similar in scope to this requirement with a period of performance of at least six months. Submissions shall include email addresses and phone numbers of points of contact that were responsible for evaluating the contract performance, the contract number, the period of performance, contract dollar amount, number of personnel supported, and a brief description of the work performed which will demonstrate relevancy. For this solicitation, number of personnel supported means the amount of individuals in the organization for each contract. (i.e. Attachment 1 PWS Appendix B, Estimated Workload) This submission can be in the form of CPARS or any format providing that it includes the aforementioned documentation.

(4) Volume 2(b), Technical:

i. Technical Approach: Offerors must submit a Technical Approach that clearly demonstrates a complete and realistic plan to meet the requirements of the solicitation. The entire Technical Approach document shall not exceed 25 pages including charts and tables and shall be written in a font not smaller than twelve (12) point, although 10 point may be used for charts and tables. The technical approach must include:

a. Qualification Documents - Offerors shall provide documentation for the personnel (hereafter referred to as candidate(s)) that the offer intends to use to fill the positions identified below. The documentation must demonstrate that the qualifications of the candidate(s) submitted meets all “Specialty Qualifications” of the PWS that corresponds to the position. In addition, the offer shall submit a Letter of Intent of employment for each candidate. The Letter of Intent must demonstrate the candidates’ intent to work for the offeror under the contract that may result from this solicitation. Qualification Documents are not required for the 41st and 71st Standardization Evaluation Administrative Program Assistants. The offeror must submit this documentation for the following positions:

41st Training Manager 71st Training Manager

347th Weapons Tactics Support Specialist

b. Facility Clearance – The offeror shall provide documentation indicating that the offeror currently has an active Secret or higher level Facility Clearance. Offerors should log-in at http://www.dss.mil/isp/index.html to view facility security clearance requirements.

c. Essential Services Plan: The offeror must submit an Essential Services Plan as part of the offerors technical approach. All Support services outlined in Attachment 1 are designated as Essential Services in accordance with (IAW) the clause DFARS 252.237- 7023. The offeror shall therefore include an Essential Services Plan, IAW DFARS clause 252.237-7024, explaining how the offeror will undertake steps to maintain the service in the event of a qualifying event or emergency. The plan must address;

i. Challenges associated with maintaining essential contractor services during an extended event, such as a pandemic that occurs in repeated waves;

ii. The time lapse associated with the initiation of the acquisition of essential personnel and resources and their actual availability on site;

iii. The components, processes, and requirements for the identification, training, and preparedness of personnel who are capable of relocating to alternate facilities or performing work from home;

iv. Any established alert and notification procedures for mobilizing identified “essential contractor service” personnel; and

v. The approach for communicating expectations to contractor employees regarding their roles and responsibilities during a crisis.

Note: FAR 52.222-17 Non-Displacement of Qualified Workers applies. Contractors may contact Allison Lewis at allison.lewis.2@us.af.mil and 23CONS.LGCB@us.af.mil for contact information of current employees. Contractors will have access to employee information of only those employees who have consented to release this information.

All current employees may be considered.

(End of addendum)

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

MDY ADM - 2

MDY ADM-2 ADDENDUM (MAR2015): ADDENDUM TO FAR PROVISION 52.212-2,

EVALUATION - COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT2014)

(Note: Provision has been tailored to reflect Agency requirements, as prescribed by 12.301(c)) For the purposes of award, offers will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

mailto:allison.lewis.2@us.af.mil mailto:23CONS.LGCB@us.af.mil

I. Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA)

(a) Source selection will be conducted using the modified procedures (as specified herein) from the revised Air Force Source Selection policies and procedures contained in the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Part 15, DOD FAR Sup, and Air Force FAR Sup. Award will be made to the single (1) Offeror who is deemed responsible, whose proposal conforms to the Request For Proposal (RFP) requirements and is judged to represent the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) proposal to the Government. To be eligible for award, a proposal must meet all past performance and technical requirements, conform to all required terms and conditions, and include all information required in the solicitation. Therefore, the proposal shall contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. This will result in award being made to lowest-priced offer that the Contracting Officer has determined as acceptable in both past performance and technical areas.

(b) While the Government and the Contracting Officer will strive for maximum objectivity, the evaluation process, by its nature, is subjective and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire evaluation process.

(c) The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror's initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from a cost or price, past performance, and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

(d) The Government reserves the right to reject any or all offers if such action is in the Government's best interests. Upon the receipt of proposals the Government will conduct an initial evaluation in which the proposals will be ordered from the lowest-priced to the highest priced. Next, the government shall review the three lowest priced proposals first. If all three of these proposals are evaluated as technically acceptable, and are evaluated as acceptable in past performance, the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal will be selected as the proposal that represents the best value to the government. If any of these three proposals are evaluated as technically unacceptable, or evaluated as unacceptable in past performance, then the government will continue to review the proposals from the next lowest priced proposal until the government has three technically acceptable proposals, each of which are also evaluated as acceptable in past performance, or until all proposals have been reviewed. The lowest priced technically acceptable proposal, with acceptable past performance, may then be selected as the proposal that represents the best value to the government.

(e) If the contracting officer determines that a competitive range needs to be established, the contracting officer may determine that the proposals that might otherwise be included in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, then the contracting officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

I. Price Evaluation:

(a) In Attachment 4, Pricing Schedule, the Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) price for each CLIN will be determined by multiplying the CLIN Unit Price by the CLIN Quantity. CLINS 0006, 1006, 2006, 3006, and 4006 will be evaluated at the amount identified by the government in the CLIN description. CLINS 007, 1007, 2007, 3007, 4007 will be evaluated by multiplying each positions unit price/overtime rate by the estimated 15 hours and calculating the sum of the five positions. The CLIN prices for each period of performance, including the basic period and each option period, will be added together to determine a price for each period of performance. These annual prices will then be added to arrive at a total proposed price.

(b) For evaluation purposes, in order to evaluate the impact of a possible six (6) month extension under the clause FAR 52.217-8, the pricing proposed for option period four (4) will be divided by two (2) to calculate an extension price. Although work is not guaranteed for CLINS 4004 and 4005 their pricing will be used to calculate an extension price. The extension price will then be added to the total proposed price to arrive at a total evaluated price.

(c) The total evaluated price will be evaluated to determine whether it is reasonable. A reasonable price/cost represents a price/cost that provides best value to the government, taking into account market prices, the technical and functional capabilities of the offeror, and risk.

(d) The government reserves the right to, but is not required to, conduct a price realism analysis on offers that appear to be exceptionally low and not supported by the offeror’s technical approach. In instances where an offeror’s proposed price(s) appear exceptionally low, offerors may be requested to address this disparity by providing evidence of their capability and/or performance at similar price(s). The burden of proof as to price credibility rests with the offeror. An exceptionally or unrealistically low offer that’s left unexplained may pose an unacceptable risk to the government and may be a reason to reject an offeror’s proposal.

II. Past Performance Evaluation:

(a) Recent, relevant Past Performance will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable scale as defined below. For the purpose of this solicitation, recency is performance occurring within the last five years from the period of the solicitation release date. For the purpose of this solicitation, relevancy is defined as performance of support services similar in scope to this requirement with a period of performance of at least six months.

DEFINITION RATING

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Acceptable

Base on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unacceptable

NOTE: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”

(b) Proposals must be evaluated as Acceptable in Past Performance to be considered awardable. If a proposal receives an Unacceptable rating, the offeror will not be considered for award. Although only recent, relevant past performance will be evaluated for award, poor performance ratings or other negative information regarding non-recent and/or non-relevant past performance will be evaluated for contractor responsibility IAW FAR 9.104-1(c) and FAR 9.104-3(b) and may still result in disqualification from award.

(c) The government reserves the right to obtain and evaluate past performance information from any sources it deems appropriate.

(d) An offeror may be given the opportunity to clarify certain aspects of their proposals, such as, the relevance of an offeror’s past performance information (as related to this acquisition), and adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond or to resolve minor clerical errors.

III. Technical Evaluation

(a) Technical will be evaluated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” scale as defined below.

DEFINITION RATING

Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation. Acceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation. Unacceptable

ii. In order to be determined technically acceptable, Offerors must submit a Technical Approach that clearly demonstrates a complete and realistic plan to meet the requirements of the solicitation. The entire Technical Approach document shall not exceed 25 pages including charts and tables and shall be written in a font not smaller than twelve (12) point, although 10 point may be used for charts and tables. The technical approach must include:

a. Qualification Documents - Offerors shall provide documentation for the personnel (hereafter referred to as candidate(s)) that the offer intends to use to fill the positions identified below. The documentation must demonstrate that the qualifications of the candidate(s) submitted meets all “Specialty Qualifications” of the PWS that corresponds to the position. In addition, the offer shall submit a Letter of Intent of employment for each candidate. The Letter of Intent must demonstrate the candidates’ intent to work for the offeror under the contract that may result from this solicitation. Qualification Documents are not required for the 41st and 71st Standardization Evaluation Administrative Program Assistants. The offeror must submit this documentation for the following positions:

41st Training Manager 71st Training Manager

347th Weapons Tactics Support Specialist

b. Facility Clearance – The offeror shall provide documentation indicating that the offeror currently has an active Secret or higher level Facility Clearance. Offerors should log-in at http://www.dss.mil/isp/index.html to view facility security clearance requirements.

c. Essential Services Plan: The offeror must submit an Essential Services Plan as part of the offerors technical approach. All Support services outlined in Attachment 1 are designated as Essential Services in accordance with (IAW) the clause DFARS 252.237- 7023. The offeror shall therefore include an Essential Services Plan, IAW DFARS clause 252.237-7024, explaining how the offeror will undertake steps to maintain the service in the event of a qualifying event or emergency. The plan must address;

vi. Challenges associated with maintaining essential contractor services during an extended event, such as a pandemic that occurs in repeated waves;

vii. The time lapse associated with the initiation of the acquisition of essential personnel and resources and their actual availability on site;

viii. The components, processes, and requirements for the identification, training, and preparedness of personnel who are capable of relocating to alternate facilities or performing work from home;

ix. Any established alert and notification procedures for mobilizing identified “essential contractor service” personnel; and

x. The approach for communicating expectations to contractor employees regarding their roles and responsibilities during a crisis.

iii.

(b) DEBRIEFINGS: Post award debriefing to offeror

An offeror, upon its written request received by the agency within 3 days after the date on which that offeror has received written notification of contract award in accordance with FAR 15.503(b), shall be debriefed and furnished the basis for the selection decision and contract award. The debriefing shall be conducted IAW FAR 15.506.

(End of addendum)

(End of Summary of Changes)