PastPerformanceQuestionaireattachment2toPost.doc
DOC document 42 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Postal Service Center Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4690-08-R-0007
About this file
Past Performance Questionaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| PWStopost.rtf | RTF text file | |
| solicitation27Aug08topost.doc | DOC document | |
| wagedettoost.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
8 August 2008
Solicitation: FA4690 -08-R-0007 Attachment 2 Questionnaire on Contractor's Present and Past Performance
Request you provide the following information on the subject contractor's present and past performance by placing an X in the space provided by the most appropriate response. If you wish to elaborate on your answer, please provide comments on the lines provided after each question. If more space is needed, continue your comments on a separate sheet of paper and attach it to this questionnaire prior to submittal to the 28th Comptroller and Contracting Squadron. You are asked to provide frank, concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor's performance on the contract identified. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor's performance with the judgment of others in your organization. The following definitions are applicable rating levels of the contractor's performance on the identified program.
| Substantial Confidence |
| Based on the offeror's performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Satisfactory Confidence |
| Based on the offeror's performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Limited Confidence |
| Based on the offeror's performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| No Confidence |
| Based on the offeror's performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
| Unknown Confidence |
| No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. |
Individual's Name, Title and Phone Number Completing Questionnaire:
Company's Name:
Contractor's Name:
Contract Number Contract Title:
Period of Performance (Including Options)
Contract Amount (Including Options)
Contract Type: Firm Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Specify) Management:
1. Rate the contractor on their ability to provide adequate manning and equipment to respond surge requirements, contingencies, emergencies, and weather delays without falling behind the regular schedule.
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Neutral Marginal Unsatisfactory
Comments:
Quality of Service:
2. Rate the contractor on their ability to provide effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements and their ability to take appropriate action to correct deficiencies when identified. Does the contractor conform to the government accepted quality control plan? Does the contractor provide effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contractual requirements?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Neutral
Comments:
3. Rate the contractor's ability to proactively recognize and resolve unanticipated difficulties. Does the contractor display initiative to solve problems? Does the contractor identify risks/problems as they occur?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Neutral
Comments
Timeliness of Performance:
4. Rate the contractor on their ability to provide a sufficient number of qualified personnel to ensure all contract requirements were successfully completed in an expedient manner. Does the contractor demonstrate the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Neutral
Comments:
Customer Satisfaction:
5. Rate the working relationship between the contractor and your company and your designated representatives. (Includes inspection personnel)
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Neutral Marginal Unsatisfactory
Comments:
6. Rate the contractor on their environmental awareness. (Includes environmental compliance and environmental initiatives, such as affirmative procurement).
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Neutral Marginal Unsatisfactory
Comments:
7. Has the contractor ever been given a Cure Notice, Show Cause Notice, Letter of Concern, or had payment withheld for services not rendered?
Number of Cure Notice:
Number of Show Cause Notice:
Number of Letter of Concerns:
Number of times payment withheld for services not rendered:
Solicitation: F4690 -08-R-0007 Attachment 2 Comments:
Summary:
8. Would you hire this contractor again? Highly Likely Likely Unlikely Highly Unlikely
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .