FA462518R0002_Refuse_Atch_4_PPQ.pdf
PDF 527 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Refuse Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA462518R0002
About this file
Refuse Atch 4 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 18R0002_Atch_5,_Ack_Amend.pdf | ||
| FA462518R0002_Refuse_Combo_16_Mar_18.pdf | ||
| Refuse_SV_Questions.pdf | ||
| FA462518R0002_Refuse_Atch_1_PWS_7Feb18.pdf | ||
| FA462518R0002_Refuse_Atch_2_Bid_Schedule_7Feb18.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FA462518R0002_Refuse_Atch_3_Clause_Full_Text_Info_23Feb18.pdf | ||
| FA462518R0002_Refuse_Atch_1_PWS_Appendix_B_Map.pdf | ||
| FA462518R0002_Refuse_Combo_23Feb18.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
509TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON (AFGSC)
WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE, MISSOURI
Defend…Avenge!
Digitally signed by
FISK.MICHEAL.D.1147356
Date: 2018.02.23 11:04:35 -06'00'
For Official Use Only
When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
FA462518R0002, Attachment 4: Past Performance Questionnaire
For Official Use Only Page 1 of 5
Section 1: Contract Identification
A. Contractor (Company/Division):
B. Contractor Cage Code:
C. Contract Number:
D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):
E. Contract Title:
F. Brief Contract Description:
G. Period of Performance
1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):
Beginning Date _________ through ____________
2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):
Beginning Date _________ through ____________
3. Reason for difference (if applicable):
H. Contract Dollar Value
1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $
2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $
3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):
I. Description of work performed:
J. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No
K. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel
Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last five (5) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.
http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836
For Official Use Only Page 2 of 5
Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other
Commands):
Section 3: Respondent Identification
A. Respondent’s name:
B. Respondent’s title:
C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:
D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:
E. Other suggested points of contact:
For Official Use Only Page 3 of 5
Section 4: Performance Information
In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:
Code Performance Rating
E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the
Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.
The Contractor: E V S M U N/A
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
For Official Use Only Page 4 of 5
The Contractor: E V S M U N/A
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
6. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
7. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
8. Identified problems as they occurred.
9. Met established performance schedules.
10. Was responsive to contract changes.
11. Provided adequate contract supervision.
For Official Use Only Page 5 of 5
The Contractor: E V S M U N/A
12. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
13. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?
14. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
If yes, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes
☐ No
15. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes
☐ No
IF THIS WAS A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT:
Did this contract include FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns?
☐ Yes ☐ No
If yes, did the contractor comply with the clause? Please explain.
Additional remarks:
Respondent’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
E-Mail to: 509cons.sollgca@us.af.mil
Attention: A1C Zachary Koutz http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 mailto:509cons.sollgca@us.af.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it.