Atch_8-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Integrated Tactical Warning/Attack Assessment (ITW/AA) Simulation Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4600-15-R-0035
About this file
Attachment 8- Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA4600-15-R-0035-A001.pdf | ||
| ITW_AA_Pricing_Model-Amend_1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP-FA4600-15-R-0035_ITW_AA.pdf | ||
| Atch_10_-_Subktr-_Team_Consent_Ltr.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch_6-_Special_Offutt_Provisions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch_3-ITW_AA_Pricing_Model.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Exhibit_B-_CDRLs.pdf | ||
| Atch_7_-_Past_Performance_Information_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| ITW_AA_QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch_2 _NCIC_Screening.pdf | ||
| Atch_11_-_Client_Authorization_Ltr.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch_9-_Questionnaire_Cover_Letter.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit_A-_CDRL_List.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch_4-DD_254-ITW_AA.pdf | ||
| Atch_1_Insurance_Requirements_Certif.pdf | ||
| RFP-FA4600-15-R-0035_ITW_AA.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 8
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
1. Contractor: _____________________________________________________________________________
1. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________
1. Contract number: _______________________________________
1. Contract type:Cost-Reimbursement: CPIF---- CPAF---- Other (explain)________________________ Fixed Price: FFP----FPIF---- Other (explain) _______________________________________
1. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No ____
1. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
1. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
1. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
1. Contractor performed work as Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Joint Venture. For Sub-Contractor or Joint Venture, please indicate actual dollar value of work completed $____________________________
1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _________________________
1. Description of service provided:______________________________________________________________
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
1. Customer or agency name: _________________________________________________________________
1. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _______________________________________________________________
1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
1. Evaluator's name: _________________________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's title: __________________________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ______________________________________________________________
D. E-mail Address:___________________________________________________________________
E. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS
| Rating |
| Description |
| Acceptable |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.) |
| Unacceptable |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”
| Evaluation |
| Ratings |
The Contractor:
| Sub-Factor 1: ITW/AA Scenarios |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| 1 |
| The offeror demonstrated experience in generating dynamic ITW/AA simulations to be used on the Processing and Display Sub-system Migration (PDS-M), the Missile Analysis Reporting System (MARS), the Force Survivability Analysis and Management (FSAM), Global Command and Control System (GCCS), and related products as generated from the scenario request. |
| 2 |
| The offeror demonstrated experience in executing ITW/AA scenarios through the Test Development Facility (TDF) and capture outputs when necessary. |
| 3 |
| The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to generate exercise simulation inputs for the Mobile Ground System compatible to scenario request and intent. |
| 4 |
| The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to develop Scenario Injection and Generation System (SIGS) input files. |
| 5 |
| The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to develop, submit, and track test objective worksheet (TOW) for exercises. |
| 6 |
| The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to generate ground based sensor response and support simulations for requested scenarios and requested sensor locations. |
| Sub-Factor 2: Configuration Management |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| 1 |
| The offeror demonstrated experience in providing a configuration management scheme for the generation and maintenance of scenarios and define applicable quality control methods. |
| Sub-Factor 3: NORAD and USNORTHCOM, Joint Training and Exercise Support |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| 1 |
| The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability in providing Correlation Center Emulator (CCE) software engineering, software and simulation enhancement, and command and control (C2) system virtualization and integration support in accordance with the PWS. |
| 2 |
| The offeror demonstrated experience in modeling missiles and missile warning radars and space based infrared sensors; supporting the missile warning and missile defense portion of the Tier 1 Combatant Commander exercises. |
| Sub-Factor 4: Distributed Missile Warning/Missile Defense Training Capability Support |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| 1 |
| The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to develop and support an interface between MDA’s Missile Defense Training Support System (TSS), IC2S strategic missile warning capability -- Combatant Commanders Integrated Command and Control System (CCIC2S) and Global Command and Control System (GCCS). |
| Sub-Factor 5: Graphic User’s Interface (GUI) Integration |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| 1 |
| The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to integrate the output of the GUI with the existing Correlation Center Emulator (CCE), the PDU Converter, the Global Sensor Integration on Networks (GSIN) and the GCCS in accordance with the PWS. |
| Sub-Factor 6: Product Sustainment and Configuration Management |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| 1 |
| The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to provide formal configuration management, testing, and validation/verification of product development and integration. |
| Sub-Factor 7: Transition |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| 1 |
| Ensured no interruption or degradation of services during the transition period |
| 2 |
| Ensured adequate staffing with appropriately qualified personnel to meet all PWS requirements from award to full performance |
| 3 |
| Identified transition risks and effective mitigation measures |
| 4 |
| Successfully mitigated identified transition risks using those mitigation measures |
| Customer Satisfaction/General Information |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| 1 |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 2 |
| Based on this contractor's overall performance, would you award this contractor a similar contract? |
Yes ______ No______
| 3 |
| Has the contractor received any quality awards or certifications for work performed on this contract? |
Yes ______ No______
| 4 |
| Has the contractor ever been given a cure notice, show cause notice, suspension of progress payments, or letters of direction? |
Yes ______ No______ If yes, please explain
2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Acceptable/Unacceptable in response to the questions above, use additional sheets, if necessary
3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___ If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?
What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Email Address: Theresa.Bryant@us.af.mil, Paula.Owen.1@us.af.mil Or FAX to: 402-294-0430 (COMM), 271-0430 (DSN)
| FA4600-15-R-0035 ITW/AA |
| Attachment 8 |
| Pages 1 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .