Atch_8-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Integrated Tactical Warning/Attack Assessment (ITW/AA) Simulation Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4600-15-R-0035
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

Attachment 8- Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Integrated Tactical Warning/Attack Assessment (ITW/AA) Simulation Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA4600-15-R-0035-A001.pdf PDF
ITW_AA_Pricing_Model-Amend_1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP-FA4600-15-R-0035_ITW_AA.pdf PDF
Atch_10_-_Subktr-_Team_Consent_Ltr.docx DOCX document
Atch_6-_Special_Offutt_Provisions.docx DOCX document
Atch_3-ITW_AA_Pricing_Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_B-_CDRLs.pdf PDF
Atch_7_-_Past_Performance_Information_Sheet.docx DOCX document
ITW_AA_QASP.docx DOCX document
Atch_2 _NCIC_Screening.pdf PDF
Atch_11_-_Client_Authorization_Ltr.docx DOCX document
Atch_9-_Questionnaire_Cover_Letter.docx DOCX document
Exhibit_A-_CDRL_List.docx DOCX document
Atch_4-DD_254-ITW_AA.pdf PDF
Atch_1_Insurance_Requirements_Certif.pdf PDF
RFP-FA4600-15-R-0035_ITW_AA.pdf PDF
Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 8

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1. Contractor: _____________________________________________________________________________

1. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________

1. Contract number: _______________________________________

1. Contract type:Cost-Reimbursement: CPIF---- CPAF---- Other (explain)________________________ Fixed Price: FFP----FPIF---- Other (explain) _______________________________________

1. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No ____

1. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

1. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

1. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

1. Contractor performed work as Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Joint Venture. For Sub-Contractor or Joint Venture, please indicate actual dollar value of work completed $____________________________

1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _________________________

1. Description of service provided:______________________________________________________________

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

1. Customer or agency name: _________________________________________________________________

1. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _______________________________________________________________

1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

1. Evaluator's name: _________________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's title: __________________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ______________________________________________________________

D. E-mail Address:___________________________________________________________________

E. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS

Rating
Description
Acceptable
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
Unacceptable
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

Evaluation
Ratings

The Contractor:

Sub-Factor 1: ITW/AA Scenarios
Acceptable
Unacceptable
1
The offeror demonstrated experience in generating dynamic ITW/AA simulations to be used on the Processing and Display Sub-system Migration (PDS-M), the Missile Analysis Reporting System (MARS), the Force Survivability Analysis and Management (FSAM), Global Command and Control System (GCCS), and related products as generated from the scenario request.
2
The offeror demonstrated experience in executing ITW/AA scenarios through the Test Development Facility (TDF) and capture outputs when necessary.
3
The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to generate exercise simulation inputs for the Mobile Ground System compatible to scenario request and intent.
4
The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to develop Scenario Injection and Generation System (SIGS) input files.
5
The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to develop, submit, and track test objective worksheet (TOW) for exercises.
6
The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to generate ground based sensor response and support simulations for requested scenarios and requested sensor locations.
Sub-Factor 2: Configuration Management
Acceptable
Unacceptable
1
The offeror demonstrated experience in providing a configuration management scheme for the generation and maintenance of scenarios and define applicable quality control methods.
Sub-Factor 3: NORAD and USNORTHCOM, Joint Training and Exercise Support
Acceptable
Unacceptable
1
The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability in providing Correlation Center Emulator (CCE) software engineering, software and simulation enhancement, and command and control (C2) system virtualization and integration support in accordance with the PWS.
2
The offeror demonstrated experience in modeling missiles and missile warning radars and space based infrared sensors; supporting the missile warning and missile defense portion of the Tier 1 Combatant Commander exercises.
Sub-Factor 4: Distributed Missile Warning/Missile Defense Training Capability Support
Acceptable
Unacceptable
1
The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to develop and support an interface between MDA’s Missile Defense Training Support System (TSS), IC2S strategic missile warning capability -- Combatant Commanders Integrated Command and Control System (CCIC2S) and Global Command and Control System (GCCS).
Sub-Factor 5: Graphic User’s Interface (GUI) Integration
Acceptable
Unacceptable
1
The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to integrate the output of the GUI with the existing Correlation Center Emulator (CCE), the PDU Converter, the Global Sensor Integration on Networks (GSIN) and the GCCS in accordance with the PWS.
Sub-Factor 6: Product Sustainment and Configuration Management
Acceptable
Unacceptable
1
The offeror demonstrated experience in their ability to provide formal configuration management, testing, and validation/verification of product development and integration.
Sub-Factor 7: Transition
Acceptable
Unacceptable
1
Ensured no interruption or degradation of services during the transition period
2
Ensured adequate staffing with appropriately qualified personnel to meet all PWS requirements from award to full performance
3
Identified transition risks and effective mitigation measures
4
Successfully mitigated identified transition risks using those mitigation measures
Customer Satisfaction/General Information
Acceptable
Unacceptable
1
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
2
Based on this contractor's overall performance, would you award this contractor a similar contract?

Yes ______ No______

3
Has the contractor received any quality awards or certifications for work performed on this contract?

Yes ______ No______

4
Has the contractor ever been given a cure notice, show cause notice, suspension of progress payments, or letters of direction?

Yes ______ No______ If yes, please explain

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Acceptable/Unacceptable in response to the questions above, use additional sheets, if necessary

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___ If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Email Address: Theresa.Bryant@us.af.mil, Paula.Owen.1@us.af.mil Or FAX to: 402-294-0430 (COMM), 271-0430 (DSN)

FA4600-15-R-0035 ITW/AA
Attachment 8
Pages 1

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .