SF_30.pdf
PDF 177 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Minot AFB SABER IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4528-18-R-0010
About this file
SF-30
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_9_-_Questions_and_Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_1_-_SABER_IDIQ_SOW_Revised.pdf | ||
| FA4528-18-R-0010.pdf | ||
| Attachment_8_-_Construction_Cost_Breakdown.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_6_-SOW_12April18_ANNEX.pdf | ||
| Attachment_4_-_Financial_Responsibility.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_7_-_Drawings.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3_-_Wage_Determinations.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_-_SABER_Master_Specifications.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_-_SABER_IDIQ_Statement_of_Work.pdf | ||
| Attachment_5-_Past_Performance_Information_Form.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
The purpose of this amendment is to:
A. Add Attachment 9 - Questions and Answ ers.
B. Replace Attachment 1 - SOW w ith a revised dated 7 June 2018.
C. Change the page limitation of the Part III - Price to 30 pages.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 7
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 07-Jun-2018
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA452818R0010
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
14-May-2018
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
07-Jun-2018
CODE
5 CONS
165 MISSILE AVENUE
MINOT AFB ND 58705-5027
FA4528 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
FA452818R0010
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS
The following have been modified:
ATTACHMENTS
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
No. Title/Description Pages Date
1 Revised Statement of Work 42 7 June 2018
2 SABER Specification 8476 Apr 2018
3 Wage Determinations 43 Various
4 Financial Responsibility Questionnaire 1 N/A
5 Past Performance Information Form 3 N/A
6 Seed Project – SOW 4 11 Apr 2018
7 Seed Project - Drawings 1 N/A
8 Construction Cost Breakdown 3 N/A
9 Questions and Answers 1 7 June 2018
INSTRUCTIONS
A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, Offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.
Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts, Part I – Technical Proposal, Part II – Price Proposal, and Part III - Past Performance.
B. The Contracting Officer (CO) has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the CO will review this determination and if, in the CO’s opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the CO determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit information other than certified cost and pricing data.
C. Exchanges of source selection information between Government and offerors will be controlled by the
Contracting Officer. Email may be used to transmit such information, only if the email can be sent encrypted, and must include “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104” in the subject line of the email.
Otherwise, source selection information will be transmitted via direct mailing or facsimile. In order to facilitate the sending and receiving of encrypted emails, offerors must use MS Outlook email configured to support encryption or a different email product that is S/MIME compatible and configured to support encryption. If you intend to submit your source selection information via encrypted email, you will need to contact the Buyer/Contracting Officer indicated on the face page of the solicitation prior to that first submittal in order to exchange certificates used for encryption. To insure the process is working correctly, send a test encrypted message first (without including any source selection information). Otherwise, source selection information will be transmitted via direct mailing or AMRDEC SAFE at https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/guide.aspx .
When submitting source selection information via email, file suppression utilities, to include but not limited to zip files, will not be accepted.
D. Specific Instructions:
1. PART I – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL – Limited to no more than 30 pages as defined in Section D.
Technical Proposals will be rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis by subfactor.
a. Subfactor 1 – Organizational Structure
Description: This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s organizational chart identifying all key personnel with a description of their work experience relating to projects similar in scope to those expected to perform work with this project.
Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the offeror’s proposal provides a diagram identifying the individuals (management and supervisors) specifically used for this project with the minimum number of years identified as follows: Contract Manager (CM) 5 years of related experience; Quality Control Manager (QCM) 3 years; Project Superintendent (PS) 2 years. Provide information as directed in Attachment 1 - Statement of Work.
b. Subfactor 2 – Surge Plan
Description: This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s surge plan
Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the offeror’s proposal provides how they will manage surges in multiple work sites on separate task orders concurrently without causing undue delay of completion of these multiple task orders. An acceptable surge plan shall include sourcing for staffing and equipment during a surge.
c. Subfactor 3 – Software
Description: This subfactor evaluates the proposed pricing guide/software
Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the offeror’s proposal provides an approved estimating software program for use on orders under this IDIQ. The approved estimating software includes Win Est Pro Plus® and E4Clicks®. The estimating software shall use RSMeans as the price book.
2. PART II – PAST PERFORMANCE - Past Performance will be rated using a confidence assessment scale based on the overall record of recency, relevancy, and quality of past performance efforts.
a. A Past Performance Information Form (PPIF), Attachment 5, is provided with the solicitation for offerors to send to a maximum of three (3) references of their choice. PPIF references who have returned the questionnaires will be used in the past performance evaluation. Please note that the PPIF will only be accepted if it is received directly from the reference, and the PPIF must also be received by the offeror due date and time, Central Daylight Time (CDT), as annotated in the solicitation SF1442 block 13.
b. The US Government will consider and evaluate offeror's past performance information, to include the
PPIFs, which are deemed recent and relevant for the requirements of this RFP. The Government will also use information submitted by the offeror and other sources such as other Federal Government offices and commercial sources, to assess performance. Offerors are cautioned that the Government will use information provided by the offerors and information obtained from other sources in the development of the performance assessments. Recent and Relevant is defined in the subparagraph below:
i. Recency Assessment: An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past 5 years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.
ii. Relevant performance information determines whether the products provided/services performed under those contracts relate to the Technical sub factors and Price factor. For each recent past performance citation reviewed, the relevance of the work performed will generally be assessed for the Technical subfactors and Price Factor (however, all aspects of performance that relate to this acquisition may be considered). Consideration will be given to:
The offeror performed as the prime contractor demonstrating construction experience with projects such as renovations, alterations and repairs as defined by the North American Industry System code (NAICS Code) 236220 with a contract dollar value of at least $500,000.00 and having similar complexity and function, utilizing trades relevant to those required by this solicitation.
In determining the relevancy of effort performed under individual past performance contracts, the Government will only consider the specific effort or portion consistent with that proposed by the prime, subcontractor or teaming partner. The past performance information forms (PPIFs) and information obtained from other sources will be used to establish the relevancy of past performance.
An adjectival relevancy rating will be given based on a comparison of the scope, magnitude of effort, and complexities of the offeror’s recent engagements as a contractor, either prime or sub-contractor, for projects such as renovations, alterations and repairs required by this solicitation.
c. Teaming arrangements are characterized by two or more business entities that are working together under the representation of one of the existing business entities for the duration of a contract. A teaming arrangement is not a formal merger of two or more business entities. The Government recognizes the validity and integrity of teaming arrangements as detailed in FAR 9.6. All offerors are encouraged to review FAR 9.6 to acquaint themselves with its details. Since the Government can only determine the responsibility of the prime contractor per FAR 9.604(b), in accordance with FAR 9.1, Responsible Prospective Contractors, offerors must identify in their offer any teaming arrangement to be considered and completely identify the relationships/responsibilities of the teaming members, to include relevant and recent past/present performance information on a maximum of three (3) projects teamed with the same partner. If unable to submit three (3) past/present performance information questionnaires with the same partner, submit past/present performance information on the prime contractor for a maximum of three (3) projects total.
d. Joint ventures are characterized as two or more business entities that have been merged to create one business entity with equal responsibility during the course of the contract. If this is a first time Joint Venture, please submit past/present performance information on a maximum of three (3) projects total by any business entity in the arrangement as identified in paragraphs (a) and (b) above.
e. Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s written consent. Provide a letter of consent to release past performance information to the prime offeror from each subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement.
f. Return completed Past Performance Information Forms NLT the offeror due date and time specified in block 13 of the solicitation SF1442. Please note that the PPIF will only be accepted if it is received directly from the reference. Have PPIFs sent directly to:
Attn: Wade Vinje & Lisa Peckham, FA4528-18-R-0010 165 Missile Ave Minot AFB, ND 58705
-OR-
wade.vinje@us.af.mil and lisa.peckham@us.af.mil
3. PART III – PRICE – Limited to no more than 30 pages as defined in Section D.
a. Complete blocks 14 through 20C of the RFP Section A, SF 1442. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in RFP Sections A through K. These sections constitute the model contract.
b. Insert proposed coefficients in Section B for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN).
c. Complete the Construction Cost Breakdown (Attachment 8) using pricing from the propsed coefficients in Section B, it shall be utilized for evaluation purposes only and shall not be a resultant part of the contract.
d. Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Sections I through K. Section K shall be returned in its entirety. For Sections F through I, the offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.
e. Provide a proposal for the initial Task Order – Building 168, Youth Center Annex (see Attachment 6 – Statement of Work & Attachment 7 - Drawings) using pricing from CLIN 0001 coefficients.
f. Other than certified cost or pricing data may be requested by the Government IAW FAR 15.4.
E. General Information:
1. Format for proposal parts I, II, & III shall be as follows:
a. The proposals will be 8 1/2” x 11” paper or standard A4 paper, except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17”.
b. A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information.
c. Typing shall not be less than 10 point.
d. Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required.
e. Electronic Submission – In accordance with FAR 52.215-1 – Instructions to Offerors, emailed proposals will be accepted. Emailed proposals must be sent to lisa.peckham@us.af.mil and wade.vinje@us.af.mil. Note email size must not exceed 10 mb. If the proposal is more than 10 mb, please submit as email 1 of 2, etc. Format must be a Word Document, PDF, or Excel sheet. The offeror must request and obtain an acknowledgement of receipt for electronic submission.
f. A letter of authorization for the Contracting Officer to verify offeror’s financial responsibility
(Attachment 4). Include name, address and phone numbers for financial institutions to include points of contact.
g. Acknowledgement of all amendments to the solicitation in accordance with the instructions on the SF
30 (amendment form).
2. A pre-proposal site visit will be conducted as specified in 52.236-27 Alternate 1.
3. Offeror should allow sufficient time to arrive and submit the proposals to the Contracting Office prior to the closing time. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with the provisions established in FAR
15.208 “Late Submission, Modifications, and Withdrawals of Proposals”. If gate access is not granted, please contact the CO immediately. The contractors are responsible for coordinating and processing gate pass requests in a timely manner. The USAF shall not be held accountable. The USAF shall not be responsible for delays due to in-processing or out-processing the base.
4. All contractors’ questions in response to this solicitation must be emailed to lisa.peckham@us.af.mil, and wade.vinje@us.af.mil no later than 4 June 2018 at 1400 CDT. The US Government will not be held responsible for answering any questions after this time. All questions/answers resulting from this solicitation will be posted to Federal Business Opportunities.
5. This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals. Offerors’ proposals must include all data and information requested by this solicitation and must be submitted and conducted in strict accordance with these instructions. Non-conformance with the specific organization, content, and page limitations may result in misevaluation of proposals or, depending on the magnitude of the nonconformance; the proposals may be eliminated from further consideration.
6. The proposal must be completed and returned NLT the offeror due date and time specified in block 13 of the solicitation SF1442:
Attn: Wade Vinje & Lisa Peckham, FA4528-18-R-0010 165 Missile Ave Minot AFB, ND 58705
-OR-
wade.vinje@us.af.mil and lisa.peckham@us.af.mil
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it.