FA441718R0010_Amendment_0001.pdf

FTEV163001

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment is to:

1) Incorporate Addendum 1, Dated 10 Aug 2018;

2) Incorporate revised Specifications, Dated 10 Aug 2018 w hich revises Section 23 09 23, Direct Digital Control System for HVAC;

3) Replace Draw ing Sheets D-101, A-101, A-102, A-301, A-401, A-603, Dated 10 Aug 2018; and

4) Extend the proposal due date from 13 Aug 2018 at 2:00 p.m. (CST) to 20 Aug 2018 at 2:00 p.m. (CST).

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 17

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 10-Aug-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA441718R0010

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13-Jul-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

10-Aug-2018

CODE

1SOCONS/PKB - CORY TERRELL

350 TULLY ST

HURLBURT FLD FL 32544-5810

FA4417 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA441718R0010

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 13-Aug-2018 02:00 PM to 20-Aug-

2018 02:00 PM.

The Issued By organization has changed from

1SOCONS/PKB - CORY TERRELL

350 TULLY ST

HURLBURT FLD FL 32544-5810

to

1 SOCONS

350 TULLY ST.

HURLBURT FIELD FL 32544

The offeror acceptance period has decreased by 7 from 48 to 41.

The required performance has changed from -Project CP1018526, FTEV 16-3001, Repair Bldg. 90748, 23 SOWS-Specifications, dated 6 Jul 18, and Drawings, dated 16 Jan 18- Enter prices in Section B, TYPE or HANDWRITE in BLUE or BLACK INK ONLY-Notice to Offeror(s)/Supplier(s): Funds are not presently available for this effort. No award will be made under this solicitation until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.” -THE

ACQUISITION IS A 100% SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN OWNED SMALL BUSINESS

SET-ASIDE. NAICS CODE: 236220 SIZE STANDARD: $36,500,000.00-Disclosure of Magnitude of Construction: The estimated amount of this project is between $1,000,000.00 and $2,000,000.00-The solicitation will be awarded IAW FAR Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation.

Your attention is directed to Sections L & M for proposal preparation.-See continuation page for additional Block 10 Information. to -Project CP1018526, FTEV 16-3001, Repair Bldg. 90748, 23 SOWS-Specifications and Drawings, Dated 10 Aug 2018-Enter prices in Section B, TYPE or HANDWRITE in BLUE or BLACK INK ONLY-Notice to Offeror(s)/Supplier(s): Funds are not presently available for this effort. No award will be made under this solicitation until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.” -THE ACQUISITION IS A 100% SERVICE-

DISABLED VETERAN OWNED SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE. NAICS CODE: 236220

SIZE STANDARD: $36,500,000.00-Disclosure of Magnitude of Construction: The estimated amount of this project is between $1,000,000.00 and $2,000,000.00-The solicitation will be awarded IAW FAR Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation. Your attention is directed to Sections L & M for proposal preparation.-See continuation page for additional Block 10 Information..

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

Global Changes

CLIN 0001 -- CLIN 0002

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

The contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, supervision, and equipment to perform all operations necessary to accomplish all work as shown on the specifications, dated 6 July 2018, and drawings, dated 16 January 2018.

To:

The contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, supervision, and equipment to perform all operations necessary to accomplish all work as shown in the specifications, addendums, and drawings listed in Section J.

SECTION H - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

The following have been added by full text:

HF004 REQUIRED INSURANCE (IAW FAR 28.306(b))

Reference FAR clause entitled “Insurance...” the Contractor shall, at its own expense, procure and thereafter maintain the following kinds of insurance with respect to performance under the contract. The Contractor will have the option to complete a form entitled “Notification of Compliance with Contract Insurance Requirements” that will be provided by the Government at time of award, or to submit an insurance certificate before any work commences on the installation.

a. Workman’s Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance as required by law except that if this contract is to be performed in a state which does not require or permit private insurance, then compliance with the statutory or administrative requirements in any such state will be satisfactory. The required Workmen’s compensation insurance shall extend to cover employer’s liability for accidental bodily injury or death and for occupational diseases with a minimum liability limit of $100,000.00.

b. General Liability Insurance. Bodily injury liability insurance, in the minimum limits of $500,000.00 per occurrence shall be required on the comprehensive form of policy.

c. Automobile Liability Insurance. This insurance shall be required on the comprehensive form of policy and shall provide bodily injury liability and property damage liability covering the operation of all automobile used in connection with the performance of the contract. At least the minimum limits of $200,000.00 per person and $500,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury and $20,000 per occurrence for property damage shall be required.

HF010 PREPARATION OF MATERIAL APPROVAL SUBMITTALS

Submittals contemplated by the clause herein entitled "Material and Workmanship" shall be accomplished on and in accordance with instructions pertaining to AF Form 3000 (Material Approval Submittal).

HF011 PREPARATION OF SCHEDULE FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS

The reports contemplated by clause entitled "Schedule for Construction Contracts" shall be accomplished on and in accordance with instructions pertaining to AF Form 3064 (Contract Progress Schedule) and AF Form 3065 (Contract Progress Report).

HF016 AVAILABILITY OF UTILITIES SERVICES

Notwithstanding provisions of Contract Clause, FAR 52.236-14, "AVAILABILITY AND USE OF UTILITY SERVICES," reasonable required amounts of water, gas, electricity, etc., essential to contract performance, will be made available at no cost to the contractor from existing systems, outlets, and supplies. Temporary connections, outlets, and distribution lines as required shall be installed by the contractor at his own expense.

**Section L – Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Bidders**

HF021 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

(1) General Instructions.

(a) To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors.

Offerors must clearly identify any exception to solicitation terms and conditions and provide accompanying rationale.

(b) The Contracting Officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the Contracting Officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer’s opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price.

(c) The following instructions are to aid in the evaluation process. Proposals shall be complete, comprehensive and clearly presented, as detailed in section M of this solicitation. Proposals shall be neat, indexed (cross-indexed as appropriate) and assembled in an orderly manner. Elaborate artwork, expensive paper/binding, and expensive visual and other presentation aids are neither necessary nor desired. All pages of each part shall be appropriately numbered and identified with the Request for Proposal (RFP) number. Include only information that is relevant to this source selection. Pages in excess of the maximum will be removed from the proposal and will not be evaluated. For the purposes of formatting, a page is defined as one face of an 8 ½” X 11” sheet of paper containing information and typing shall not be less than 12 pitch. Double-sided pages are acceptable and counted as 2 pages).

(d) A complete proposal shall consist of three (3) sections: Section I, Technical Proposal; Section II, Past Performance; and Section III, Price Proposal/Executed RFP Documents, and Teaming Agreement (if applicable).

Offerors shall submit one (1) original proposal, including all three sections, and one additional copy of Section I, Technical Proposal (sanitized with CAGE code only), and Section III, Price Proposal/Executed RFP Documents and Teaming Agreement (if applicable).

(2) Specific Instructions.

(a) Section I – Technical Proposal. Submit original and one (1) copy (sanitized with CAGE code only)

(i) Proposed Contract Progress Schedule: Prepare and submit a practicable contract progress schedule showing all necessary work elements to complete the project identified under this solicitation. The schedule must be in the form of a progress chart of suitable scale to indicate appropriately the percentage of work scheduled for completion by any given date during the performance period. The submitted schedule must be developed using project scheduling software such as MS Project, Primavera, or any other comparable form. The AF Form 3064 (Contract Progress Schedule) may also be used for submission of this item. The Sample Contract Progress Report located in Paragraph 1.16 of Section 01 00 00 of the specifications identifies numerous possible work elements offerors can use in preparing their technical proposals. Offerors should only include the work elements necessary to complete the required work. This list is provided as a guide and is NOT all inclusive or exclusive. It is the offeror’s responsibility to identify all necessary work elements.

(ii) Each offeror’s technical proposal must address the following:

(1) Order of work elements to include project phasing (if required)(identify whether or not to include option items or not)

(2) Number of days for each work element

(3) Identification of long lead time materials

(4) Identification of work elements in the critical path

(5) Identification of separate work elements

(iii) The proposed schedule must include the activities which are consistent with those described within the project specifications and drawings and must not exceed the Government’s maximum allowable performance period, as noted in FAR Clause 52.211-10, paragraph I of the RFP.

(iv) Offerors are encouraged to provide, as necessary, additional information to clarify their technical proposal. Additional information is limited to one (1) page and will be considered as part of their technical proposal.

(v) Failure to submit a schedule will result in immediate eliminationd from competition.

(b) Section II—Past Performance. Submit originals only, maximum of 10 total references.

Offerors shall provide past performance information on completed or current contracts (including Federal, State, local government and private) to demonstrate their ability to perform the proposed work as identified within the Specifications. Offerors must provide past performance information to establish Recency and Relevancy on all Federal contracts before State, local government or private contracts. The Government’s evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub contractors that will perform major or critical aspects (See Teaming Agreements, paragraph (d)), when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition.

(i) Recency is defined as projects performed in within the last three years of the issue month of the solicitation. All references for work not performed within three (3) years of the issue month of the solicitation will not be evaluated.

(ii) Relevancy is defined as Projects involving the type of construction and work elements described in the attached specifications, Section 011000, paragraphs 1.01 and 1.02 , and cost within project magnitude as specified in the RFP, Block 10 of SF 1442.

(iii) Offerors shall complete Section A, Contractor Information, of Attachment 4, Past/Present

Performance Questionnaire and mail, fax or email the attached Past/Present Performance Questionnaire to all past performance references listed below and instruct them to return the completed questionnaire to the individual(s) indicated in paragraph (2)(b)(v) below. Evaluators are only allowed to use the Attachment 4, Past Performance Questionnaire. Altered or substituted questionnaires will not be evaluated. Also, Past Performance Questionnaires will only be accepted from Project Owners or their authorized representatives.

Past Performance Questionnaires will not be accepted from Prime Contractors, Subcontractors, or Manufacturers. Offerors are responsible to ensure questionnaires are transmitted to their references, and to indicate which references the questionnaire was sent to (see paragraph (2)(b)(v) below).

(a) In lieu of a Past/Present Performance Questionnaire, if a project is currently available in the

Contractor Performance Assesment Reporting System (CPARS) the contractor should attach the evaluation to the questionnaire with the relevant solicitation number and submit directly to the 1st Special Operations Contracting Squadron office before the official closing date and time.

(iv) If Teaming Agreements are contemplated, the teaming members must provide complete information as to relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming agreements. If this is a first time teaming effort, each party to the teaming agreement must provide information on all relevant contracts as specified in paragraph (2)(b). The maximum number of past performance for each teaming member shall not exceed a total of 10 references. See additional requirements for Teaming Agreements in paragraph (2)(d).

(v) Inform your references that they shall forward questionnaires directly to the Contracting Officer or

Administrator at the address below. Questionnaires must be received in the 1st Special Operations Contracting Squadron office not later than the closing date of the solicitation. Offerors are responsible for ensuring their references transmit the questionnaire to the Contracting Office.

1 SOCONS/LGCB

Attention: Contract Specialist Name and CO NAME 350 Tully St, Bldg 90339 Hurlburt Field, FL 32544-5810

Fax: (850) 884-1272 (Attention: Contract Specialist Name and CO Name) Email: Contract Specialist Name@us.af.mil and CO Name@us.af.mil

(vi) Offerors are required to provide a summary of each past performance reference, with a maximum of 10 total references. The summary should explain what aspects of each contract are deemed recent and relevant as related to the requirements of this solicitation and in accordance with Section M. Failure to provide required relevancy description may impact the confidence rating, (i.e. aspects of previous projects should match work elements identified in the solicitation/specification). The summary should not exceed 1 page per reference (maximum total of 10 pages) and include:

(1) Name of project (Contract number, if applicable)

(2) Name and address of customer or Government agency

(3) Name, telephone, fax number and/or email of customer contact or contracting officer

(4) Dollar value

(5) Period of performance/Completion date

(6) Brief description of work performed and relevance to proposed work efforts

(7) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions

(vii) Lack of any past performance will not automatically disqualify an offeror, but it is a factor that is considered in the Performance Price Trade-Off (PPT) technique described in Section M.

(viii) If the offeror claims there is no past performance, then status must be identified to the contracting officer not later than the date/time proposals are due from all offerors.

(ix) The government shall consider past performance information on contracts obtained from any other sources when evaluating the offeror’s past performance.

(c) Section III – Price/Cost Proposal and Financial Questionnaire. Submit the Standard Form 1442 and all pages originally included in the RFP. Submit original and one (1) copy.

(i) Complete blocks 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 20a-c of the SF 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award. An authorized official of the firm submitting the offer must sign and date the SF 1442 in block 20a-c. (In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP, Sections A through K).

(ii) Complete the necessary fill-ins (SF 1442, Block 10 Continuation Page)

(iii) Insert proposed prices in Section B for each Contract Line Item.

(iv) Complete representations and certifications in Section K or the System for Award Management

(SAM).

(d) Section III – Teaming Agreements (include only if applicable). Submit original and one (1) copy of signed Teaming Agreement.

(i) If Teaming Agreements are contemplated they must comply with the appropriate Federal Regulations (13 C.F.R. Part 121 (Size Regulations), Part 124 (8(a) & SDB), Part 125 (Government Contracting Programs), and/or Part 126 (HUBZone). The Government will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor teaming agreements; provided, the agreements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in an offer. Teaming agreements will be incorporated into the contract.

Failure to clearly define roles and/or provide a teaming agreement with a proposal shall make teaming agreements and related subcontractor past performance ineligible for evaluation and consideration of award. Teaming Agreements must provide the following information as part of their proposal (Section III) not later than the date/time proposal are due:

(a) Clearly establish roles of each party (who is prime and who is subcontractor, who is responsible for what tasks, contract administration, proposals, work management, etc

(b) Provide for protection of competition-sensitive proprietary information. (subcontractor past performance cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent.

Provide a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor, only if it is being used as part of the past performance evaluation.

(c) Identify each member’s share of the prospective contract, 50/50, 51/49, etc.

(d) Exclusivity. Assurance that the team member will not be replaced for the duration of the contract, any exceptions should be identified. Assurance that the team members are not teaming with another firm for the same procurement.

(e) Statement of acknowledgement that the Prime Contractor is responsible for adhering to contract terms and conditions and daily management. The Prime Contractor is obligated to negotiate in good faith and responsible for conveying mandatory government terms and conditions to subcontractors.

(f) The prime contractor shall remain fully responsible for contract performance, regardless of any teaming agreement between the prime contractor and its subcontractors.

(3) Relationship between Instructions and Evaluation. Your attention is directed to the functional relationship between Sections L and M of this solicitation. Section L provides information for the purpose of organizing the proposal and is not intended to be all inclusive. Section M describes evaluation factors for award. The Government evaluation of proposals will cover areas identified in Section M, proposals should address all such areas of evaluation.

(4) Amendment of Solicitation Prior to Closing. The government reserves the right to revise or amend the specifications, drawings, or the solicitation prior to the proposal closing time. Such reservations or amendments will be communicated by amendments to the Request for Proposal (RFP) and posted in Fedbizops (www.FBO.gov). If such amendments require material changes in quantities or prices, the proposal closing date may be postponed by enough days to enable offerors to revise their proposals. In such cases, the amendment will include an announcement of the new closing date and time. Offerors MUST acknowledge all amendments in their proposal, either by completing SF 1442 Block 18, or providing signed copies of the amendments with their proposal (Section

III).

(5) Questions. All questions regarding this solicitation must be submitted in writing no later than 5 calendar days after the site visit. All questions received prior to the RFP closing date and subsequent answers will be posted to the Federal Business Opportunities website www.fbo.gov. It is the responsibility of the contractor to continuously monitor the site for updates. To mitigate the risks associated with the cancellation of this solicitation due to untimely submission of questions, all questions must be submitted to the individual(s) listed below no later than close of business 5 calendar days after the site visit. Any questions submitted after this period may not be answered.

Fax: (850) 884-1272 (Attention: Contract Specialist Name and CO Name) Email: Contract Specialist Name@us.af.mil and CO Name@us.af.mil

**Section M – Evaluation Criteria for Award**

HF022 EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR AWARD

(IAW FAR 15.204-5(c))

(1) Basis for Award:

(a) This is a competitive best value source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.3, Source Selection, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Supplement (DFARS), and the Air Force Federal Acquisition Supplement (AFFARS). By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable.

(b) This acquisition will utilize a best value approach, in which the Government seeks to award to an offeror who provides the greatest confidence that they will meet the Government’s requirements affordably. The Best Value technique chosen for this particular acquisition will be Performance Price Tradeoff (PPT). The PPT approach permits tradeoffs between price/cost and past performance, and includes evaluation for technical acceptability. Contract award will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements, is considered technically acceptable, and provides the best value to the Government, considering price and past performance. For this acquisition, past performance is significantly more important than price/cost. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

(2) Technical Evaluation. Initially, offers shall be evaluated independently of the cost/price proposal evaluation to determine the offerors compliance with the technical requirements of this solicitation. The government may make a final determination as to the rating of an offer based on the proposal as submitted without requesting any further information. Offerors proposals will be evaluated against the following factors:

(a) Proposed Contract Progress Schedule: The offerors proposed contract progress schedule will be evaluated relative to overall coordination of the construction phase, to include ability to identify all necessary work elements of the specific project, and the offerors ability to schedule the activities in a logical sequence and within the time required in this solicitation. The proposed schedule must include the activities which are consistent with those described within project specifications, and drawings and must not exceed the Government’s maximum allowable performance period, as noted in SF 1442 (RFP), Block 11 and Section F, FAR Clause 52.211-10.

(b) In accordance with Section L, Clause HF021, each technical proposal will be evaluated against the following requirements:

(8) Order of work elements to include project phasing (if required)(identify whether or not to include option items or not)

(9) Number of days for each work element

(10) Identification of long lead time materials

(11) Identification of work elements in the critical path

(12) Identification of separate work elements

(c) Evaluators shall assign a rating of ACCEPTABLE OR UNACCEPTABLE based on the minimum requirements established above.

(i) ACCEPTABLE – Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

(ii) UNACCEPTABLE – Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

(iii) If all offerors are deemed unacceptable, the government may establish a competitive range and enter into discussions.

(iv) Failure to submit a schedule will result in immediate elimination from competition.

(3) Price/Cost Evaluation and Teaming Agreements (if applicable).

(a) Only offerors determined to be technically acceptable shall be ranked according to price, including any option prices (if applicable) using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404. Each offeror’s price will be evaluated to determine if it is reasonable and realistic.

(i) Reasonable – Must represent a price to the Government that a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business.

(ii) Realistic – Evaluation of the extent to which proposed costs are sufficient for the work to be performed, reflective of a clear understanding of the requirements, and consistent with the unique methods of performance and materials described in the offeror’s technical proposal.

(iii) Unrealistically low proposed costs/prices may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that the offeror does not understand the requirement or the offeror has made an unrealistic proposal.

(b) Teaming Agreements must provide the following information as part of their proposal (Section III) not later than the date/time proposals are due:

(a) Clearly establish roles of each party (who is prime and who is subcontractor, who is responsible for what tasks, contract administration, proposals, work management, etc

(b) Provide for protection of competition-sensitive proprietary information. (subcontractor past performance cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent.

Provide a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor, only if it is being used as part of the past performance evaluation.

(c) Identify each member’s share of the prospective contract, 50/50, 51/49, etc.

(d) Exclusivity. Assurance that the team member will not be replaced for the duration of the contract, any exceptions should be identified. Assurance that the team members are not teaming with another firm for the same procurement.

(e) Statement of acknowledgement that the Prime Contractor is responsible for adhering to contract terms and conditions and daily management. The Prime Contractor is obligated to negotiate in good faith and responsible for conveying mandatory government terms and conditions to subcontractors.

(f) The prime contractor shall remain fully responsible for contract performance, regardless of any teaming agreement between the prime contractor and its subcontractors.

(4) Past Performance Evaluation.

(a) The government will evaluate past performance for the lowest priced proposal, determined to be technically acceptable. Offerors shall provide information regarding past or current contracts (including Federal, State, local government, and private) for efforts similar to the Government requirement as stated in this solicitation through either questionnaires or evaluations from the Contractor Performance Appraisal Reporting System (CPARS) as identified in Section L paragraph (2)(b). The Government evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects (See Teaming Agreement, Section L, paragraph (2)(d) and Section M paragraph (3)(b) when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition. The Government may also evaluate information on problems identified and encountered on previous contracts and corrective actions taken by the offeror. The Government may use information previously obtained from past performance questionnaires or data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources in the evaluation process.

(b) In the event an Offeror submits a Past Performance Questionnaire and it is subsequently determined that the referenced project was formally evaluated in CPARS, these ratings in CPARS shall take precedence.

(c) In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Therefore, the offeror shall be rated as “Unknown Confidence (Neutral)”. However, as stated in Section L, paragraph (2)(b)(vii) it is a factor that is considered in the Performance Price Trade-off (PPT) technique.

(d) Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Offerors may be asked to clarify or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond.

(e) Teaming Agreements, if applicable: Each teaming offeror’s past performance will be evaluated separately. The Prime Contractor’s past performance will be weighted slightly more than equal based on their overall responsibility for contract management. The separate ratings of each party in the Teaming Agreement will be combined to determine the Government’s overall evaluation of best value.

(f) The Government will evaluate the offerors ability to successfully complete projects based on demonstrated past and present experience that meet the requirements of Recent and Relevant.

(i) Recency is defined as contracts performed within three (3) years of the issue month of the solicitation.

(ii) Relevancy is defined as contracts involving:

(a) Projects involving the type of construction and work elements described in the attached Specifications, Section 0110 00, paragraphs 1.01 and 1.02.

(b) Cost within project magnitude, as specified in Block 10 of the SF 1442 (RFP).

(c) In evaluating past performance, relevant performance will have a greater impact on the Performance Confidence Assessment than a less relevant effort. Between the subfactors of recency and relevancy, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this RFP.

(g) The following relevancy definitions, apply:

(i) VERY RELEVANT: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(ii) RELEVANT: Present/Past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(iii) SOMEWHAT RELEVANT: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and

(iv) NOT RELEVANT: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and

(h) Based on the evaluation of all recent and relevant past performance for an offeror an overall

Performance Confidence rating is assigned in accordance with FAR 15.305(a) (2). The Performance Confidence assessment represents the Government evaluation team's judgment of the probability of an offeror successfully accomplishing the proposed effort based on the offerors demonstrated past and presents performance.

The ratings are defined as follows:

SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

LIMITED CONFIDENCE: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NO CONFIDENCE: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE (Neutral): No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

(5) Evaluation of Ratings. If the lowest priced evaluated offer has been determined technically acceptable and is judged to have a Substantial Confidence rating that offer represents the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers. If the lowest priced offeror, that is technically acceptable, is not judged to have a Substantial Confidence rating, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is judged to have a Substantial Confidence rating or all offerors are evaluated. The Source Selection Authority shall then make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

(6) Contractor Responsibility. Once the apparent successful offeror is selected the government will evaluate the offeror’s financial capabilities. In the case of a Teaming Agreement, the financial capabilities of both teaming partners will be evaluated, with the Prime Contractor’s financial capability carrying significantly more weight than the subcontractor’s. Attachment 5, Financial Reference Worksheet will be forwarded to the financial institution and a determination will be made regarding the apparent successful offerors financial capabilities.

(7) Clarifications, Discussions, and Negotiations. The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offerors initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. In accordance with FAR 15.306, Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, relevance of past performance information). Communications (Clarifications) conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. Discussions or negotiations may be conducted with all offerors in the competitive range. Offerors may be required to participate in telephone discussions or in face-to-face oral discussions at the 1st Special Operations Contracting Squadron, 350 Tully Street, Hurlburt Field, FL.

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

52.219-4 NOTICE OF PRICE EVALUATION PREFERENCE FOR HUBZONE SMALL BUSINESS

CONCERNS (OCT 2014)

(a) Definitions. See 13 CFR 125.6(e) for definitions of terms used in paragraph (d).

(b) Evaluation preference. (1) Offers will be evaluated by adding a factor of 10 percent to the price of all offers, except--

(i) Offers from HUBZone small business concerns that have not waived the evaluation preference; and

(ii) Otherwise successful offers from small business concerns.

(2) The factor of 10 percent shall be applied on a line item basis or to any group of items on which award may be made. Other evaluation factors described in the solicitation shall be applied before application of the factor.

(3) When the two highest rated offerors are a HUBZone small business concern and a large business, and the evaluated offer of the HUBZone small business concern is equal to the evaluated offer of the large business after considering the price evaluation preference, award will be made to the HUBZone small business concern.

(c) Waiver of evaluation preference. A HUBZone small business concern may elect to waive the evaluation preference, in which case the factor will be added to its offer for evaluation purposes. The agreements in paragraphs

(d) and (e) of this clause do not apply if the offeror has waived the evaluation preference.

___ Offeror elects to waive the evaluation preference.

(d) Agreement. A HUBZone small business concern agrees that in the performance of the contract, in the case of a contract for

(1) Services (except construction), at least 50 percent of the cost of personnel for contract performance will be spent for employees of the concern or employees of other HUBZone small business concerns;

(2) Supplies (other than procurement from a nonmanufacturer of such supplies), at least 50 percent of the cost of manufacturing, excluding the cost of materials, will be performed by the concern or other HUBZone small business concerns;

(3) General construction. (i) At least 15 percent of the cost of contract performance to be incurred for personnel will be spent on the prime contractor's employees;

(ii) At least 50 percent of the cost of the contract performance to be incurred for personnel will be spent on the prime contractor's employees or on a combination of the prime contractor's employees and employees of HUBZone small business concern subcontractors;

(iii) No more than 50 percent of the cost of contract performance to be incurred for personnel will be subcontracted to concerns that are not HUBZone small business concerns; or

(4) Construction by special trade contractors. (i) At least 25 percent of the cost of contract performance to be incurred for personnel will be spent on the prime contractor's employees;

(ii) At least 50 percent of the cost of the contract performance to be incurred for personnel will be spent on the prime contractor's employees or on a combination of the prime contractor's employees and employees of HUBZone small business concern subcontractors;

(iii) No more than 50 percent of the cost of contract performance to be incurred for personnel will be subcontracted to concerns that are not HUBZone small business concerns.

(e) A HUBZone joint venture agrees that the aggregate of the HUBZone small business concerns to the joint venture, not each concern separately, will perform the applicable percentage of work requirements.

(f)(1) When the total value of the contract exceeds $25,000, a HUBZone small business concern nonmanufacturer agrees to furnish in performing this contract only end items manufactured or produced by HUBZone small business concern manufacturers.

(2) When the total value of the contract is equal to or less than $25,000, a HUBZone small business concern nonmanufacturer may provide end items manufactured by other than a HUBZone small business concern manufacturer provided the end items are produced or manufactured in the United States.

(3) Paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this section do not apply in connection with construction or service contracts.

(g) Notice. The HUBZone small business offeror acknowledges that a prospective HUBZone awardee must be a HUBZone small business concern at the time of award of this contract. The HUBZone offeror shall provide the Contracting Officer a copy of the notice required by 13 CFR 126.501 if material changes occur before contract award that could affect its HUBZone eligibility. If the apparently successful HUBZone offeror is not a HUBZone small business concern at the time of award of this contract, the Contracting Officer will proceed to award to the next otherwise successful HUBZone small business concern or other offeror.

(End of clause)

HF045 Protection of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) on Electronic Media

1. Protecting sensitive PII is everyone’s responsibility. Sensitive PII is defined as personal information, which if lost, compromised or disclosed without authorization, could result in substantial harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness to an individual.

a. Some information, standing alone, is sensitive PII, such as: social security number in any form (including the ‘last four’), alien registration number, biometric information, and financial account numbers.

b. Some information is sensitive PII when grouped with the person’s name or other unique identifiers (like an address or phone number), such as: driver’s license number, medical information, citizenship or immigration status, passport number, full date of birth, and authentication information, such as mother’s maiden name, place of birth, or phone passwords.

2. Contractors shall:

a. Encrypt all e-mails containing sensitive PII sent to or from an unclassified e-mail account;

b. When encrypted e-mail is not feasible, but electronic transmission of sensitive PII is operationally required, will use a DoD-approved file exchange, such as the Safe Access File Exchange, which can be found at https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/;

c. Not send sensitive PII to any person who does not have an official need for such information; and

d. Not post or place sensitive PII on social media, share drives, SharePoint sites, or other similar collaborative environments, unless required for daily operation and the drive or site is password-protected or has other similar robust access controls which limit access only to persons who have an official need for such information.

3. These rules apply to any contractor doing business with Hurlburt Field.

4. Failure to comply with these rules may result in termination and/or debarment.

End of Clause

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT TITLE DATE PAGES

1 FTEV 16-3001, REPAIR BLDG. 90748, 23 SOWS, SPECIFICATIONS AUGUST 10, 2018 668

2 FTEV 16-3001, REPAIR BLDG. 90748, 23 SOWS, DRAWINGS JANUARY 16, 2018 48

3 WAGE DETERMINATION FL180262 JANUARY 12, 2018 5

4 ADDITIONAL CONTRACTOR INFORMATION NO DATE 2

5 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE NO DATE 4

6 FINANCIAL REFERENCE SHEET NO DATE 1

7 ADDENDUM 1 AUGUST 10, 2018 1

8 REVISED DRAWING SHEETS, D-101, A-101, A-102, A-301, A-401, AUGUST 10, 2018 6

& A-603

Amendments: Amendments issued to this solicitation will be part of any resultant contract and will be listed above at the time of award.

SECTION K - REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

The following have been added by reference:

52.209-2

52.225-25 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING WITH ENTITIES ENGAGING IN CERTAIN ACTIVITIES OR

TRANSACTIONS RELATING TO IRAN--REPRESENTATION AND CERTIFICATIONS. (OCT 2015)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--

Person--

(1) Means--

(i) A natural person;

(ii) A corporation, business association, partnership, society, trust, financial institution, insurer, underwriter, guarantor, and any other business organization, any other nongovernmental entity, organization, or group, and any governmental entity operating as a business enterprise; and

(iii) Any successor to any entity described in paragraph (1)(ii) of this definition; and

(2) Does not include a government or governmental entity that is not operating as a business enterprise.

Sensitive technology--

(1) Means hardware, software, telecommunications equipment, or any other technology that is to be used specifically--

(i) To restrict the free flow of unbiased information in Iran; or

(ii) To disrupt, monitor, or otherwise restrict speech of the people of Iran; and

(2) Does not include information or informational materials the export of which the President does not have the authority to regulate or prohibit pursuant to section 203(b)(3) of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(3)).

(b) The offeror shall email questions concerning sensitive technology to the Department of State at CISADA106@state.gov.

(c) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this provision or if a waiver has been granted in accordance with 25.703- 4, by submission of its offer, the offeror—

(1) Represents, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that the offeror does not export any sensitive technology to the government of Iran or any entities or individuals owned or controlled by, or acting on behalf or at the direction of, the government of Iran;

(2) Certifies that the offeror, or any person owned or controlled by the offeror, does not engage in any activities for which sanctions may be imposed under section 5 of the Iran Sanctions Act. These sanctioned activities are in the areas of development of the petroleum resources of Iran, production of refined petroleum products in Iran, sale and provision of refined petroleum products to Iran, and contributing to Iran's ability to acquire or develop certain weapons or technologies; and

(3) Certifies that the offeror, and any person owned or controlled by the offeror, does not knowingly engage in any transaction that exceeds $3,500 with Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps or any of its officials, agents, or affiliates, the property and interests in property of which are blocked pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (see OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List at http://www.treasury.gov/ofac/downloads/t11sdn.pdf).

(d) Exception for trade agreements. The representation requirement of paragraph (c)(1) and the certification requirements of paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3) of this provision do not apply if—

(1) This solicitation includes a trade agreements notice or certification (e.g., 52.225-4, 52.225-6, 52.225-12, 52.225- 24, or comparable agency provision); and

(2) The offeror has certified that all the offered products to be supplied are designated country end products or designated country construction material.

(End of provision)

252.213-7000 NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE SUPPLIERS ON USE OF SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE RISK

SYSTEM IN PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS (MAR 2018)

(a) The Supplier Performance Risk System (SPSR) application (https://www.ppirssrng.csd.disa.mil/) will be used in the evaluation of suppliers' past performance in accordance with DFARS 213.106-2(b)(i).

(b) SPRS collects quality and delivery data on previously awarded contracts and orders from existing Department of Defense reporting systems to classify each supplier's performance history by Federal…