FA301620R00320001.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

List of Attachments

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

1. Performance Work Statement (PWS) - Airfield Friction Testing

2. Wage Determination (Wage Determination 2015-5253, Rev 11)

3. Questions and Answers

Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Addenda to FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Items

Addendum to 52.212-1(b), Submission of Offers. The paragraph is tailored as follows:

1.0 General Instructions. This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals, as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. Throughout this solicitation, the term "Offeror" includes subcontractors, teammates and/or joint venture partners. The Offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested, and must be submitted in accordance with (IAW) these instructions. The Offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the solicitation. A proposal that is sufficiently documented to support technical capability and price in a complete, orderly, and specific detailed manner will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation. Compliance with the instructions and solicitation is mandatory. Failure to comply may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation and render the proposal ineligible for award.

2.0 Information Regarding Submission Requirements. Documents submitted in response to this solicitation must comply with requirements of the solicitation and Performance Work Statement (PWS).

To be considered, the complete proposal must be submitted by hard copy/electronically on CD-ROM and contain both Volume I and Volume II. The proposal must be received not later than the date and time established in Block 8 of the SF 1449, at:

502 CONS/JBKAA

Attn: Keegan Hoover & Lauren Macias 1655 Selfridge Avenue, Building 5450 JBSA Lackland, TX 78236

The CD-ROM shall reflect the following information on the label:

(1) Solicitation Number FA301620R0032

(2) Contract Name, Volume #

Offerors are cautioned that JBSA Lackland AFB has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. SOME DELAY SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED WHEN HAND-CARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at the location PRIOR to the time specified for receipt. Offerors should be aware of the potential that the Government experiences delays in the postal service to JBSA Lackland and take all necessary

FA301620R00320001

precautions. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f) "Late submission, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers."

All proposals must be in English. FAX OR EMAIL PROPOSALS SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED; however, the Government will accept submissions electronically through DoD Safe. If an offeror chooses to submit a proposal electronically using this app, the offeror shall send an email with a read receipt to keegan.hoover.2@us.

af.mil no later than 48 hours prior to the solicitation due date. The email shall have the subject "FA301620R0032-Request to Submit Electronically" and shall express the offeror's intent to submit a proposal in the email body with the email addresses of at least two (2) POCs. Upon receipt and processing of the email, the Government will request a drop off from the offeror using the DoD Safe application. DoD Safe will send an automated email with access codes and instructions on utilization of the service. It is advised the offeror sends and additional email to the above address after submission through DoD Safe.

All questions must be submitted in writing through email to keegan.hoover.2@us.af.mil no later than Friday, 24 APR 2020 at noon CST. Questions submitted after this date will not be considered. Any proposal, modification, or revision, that is received at the designated Government office after the exact time specified for receipt of proposals is "late" and will not be considered unless it is received before award is made, the contracting officer determines that accepting the late proposal would not unduly delay the acquisition; and (i) there is acceptable evidence to establish that it was received at the Government installation designated for receipt of proposals and was under the Government's control prior to the time set for receipt of proposals; or (ii) It was the only proposal received.

3.0 Proposal Preparation and Format Instructions. This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals in regards to the format and content of the proposal. Each volume shall be complete in itself. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein; all the requirements specified in this solicitation are mandatory. Offerors are representing that your firm will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation by submitting your proposal. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, and representations and certifications, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sub factors. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale.

3.1 Page Limitations. Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. Total page count will be based on the printed proposal submission. If page limitations are exceeded, excess pages will not be read nor considered in the evaluation of the proposal. A page is defined as each face of an 8.5 x 11-inch sheet of paper containing information. All information except for document numbers, page number, etc., shall be provided in an image area with no less than one inch in margin. Two pages may be printed back-to-back on one sheet of paper.

However, this will be considered two (2) pages for the purpose of page count. The background color of each page of the proposal submission shall be white or ivory stock only. The maximum number of pages for each volume is listed below. Price information shall be limited to Volume I. Excess pages will not be evaluated, but will be retained in the file. See table below for specific number of copies required and pages for each of the Volumes.

Volume I. Contracting & Pricing 1 Compact Disk (Hard copy file is NOT needed) No page limitation.

Volume II. Technical 1 Compact Disk AND 3 hard copies Limit to no more than ten (10) pages total.

3.2 Pages Counted. Each page shall be counted except for the following:

(a) Cover pages

(b) Table of Contents

(c) List of Figures

(d) Glossaries

(e) Tabs

(f) Dividers

(g) Blank pages

3.3 Text. Text type should be Times New Roman or Arial, no smaller than 12-point with normal proportional spacing. Illustrations and tables shall be no smaller than Times New Romans or Arial 10 point. Text lines will be, at a minimum, single-spaced.

3.4 Tables, Charts, Graphs, and Figures. Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible, and shall not exceed 11 x 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume, and count as a single page. Foldout pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams and schematics not for pages of text. For graphics, exhibits and figures, text shall be no smaller than Times New Roman or Arial 10-point font. Text within tables shall be no smaller than Times New Roman or Arial 10-point font. These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals.

3.5 Binding and Labeling. Volume II (Technical) of the proposal will be bound separately in a standard loose-leaf three-ring binder. The volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated on a stand-alone basis. Cross Referencing between volumes is not permitted. Information required for proposal evaluation which is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal.

Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted. Elaborate format and binding are neither necessary nor desirable. The cover and spine of each binder will clearly identify the Offeror's name, volume number, Request for Proposal (RFP) number "FA3020R0032", RFP title "JBSA Runway Friction Testing", and copy number, e.

g., copy 2 of 2. The original for each volume will be clearly identified on the cover and the spine. All binders will allow for easy removal and replacement of pages. Replacement pages in response to evaluation notices (if any), shall be colored stock with lines in the margin designating the change and the change highlighted.

3.6 Electronic Copies. The content of electronic copy of the Contracting & Pricing must be identical to the hard copy. The electronic copy shall be submitted on compact disk/read only memory (CD/ROM) disks in a Microsoft Operation System and as a minimum saved using Microsoft Office 2007(r) format. Offerors are advised to perform a computer virus check prior to submission. The Government will perform computer virus checks on all submitted electronic media and will immediately return for replacement any disk found to be infected. In the event of discrepancies between hard copies and electronic copies of a proposal, the hard copies will be used for evaluation.

3.7 Proposal Clarity. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation of the Offeror's capabilities and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The Offeror's proposal shall not simply rephrase, reiterate, or restate the Government's own language, but rather shall provide convincing rationale describing how it intends to fulfill the requirement. Legibility, clarity, and coherence are very important. Provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology you would use for accomplishing and satisfying the requirements. The Offeror shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of its capabilities, facilities and experience, and will base the evaluation on the information presented in the Offeror's proposal.

4.0 Specific Proposal Instructions. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the Offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, stand-alone, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The response shall consist of two (2) separate parts:

Volume I - Contracting & Pricing Volume II - Technical

4.1 Volume I - Contracting & Pricing. The Offeror's proposal shall include a signed copy of the solicitation, and signed copy of any issued amendments. Complete all contract clause fill-ins if applicable.

4.1.1 Instructions. The CO has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the CO will review this determination and if, in the CO's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional cost information will be requested. However, if at any time during this competition the CO determines that adequate price competition no longer exists offerors may be required to submit other than certified cost or pricing data to the extent necessary for the CO to determine the reasonableness of the price.

4.1.2 Schedule of Supplies/Services. The Offeror shall complete the Schedule of Supplies/Services of the RFP and the electronic Pricing Schedule spreadsheet and submit within Volume I. A unit price shall be proposed and inserted for each Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) for each performance period and shall be rounded up to two decimal places. The extended amount must equal the unit price multiplied by the number/quantity of units. The proposed prices shall be based on the Offeror's own approach and the Government's Performance Work Statement (PWS) requirements as set forth herein. Offerors who change the quantities stated in the solicitation will render the proposal ineligible for award.

The Offeror shall submit only pricing information that will be evaluated for award or become part of the resulting contract. Supply costs and associated General and Administrative (G&A) cost plus profit or fee, should be included in the unit price for each task listed in the Price List. Wages will be subject to SCA/CBA increases over the contract life. Each Offeror shall submit a contracting & pricing volume IAW the format below.

4.1.2.1: Solicitation. A signed copy of the SF 1449 from an individual legally authorized to bind the offeror, and completed blocks 12, 17, 26 and 30; in doing so, the Offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the solicitation with attachments. In the event that any amendments (SF 30) to the solicitation are issued, a signed copy of each amendment should be placed before the solicitation in order starting with the most recent amendment issued.

4.1.2.2: Representations and Certifications. Complete the necessary fill-ins, certifications, and provisions. The offeror shall complete only paragraph (b) of the provision FAR 52.212-3 if the Offeror has completed the annual representations and certification electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) Web site. If the offeror has not completed the annual representations and certifications electronically, the offeror shall complete only paragraphs (c) through (p) of the provision FAR 52.212-3 and return it along with the proposal.

4.1.2.3: Cognizant SBA Office. The point of contact and information of the Cognizant SBA District Office where the approved business plan is on file.

4.1.2.4: Financial Disclosure Release Statement. A release statement authorizing the Government to request information from current financial institutions or lenders must be submitted on official letterhead. In addition to this authorization, the offeror should include the financial institution or lender's address, and a point of contact including email and phone number to be contacted with the authorization.

4.1.2.5: Teaming Agreement. All Team Members shall have a signed Teaming Arrangement (TA) or Letter of Intent (LOI), and provide a copy in this tab. To be valid under this solicitation, a Teaming Arrangement (TA) or Letter of Intent (LOI) must commit the business entities to performance under this contract, should it be awarded to the Offeror.

(a) Any business entity without a TA or LOI with the Offeror is NOT considered as part of the "team" and will not be evaluated as such.

(b) Mentor-Protege (M-P) is a relationship and not a business entity. M-Ps require formal TAs or LOIs to qualify for consideration as a Team Member.

(c) A Joint Venture (JV) will be considered a sole business entity. Signed JV documentation must be provided in Volume I, Contracting.

(d) The proposal shall present a complete, coherent presentation of the Team's ability as applicable.

4.2 Volume II - Technical Proposal. Each Offeror shall submit a technical volume with its proposal IAW the format below. Offerors are cautioned that the Government will only use data provided by each Offeror in this volume in the technical evaluation. By your proposal submission, you are representing that you will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation. It is not necessary or desirable for you to tell us so in your proposal. Do not merely reiterate the objectives or reformulate the requirements specified in the solicitation.

Technical Factors and Sub factors. All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory. The contractor shall address the proposed approach to meeting the minimum performance or capability requirements of each technical Sub factor. The responses will be evaluated against FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation Factors.

Marketing presentations are not wanted and will not be evaluated. Hard and compelling evidence of capabilities is required to receive credit for evaluation factors. Legibility, clarity, and coherence are very important. Offerors are strongly encouraged to provide as specifically as possible, the actual methodology to be used for accomplishing and satisfying the requirements.

(A) Technical Factor # 1 - Management Plan Standard: The offeror shall submit a management plan that illustrates the corporate philosophy and management approach to demonstrate evidence of sound organization, appropriate manning mix and qualifications proposed, and performance management processes to successfully accomplish tasks delineated in the PWS. The plan should provide evidence of knowledge and capability delivering runway friction testing services as defined in the solicitation. At a minimum, the plan should:

i. Demonstrate a business approach for planning, controlling, directing, and integrating resources in an efficient manner to fulfill the requirements identified in the PWS.

ii. Approach for structuring, staffing (to include a proposed manning mix of personnel), retaining personnel, and utilization of key personnel to plan, control, and direct the labor force to meet the requirements of the PWS. The approach shall include an organizational chart with definition of roles and responsibilities of key operating personnel and staffing levels depicting various job classifications (including supervision).

iii. Provide mitigating strategies and processes designed to prevent and proactively identify and forecast potential risks that could have an adverse impact to schedule or performance.

iv. Provide a sample runway friction test report IAW the PWS to demonstrate an understanding of the requirements (excluded from the volume page limit). This can be a report from a similar project.

(B) Technical Factor # 2 -- Quality Control Plan:

Standard: The offeror shall provide a "quality control plan" (QCP) with a complete written system for identifying and correcting deficiencies and degradation in the quality of services before the level of performance becomes unacceptable. At a minimum, the plan should specifically address contract requirements and location

(s) listed and provide the following:

i. The plan shall address responsibilities for oversight of the QCP, functions associated with such oversight, and specify authority to coordinate with the COR and CO.

ii. Describe the methodology to monitor service deficiencies/complaints in relation to the performance standards, approach to inform employees of identified deficiencies/complaints, and a process to ensure that the deficiencies/complaints are corrected and eradicated.

iii. Samples of all inspection forms, records, reports, and any other internal quality control methods to the services provided under this PWS.

Addendum to 52.212-1(c), Period for Acceptance of Offers. The paragraph is tailored as follows: "The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 180 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers."

Addendum to 52.212-1(d), Product Samples, is deleted in its entirety.

Addendum to 52.212-1(e), Multiple Offers, is deleted in its entirety.

Addendum to 52.212-1(g), Contract Award. The following sentence is added: "If the Contracting Officer determines discussions are to be conducted, a competitive range will be established."

Addendum to 52.212-1(h), Multiple Awards, is deleted in its entirety.

(End of Addenda)

Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Addenda to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Items Addendum to 52.212-2(a): Paragraph (a) is tailored as follows:

(a) Basis for Contract Award. The Government intends to award one contract for this competitive Small Business Set-Aside service acquisition. Award will be made to the technically acceptable Offeror with the lowest evaluated price who is deemed responsible in accordance with FAR 9.104 and whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements. The solicitation requirements include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by this solicitation. Unless specifically identified in your proposal, by submission of its offer, the Offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sub factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in a proposal being determined ineligible for award.

This contract will be awarded as Firm Fixed Price (FFP). It is the Government's intent to evaluate proposals and award a contract IAW FAR 13.106. FAR Part 15 based evaluations will NOT be used for this acquisition. The initial proposal should contain your best terms; however; the Government reserves the right to conduct exchanges if determined necessary by the Contracting Officer to resolve issues such as technical or price, or deal with contract documentation including any other matter in the evaluation process. The contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity to revise proposals.

1.0 Evaluation Process. The Government may consider, throughout the evaluation, the "correction potential" of any proposal. The judgment of such "correctional potential" is within the sole discretion of the Government. If any aspect of an offeror's proposal does not meet the Government's requirements and is not considered correctable, the offer may be ineligible for award. All technically acceptable proposals shall be treated equally except for their cost/price record. Offers will be ranked based on initial assessment of total overall evaluated prices, followed by a full evaluation of Technical Acceptability, then Price Reasonableness of the technically acceptable offer with the lowest evaluated price. Only proposals rated technically acceptable are eligible to receive an award.

1.1 Proposals. The Government will rank proposals based on an initial assessment of offeror's total evaluated prices, followed by a full evaluation of Technical Acceptability and Price Reasonableness as follows:

Rank by Total Evaluated Price, as submitted. The Government will rank all proposals by the initially proposed total evaluated price, from lowest to highest, including all ordering periods. An offeror's proposed estimated price will be determined by multiplying the estimated quantities by the proposed unit price for each CLIN. The extended amount for each CLIN will be totaled to obtain the estimated total for each performance period. The estimated total for the basic performance period will then be added to the estimated total for each ordering period to obtain the Total Evaluated Price. The Total Evaluated Price consists of the base and all option periods.

The contract will include a base plus four 1-yr option periods with the potential to extend the contract an additional 6 months beyond the awarded contract performance period IAW FAR 52.217-8 (Option to Extend Services Clause) which is also included in the evaluation of prices. The price for that period will be determined based on the unit prices proposed for the current option period and will be evaluated at time of award. In the event the Government requires continued performance, the Government's evaluation of prices proposed will be considered fair and reasonable as applied to an extension of services. Should an extension of services be required rates will be adjusted only as result of revisions to applicable prevailing Department of Labor wage rates.

1.1.2 Technical Evaluation. If the Government receives three (3) or fewer initial proposals all proposals will be evaluated for Technical Acceptability. If the Government receives three (3) or more initial proposals the Government will only select the three (3) lowest priced proposals and then evaluate them for Technical Acceptability. The Government reserves the right to evaluate additional proposals for technical acceptability if in the Government's best interest. If additional proposals are evaluated for technical acceptability they will be selected in the order of total evaluated price.

1.1.3 Acceptability Ratings. The evaluation factors listed below will be evaluated and receive one of the following ratings:

(i) Acceptable - The proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

(ii) Unacceptable - The proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

1.1.4 Evaluation of Factors. Offerors are advised that their initial submission should be their best effort. Only technically acceptable proposals, either initially or as a result of discussions, are eligible for award. If award is made without discussions, proposal revisions will not be permitted. The Government will evaluate the proposals selected above for technical acceptability on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. For the technical proposal to be rated as "Acceptable", all technical factors and sub factors must be rated acceptable. If any technical factor or sub factor is rated "Unacceptable" the overall proposal will be rated as "Unacceptable".

(A) Technical Factor # 1 - Management Plan Standard: The offeror shall submit a management plan that illustrates the corporate philosophy and management approach to demonstrate evidence of sound organization, appropriate manning and qualifications proposed, and performance management processes to successfully accomplish tasks delineated in the PWS. The plan should provide evidence of knowledge and capability delivering the services as defined in the solicitation. At a minimum, the plan should:

i. Demonstrate a business approach for planning, controlling, directing, and integrating resources in an efficient manner to fulfill the requirements identified in the PWS.

ii. Approach for structuring, staffing (to include a proposed manning of personnel), retaining personnel, and utilization of key personnel to plan, control, and direct the labor force to meet the requirements of the PWS. The approach shall provide include an organizational chart with definition of roles and responsibilities of key operating personnel and staffing levels depicting various job classifications (including supervision).

iii. Provide mitigating strategies and processes designed to prevent, and proactively identify and forecast potential risks that could have an adverse impact to schedule, or performance.

iv. Provide a sample runway friction test report IAW the PWS to demonstrate an understanding of the requirements (excluded from the volume page limit). This can be a report from a similar project.

The standard has been met when: The offeror adequately demonstrates a sound, comprehensive, realistic, effective, and efficient management approach to provide and manage the appropriate workforce to achieve consistent, efficient, and uninterrupted operations in accordance with the requirements of the PWS.

(B) Technical Factor # 2 -- Quality Control Plan:

Standard: The offeror shall provide a "quality control plan" (QCP) with a complete written system for identifying and correcting deficiencies and degradation in the quality of services before the level of performance becomes unacceptable. At a minimum, the plan should specifically address contract requirements and location

(s) listed and provide the following:

i. The plan shall address responsibilities for oversight of the QCP, functions associated with such oversight, and specify authority to coordinate with the COR and CO.

ii. Describe the methodology to monitor service deficiencies/complaints in relation to the performance standards, approach to inform employees of identified deficiencies/complaints, and a process to ensure that the deficiencies/complaints are corrected and eradicated.

The standard has been met when: The offeror adequately demonstrates a sound, comprehensive, realistic, effective, and efficient quality control approach to correct deficiencies and degradation of services to achieve consistent, efficient, and acceptable performance service levels in accordance with the requirements of the PWS.

The strategies outlined in the plan are realistic to minimize the effects of defeciencies/complaints and designed to efficiently and effectively correct and prevent reocurrence.

2.0 The Government will conduct a complete Price Analysis using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404-1, to determine if the lowest price technically acceptable offer is reasonable and balanced.

Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable TEP, the price of one or more contract line items or sub line items appears to be significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques. An offeror's proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

(End of Addendum)

1655 SELFRIDGE AVE BLDG 5450

CP 210-671-3617

JBSA LACKLAND, TX 78236-5286

United States Keegan Hoover, Email: keegan.hoover.2@us.af.mil Telephone: 210-671-6415

2. Make allowances and provide instructions for electronic submissions.

3. Make administrative corrections identified in the answers to questions.

All other items remain unchanged.

Email: lauren.macias.1@us.af.mil Telephone: 210-671-6414