Amendment_0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to update Section L and M with expanded language on the price evaluation factor and to update Attachment 1, Unit Price Book.

Changes to Sections L&M have been annotated with underlined text, specifically para L-2.0(A), L-2.0(F), M-1(E) and M-1(B).

NOTE: Attachment 1, Unit Price Book, revised 7 Dec 17 must be submitted in Excel format on CD/DVD with proposal.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 10

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-Dec-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA301618R0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

01-Nov-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-Dec-2017

CODE

502D CONTRACTING SQUADRON

1655 SELFRIDGE AVE

JBSA LACKLAND TX 78236-5253

FA3016 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA301618R0004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 12-Dec-2017 02:00 PM to 15-Dec-2017 02:00 PM.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment Number

Document Title Date Number of Pages

1 Unit Price Book (revised) 7 Dec 17(revised) 23 (revised)

2 Specifications 25 Aug 2017 420 3 Wage Determination

General Decision Number TX: 170280 8 Sep 2017 7

4 Submittal Register N/A 19 5 Past Performance Questionnaire 31 Oct 2017 3 6 Unescorted Access Request N/A 4 7 Sample Progress Schedule N/A 1 8 DD Form 1354 April 2013 2

*9 Demonstration Project Specifications 29 Aug 2017 3 *10 Demonstration Project Task Order Drawings 29 Aug 2017 4

*Attachments 9 (Demonstration Project Specifications) and 10 (Demonstration Project Task Order Drawings) will be used for evaluation purposes only and removed upon award.

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

SECTION L – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

L-1.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

A. This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals, as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. Throughout this section, the term “offeror” means the prime contractor submitting the proposal. The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information requested and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. Any offeror who submits an incomplete package may be considered unacceptable. It is the Offeror's responsibility to ensure the completeness of the proposal submitted. A proposal that is sufficiently documented to support cost/price and technical requirements in a complete, orderly and specific detailed manner will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation. Evaluation of a proposal will be conducted solely on the basis of the information contained within it and the Government will not assume that an Offeror possesses any capabilities not specified. Non-compliance with the instructions and RFP may result in an unacceptable proposal evaluation and may be grounds to eliminate the proposal from consideration for contract award.

B. Type of Acquisition. This acquisition is a competitive HUBZone Small Business Set-Aside, geographically restricted to Texas. For this acquisition, selection of the best value offeror will be made using Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) procedures with the technical factor evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis.

C. Joint Venture Offerors: If the offeror is a joint venture, the offeror shall provide all required solicitation information for all parties including a signed copy of the joint venture agreement with proposal. The agreement shall include information, which identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract. The agreement shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind each entity of the joint venture.

D. Discrepancies and Ambiguities. If an offeror believes the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, ambiguities, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the CO in writing with supporting rationale no later than 10 calendar days after the RFP release.

E. Mistakes. Mistakes in offeror’s proposal shall be handled in accordance with FAR 14.407-4 as referenced in

FAR 15.508.

F. Postponement of Proposal Closing Date. If a determination is made to postpone a proposal closing date, an announcement of the determination shall be posted to the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) and, if practicable, before issuance of a formal RFP amendment otherwise communicated to prospective offerors.

G. Post-Award/Pre-Performance Conference. A post-award/pre-performance conference will be scheduled by the

Contracting Officer (CO) immediately after award of the contract. Post-award/preperformance conferences will also be conducted for each task order awarded and held prior to the commencement of any work to be performed. The offeror or their duly authorized representative is required to attend the post-award/pre-performance conference.

H. Discussions. If discussions or requests for revised proposals are conducted or requested by the Government, the prices identified in Schedule B of the final revised proposals shall be valid through the proposal acceptance period (SF 1442 Block 13D).

I. Acceptance Period. “Acceptance period” means the number of calendar days available to the Government for award from the date specified in this solicitation for receipt of offers. The Government requires a minimum acceptance period of 120 calendar days (SF 1442 Block 13D). Offerors allowing less than the Government’s minimum acceptance period will be rejected.

J. Contract Document. Sections K, L and M apply to the solicitation phase only; therefore, they will not be a physical part of the resulting agreement.

K. Points of Contact (POC). The POC for this acquisition is Jenifer Lash, Contracting Officer (CO), and Wayne Shavers, Contracting Administrator (CA). Written requests for clarification may be sent to the CO/CA. Address any questions or concerns to them using the following contact information:

WAYNE SHAVERS JENIFER LASH

Contract Administrator Contracting Officer

502 CONS/JBKAD 502 CONS/JBKAD

1655 Selfridge Ave, Bldg 5450 1655 Selfridge Ave, Bldg 5450 JBSA Lackland, TX JBSA Lackland, TX

(wayne.shavers.2@us.af.mil) (jenifer.lash.1@us.af.mil) Phone: (210) 671-6084 Phone: (210) 671-0790

L-2.0 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Proposals must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation;

alternate proposals will not be accepted. The response shall consist of three (3) separate volumes; Volume I – Price Proposal, Volume II - Technical Proposal, and Volume III – Past Performance.

TITLE # OF COPIES MAXIMUM # OF PAGES

Volume I - Price Proposal

Original and 1 hard copy *Unit Price Book MUST be submitted in Excel format on CD/DVD

No page limitation

Volume II - Technical Proposal Original, CD/DVD and 1 hard copy 20 pages

Volume III - Past Performance Original and 1 hard copy 10 Pages

B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional data will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the Contracting Officer to determine the reasonableness of the price.

C. Documents submitted in response to this RFP shall be fully acceptable to and consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the RFP (Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs), Sub Contract Line Item Numbers (SubCLINs) & Specifications or Statement of Work (SOW)), and Government standards and regulations pertaining to the Specifications or SOW.

2. Evaluation Factors for Award in Section M of this RFP.

3. Any limitation on the number of proposal pages. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this Section L will not be read or evaluated, and will be removed from the proposal.

4. Format for proposal Volumes II and III shall be as follows:

(a) The proposals will be 8 ½” x 11” except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17”

(b) A page is defined as one side of a printed sheet of paper containing information.

(c) Typing shall not be less than 12 pitch.

(d) Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required.

D. INFORMATION REGARDING SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL: All proposals must be either hand carried or mailed (i.e. USPS, FEDEX, DHL, and UPS etc.) directly to the 502nd Contracting Squadron, 1655 Selfridge Avenue, JBSA Lackland, TX 78236. The sealed envelope/package used to submit your proposal must show the time and date specified for receipt, the Solicitation Number, and the name and address of the offeror. Faxed or emailed proposals WILL NOT be accepted.

mailto:wayne.shavers.2@us.af.mil mailto:jenifer.lash.1@us.af.mil file://periwinkle_vnx/SAF_AQC_ORG/AQCP/5640%20-%20AFFARS/Templates%20Project%20--%20Sep%202013/5315/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/far/FAR15.DOC#b154062

E. Offerors are cautioned that Joint Base San Antonio - Lackland (JBSA - LAK) has stringent visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass and be cleared by the Government point of contact to be visited prior to entrance. A request with at least 3 business days prior to entry must be received for an offeror to gain entrance onto JBSA - LAK. If within 3 business days prior to the proposal due date and time, offerors may try and schedule a time with the points of contact to pick up the proposal at the Visitor Center. It is possible the point of contact may not be available to clear offerors for entrance or pick up proposals, which may prohibit submission of hand-carried proposals; consequently, offerors electing to hand-carry their proposals for submittal just prior to closing time do so at their own risk. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208(b) “Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal of Proposals.”

F. Specific Instructions:

1. VOLUME I – PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit original and one (1) copy *Unit Price Book MUST be submitted in Excel format on CD/DVD

(a) Complete blocks 14 through 20c of the SF 1442. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP Sections A through K. These sections constitute the model contract.

(b) Insert proposed unit prices in Section B (Attachment 1 of the solicitation) for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) or Sub CLIN (SCLIN). Offerors who do not comply with this requirement shall be considered unacceptable and may not be eligible for award.

(c) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Sections C through K. Section K shall be returned in its entirety. For Sections C through I, the offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.

(d) Acknowledge any and all amendments issued to the solicitation in block 19 of the SF1442.

2. VOLUME II – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - Submit original, CD/DVD and one hard copy.

Offerors must meet an “Acceptable” standard in the Technical Factor in order for their technical proposal to be determined “technically acceptable.” The standard to pass is defined in Section M.

Demonstration Project: Offeror must provide a solution to the Demonstration Project (Attachment 9 and 10 of the solicitation). The solution shall conform to United Facilities Guide Specifications as supplied with the solicitation and others as referenced or applicable.

• A cover page including the Project Number, Solicitation Number, and Project Title.

• A written narrative describing approach to the subject project, to include at a minimum total project cost, list of assumptions, list of requirements, performance period, material lead times, and any special considerations such as phasing of construction.

• Drawings to show the intended work meeting the intent of SECTION 01 35 13.20 00 SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES-CAD (Located within attachment 2).

• A schedule outlining the United Facility Guide Specification that would apply to the solution and identifies the Section number and Title.

• A schedule showing the offeror’s breakout of major work components, any permits required, etc.

for the project and progression of work effort from task order award to completion.

• A schedule of material submittals schedule which identifies all items that have a material effect on the demonstration project.

3. VOLUME III – PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION - Submit original and one hard copy:

Only references for recent and relevant past efforts/contracts are desired. Recent is defined as “within the past 3 years (From the date in block 3 of the solicitation),” relevant is defined as “projects of similar scope and complexity to those described in the Specifications with costs ranging between $2,000 and $1,000,000.”

a) Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Three Years:

Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for relevant past efforts/contracts. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc.

b) Instruction for Questionnaires: The offeror shall forward a copy of the past performance questionnaire (Attachment 5 of the solicitation) to no more than five (5) of their most recent references, for who the offeror has contracted similar services with Federal, State or Local Government agencies and commercial businesses. The questionnaires must be forwarded to a verified point of contact at each of those agencies or business organizations for completion. Prior to forwarding the questionnaire to each reference, the Offeror shall insert in the “MEMORANDUM FOR” the contractor name, address, phone number and the verified point of contact. Offerors will notify the point of contact that the completed questionnaires will be sent directly to the Contracting Officer.

c) Joint Venture Offerors: Past performance information may be submitted on behalf of the joint venture by either party to the joint venture. Joint venture past performance will be evaluated and rated on the basis of either party’s past performance.

d) Teaming/Partnering Offerors: If the offer is based on a teaming/partnering relationship, the offeror shall provide all required solicitation information for all parties, including a copy of the teaming/partnership agreement. The agreement shall include information, which identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract. The agreement shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind each entity of the teaming/partnering relationship.

e) Sub-Contractor Consent Form: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M-1 SOURCE SELECTION

A. Basis for Contract Award

This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15, Contracting by Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS), DoD Source Selection Procedures, Appendix A, and Air Force Mandatory Procedures 5315.3.

These regulations are available electronically at the Air Force (AF) FAR Site, http://farsite.hill.af.mil. The Government will select the proposal with the lowest total evaluated price from among those rated as technically http://farsite.hill.af.mil/

“acceptable.” A contract may be awarded to the offeror deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR 9.1, as supplemented, and determined eligible by the Small Business Administration in accordance with FAR 19.9, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by section L of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors to represent the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

B. Number of Contracts to be Awarded

The Government intends to award one contract in response to this solicitation.

C. Exchanges

The Government intends to award without discussions; therefore, offerors should submit proposals that represent their best efforts. If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. In the event discussions are to be conducted, the Government will establish a competitive range IAW FAR 15.306(c).

D. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable.

E. Evaluation Process

The evaluation process to be used is as follows:

Step 1: Perform initial price evaluations on all proposals and rank them from lowest to highest. The Total

Evaluated Price (TEP) for Attachment 1, Unit Price Book, will be the basis for evaluating price for contract award decision purposes only. The TEP is defined as the total sum of offered prices for all Items per all five years. The TEP will be the only discriminator amongst Offerors for the Cost/Price Factor. Failure to propose prices for all Items per each year as listed within Attachment 1, Unit Price Book, will render the proposal incomplete and the entire proposal will be subject to rejection.

Step 2: Conduct technical evaluations beginning with the lowest priced proposal. If the lowest priced proposal is determined to be technically unacceptable, then the next lowest priced proposal will be evaluated.

Technical evaluations will continue until the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal is identified. The Government, at its discretion, may continue technical evaluations until the Contracting Officer determines that a sufficient number of technically acceptable proposals have been identified to permit determination of price fairness and reasonableness based on adequate price competition.

Step 3: Once the lowest priced proposal has been deemed technically acceptable and the pricing has been determined to be fair and reasonable, the Contracting Officer will evaluate the past performance submitted with the proposal to determine acceptability. Once the Government determines the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal has acceptable past performance evaluations will then stop. The Government reserves the right to verify third party information and/or additional sources. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror will be determined to have unknown past performance and shall be considered “Acceptable”.

The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. The Government reserves the right to perform both price and technical evaluations on unacceptable offerors to determine if it is in its interest to open discussions. Only proposals rated acceptable in both technical and past performance are eligible to receive an award.

M-2 EVALUATION FACTORS

A. Evaluation Factors

The following evaluation factors will be used to evaluate each proposal. The Government will evaluate proposals for acceptability, but will not rank the proposals by the non-price factors.

Volume I: Price Volume II: Technical Volume III: Past Performance

B. Price Factor The evaluated price shall be the total price proposed by the offeror in Section B. The evaluated price shall be determined “reasonable“ as defined in FAR 31.201-3. Proposals will then be ranked from lowest to highest based on Total Evaluated Price. Price analysis will be done using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404-1. Offerors are cautioned against submitting an unbalanced offer. The Government will analyze offers to determine whether they are unbalanced with respect to price. Per FAR 52.215-1(f)(8), the Government may determine that a proposal is unacceptable if the prices proposed are materially unbalanced between contract line items or subline items. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. A proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

The Cost/Price Team will also evaluate price proposals to determine price realism by using the techniques as set forth at FAR 15.404-1 (d) in order to protect against unrealistically low prices and the risks to performance that potentially may result. Price realism analysis is the process of independently reviewing and evaluating specific elements of each Offeror’s proposed cost to determine whether the proposed cost elements are realistic for the work to be performed; reflect a clear understanding of the requirements; and are consistent with the unique methods of performance and materials described in the Offeror’s technical proposal. A business decision to submit a low-priced proposal will be considered as reflecting on the Offeror’s understanding of the technical requirements or risk associated with their proposal. Unrealistically low proposed TEPs, initially or subsequently, may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that the Offeror does not understand the requirement or the Offeror has made an unrealistic proposal.

Price realism analysis along with the results of the government technical evaluation will be used to evaluate price realism. Each offerors’ proposed price will be reviewed to determine whether the price elements: 1) were realistic for the work to be performed; 2) reflect a clear understanding of the requirements; and 3) are consistent with the unique methods and materials described in the offeror’s technical proposal.

C. Technical Factor

For the purposes of technical evaluation, the term “offeror” will include any proposed teaming arrangements.

The Government’s technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each factor. Any factor evaluated as “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, may not be eligible for award. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

The proposals shall be evaluated against the following technical factor.

Factor: Demonstration Project (This project will be used for evaluation purposes only and will not be awarded).

Description: The solution to the demonstration project is acceptable when it is complete and accurate in accordance with the fencing specifications (Attachment 2). The solution shall conform to United Facilities Criteria and with Specifications as supplied with the solicitation and others as referenced or applicable.

Standard: The solution is acceptable when the proposal adequately addresses the following:

• A cover page including the project number, solicitation number, and project title.

• The written narrative describing the approach to the subject project which clearly demonstrates a thorough understanding of the construction effort and applicable codes and regulations associated with the Demonstration Project. The narrative will include all required elements of a proposal as identified in the demonstration project. The solution shall conform to United Facilities Guide Specifications as supplied with the solicitation and others as referenced or applicable.

• Drawing(s) that demonstrate the Offeror’s clear understanding of the project and drafting capability in the required format.

• A schedule outlining the Unified Facility Guide Specification that would apply to solution that demonstrates the Offeror’s ability to access the website hosting the specification and determine application of the desired specifications for the solution.

• The schedule showing the offeror’s intended progression demonstrates a realistic timeframe, a reasonable breakout of the major work components (to include any permits required, etc.) and the associated completion percentage assigned for the Demonstration Project follows a logical progression of the work effort from task order award to completion.

• Demonstrate an understanding of the project’s requirements by providing the Schedule of Material Submittals of all items that have a material effect on the Demonstration Project.

D. Past Performance Factor Offerors must receive a past performance rating of “Acceptable” to be eligible for award.

The Past Performance factor will receive one of the ratings described below.

TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Standard: This requirement is met when the offeror’s proposal adequately demonstrates acceptable recent and relevant past performance. Recent is defined as “within the past 3 years,” relevant is defined as “projects of similar scope and complexity to those described in the Specifications with costs ranging between $2,000 and $1,000,000.”

Evidence/documentation shall include:

• The project title and contract number.

• A description of the project’s scope.

• The project’s location (city/base and state).

• The project’s original award amount and the final cost.

• Contact information (name, email address and current telephone number) of the project’s owner.

(End of Summary of Changes)

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/15.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/15.htm