RFP_Attachment_4_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 161 KB Posted

Attached to
Munitions Storage Area Management & Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA286018R0008
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Headquarters District Washington

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Munitions Storage Area Management & Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
RFP_Attachment_6_-_CBA_for_Munitions.pdf PDF
RFP_Attachment_1_-_PWS_rev_1.pdf PDF
FA2860-18-R-0008-0001.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Answers.pdf PDF
RFP_Attachment_3_-_Past_Performance_Reference.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP_Attachment_2_-_Technical_Exhibit_Library.pdf PDF
RFP__FA2860-18-R-0008.pdf PDF
RFP_Attachment_5_-_Pricing_Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP_Attachment_1_-_PWS.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER

14 May 2018

MEMORANDUM FOR

FROM: 11CONS/LGCA

1349 Lutman Drive Joint Base Andrews, MD 20762

1. The 11th Contracting Squadron on Joint Base Andrews is in the process of selecting a Contractor for the Munitions Storage Area (MSA) Management and Support Contract.

2. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of each offeror’s past performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, having had first-hand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.

3. Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Request your written response no later than 04 June 2018. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of evaluations.

4. To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and emailed. If you have any questions, please contact TSgt Arthur Morales via e-mail (arthur.l.morales.mil@mail.mil) or telephone (240-612-5639). Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records, and the Government may contact you to discuss your inputs.

5. Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this source selection.

//SIGNED//

DONNA C. HEINZ

Contracting Officer

Attachment:

Past Performance Questionnaire

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

11TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON (AFDW)

JOINT BASE ANDREWS, MARYLAND 20762

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

**When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 3.104**

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR)

A. Contractor

B. Contractor Cage Code

C. Role (check): Prime Subcontractor Teaming Partner Joint Venture Partner Other (specify)

If subcontractor, partner or other, who is the Prime?

D. Contract/Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Number

Task/Call/Delivery/Purchase Order Number

Note: If the referenced contract is an overarching ID/IQ or BPA, the Government will only assess performance at the ID/IQ level and not performance on each individual underlying task/delivery order. If the offeror would like assessment of the single task/call/delivery/purchase order, the offeror shall submit that as a separate reference.

E. Contract Type (FFP, CPFF, ID/IQ (include types), LH, etc.)__________________________________________

F. Period of Performance

G. Place(s) of Performance:

Multiple locations? Yes No If yes, specify locations:

CONUS OCONUS Both

Provide details:

State Federal DoD Other Provide details:

H. Total Contract or Task/Call/Delivery/Purchase Order $ Value (including options)

I. Has a CPAR (or more than one CPAR) been completed for this contract? Yes No If Yes, provide dates covered by CPARs:

*****FOLLOWING SECTIONS COMPLETED BY CONTRACTING AGENCY*****

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or Agency Name

B. Customer or Agency Description

C. Description of Service(s) provided (Provide details on type of work, locations worked, and organizations serviced, to include Department of Defense, Government, or commercial work)

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Name _________________________________________ B. Title

C. Phone/Fax D. E-mail

E. Years worked on Subject Contract

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the Contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

E EXCEPTIONAL - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VG

VERY GOOD- The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or was satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score or item is not applicable to the referenced contract.

Please provide detailed narrative comments to support your ratings. At a minimum, please discuss each response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions below (use additional sheets, if necessary).

Q1. Quality of Product or Service E VG S M U N/A

Ability of Contractor to: provide accurate deliverables/reports; meet service specifications of the contract; provide timely proposals; respond to short notice requirements; provide and adhere to quality control/management plan (when required)

Explanation:

Q2. Cost/Price Control E VG S M U N/A

Ability of Contractor to: provide accurate contract costs/estimates; track and control costs; meet and perform within negotiated costs; provide current, accurate and complete invoices/billing; submit cost reporting information in a timely manner

Q3. Business Relations E VG S M U N/A

Ability of Contractor to: maintain effective relationship between key Contractor personnel and key Government personnel; manage, resolve problems and respond to and/or integrate changes in mission-related requirements

Q4. Management of Personnel E VG S M U N/A

Ability of Contractor to: attract, recruit, hire, train and retain qualified management and technical personnel to accomplish mission requirements; manage subcontractors to include identification and resolution of subcontractor problems; ensure continuation of services during personnel absences or vacancies; replace/fill vacancies within timeframe specified; maintain training/certification currency

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

A. Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? (Place an “X” by all that apply.)

Yes No Default Convenience Pending Terminations

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

B. Would you have any reservations about having this Contractor perform again on one of your critical and demanding programs?

Evaluator’s Signature Date

File details come from the government source that posted it.