FA2860-18-R-0008-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate the follow ing changes:

1) Post Questions and Answ ers document;

2) Update Addendums to 52.212-1 and 52.212-2 to address questions received. Changes are highlighted;

3) Update PWS to address questions received. Changes are highlighted; and

4) Attach current CBA for munitions personnel

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 11

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 01-Jun-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA286018R0008

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

14-May-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

01-Jun-2018

CODE

11TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON

1349 LUTMAN DRIVE

JOINT BASE ANDREWS MD 20762-6501

FA2860 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA286018R0008

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM 52.212-1

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1

Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items

I. SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

A. Specific Instructions:

a. The proposals will be on 8 1/2” x 11” paper, except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17”.

b. A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information.

c. All printing shall be single-spaced. Spacing characteristics are applicable to charts and graphs.

d. Text shall not be less than Microsoft Word Times New Roman, 10 pitch. Size of print is applicable to charts and graphs.

e. Text for charts, tables, graphs, and figures shall be no smaller than Microsoft Word Times New Roman, 8 pitch, and used only when absolutely necessary.

f. Page margins shall be a minimum of 1 inch top, bottom, and each side.

B. The offeror shall provide a concise summary and master table of contents of the entire proposal and shall provide all of the following:

a. Standard Form (SF) 1449. Complete blocks 12, 17a, 30a, 30b, and 30c. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the solicitation.

b. Standard Form (SF) 30. If solicitation amendments are issued, the offeror shall also complete blocks 15a, 15b, and 15c. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as amended.

c. Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions and in the on-line Representations and Certifications at www.sam.gov. Return the provision

FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications – Commercial Items, along with the proposal. For other provisions and clauses in the solicitation, the offeror is required to submit the pages that require an offeror fill-in.

d. Statement of Compliance with the Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs) and Service Contract Labor Standards (SCLS) Area Wage Determination (AWD). Three (3) CBAs are involved in this acquisition. The offeror shall provide a statement acknowledging:

1. Offeror is in compliance with the requirements of all CBAs and AWD.

2. The prices proposed for labor covered by the CBAs and AWD were formulated using the wage and benefit rates specified in those documents as a minimum for covered contractor personnel.

e. Responsibility Determination and Supporting Documentation: To assist in determining contractor responsibility in accordance with FAR 9.104-1, the offeror shall explain how they plan to maintain adequate financial resources for a contract of this magnitude and length. The offeror shall address a fiscal plan for covering mobilization, unexpected or emergency situations, and initial performance costs prior to recoupment in the form of monthly invoice payments. The offeror must provide complete financial statements for one (1) fiscal year and year-to-date financial information through the last quarter available. The year-end financial statements must be certified by an independent accounting firm. If the offeror intends to rely on internally available working/operation capital, documentation of availability must be submitted. If the offeror plans to rely on financial support from external sources, documentation of availability and maximum lines of credit available (based upon the inclusion of this contract effort) must be submitted. Evidence of external funding must be provided in the form of a dated letter from the external source.

Note: In accordance with FAR 9.104-5, the offeror is required to comply with the submission regarding FAR 52.209-5, Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters. In accordance with FAR 52.215-1, the Government may award without discussions; therefore, the Government may request that an offeror submit additional information so a responsibility determination can be made. This request for additional information will not be construed as communications or discussions with an offeror.

C. Offeror’s proposal shall consist of three (3) volumes in accordance with the following:

Volume I – Technical Approach

This volume shall not exceed ten (10) pages, and shall consist of the following:

a) Compliance Items

1) Offeror shall provide copies of current certifications in Project

Management, Munitions Systems Apprentice course (or equivalent), and Munitions Inspector Course (or equivalent) for each key personnel. Training certificates completed toward certification will not be accepted. In lieu of a PM certification, a minimum of 10 years munitions maintenance and management operational experience will be accepted. Experience shall be annoted in the resumes.

Note: Copies of certifications and evidence of security clearance do not count against the 10-page limit.

2) Offeror shall provide evidence of current security clearance held by each key personnel.

3) Offeror must provide a Letter of Agreement between the offeror and certified personnel demonstrating acquisition support.

Note: Per FAR 52.222-17, Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers, this requirement is subject to the right of first refusal. The purpose of this “compliance” evaluation is for an offeror to demonstrate the capability to perform services should agreements between the awardee and current certified workforce not be reached. Failure to provide the requested certifications listed above will result in no further proposal evaluation and award consideration.

b) Staffing Approach – Offeror shall include the proposed management staff and labor mix that will support the resulting contract; it shall include a shift staffing approach in accordance with Performance Work Statement paragraph 4.1. Moreover, offeror shall submit resumes of prospective key personnel that include years of experience in munitions handling, munitions inspection, and years of experience in using the Combat Ammunition System (CAS) and Agile Munitions Support Tool (AMST).

Note: Resumes do not count against the page limit.

c) Vehicle Approach – Offeror shall include the specifications of proposed vehicles and material handling equipment (MHE) that will be used to support the resulting contract. Moreover, offer shall include a timeline for on-station arrival of vehicles and MHE.

d) Adherence to Directives – Offeror shall include the proposed approach to ensure compliance with all applicable directives, instructions, publications, and technical orders stated in the Performance Work

Statement. The proposed approach shall include a process to maintain and distribute up-to-date directives to personnel.

Volume II – Past Performance

This volume shall not exceed one (1) page and shall consist of the completed Attachment 3 – Past Performance Reference.

a) Offeror shall complete Attachment 3 - Past Performance Information (PPI) Reference sheet. Offeror shall list no more than five (5) recent and relevant contracts performed by the offeror.

b) Recency Determination. Past performance reference shall have been performed during the last five (5) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. This includes contracts that were awarded prior to this period, but still had performance during the last five years.

c) Relevant Contracts. Scope of work, magnitude, and complexity of past performance reference shall be the same or similar to the requirements of this solicitation.

d) Offeror shall forward Attachment 4 – Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) to each contract reference point of contact (POC) for completion.

All PPQs shall be received directly from the POCs by June 04, 2018, 4:00 PM EST. Offeror shall not complete any information in the PPQ;

questionnaires received directly from the offeror will not be evaluated.

Volume III – Price

This volume shall not exceed one (1) page and shall consist of the completed Attachment 5 – Pricing Sheet.

D. Offerors shall submit three (3) hardcopies and one (1) electronic copy of their proposal to:

11th Contracting Squadron ATTN: Ms. Donna Heinz / TSgt Arthur Morales 1349 Lutman Drive Joint Base Andrews, MD 20762

Electronic copy shall be in PDF and Excel (if applicable) format, and shall be emailed to arthur.l.morales.mil@mail.mil.

E. Proposals shall be submitted to the aforementioned address by June 14, 2018, 4:00

PM EST.

II. PERIOD FOR ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS

The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 180 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

III. SITE VISIT

A site visit is scheduled on May 24, 2018, 10:00 AM EST; no more than two (2) representatives from each offeror may attend the site visit. Offerors who would like to attend the site visit shall provide the following information for each attendee:

Name Date of Birth Social Security Number Government-issued ID (i.e. driver’s license, passport, etc.)

The aforementioned information shall be emailed to arthur.l.morales.mil@mail.mil by May 21, 2018, 12:00 PM EST.

IV. FORMAL COMMUNICATIONS

Address any questions you may have to the Point of Contact (POC) identified below by May 28, 2018, 4:00 PM EST. All inquiries shall be made in writing via email; answers will be provided to all offerors through a solicitation amendment posted on FBO.

TSgt Arthur Morales Contract Specialist Email: arthur.l.morales.mil@mail.mil

ADDENDUM 52.212-2

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2

Evaluation – Commercial Items

1. The Government will award a contract to the responsible offeror whose offer, conforming to the solicitation, will be most advantageous to the Government. The following factors will be considered:

Technical approach Past performance Price

Technical and past performance, when combined, are more important than price.

2. First, the following items in Volume 1 will be reviewed for compliance:

Munitions handling personnel shall have a current certification in Munitions

Systems Apprentice course, or equivalent, and at least two (2) years experience in a munitions handling position.

Munitions inspection personnel (at least two individuals) shall have a current certification in Munitions Inspector Course, or equivalent, and at least 4 years experience as an inspector.

All key personnel shall have a current Secret security clearance.

Project Manager shall have a valid certificate from the Project Management

Institute (PMI) or equivalent organization. In lieu of a PM certification, a minimum of 10 years munitions maintenance and management operational experience will be accepted. Experience shall be annoted in the resumes.

If offeror’s proposal does not meet the aforementioned compliance requirements, their proposal will not be evaluated.

3. The Government will evaluate technical proposals on a pass/fail basis and assign an Acceptable or Unacceptable rating as described in the table below.

TECHNICAL APPROACH RATINGS

Rating Definition

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation Not Acceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

A rating of unacceptable in one or more technical approach elements will constitute an overall rating of Unacceptable for the Technical Approach evaluation. The offeror’s proposal shall, at a minimum, address each of the elements outlined below:

A. Staffing Approach. This element evaluates the adequacy of the offeror’s proposed staffing approach. Offer will be assigned an Acceptable or Unacceptable rating as described in the table below.

STAFFING APPROACH RATINGS

Acceptable

The proposed approach demonstrates the following:

1) Adequate management staff and labor mix that meet shift staffing requirements.

2) Adequate key personnel qualifications that meet PWS requirements.

3) Key personnel’s adequate experience in using the Combat Ammunition System (CAS) and Agile Munitions Support Tool (AMST).

Not Acceptable Proposed approach does not meet, or does not clearly demonstrate, an adequate staffing approach.

B. Vehicle Approach. This element evaluates the adequacy of the offeror’s proposed vehicle approach. Offer will be assigned an Acceptable or Unacceptable rating as described in the table below.

VEHICLE APPROACH RATINGS

Acceptable

The proposed approach demonstrates the following:

1) Adequate vehicles and material handling equipment for munitions transportation and movement requirements.

2) On-station arrival and availability of vehicles and material handling equipment prior to the end of the phase-in period.

Not Acceptable vehicle approach.

C. Adherence to Directives. This element evaluates the adequacy of the offeror’s proposed approach to ensure adherence to directives that include instructions, publications, and technical orders stated in the PWS. Offer will be assigned an Acceptable or Unacceptable rating as described in the table below.

ADHERENCE TO DIRECTIVES RATINGS

Acceptable

The proposed approach demonstrates the following:

1) Adequate review process that ensure the use of current and accurate directives in the performance of the contract.

2) Adequate distribution process that ensure the availability and accessibility of directives to employees.

Not Acceptable approach that ensure adherence to directives.

4. All offerors rated Acceptable will be ranked from lowest to highest based on their Total

Evaluated Price (TEP), defined as the sum of the base period price, all option year prices, and 6-month extension price. Past performance and price evaluations will begin with the offeror that has the lowest TEP.

5. Past performance evaluation will be done using the Past Performance Information (PPI) sheet included in the offeror's proposal, Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) received from offerors' PPI references, data independently obtained from other Government (CPARS, PPIRS, FAPIIS), and commercial sources. The Government will evaluate recent and relevant PPI in accordance with the following terms to determine the Government's confidence in the offeror's ability to successfully perform the requirement.

Offeror shall not complete any information in the PPQ; questionnaires received directly from the offeror will not be evaluated.

Past performance information is required of the offeror or critical subcontractors, teaming partners, and joint venture partners who are critical to the overall successful performance of the resulting contract. A critical subcontractor is defined as an entity (subcontractor and/or teaming member), other than the offeror itself, that would perform more than 30 percent of the overall effort, based on the sum of the price proposed for each contract line item. Offeror’s past performance shall be done as the prime contractor, or, if a member of a joint venture, the Offeror shall have contributed at least 50% of the effort.

A. Recency. As outlined in Addendum to 52.212-1, offeror shall provide a maximum of five (5) references of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within five (5) years from issuance of this solicitation that demonstrate customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed service. References for contracts in which performance started prior to five (5) years from the issuance of this solicitation but performance is still on-going during the issuance of this solicitation are considered recent. Questionnaires received must also meet recency criteria to be evaluated. Past performance information that fails these conditions will not be evaluated.

B. Relevancy. Relevant performance includes performance of efforts involving requirements that are similar or greater in scope, magnitude, and complexity than the effort described in this solicitation. Relevancy will be assigned ratings of Relevant or Not Relevant based on the following relevancy rating definitions:

PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATINGS

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope, magnitude of effort, and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Past performance information determined to be Not Relevant will be given a Neutral rating, which will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably.

C. The Government will consider the quality of services of recent and relevant efforts, however, a separate rating will not be established. Quality assessment will be based on PPQ responses received from past performance references, and will be reflected in the overall confidence assessment.

D. The Government will use the following Performance Confidence Assessment ratings in the assessment of performance confidence:

PAST PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT

Rating Description

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will

6. The offeror's TEP will be evaluated for reasonableness using price analysis. If adequate competition is not attained, data other than certified cost or pricing data may be used to determine price fair and reasonableness.

7. If the lowest priced acceptable offer is found to be fair, reasonable, and balanced, and is judged to have a “SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE” performance confidence assessment, the contracting officer will determine if the offer represents the best value to the government. If found to be the best value, the evaluation process will stop at that point and award will be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

8. If the lowest priced offeror is not judged to be the best value, the next lowest priced acceptable offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order of price) until a best value offer is determined. In the event that a significant price difference exists between a technically acceptable offeror with “SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE” and a technically acceptable offeror with “SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE”, the contracting officer will determine the best value offer for award.

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT 1 – Performance Work Statement (PWS)

ATTACHMENT 2 – Technical Exhibit Library

ATTACHMENT 3 – Past Performance Information Reference Sheet successfully perform the required effort.

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NEUTRAL CONFIDENCE No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

LIMITED CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NO CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

ATTACHMENT 4 – Past Performance Questionnaire

ATTACHMENT 5 – Pricing Sheet

ATTACHMENT 6 – Collective Bargaining Agreement for Munitions Personnel

(End of Summary of Changes)