Attach_5_-_PPQ.pdf

PPQ for FA2823-19-Q-0013 – Corrosion Control Maintenance and Repair at Eglin AFB, FL

FA2823-19-Q-0013 Corrosion Control Building 72 & Building 455 Past Performance Questionnaire

AFTC/PZIOC (OL-EGLIN) of the Air Force AFMC MAJCOM is in the process of competitively selecting a source to provide Corrosion Control Maintenance and Repair Services at Eglin AFB.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the Offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the Offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 17 April 2019.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to kristina.brannon.1@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official contract records.

Some Government agencies may have specific policies in place in regards to responding to Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) when the references contract has been formally evaluated in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). If your agency has a specific policy we request that you complete D-L of Section 1, Section 2, and Section 3 of the PPQ and attach a copy of the final or most recent CPARS evaluation and send to the point of contact listed above.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely selection of a contractor.

KRISTINA B. BRANNON

Contracting Officer

Attachments:

1) Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Request for Proposal: FA2823-19-Q-0013

Corrosion Control Maintenance and Repair, Eglin AFB, FL 32542

To Be Completed by Offeror/Contractor:

Name of Contractor:

Point of Contact:

Telephone #:

E-Mail:

We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for Solicitation Number FA2823-19-Q-0013, to provide Corrosion Control Maintenance Support at Eglin AFB, Florida. As part of our proposal, we have offered as a reference on our performance for this type of work, under the previous/current contract listed below, with your company. Your input on our performance is therefore requested. Please complete this survey and provide a sufficient description so this contract may be evaluated whether it is the same or similar in scope to this solicitation.

Please return to the Point of Contact listed above so that it may be provided with proposal, per solicitation instructions. Thank you.

To Be Completed by Assessor:

1. Name of Prime Contractor: _______

Contract or Identifying Number: ______________

Title/Description of Contract: ______________

Based upon the definitions below, indicate your assessment of the contractor’s performance on your contract. Your assessment should consider the contractor’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements.

2. Brief description of scope of work:

EVALUATION: Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Assessment Definition Substantial Confidence

(SC)

Based on the Contractor’s recent/relevant performance record, the Evaluator has a high expectation that the Contractor will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

(SAT)

Based on the Contractor’s recent/relevant performance record, The Evaluator has a reasonable expectation that the Contractor will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence

(UNK)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Contractor’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Limited Confidence

(LC)

Based on the Contractor’s recent/relevant performance record, The Evaluator has a low expectation that the Contractor will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence

(NC)

Based on the Contractor’s recent/relevant performance record, The Evaluator has no expectation that the Contractor will successfully perform the required effort.

Contract or Identifying Number: ______________

# Performance Objectives Confidence 01 Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary qualified personnel during the contract period (maintenance staff were authorized, trained, qualified, and current for operations.)

SC SAT LC NC UNK

02 Followed approved quality control plan, if applicable. SC SAT LC NC UNK 03 Provided effective quality control and /or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

SC SAT LC NC UNK

04 Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

SC SAT LC NC UNK

05 Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. SC SAT LC NC UNK 06 Identified maintenance problems as they occurred. SC SAT LC NC UNK 07 Displayed initiative to solve problems. SC SAT LC NC UNK 08 Provide adequate project supervision. SC SAT LC NC UNK 09 Cooperated with Customer personnel after award. SC SAT LC NC UNK 10 Demonstrated responsiveness to short notice repair taskings SC SAT LC NC UNK 23 How would you rate the Contractor's overall performance? SC SAT LC NC UNK 24 Was the Contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES No

25 Would you award another contract to this Contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES No

26 Is the Contractor rated in CPARS? YES No

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF OVERALL RATING GIVEN:

Contract or Identifying Number:

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Name of Person Completing Evaluation:

Base/Company: Date:

Position Title/Grade: Phone:

Email: Fax: