Appendix_B_-_PP_Questionnaire.pdf

APPENDIX B

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Request for Proposal: FA2823-13-R-0001 Flight Test Support, Eglin AFB, FL 32542

1. Name of Contractor:

Contract or Identifying Number:

Title/Description of Contract:

Based upon the definitions below, indicate your assessment of the contractor’s performance on your contract described on Appendix A. Your assessment should consider the contractor’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements.

2. Brief description of scope of work:

EVALUATION: Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Assessment Definition

Substantial Confidence

(SC)

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

(SAT)

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, The Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence

(LC)

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, The Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence

(NC)

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, The Government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral) (UC)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

01 Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary qualified personnel during the contract period (i.e. aircrew and maintenance staff were authorized, trained, qualified, and current for operations.)

SC SAT LC NC UC

02 Followed approved quality control plan. SC SAT LC NC UC 03 Provided effective quality control and /or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

SC SAT LC NC UC

04 Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

SC SAT LC NC UC

05 Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. SC SAT LC NC UC 06 Identified risks/problems as they occurred. SC SAT LC NC UC 07 Displayed initiative to solve problems. SC SAT LC NC UC 08 Met established project schedules. SC SAT LC NC UC 09 Was responsive to contract changes. SC SAT LC NC UC

10 Provide adequate project supervision. SC SAT LC NC UC 11 Cooperated with Government personnel after award. SC SAT LC NC UC 12 Demonstrated responsiveness to short notice tasking (i.e. performed flight test 2 weeks after request.)

SC SAT LC NC UC

13 Demonstrated the ability to properly control classified data. SC SAT LC NC UC 14 Had resources available to modify aircraft IAW FAA regulations and assured compliance during flight test operations.

SC SAT LC NC UC

15 Had required aircraft available and capable of flying mission prior to flight test operations.

SC SAT LC NC UC

16 Demonstrated the ability to complete sorties as scheduled. SC SAT LC NC UC 17 Demonstrated ability to support military test authorization process. SC SAT LC NC UC 18 Displayed engineering design ingenuity in responding to customer requirements.

SC SAT LC NC UC

19 Demonstrated the ability to support TDY off-site test locations. SC SAT LC NC UC 20 Demonstrated the ability to conduct flight test using military runways and ranges.

SC SAT LC NC UC

21 Demonstrated the ability to legally and ethically conduct business with other contractors (while considering security, proprietary information, and customer’s requirements).

SC SAT LC NC UC

22 Did the contractor exhibit proper care for GFE property and return it in working condition?

SC SAT LC NC UC

23 How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? SC SAT LC NC UC 24 Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES No

25 Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES No

26 Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES No

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: __________________________ CONTRACT NO.: ___________________________

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF OVERALL RATING GIVEN:

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Name of Person Completing Evaluation:

Base/Company: Date:

Position Title/Grade: Phone:

Email: Fax: