Attachment 5-ESC III Past Perf Questionnaire 2 Dec 11.docx

DOCX document 32 KB Posted

Attached to
Environmental Support Contract (ESC III) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA2521-12-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Space Command

About this file

DRAFT Attachment 5 - ESC III Performance Evaluation Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Environmental Support Contract (ESC III), newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 1 PWS - ESCIII 1 Dec.docx DOCX document
Attachment 6-CCAFS LMU Map.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1a- Items List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 7-Pricing Worksheet Bid Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 3-SCA Wage Determination 6-13-11.pdf PDF
Attachment 8-Sample Consent Letter.docx DOCX document
Attchment 1b-Appendix E SAM.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA2521-12-R-0001 ESC III FINAL DRAFT .doc DOC document
Attachment 2-Pricing Worksheet Bid Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 4-PEQ COVER LETTER.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

FA2521-12-R-0001

Attachment 5

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

(The offeror will enter this information…)

Contractor’s Name: ____________________Telephone Number: ____________________
Address: ____________________________Fax Number: _________________________
____________________________Point of Contact: ______________________
____________________________
____________________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________ Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

(The respondent will enter this information…)

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: _____________________________________

Address: ___________________________ Telephone Number: _________________________

___________________________________ Fax Number: _____________________________

___________________________________ Email Address: _____________________________

Length of involvement in the contract:

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Scott Syring, Contracting Officer, at scott.syring@patrick.af.mil, and Candon Haynicz, Contract Specialist, at Candon.haynicz@patrick.af.mil.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF E or G and M or U.(i.e. If the contractors overall rating is Exceptional please provide a narrative on what made them Exceptional.)

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

CERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS: ____________________________________________

WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS: ______________________________________________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Please rate the contractor’s overall compliance with contract terms and conditions.
2.
Please rate the contractor’s organizational support structure and their ability to provide experienced managers and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
3.
Please rate the contractor in terms of numbers and quality of personnel and their ability to perform contract requirements.
4.
Please rate the contractor’s demonstrated ability to replace personnel, if necessary, without project delays.
5.
Please rate the contractors’ ability to hire and manage quality subcontractors.
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7.
Please rate the contractor’s ability to provide effective quality control using metrics and other tools to accurately measure and track programs.
8.
Please rate the contractor’s ability to respond to short- or no-notice emergencies.
9.
Please rate the contractor’s Initiative in identifying and resolving unforeseen technical and schedule problems (causes, impacts, and resolutions).
10.
Please rate the contractor’s responsiveness to contract changes.
11.
Please rate the contractor’s ability to effectively plan efforts, provide realistic cost and schedule estimates.
12.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
13.
Based on your judgment of the contractor’s performance, would you award the contractor another contract?
YES/NO
14.
Is the contractor rated in CCASS?
YES/NO

TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

For questions 1 through 6, please specify if the contract did not include the program or if the contractor did not perform each/all of these functions.

(1) Contractor’s ability to operate a compliant hazardous waste program base wide including a permitted hazardous waste facility, onsite accumulation sites, and transport of hazardous wastes, including all associated reports.

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

Narrative:

a. Was your hazardous waste program ever out of compliance?

|_| Yes
|_| No

b. If yes, describe the noncompliance:

c. What were the consequences regardless of contractor responsibility? (fine, letter of noncompliance, Notice of Violation, etc.):

d. How did the contractor resolve or assist in resolving the issue?

(2) Contractor’s ability to conduct environmental compliance sampling and analysis program as required by regulatory and permit requirements, including all associated reports.

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

Narrative:

Did contract include or did contractor perform the following:

a. Drinking water sampling and analysis

|_| Yes
|_| No

b. Wastewater sampling and analysis

|_| Yes
|_| No

c. Groundwater sampling and analysis

|_| Yes
|_| No

d. Stormwater sampling and analysis

|_| Yes
|_| No

e. Surface water sampling and analysis

|_| Yes
|_| No

f. Soil sampling and analysis

|_| Yes
|_| No

g. Air sampling and analysis

|_| Yes
|_| No

h. Other (specify) ____________________

(3) Contractor’s ability to ensure a compliant water program including drinking water, wastewater, stormwater, groundwater, surface water.

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

Narrative:

a. Was your water program ever out of compliance?

|_| Yes
|_| No

b. If yes, describe the noncompliance:

c. How did the contractor resolve or assist in resolving the issue?

(4) Contractor’s ability to ensure a compliant air quality program including Title V permitting, greenhouse gas and NESHAPs requirements.

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

Narrative:

a. Was your air quality program ever out of compliance?

|_| Yes
|_| No

b. If yes, describe the noncompliance:

c. What were the consequences regardless of contractor responsibility? (fine, letter of noncompliance, Notice of Violation, etc.):

d. How did the contractor resolve or assist in resolving the issue?

(5) Contractor’s ability to ensure a compliant petroleum storage tank/SPCC program including tank registrations, inspections, reporting requirements, and 24hr spill response (excluding cleanup).

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

Narrative:

a. Was your petroleum storage tank/SPCC/spill response program ever out of compliance?

|_| Yes
|_| No

b. If yes, describe the noncompliance:

c. What were the consequences regardless of contractor responsibility? (fine, letter of noncompliance, Notice of Violation, etc.):

d. How did the contractor resolve or assist in resolving the issue?

(6) Contractor’s ability to perform internal and support external environmental compliance inspection program including Air Force ESOHCAMP audits.

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

Narrative:

a. Were you satisfied with the contractor’s ability to identify and document findings?

|_| Yes
|_| No

b. Were you satisfied with the contractor’s follow-up actions to close out findings?

|_| Yes
|_| No

c. Were you satisfied with how the contractor conducted the environmental compliance audit (e.g., ESOHCAMP)?

|_| Yes
|_| No

d. Were these services performed as prime or sub contractor?

|_| Prime
|_| Sub

(7) Please rate the contractor's technical reports and other submittals on:

a. Content.

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

b. Accuracy

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

c. Timeliness.

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

Narrative:

(8) Please rate the contractor’s ability to:

a. Perform prescribed burns

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

b. Use certified personnel and proper equipment in performance of prescribed burns

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

c. Coordinate prescribed burns with regulatory and local agencies

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

Narrative:

(9) Please rate the contractor’s ability to:

a. Clear land

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

b. Utilize an air curtain incinerator or burn box to dispose of vegetation

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

Narrative:

(10) Please rate the contractor’s ability to:

a. Perform pesticide/herbicide applications

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

b. Use certified personnel for pesticide/herbicide applications

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

Narrative:

(11) Please rate the contractor’s ability to perform habitat restoration including exotic/invasive vegetation treatment/removal/control.

|_| Exceptional
|_| Very Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

Narrative:

a. What types of habitat restoration did the contract include?

b. Does the contractor have experience treating/controlling/removing:

1. Brazilian Pepper

|_| Yes
|_| No

2. Cogon Grass

|_| Yes
|_| No

Narrative:

(12) Does the contractor have experience working in wetlands:

|_| Yes
|_| No

Narrative:

(13) Please rate the contractor's experience with threatened and endangered species, animal relocation and/or nuisance wildlife removal.

|_| Exceptional
|_| Good
|_| Satisfactory
|_| Marginal
|_| Unsatisfactory
|_| Unknown

Narrative:

(14) Has contractor ever had experience working with the following species and/or improving their habitats:

a. Florida Scrub Jay

|_| Yes
|_| No

b. Sea Turtles

|_| Yes
|_| No

c. Beach Mouse

|_| Yes
|_| No

d. Gopher Tortoise

|_| Yes
|_| No

e. If answer is yes to any of the above, please expand and explain the level of effort for each activity.

Narrative:

Remarks:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Respondent’s Signature: _______________________________________

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .