BOSS_JA_Above_SAT.pdf

Justification and Approval (J&A) for Other Than Full and Open Competition

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDUpdated: 15 Mar 16

NOTE: If a Justification and Approval was approved for the preceding acquisition, a copy of the approved J&A for the predecessor action must be included in the staff package for approval of the instant J&A. This applies to J&A staff packages that are submitted for review and approval at a level above the contracting officer. The predecessor J&A will be used as a reference document by the approving official.

Choose the funding level for this J&A Document:

< $700K > $700K and < $13.5M > $13.5M and < $93M > $93M

Contracting Activity: 377 MSG / Contracting Division

Purchase Request / Local ID Number: F2KTAB6095A101

Program / Project (and PE, if applicable): 705 CTS Battlespace Network

Program Type (PEO or Other Contracting):

Authority (include full title):

6.302-1 -- Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements

Estimated Contract Cost (including options): $220,220.00 J&A Type: Class Individual

COORDINATION (AFFARS 5306.304(a) ) Sign and Save Procedure

** The text in the signature blocks below is editable, including the title.

** To remove a row, click the "X" next to the signature block. CAUTION: Once removed, it can only be restored by downloading the BLANK FORM again.

Date

25 Jul 2016

Contracting Officer Thaddeus F. Gray 377 MSG/Contracting Officer

Signature

X

Date

20 Jul 2016

Project Lead / Program Mgr / Requiring Activity Andrew Finley

705 CTS DOP/ 505-853-0883

Signature

X

APPROVAL (AFFARS 5306.304(a) ) ** The text in the signature blocks below is editable, including the title.

** To remove a row, click the "X" next to the signature block. CAUTION: Once removed, it can only be restored by downloading the BLANK FORM again.

Date

25 Jul 2016

Contracting Officer

Thaddeus F. Gray

377 MSG/Contracting Officer

Signature

X

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDUpdated: 15 Mar 16

Note 1: See guidance at the end of this document for completing the following sections.

Note 2: Each field will expand automatically if additional space is needed.

I. Contracting Activity.

377 MSG / Contracting Division, F2KTAB6095A101, Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition

II. Nature and/or description of the action being processed.

This action will be awarded as a new contract

III. Description of supplies/services required to meet agency needs.

The 705 CTS is looking to purchase a Battlefield Operations Support System (BOSS) system from Tactical Communications Group, LLC (TCG). This system is intended to be utilized for advanced Tactical Datalink analysis and troubleshooting by participants and 705 CTS personnel during large scale Distributed Mission Operations (DMO) events. Reference attached document titled "TCG BOSS Quote" for all supplies/ services, value, quantity and PoP

IV. Statutory authority permitting Other than Full and Open Competition.

10 USC 2304(c)(1), as implemented by FAR 6.302-1, required by FAR 6.303-2(b)(4).

V. Demonstration that the contractor's unique qualifications or nature of the acquisition requires the use of the authority cited above (applicability of authority).

The 705 CTS strives to provide the most combat representative environment possible to event participants.

To further this goal, the 705 CTS requires a real-world tactical datalink analysis and troubleshooting tool.

There are other tactical datalink analysis tools offered by different vendors however, the BOSS system is by far the most capable. Additionally, the BOSS system, while not an official Air Force system of record, is utilized by Air Force units with a requirement for a power tactical datalink troubleshooting tool. As the 705 CTS primary training audience is Air Force personnel, we need to provide tools with which they are already familiar in order to enhance the training provided.

VI. Description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable.

TCG is the only sole source vendor of the BOSS system - reference attached sole source letter from TCG

VII. Determination by the Contracting Officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.

Prices will be compared to TCG's public price list, invoices, other contracts for both to the Government or Non-Government contracts.

VIII. Description of the market research conducted and the results, or a statement of the reasons market research was not conducted.

Market research performed by the 705 CTS has identified multiple vendors for similar tactical datalink analysis tools. After review of the capabilities and limitations of each system, it was determined only the

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDUpdated: 15 Mar 16

BOSS system meets or exceeds all 705 CTS requirements for a tactical datalink analysis tool. TCG is the only sole source vendor of the BOSS system - reference attached sole source letter from TCG

IX. Any other facts supporting the use of Other Than Full and Open Competition.

None

X. List of sources, if any, that expressed interest in the acquisition.

None

XI. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before making subsequent acquisitions for the supplies or services required.

The 705 CTS will continue to monitor the market for Tactical Datalink analysis tools to determine if a tool becomes available which has equal or better capabilities to the BOSS system and has a lower total cost of ownership.

XII. Certification by the Contracting Officer.

As evidenced by my signature above, I have determined this document to be both accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

XIII. Certification by the technical/requirements personnel.

As evidenced by my (our) signature(s) above, I (we) certify that any supporting data contained herein, which is my (our) responsibility, is both accurate and complete.

Remove the Guidance pages below. Remove the IACR pages below.

BOSS

is a Registered Trademark of Tactical Communications Group, LLC

This quote may not be disclosed to 3 rd parties without the express written consent of TCG, LLC.

CON-4197

March 25, 2016

49 OSS/OSK

Holloman AFB, NM

Attention: Capt. Clifton M. Noble

Subject: BOSS Pricing Information

Reference: TCG Quote P16064

Dear Capt. Noble:

In accordance with your recent request, Tactical Communications Group, LLC (TCG) is pleased to provide the enclosed pricing information for TCG’s BOSS products. See the attached pricing matrix for details of this offer.

The prices shown include commercial grade hardware such as Dell workstations. Prices are subject to change should different hardware be required. Due to the constant evolution of COTS hardware, TCG reserves the right to substitute items of equal or better capability. All sales shall be subject to

TCG’s software license agreement. TCG conveys restricted rights to government customers.

TCG’s products and services can be purchased through the GSA. Our GSA Schedule # is GS-24F-

0030M. The prices shown herein reflect the discount and Industrial Funding Fee (IFF) required by the GSA. This pricing shall remain valid through September 30, 2016.

Thank you for your interest in TCG. Should you have any questions, please call me at (978) 654-

4810 or via email at kevin.mawn@g2tcg.com.

Sincerely, Tactical Communications Group, LLC

Kevin J. Mawn

Vice President, Operations mailto:kevin.mawn@g2tcg.com

Pricing for Kirtland AFB

Model Description Unit Price Qty Total Price

TCG-2000

Battlefield Operations Support System

(BOSS) Single Link 16 Capable

(workstation or notebook model)

$ 155,257.93 1 $ 155,257.93

TCG-DIS DIS Interface 15,024.96 1 15,024.96

TCG-DM Dual Monitor 2,431.22 1 2,431.22

TCG-JREAP JREAP Appendix C 12,520.80 1 12,520.80

TCG-IMG J16.0 Imagery 17,529.12 1 17,529.12

TCG-LOS Line of Sight Visualization Software 2,500.00 1 2,500.00

TCG-SIT Tactical Cockpit Display 4,862.45 1 4,862.45

TCG-SMPL SIMPLE Interface 12,520.80 1 12,520.80

N/A Documentation and Manuals NSP 1 NSP

Installation Installation & Checkout 10,697.38 1 10,697.38

Subtotal $ 235,848.82

Less Discount (15,628.60)

TOTAL $ 220,220.22

NOTES:

(1) SPECIAL OFFER: If the package quoted above is purchased in its entirety in a single PO NLT

September 30, 2016, TCG will provide the installation & checkout, dual monitor, and Line of Sight items at no additional cost. This represents a savings of $15,628.60 to the government.

(2) The pricing offered is a la carte; items shown in the table above or in the options table below can be added or removed as desired.

(3) Delivery is no later than 90 Days ARO. The FOB point is Destination (CONUS).

(4) Six (6) months software warranty support, including software updates, are provided with the purchase of a system. The installation and checkout item provides for training for up to 5 people for 3 days at the client’s facility. The price shown for the installation and checkout item is inclusive of labor and travel costs. See special offer above.

(5) Sole acceptance criteria shall be successful completion of TCG’s standard factory acceptance test at

TCG’s facility. Buyer has option of witnessing this test.

(6) Payment terms are net 30. Remittance is at the letterhead address.

(7) Documentation provided with each system includes:

• Users Manuals

• Software Test Report

• Software Version Description Document

• COTS Manuals

(8) All sales are subject to United States Department of State export regulations.

(9) TCG is not a foreign corporation nor is it a representative of a foreign interest (RFI).

Other Available Options:

Item Description Unit Price

TCG-ETR External Time Reference 15,024.96

TCG-JREAP JREAP Appendix C 15,024.96

TCG-JREAP A JREAP Appendix A 24,312.23

TCG-JREAP S JREAP A & C 29,174.68

TCG-BSDT BOSS Script Developers Toolkit 60,099.84

TCG-SADL SADL Interface 15,024.96

TCG-PSG SLB Product Support Gold 29,660.93

PRODUCT NARRATIVES:

The BOSS has a flexible message scripting and generation capability; it is multi-link capable and easily upgradeable. The system is scalable and is designed to accommodate changes to current data links as well as the addition of future data links. The BOSS has a robust terminal interface with terminal alert functions, which alert the operator of a change in status with the terminal. Both the notebook and desktop versions have a Dual Monitor option capability and the locations of the windows are configurable by the operator.

The BOSS also includes TCG’s Terminal Control Wizard (TCW). The TCW delivers “6 clicks to the net” by providing an intuitive user interface that utilizes automated decision making to facilitate the often-complex task of Link 16 network entry. The DERGViewer feature provides a significant analysis capability over legacy systems and can be run in “real-time” during live or simulated activity. The display de-clutter/find track feature makes finding track location and data on a busy display much easier. The BOSS has an embedded Network Design Load (NDL) editing capability.

The Terminal Control Interface (TCI) allows the operator to read an NDL created by a network design facility. It also allows the operator to retrieve an NDL from the terminal. Once the NDL is loaded into the TCI, the operator may review and edit any portion of the NDL. This can be saved to a disk file for future re-use. The BOSS User Manuals provide detailed instructions on its use.

The BOSS also supports Network Enabled Weapons. TCG has invested significantly in providing a comprehensive Network Enabled Weapon (NEW) implementation. Unlike most data link messages, the three NEW messages require significant handshaking and sequencing between weapon, controller and future controller. Whenever possible, BOSS validates message field dependencies and populates message fields with data derived from the data link in order to simplify the data entry requirements for the user.

The standard TCG-2000 BOSS includes one nonexclusive software license for executable code pursuant to TCG’s standard form of software license. The BOSS also includes a computer – such as a Dell Precision (notebook – dual core processor) or Workstation T7910 (desktop) with 2.4 GHz quad core Xeon processors, 8GB RAM, removable 500GB hard drive, keyboard, mouse, monitor, DVDRW drive, laser printer, 1GB professional graphics card, and 1553 hardware for the terminal interface for Link 16.

The TCG-DIS option allows the BOSS to support a Distributed Interactive Simulation (DIS) interface to exchange Link 16 data between one or more Link 16 networks and a DIS network to support Live, Virtual, and Constructive (LVC) simulation and training needs. With this capability, the BOSS can support platform sensor correlation testing by translating DIS entities to Link 16 surveillance messages while the platform is simultaneously processing sensor input synchronized with the DIS entities. Optimal configurations allow for connectivity between flight simulators, Air

Combat Maneuver Instrumentation (ACMI) training ranges, and live Link 16 participants. The

BOSS supports either the IEEE Standard 1278.1-1995 protocol or SISO-STD-002 protocol to allow for maximum compatibility with other DIS applications. The BOSS supports Entity State, Transmitter, and Signal Protocol Data Units (PDU) and allows for connections to be made as

Broadcast, Multicast, or Unicast.

The TCG-DM Dual Monitor feature can be added to the BOSS in either the Desktop or Laptop version. This feature allows the user to take full advantage of the very flexible GUI. The Windows are moveable and many can be sized to fit the preference of the user. The GUI allows the user to locate all of the pop-up Windows any place on either monitor. The location is maintained in memory until changed. The Tactical Display can be placed on one monitor and all the Windows can be placed on the second monitor. The price includes two 24” flat panel monitors and a docking station (for the laptop model).

The TCG-ETR option provides an integrated GPS receiver and antenna with the GTS. The GPS time is sent to the terminal to support the ETR requirement. The GPS simplifies the Link 16 network entry process and allows the GTS to be configured as an External Time Reference (ETR) for Link 16 operations. The ETR option includes the following hardware and software.

The latest ETR software Trimble Resolution-T Starter kit, which includes a Trimble Resolution T GPS receiver, GPS antenna, 50 feet of antenna cable, and software to configure the receiver. This kit has been chosen by TCG due to its combination of performance characteristics and adaptability for use with all terminal variants. It is the only GPS receiver that is currently supported for the

GTS’ GPS capability.

TCG’s 1PPS pulse shaper circuit and cabling to connect it between the GTS and terminal.

This circuit conditions the 1 Pulse-Per-Second signal from the GPS receiver so that the signal is properly formatted for the terminal.

The TCG-IMG J16.0 Imagery option for the BOSS provides the capability to transmit and receive imagery data over Link 16 using the J16.0 message. This implementation is in accordance with the

6016D and 6016B/C ICP TM00-071. In addition, this option also provides the capability to create, modify, and view National Imagery Transmission Format (NITF) files containing JPEG images.

The JREAP-C feature allows for the routing or forwarding of Link 16 data over IP-based networks.

The BOSS implements Appendix C of MIL-STD-3011 revision A, using both Transmission Control

Protocol (TCP) and Universal Datagram Protocol (UDP) Internet Protocols (IP) as the means of communication. It can operate as either a client or server, supporting up to five connections, when using TCP/IP. When using UDP, both unicast and multicast connections are supported.

TCG-JREAP A option provides an interface for Joint Range Extension Application Protocol

(JREAP), Appendix A to a multimode, satellite radio. The BOSS currently supports communication via synchronous serial interface with the AN/ARC-210, AN/PRC-117, and PSC-5

DAMA radios. The BOSS can operate on a JREAP-A network in a Network Controller, Alternate

Network Controller, Network Listener, or Network Participant role. The BOSS provides the user interface software to configure the JREAP-A characteristics, such as role, Transmission Sequence

List (TSL), and serial interface parameters, and to monitor the communications interface. The

BOSS does not include hardware or software to control the above radios and assumes this capability will be accomplished via other equipment such as the front panel of the PRC-117 or RCU for the

ARC-210. This feature includes a Sea Level USB to synchronous serial (25-pin) adapter for making the physical connection to the radio.

The TCG-JREAP S is a bundle option that includes both the JREAP-C and JREAP-A options described above.

*The Line of Sight Visualization Software item provides the ability to process Digital Terrain

Elevation Data (DTED). DTED must be provided by the customer. The DTED related optional functions include:

Land Track Elevation: The user has the option to use elevation data for Land track elevation. If the option is selected, terrain data is loaded, and if the track is in the bounds of the terrain data, the track's elevation will be set to the DTED elevation.

LOS Profile: The user has the option to display line of sight from a track, ownship or point to another track or point as well as a terrain view along with the line of sight calculation. The user has the additional option to display an area of visibility around a track, ownship, or point.

*This item is not on TCG’s GSA schedule and would be an open market purchase.

The TCG-SD BOSS Script Developers Toolkit (BSDT) enables a user to build and verify tactical scenario scripts on a single self-contained workstation, freeing the BOSS platform for other or parallel use. A back-to-back simulator and scripting capability is provided as well as the ability to execute scripts with transmit and receive data link message processing rules enforced. The BSDT is provided as a software install for a PC running under Windows 7. TCG can provide the workstations at additional cost.

The TCG-SADL interface provides the capability to control the SADL EPLRS radio, version 11.xy.

The SADL 11.xy radio provides a self-contained “Gateway” for translation of J Series and SADL messages. When employed with the TCG-2000 GTS and MIDS terminal, the system provides a seamless link between Link 16 and SADL equipped platforms. The SADL radio is not included in this quote and must be furnished by the gaining unit.

SIMPLE (Standard Interface for Multiple Platform Link Evaluation) is a NATO Standardization

Agreement (STANAG) specifying a standard for interfacing test rigs for the purpose of Tactical

Data Link (TDL) interoperability testing. The TCG implementation provides the capability to process Link 11 and Link 16 messages either using a virtual network connection or operating as a

Terminal/DTS emulator. It supports SIMPLE packet types 1, 2, 61, 62, 63, and 65 over IP.

The Gold Product Support Plan is a fixed price subscription plan and can cover all systems at the

Client's site. The plan provides for product support, extended warranty for both the hardware and software as well as software updates for a period of one year. The Gold Plan for a single link BOSS is priced at $29,660.93 for the first system and provides for unlimited help desk support and 1 site

(CONUS) visit for up to three days. The site visit can be used to accomplish a myriad of items including, but not limited to, a refresher-training course. The plan can be modified to provide for increased support to suit the Client’s requirements and is renewable on an annual basis. Customers covered by a Gold Plan for three consecutive years are eligible to receive a new, replacement server computer to re-host their TCG software at no additional cost (the 1553 hardware is reused).

Payment for the subscription is due in full at commencement of the support period. Lapses in maintenance are subject to a reinstatement fee. Additional systems can be added to the plan for

$9,238.65 each. Note: The purchase of a Gold Plan with a new system represents an 18 month warranty when combined with the 6 month standard system warranty.

BOSS

is a Registered Trademark of Tactical Communications Group, LLC

CON-4179

March 9, 2016

US Air Force

Distributed Mission Operations Center

705 Combat Training Squadron/DOP

Attention: Capt. Clifton M. Noble

Subject: Battlefield Operations Support System (BOSS)

Dear Capt. Noble:

Tactical Communications Group, LLC (TCG) is a privately owned, small business that focuses on developing technologically advanced solutions for the global Tactical Data Link (TDL) community. TCG is the sole manufacturer of the BOSS system. The BOSS was created by

TCG’s engineers with internal funding and as such, TCG is the sole owner of the BOSS intellectual property. There are no distributors. This includes installation and maintenance.

Thank you for your interest in TCG. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (978)

654-4810 or via email at kevin.mawn@g2tcg.com.

Sincerely, Kevin J. Mawn

Vice President, Operations mailto:kevin.mawn@g2tcg.com

Page of Updated: 15 Mar 16 International Agreement Competitive Restrictions Page of NOTE: If a Justification and Approval was approved for the preceding acquisition, a copy of the approved J&A for the predecessor action must be included in the staff package for approval of the instant J&A. This applies to J&A staff packages that are submitted for review and approval at a level above the contracting officer. The predecessor J&A will be used as a reference document by the approving official.

Choose the funding level for this J&A Document:

J&A Type:

COORDINATION (AFFARS 5306.304(a)) ** The text in the signature blocks below is editable, including the title.

** To remove a row, click the "X" next to the signature block. CAUTION: Once removed, it can only be restored by downloading the BLANK FORM again.

APPROVAL (AFFARS 5306.304(a)) ** The text in the signature blocks below is editable, including the title.

** To remove a row, click the "X" next to the signature block. CAUTION: Once removed, it can only be restored by downloading the BLANK FORM again.

Note 1: See guidance at the end of this document for completing the following sections.

Note 2: Each field will expand automatically if additional space is needed.

I. Contracting Activity.

II. Nature and/or description of the action being processed.

III. Description of supplies/services required to meet agency needs.

IV. Statutory authority permitting Other than Full and Open Competition.

V. Demonstration that the contractor's unique qualifications or nature of the acquisition requires the use of the authority cited above (applicability of authority).

VI. Description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable.

VII. Determination by the Contracting Officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.

VIII. Description of the market research conducted and the results, or a statement of the reasons market research was not conducted.

IX. Any other facts supporting the use of Other Than Full and Open Competition.

X. List of sources, if any, that expressed interest in the acquisition.

XI. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before making subsequent acquisitions for the supplies or services required.

XII. Certification by the Contracting Officer.

XIII. Certification by the technical/requirements personnel.

GUIDANCE

I. Contracting Activity.

Fully identify the contracting agency and organizational activity responsible for the proposed contracting action. Specifically identify as a “Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition.” Identify purchase request number, if applicable.

II. Nature and/or description of the action being processed.

State whether the action will be awarded as a new contract or by modification to an existing contract (identify contract number) and identify the type contract planned (e.g., firm-fixed-price, cost-plus-incentive-fee, etc.). If exception 2 is cited (unusual or compelling urgency), state date of UCA/contract/modification issuance and amount.

An individual J&A cannot be used to support more than one contract irrespective of the quantities or the dollar value stated therein. If a proposed contract will contain unpriced options (including NTE prices), those options must be supported by a separate J&A prior to option exercise or the J&A supporting the basic contract must be a Class J&A. For Class J&A situations where the number of contracts in the class can be identified: (1) Provide brief general description of actions, (2) identify the document as a Class J&A, (3) identify the supplies and services that are being acquired, and (4) for each contract in the class identify the contractor; estimated value; type of contract and rationale for contract length; and estimated award date. Where the same information applies to more than one contract within the class, it need only be stated one time. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(2)).

III. Description of the supplies/services required to meet agency needs. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(3))

Specifically describe the supplies and/or services to be acquired including the estimated value (including options) and quantity of each item, the total estimated value of the acquisition, and the estimated delivery dates/periods of performance. For example, if commodities are being procured with technical data, support equipment, and support services (staff-hour quantity of support hours) each should be listed, not just commodity quantities. If all of the ancillary requirements associated with a particular item are not specifically described in the J&A, those ancillary requirements cannot be included in the resulting contract unless a second J&A covering those ancillary requirements is executed. Also, state the type of appropriation (e.g., 3600, 3010, 3400) that will be used to fund each requirement listed.

Here is an example of such a list:

“Under the contemplated contract, ABC Corporation will provide the following supplies and services in sustainment of the XYZ program:

(1) Approximately 30,030 staff-hours will be acquired each year for: (a) depot-level (Level II) maintenance on eight XYZ systems around the world and routine (Level 1) maintenance on the two systems located at ABC Corporation's facility, (b) help desk services (24 hours/day, 7 days/week) to provide daily assistance to military personnel to maintain the systems, and (c) software releases for the XYZ system (including any deficiency releases needed to fix minor problems that occur after a major release) and maintenance training on those software releases. The period of performance of this effort will be from January 2005 through 30 September 2005, and 3400 appropriations will fund this effort.

(2) Approximately 2,640 staff-hours will be acquired each year to convert seventeen XYZ systems into seventeen QRS systems to enable a transportable weather system to be deployed into forward locations in order to provide polar ingest capability outside the UMQ-13 polar footprint. Deliveries of these items will occur between January 2005 and March 2006, and 3400 appropriations will fund this effort.

(3) . . .

(N) . . .”

If approval for more than one fiscal year requirement is needed, give the rationale for this request. Generally, the scope of these actions is limited to current requirements only, so that actions may be taken to facilitate competition for out-year requirements. In some cases, there are no feasible actions that could develop future competition, and it is reasonable to seek approval for more than one fiscal year's requirements.

For ID/IQ or requirements contracts, use the maximum dollar value of the total estimated orders as the estimated J&A dollar value.

IV. Statutory authority permitting Other Than Full and Open Competition.

10 USC 2304(c)(?) (see Note 1 below), as implemented by FAR 6.302-? (see Note 2 below), required by FAR 6.303-2(b)(4).

Note 1: Complete the 10USC 2304(c) citation with the statutory subparagraph cited in the (a) Authority (1) Citations portion of the Competition exception used for your J&A.

Note 2: Complete the FAR citation with the appropriate subparagraph.

Note 3: For class J&As, all contracts within the class should fall within the same statutory authority. Where a different authority must be used for any contract action, a separate J&A should be prepared.

V. Demonstration that the contractor's unique qualifications or nature of the acquisition requires the use of the authority cited above (applicability of authority).

Provide, in narrative form, a detailed explanation supporting and clearly relating to the conditions described by the FAR for using the particular authority cited. This section is normally the most detailed part of the justification as the essence of the justification is presented here. For acquisitions that include both supplies and services, separately justify the use of the authority for the services and supplies. (FAR 6.303-2(5))

Contracting without providing for full and open competition shall not be justified on the basis of lack of advance planning by the requiring activity or concerns related to the amount of funds available (e.g., funds will expire) (FAR 6.301(c)). To assist you, the following information is provided:

A. Only One Responsible Source (FAR 6.302-1)

In the case of a follow-on contract for continued development or production of a major system or highly specialized equipment/services, the rationale must first justify the supplies/services as being a “major system” or “highly specialized.” The rationale must then justify “either” substantial duplication of cost to the government that is not expected to be recovered through competition, or unacceptable delays in fulfilling the agency's requirements, whichever situation applies. If both of these situations apply, the rationale can be based on either of these two situations, or both

Discuss the use of restrictive brand name descriptions in requirements documentation here under Part V. An acquisition that uses a brand name description or other purchase description to specify a particular brand name, product, or feature of a product peculiar to one manufacturer does not provide for full and open competition regardless of the number of sources solicited. If a brand name will be used, you must justify it and clearly explain why a specific brand produced by a single company is required, as opposed to allowing free and open competition. The justification should indicate that the use of such descriptions in the acquisition is essential to the Government's requirements, thereby precluding consideration of a product manufactured by another company. (FAR 6.302-1(c))

(Brand-name or equal descriptions, and other purchase descriptions that permit prospective contractors to offer products other than those specifically referenced by brand name, provide for full and open competition and do not require justifications and approvals to support their use.)

Subsection 1. When using this exception…

(a) Describe the system or support element to which supply/service to be procured under the contemplated acquisition relates in terms of its purpose and its capabilities. Describe how the contemplated acquisition relates to that system or support element. State what work the current contractor has been performing. Include the current contract number, basis of award for that contract award (competitive/sole source), when the contract was awarded, and when the contract will expire. If the work the contractor will perform under the contemplated acquisition is being done under an ACAT I or II program, state that designation. If the work will not be done under an ACAT I or II program, provide a detailed explanation from a technical perspective as to why the supplies/services to be procured are “highly specialized.” This section must summarize your justification by including the main point(s) of the justification.

(b) If the planned acquisition is a “bridge” effort, which contains options, so state and explain why options are necessary.

(c) Add a concluding sentence to the end of this paragraph, suitably tailored; e.g., “Therefore, this acquisition will be a follow-on contract for the continued production of a major system,” or “Therefore, this acquisition will be a follow-on contract for the continued development of highly specialized equipment,” or “Therefore, this acquisition will be follow-on contract for the continued development of a major system,” or “Therefore, this acquisition will be a follow-on contract for the continued production of highly specialized equipment,” or “Therefore, this acquisition is for continued performance of a highly specialized service.”

Subsection 2. When using this exception, describe in 3-4 sentences the contractor's unique/highly specialized capabilities and/or qualifications (e.g., facilities, personnel, special tooling acquired). (FAR 6.303-2(b)(5))

Subsection 3. When using this exception, you should begin with the following sentence, suitably tailored: “The (XXX SPO, or XXX Wing) believes that award to any other source would result in substantial duplication of cost to the Government that is not expected to be recovered through competition and unacceptable delays in fulfilling the Air Force's requirements.” Then, discuss either or both of the following situations (although only one of these situations is needed; if the facts exist to support both, then provide that information):

(a) When the rationale is based on substantial duplication of cost, state the approximate cost and state that the cost could not be recovered through competition. When FAR 6.302-1(a)(2)(ii) is cited for follow-on acquisitions as the basis for the justification, include an estimate of the anticipated cost to run a competition offset by the amount of cost that would be duplicated. Include the rationale for the amount of cost that would be duplicated (e.g., training required so that another source could acquire the skills necessary to perform the effort, equipment, facilities) and how the estimate was derived (e.g., development costs incurred by the Government under the existing contract or similar programs). (FAR 6.303-2(b)(9)(ii))

(b) When the rationale is based on unacceptable delay, state how long it would take someone else to obtain this capability (e.g., months, years) and why, and provide a detailed explanation of the impact or problem caused by the delay. For example, the impact of not adding additional quantities of launch support services staff-hours to an existing contract might cause a launch to not occur as scheduled, thus delaying the operational use of a spacecraft, thus reducing the constellation's operational availability - and thus reducing (or precluding) the ability of the war fighter to accomplish specific missions.

Subsection 4. When using this exception, you should include one of the following sentences, whichever is applicable:

(a) “Accordingly, XYZ Corporation is the only firm capable of providing the supplies and services described in Section III above without the U.S. Air Force experiencing substantial duplication of cost that could not be expected to be recovered through competition.”

(b) “Accordingly, XYZ Corporation is the only firm capable of providing the supplies and services described in Section III above without the U.S. Air Force experiencing unacceptable delays in fulfilling its requirements.”

(c) “Accordingly, XYZ Corporation is the only firm capable of providing the supplies and services described in Section III above without the U.S. Air Force experiencing substantial duplication of cost that could not be expected to be recovered through competition and unacceptable delays in fulfilling its requirements.”

B. Unusual and Compelling Urgency (FAR 6.302-2, 6.303-2(a)(b)(iii), DFARS PGI 206.302-2)

Contracting Officers shall contact SAF/AQC at usaf.pentagon.saf-aq.mbx.saf-aqc-workflow@mail.mil as soon as practicable when contemplating an award under the authority cited in FAR 6.302-2 for J&As requiring SPE approval. Provide an explanation why (1) the supplies or services are needed at once because of fire, flood, explosion, or other disaster, or (2) essential equipment or repairs to that equipment are needed at once, e.g., to preclude impairment of launch capabilities or mission performance of missiles or missile support equipment, eliminate imminent grounding of the XX fleet crucial to what mission of the USAF and Defense of the Nation. In other words, identify the anticipated serious injury to the Government, the nature of the urgency, the reasons for it occurring and why it is “urgent and compelling” to preclude adverse impact to military readiness. Merely citing a Joint Urgent Operational Need (JUON),Force Activity Designator (FAD) rating, Program Management Directive (PMD)/Program Action Directive (PAD) guidance, or DX priority rating is not in and of itself sufficient reason to use this exception from the requirement to obtain full and open competition. Note that only the minimum quantity required to satisfy the unusual and compelling urgency qualifies for this exception; thus, this exception might not suffice to justify option quantities. For example, a JUON covering an entire program may not necessarily warrant a class J&A for all program requirements. The inclusion of future “unknown” requirements in class J&As proceeding on this basis is disfavored. In addition, actions covered by a relevant JUON should, a) cite the JUON, b) describe the nature of the need covered by the JUON, and c) describe the relationship between the JUON and the requirements contemplated under the J&A (e.g., whether the J&A includes requirements not covered by the JUON, whether the J&A covers just a portion of the JUON's scope, etc.). JUONs can provide important support for the J&A; however, the J&A is a stand-alone document and should not rely solely upon the fact that a JUON has been issued as a basis for approval. Activities are under a continuing duty to ensure maximum competition practicable under the circumstances, and JUONs to not automatically provide relief from that duty.

The exception for “unusual and compelling urgency” does not authorize a sole source contract. This exception only authorizes limitation to the greatest number of potential sources than can fulfill the requirement in the time needed. Therefore, the J&A should also describe the method and rationale for identifying the sources to which the solicitation will be limited. If the solicitation is to be limited to only one source, the J&A must be based on an exception that authorizes selection of a single source.

C. Industrial Mobilization; or Engineering, Developmental, or Research Capability (FAR 6.302-3)

The most important part of justifications citing this authority is demonstrating the need to maintain the capability possessed by the identified source(s). Some form of market survey may be critical in demonstrating the uniqueness of this capability.

D. Authorized or Required by Statute (FAR 6.302-5)

It is imperative to identify what is being acquired and the applicable statute authorizing other than full and open competition. Note: Some statutes do not require a written J&A.

E. National Security (FAR 6.302-6)

Provide the minimum essential information needed to establish validity of the justification. This information will make the J&A a classified document. Special handling procedures are required for processing such documentation to the approval authority. Only parties with a “need to know” and the proper level of security clearance should be permitted access to the documentation. Such acquisitions are also exempt from synopsis under FAR 5.202(a)(1).

F. Public Interest (FAR 6.302-7)

This authority may only be used when none of the other authorities is appropriate and may not be made on a class basis. Provide detail addressing the reasons full and open competition is not in the public interest and why no other authority is appropriate for use.

VI. Description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable.

Describe all efforts taken (or to be to be taken) to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable under the circumstances. Although Market Research is covered in Section VIII, the information in Section VI should correlate with the Market Research described in Section VI. The following issues should be addressed in this paragraph:

Sources Sought Synopsis. If a sources sought synopsis was issued, state the date the synopsis was issued, the synopsis number, and a brief description of its content. If any responses were received, describe in detail the results of the screening process and the rationale for determining the unacceptability of any synopsis respondents. This is particularly important when citing the authority of 10 USC 2304(c)(1), “Only one (or a limited number of) responsible source(s)”, since it is this survey of the market place that confirms our assumptions regarding the capability of industry to meet our needs.

Address whether this acquisition will require a synopsis IAW FAR 5.201. If the proposed action was not or will not be synopsized, cite the specific authority for not doing so (FAR 5.202) and the rationale for the synopsis exception. Note that although synopsis of proposed contract actions initiated pursuant to FAR 6.302-2 may not be required, use of this authority is not an automatic exemption from synopsis. (FAR 5.202(a)(2)).

Other Actions. In this paragraph, discuss any other actions taken or planned to facilitate competition for this acquisition. The discussion should include actions tried or considered even if the actions were unsuccessful. If the efforts were unsuccessful, so state and describe why.

Qualifying Country Sources. If qualifying country sources have expressed interest, but are to be excluded, provide supporting rationale.

VII. Determination by the Contracting Officer that the anticipated cost to the government will be fair and reasonable.

Include a statement by the contracting officer that the anticipated cost will be considered fair and reasonable and provide the basis for this determination. The steps that will be taken to ensure the final contract price will be fair and reasonable are also described here. Describe the extent of cost or price analysis anticipated including the requirements for certified cost or pricing data, technical evaluations, and audits. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(7)) VIII. Description of the market research conducted and the results, or explain why market research was not conducted.

Discuss any market research conducted pursuant to FAR Part 10 and describe results of that research. Market research is any effort undertaken to determine if sources capable of satisfying the agency's requirements exist and to determine if commercial items or non-developmental items are either available or can be modified so that they will satisfy the agency's needs. Market research should be focused not only on identifying alternate sources, but also on alternate equipment or substitutes that might fill the government needs with only minor modification. Regardless of the approach used, the results should provide a high level of confidence that no other qualified sources exist.

Generally, some form of market research should be conducted, but it is most critical when citing the authority of FAR 6.302-1, Only one (or a limited number of) responsible source(s). Under such circumstances, use the following sentence: “As described in Section VI above, market research, in accordance with FAR Part 10, was conducted by synopsis of the proposed acquisition, advising industry of the pending acquisition and soliciting inquiries from interested parties.”

When other exceptions from the requirement to obtain full and open competition are relied upon, the market research might be limited to an examination of the acquisition history and experience with the marketplace under previous acquisitions for the same or similar items.

If no market research was conducted, so state and provide the rationale.

IX. Any other facts supporting the use of Other Than Full and Open Competition.

Provide any other facts supporting the use of other than full and open competition, including an explanation of why technical data packages, specifications, engineering descriptions, statements of work, statements of objectives, or purchase descriptions suitable for full and open competition have not been developed, are not being developed, are not being used, or are not available. (FAR 6.302-1(b)(2) and 6.303-2(b)(9)(i)).

X. List of sources, if any, that expressed interest in the acquisition.

State “See Section VI above.”

XI. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before making subsequent acquisitions for the supplies or services required.

Describe any actions taken or to be taken to foster competition for future acquisitions of the supplies or services being acquired. Describe potential actions that could be undertaken to remove the barriers to competition that have been identified in the justification and include a milestone schedule for accomplishing these actions. For example, if a follow-on competitive acquisition is planned, so state and give planned award date (FAR 6.303-2(b)(11)), or state the Government will attempt to acquire rights in technical data and computer software sufficient to compete follow-on acquisitions as a priced option in the contract action that is the subject of this J&A, or (if applicable) state how the Government intends to challenge nonconforming markings on technical data and computer software delivered to it under previous contracts so those markings can be removed in order that that technical data and computer software may be used in support of a follow-on competitive acquisition, or describe plans to qualify additional sources.

Address efforts to ensure competition for future spare parts and maintenance in support of systems or equipment covered by the justification, even when these acquisitions will be accomplished by other organizations. Include a discussion on available breakout data.

If no actions are planned, so state and provide reasons. If approval is sought for more than one year, explain why a sole source effort is required for the planned time duration.

XII. Certification by the Contracting Officer.

As evidenced by his/her signature, the contracting officer has determined this document to be both accurate and complete to the best of his/her knowledge and belief. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(12)) XIII. Certification by the technical/requirements personnel

As evidenced by their signatures, the technical and/or requirements personnel have certified that any supporting data contained herein, which is their responsibility, is both accurate and complete. (FAR 6.303-2(c)) Do You Need to "REDACT" Text?

This template is interactive and has special features. In its current state, it cannot be redacted. In order to redact any portion of this template, you must first convert it to a normal PDF file. Click here for instructions.

The following page contains a suggested template for “International Agreement Competitive Restrictions (IACR)”. The authority to prepare an IACR has been delegated from the HCA to the Contracting Officer. (AFFARS 5306.302-4) COORDINATION (AFFARS 5306.304(a)) ** The text in the signature blocks below is editable, including the title.

** To remove a row, click the "X" next to the signature block. CAUTION: Once removed, it can only be restored by downloading the BLANK FORM again.

APPROVAL (AFFARS 5306.304(a)) ** The text in the signature blocks below is editable, including the title.

** To remove a row, click the "X" next to the signature block. CAUTION: Once removed, it can only be restored by downloading the BLANK FORM again.

IV. Statutory Authority: 10 USC 2304(c)(4) as implemented by FAR 6.302-4, International Agreement.

VI. Certification of Accuracy and Completeness:

As evidenced by his/her signature, the contracting officer has determined the IACR to be both accurate and complete to the best of his/her knowledge and belief. The CO also approves the IACR.

As evidenced by his/her signature, the program/technical/requirements manager(s) have/has determined that any supporting data contained in the IACR, which is his/her responsibility, is both accurate and complete.

9.0.0.2.20120627.2.874785