Past_Performance_Questionaires.docx
DOCX document 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Hanscom Air Force Base Grounds Maintenance ans Snow Removal Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- F2B3AQ6182A002
About this file
Updated bid due time on Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Table_1.2_Building_Details_Snow_.pdf | ||
| Base_Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation_8-31-16.pdf | ||
| Base_Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation_8-30-16.pdf | ||
| Base_Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation_8-30-16.pdf | ||
| 8-25-2016__PWS_Base_Snow_and_Grounds_2016.pdf | ||
| 8-25-2016_Hanscom_Grounds_Q_and_A.pdf | ||
| Hanscom_Grounds_Q_and_A.pdf | ||
| Past_Performance_Questionaires.docx | DOCX document | |
| PWS_Base_Snow_and_Grounds_2016.pdf | ||
| 2016_Base_Grounds_Snow_BID_Schedule_.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| Base_Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation_8-11-16.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
The United States Air Force has requested offerors responding to solicitation F2B3AQ6182A002 include relevant past performance references with their proposal to this requirement.
The offeror is to complete Section A identifying the contract and has forwarded this form to you for completion. Please complete Section B and return this past performance attachment to the Contract Specialists john.meehan.4@us.af.mil and Contracting Officer alissa.turner@us.af.mil no later than 2pm EST on 2 September 2016.
Evaluation In Section B indicate the contractor’s past performance for each category area below and provide an overall evaluation at the end. Provide rationale, including specific examples, as appropriate, to support your ratings in the space provided for comments for each category area. TABLE 1- Definition of Services to be evaluated and TABLE 2 – Performance Rating Definitions are provided at the end of this document to guide you through the evaluation.
SECTION A – TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
Grounds Maintenance Contractor
d. Contract Number:
BPA Number:
Order Number:
e. Prime or Subcontractor:
f. Dollar Amount:
(If final amount different from award amount, please provide an explanation for change in award amount.)
Date Completed:
d. Contract Type: Fixed Price __ Cost Reimbursement __Other (Specify)
h. Item/Service Description:
Be specific here as references must be determined to be relevant to the solicitation to be evaluated.
The Contractor shall provide grounds maintenance (mowing, removal of grass clipping, edging, removal of weeds, fertilizer and lime application, removal of leaves) and removal of snow from building entrances and walkways on Hanscom AFB and roads and parking areas at FAMCAMP and the remote Sudbury site.
g. Contract Period of Performance: Start Date: End Date:
a. Customer/Business/Agency Name:
b. Customer POC (Note: Ensure POC information is valid and current)
Name:
Address:
c. Phone:
c. E-mail:
SECTION B - PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TO BE COMPLETED BY PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE AND SUBMITTED TO USAF.
Grounds Maintenance Contractor
Category (please provide a narrative to support the rating chosen)
Ratings
| 1. Quality of Service: |
| __Exceptional |
__Very Good __Satisfactory __Marginal __Unsatisfactory __Not Rated
| 2. Schedule: |
| __Exceptional |
__Very Good __Satisfactory __Marginal __Unsatisfactory __Not Rated
| 3. Business Relations |
| __Exceptional |
__Very Good __Satisfactory __Marginal __Unsatisfactory __Not Rated
TABLE 4 – OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
(Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, Not Rated)
TABLE 1- Definition of Services to be evaluated
| Rating |
| Description |
| Quality of Service |
| Assessment based on the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards). |
| Schedule |
| Assessment based on the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance). |
| Business Relations |
| Assessment based on the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification of issues in controversy), customer satisfaction, timely award and management of subcontracts. |
TABLE 2 – Performance Rating Definitions
| Rating |
| Description |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with no problems. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective |
| Not Rated |
| Not applicable or has no history. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .