Attachment_D_-_Contractor_Performance_Information.doc
DOC document 77 KB Posted
- Attached to
- K Street Parking Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- ED-OOM-15-R-0002
About this file
Attachment D - Contractor Performance Information
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| K_Street_Attachment_C_-_05-2103.txt | TXT text file | |
| K_Street_Attachment_B_-__Clauses_and_Evaluation.doc | DOC document | |
| K_Street_SOW.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
U.S. Department of Education
ATTACHMENT D - CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
| Contractor Name and Address (Identify Division) |
| 1. |
Contract Number:
2.
Type of Contract:
3.
Contract Value (Current plus any unexercised options):
| (Please correct the above as needed.) |
| 4. |
Period of Performance (including any option periods):
5. Description of Requirement:
6.
Ratings. Summarize contractor performance and circle or type in the number below that corresponds to the performance rating for each category. Please see the attachment, which explains the rating scale.
| Quality: |
| 0 |
ADVANCE \d2Comments:
| Problem Resolution: |
| 0 |
Comments:
| Cost Control: |
| 0 |
Comments:
| Timeliness: |
| 0 |
Comments:
| Business Relations: |
| 0 |
Comments:
| Customer Service: |
| 0 |
Comments:
7. Total score:
Evaluated by:
Agency/Organization Date: ____________ (In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act, the following information will not be released to the contractor.)
Name and Title: ___________________________________________ Telephone number:_________________ Signature: _____________________________________________ E-mail address: _______________________ Please return this form to the following address:
Holly.Evan@ed.gov
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION—SEE FAR 3.104
Information entered on this form will be used in source selection decisions and is protected under subsection 3.104 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation. Do not disclose information entered on this form to the contractor or to any other person except as authorized by the Department of Education contracting officer.
Supplementary Questions To assist the Department of Education contracting officer, we would greatly appreciate your taking the time to answer the following questions, if any, related to the contractor’s past performance:
Contractor Performance Evaluation
Instructions for Completing Contractor Performance Information Form Based on the rating area elements presented below and the rating guidelines on the back of this sheet, please evaluate contractor performance in each of the rating areas. On the “Contractor Performance Information” form, circle (or type in the “Comments:” area) the rating from 0 to 4 that most closely matches your evaluation of the contractor’s performance. Please add written comments for each rating. If you wish, you may attach additional comments or information. We would also appreciate your answers to the specific questions, if any, on the back of the form. Please return the form to the address indicated on the back of the form. Thank you for your time and your cooperation.
The Department of Education will use the information from this form to evaluate offerors competing for contract awards. We may release the information from this form to the contractor during negotiations or debriefings. If we release information from this form, we will not release your name to the contractor.
Elements within Each Rating Area Quality of Product or Service Compliance with contract requirements Accuracy of reports Appropriateness of personnel Technical excellence Problem Resolution Anticipates and avoids or mitigates problems Satisfactorily overcomes or resolves problems Prompt notification of problems Pro-active Effective contractor-recommended solutions Cost Control Within budget Current, accurate and complete billings Costs properly allocated Unallowable costs not billed Relationship of negotiated costs to actual Cost efficiencies Timeliness of Performance Meets interim milestones Reliable Stays on schedule despite problems Responsive to technical direction Completes work on time, including wrap-up and contract administration No liquidated damages assessed
Business Relations Effective management Use of performance-based management techniques Business-like concern for the customer's interests Effective management and selection of subcontractors Effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program Reasonable/cooperative behavior Effective use of technology in management and communication Flexible Minimal staff turnover Maintains high employee morale Resolves disagreements without being unnecessarily litigious.
Customer Service Understands and embraces service and program goals Team approach with the customer Satisfaction of end users with the contractor’s service Positive customer feedback Prompt responses Courteous interactions Effective escalations and referrals Initiative and proactive improvements Creative service strategies
Rating Guidelines Quality of Product or Service
| 0 - Unsatisfactory |
| Nonconformance jeopardizes the achievement of contract goals; default. |
| 1 - Poor |
| Nonconformance requires major agency intervention to ensure achievement of contract goals; show cause or cure notices. |
| 2 - Fair |
| Quality meets specifications in most cases, however, some agency intervention required to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| 3 - Good |
| Quality meets specifications in all cases. |
| 4 - Excellent |
| Quality exceeds specifications in some cases. |
Problem Resolution
| 0 - Unsatisfactory |
| Inadequately resolved problems jeopardize contract goals. |
| 1 - Poor |
| Significant agency intervention required to resolve problems jeopardizing contract goals. |
| 2 - Fair |
| Some agency intervention required to resolve problems jeopardizing contract goals. |
| 3 - Good |
| Successfully overcomes or resolves all problems and achieves contract goals with minimal agency intervention. |
| 4 - Excellent |
| Anticipates and avoids most problems and successfully overcomes all unforeseen problems. |
Cost Control
| 0 - Unsatisfactory |
| Cost increases jeopardize achievement of contract goals; or billings routinely include unallowable costs. |
| 1 - Poor |
| Significant cost increases; or some inaccurate billings including some with unallowable costs. |
| 2 - Fair |
| Minor cost increases; or some inaccurate billings, but a minimal (1-2) number with unallowable costs. |
| 3 - Good |
| Contractor performed within costs; but some late billings, none with unallowable costs. |
| 4 - Excellent |
| Costs were less than the amount cited in the contract; and billings accurate and timely. |
Timeliness of Performance
| 0 - Unsatisfactory |
| Delays jeopardize the achievement of contract goals. |
| 1 - Poor |
| Other significant delays. |
| 2 - Fair |
| Minor delays. |
| 3 - Good |
| All deliverables on time. |
| 4 - Excellent |
| All deliverables on time with some ahead of schedule; or stays on schedule despite unforeseen circumstances. |
Business Relations
| 0 - Unsatisfactory |
| Unethical or illegal business practices. |
| 1 - Poor |
| Business practices are not attuned to customer support. |
| 2 - Fair |
| Business practices are somewhat attuned to customer support. |
| 3 - Good |
| Business practices focus on customer support. |
4 - Excellent Customer Service Highly effective, proactive business practices focused on customer support.
| 0 - Unsatisfactory |
| Response to service requests is routinely late, ineffective, or rude; customers express frustration or anger about many interactions; complaints are unresolved; contractor seems unaware of service issues. |
| 1 - Poor |
| Response to service requests is often late, ineffective or rude; some complaints are resolved. |
| 2 -Fair |
| Response to service requests is uneven in timing or effectiveness; customer interactions are tenuous; contractor is trying hard and understands service issues. |
| 3 - Good |
| Response to service requests is timely, effective and courteous; customers express positive feedback; delivery of service is smooth and organized; collects customer feedback; customer problems are resolved well. |
| 4 - Excellent |
| Response to service requests is timely, effective and courteous; the contractor is proactive in building good relations with customers, proposing new service strategies, analyzing and reporting on service loads and collecting and using customer feedback. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .