REL_-_EVM_Back_up.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 95 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- ED-IES-15-R-0016
About this file
REL - EVM Backup
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| REL_-_Amendment_0003.pdf | ||
| REL_-_Amendment_2_SF30.pdf | ||
| REL_-_Instructions_to_Offerors.docx | DOCX document | |
| REL_-_FFP_Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| REL_-_FFP_Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| REL_-_SB_Tool.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| REL_-_Rating_Scale_and_Eval_Criteria.docx | DOCX document | |
| REL_-_Instructions_to_Offerors.docx | DOCX document | |
| REL_-_Amendment_0001_SF30.pdf | ||
| REL_-_PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| REL_-_SF33_-_EDIES15R0016_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| REL_-_PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| REL_-_FFP_Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| REL_-_EVM_Reporting_Sheet.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| REL_-_Needs_Sensing.pdf | ||
| REL_-_Solicitation_Supplement.docx | DOCX document | |
| REL_-_SB_Tool.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| REL_-_IES_Web_Standards.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Checklist
| Business Case Workbook Checklist | |||
| ERROR:#REF! | |||
| Business Case Workbook Section | Complete? | ||
| Cost Workbook Sections | Cost and Schedule of Milestones | ||
| Project Funding Plan | |||
| Useful Segment Details | |||
| Lifecycle Budget | |||
| Business Case Templates | Acquisition Strategy | ||
| Alternatives Analysis | |||
| Benefits | |||
| Performance Measures | |||
| Risk Management |
Useful Segment Details Details of Useful Segments List useful segments in descending order of priority (i.e.#1 would be highest priority) For more detailed instructions, refer the Business Case Instructions, Appendix B (Press ALT-Enter to add a return within a cell)
| # | Useful Segment Name | Description | Dependencies (provide Useful Segment #) |
| 1 |
&A &F
Summary of Spending Project Name ERROR:#REF!
| Planning | PY-1 | PY | CY | BY | BY+1 | BY+2 | BY+3 | BY+4 & | ||
| 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | Beyond | |||
| Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | Total | |
| Budget Authority | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| 2001 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2002 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2003 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2004 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2005 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2006 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2007 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2008 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| Outlays | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Full Acq. | PY-1 | PY | CY | BY | BY+1 | BY+2 | BY+3 | BY+4 & | ||
| 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | Beyond | |||
| Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | Total | |
| Budget Authority | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| 2001 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2002 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2003 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2004 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2005 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2006 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2007 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2008 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| Outlays | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Subtotal Planning and Full Acquisition | PY-1 | PY | CY | BY | BY+1 | BY+2 | BY+3 | BY+4 & | |
| 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | Beyond | Total | |
| Budget Authority | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Outlays | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Maintenance | PY-1 | PY | CY | BY | BY+1 | BY+2 | BY+3 | BY+4 & | ||
| 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | Beyond | |||
| Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | Total | |
| Budget Authority | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| 2001 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2002 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2003 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2004 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2005 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2006 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2007 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| 2008 | Non-FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||||||||
| Outlays | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Total All Stages | PY-1 | PY | CY | BY | BY+1 | BY+2 | BY+3 | BY+4 & | |
| 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | Beyond | Total | |
| Budget Authority | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Outlays | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
Total Allocation and FTE 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
| Current Allocation | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| FTE Cost | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Total | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
Breakout of FTEs 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
| Percentage Maintenance | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||
| Percentage Development | |||||||||
| Planning | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||
| Useful Segments | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||
| Total Percentage | |||||||||
| (Total should equal 100%) | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
&"Arial,Italic"Summary of Spending &"Arial,Italic"&F
Lifecycle Budget
| Project Name | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||||
| ALL COSTS AND BENEFITS SHOULD BE ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION | ||||||||||
| Lifecycle Costs: | ||||||||||
| 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | Total* | |||
| Savings | 0.0 | |||||||||
| Total Budget Authority from PFP | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||
| Expenses: | ||||||||||
| Hardware | 0.0 | |||||||||
| Software | 0.0 | |||||||||
| Contractor Services | 7,911.0 | 6,514.0 | 6,744.0 | 6,983.0 | 7,207.0 | 35,359.0 | ||||
| Training | 0.0 | |||||||||
| Security | 0.0 | |||||||||
| Other | 0.0 | |||||||||
| Subtotal Expenses | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7,911.0 | 6,514.0 | 6,744.0 | 6,983.0 | 7,207.0 | 35,359.0 | ||
| Department FTE Costs | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||
| Total Expenses | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||
| Net Savings | ||||||||||
| (Savings - Expenses) | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||
| Discount Factor | 1.000 | 0.9653 | 0.9317 | 0.8993 | 0.8681 | 0.8379 | ||||
| Net Present Value | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | |||
| dollars in thousands | ||||||||||
| * Totals do not include FY 2002 costs | ||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||
| Security costs will be embedded in the contractor's technical and costs proposals. |
| Exhibit 300 Information: | CY | BY | BY+1 |
| FY2004 | FY2005 | FY2006 | |
| Hardware Percentage | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Software Percentage | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Contractor Services Percentage | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Exhibit 53 Information: | |||
| FY2003 | FY2004 | FY2005 | |
| IT Goal | A5 | ||
| IT Budget (Excluding FTE Costs) | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Number of IT FTE | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Steady State % | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Development % | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| IT Security % | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Financial Management % | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Maintenance/Operational | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Development | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
&14Lifecycle Cost Estimate
&"Arial,Italic"&A &"Arial,Italic"&F
Acquisition Strategy
1. General Acquisition Strategy For more detailed instructions, refer the Business Case Instructions, Appendix B
| A. Existing Contracts (Press ALT-Enter to add a return within a cell): |
| 1. Complete the following table with information regarding each contract supporting this IT initiative. |
Education Contract Number Contractor Name Contract Type (e.g., fixed price, cost reimbursement) Financial or performance-based contracting incentives used (e.g., incentive fees)? Period of Performance Contract Expiration Date
2. If this IT initiative uses more than one contract, then how do they all relate to one another?
(Press ALT-Enter to add a return within the cell - Cell will resize to fit text)
NA NA
B. Contract Modifications, Replacement Contracts, and New Contracts If you are replacing or modifying an existing contract, or if this is a new acquisition, then please also address the following to the extent known: (Press ALT-Enter to add a return within a cell - Cell will resize to fit text):
| 1. Describe the market research conducted. | |
| Reviewed legislative requirements (Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002); ERIC program assessment (AIR, 2002); used index of electronic journal publishers; web search of commercial database firms. | Reviewed legislative requirements (Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002); ERIC program assessment (AIR, 2002); used index of electronic journal publishers; web search of commercial database firms. |
| 2. How will competition be used to select vendors? | |
| A draft statement of work was published in fedbizops4/10/2003 for public comment with the period closing on5/9/2003. The RFP will be published 5/26/2003 and close 7/28/2003. The government will select the best qualified proposal. | A draft statement of work was published in fedbizops4/10/2003 for public comment with the period closing on5/9/2003. The RFP will be published 5/26/2003 and close 7/28/2003. The government will select the best qualified proposal. |
| 3. How many contracts will be used, and if more than one, then how do they all relate to one another? | |
| One contract. PM is working with Budget Specialist and Dept. Attorney to address CPO concerns about project bundling. It has been determined that the scope of the new contract would be different from the scope of the 19 old contracts, therefore there would be no issue on bundling. | One contract. PM is working with Budget Specialist and Dept. Attorney to address CPO concerns about project bundling. It has been determined that the scope of the new contract would be different from the scope of the 19 old contracts, therefore there would be no issue on bundling. |
| 4. What type of contract will be used (e.g., fixed price, cost reimbursement)? | |
| Cost reimbursement. | Cost reimbursement. |
| 5. What type of financial or performance-based contracting incentives will be used (e.g., incentive fees)? | |
| Incentive fees with a performance-based contract. Example: responsiveness to recommendation and comments of the Steering Committee, content experts, COR, and public comments. | Incentive fees with a performance-based contract. Example: responsiveness to recommendation and comments of the Steering Committee, content experts, COR, and public comments. |
| 6. When do the contract resources need to be available or start working in order to meet your schedule as indicated in the cost and schedule of milestones worksheet? | |
| October 7, 2003 | 37901 |
| 7. How can you use small disadvantaged businesses in developing or implementing your IT initiative? | |
| Preference will be given to bidders who incorporate small business in their proposals. | Preference will be given to bidders who incorporate small business in their proposals. |
&A &F
Alternatives Analysis
2. Alternatives Analysis (Initiatives Under Development Only) For more detailed instructions, refer the Business Case Instructions, Appendix B (Press ALT-Enter to add a return within a cell)
| Alternative | Date of Analysis | Description | Estimated Total Life Cycle Cost (FY03-08) | Benefits | Drawbacks | Comments |
| #1 – Selected |
| NA | |
| #2 |
#3
&A &F
Benefits
3. Benefits (Press ALT-Enter to add a return within a cell):
For more detailed instructions, refer the Business Case Instructions, Appendix B
| Type of Benefit: | Description | Quantification, where possible | Comments | |
| Improves services to customers | ||||
| The ERIC database will be a comprehensive, easy-to-use, searchable, Internet-based bibliographic and full-text database of education research and information for educators, researchers, and the general public. | The database shall add selected unpublished materials and journals within one month of receipt; new bibliographic records, full-text materials and links to full-text documents shall be added weekly. | |||
| Improves accuracy |
| Contractor shall provide and implement a quality assurance plan for ensuring accuracy of indexing and abstracting; metadata shall improve data search and retrieval. | Performance measures will track the number of content errors and dead links in the database; usability tests will improve web interfaces and search performance. |
| Captures future opportunities |
| Contract budget includes flexibility for incorporating new technologies to enhance efficiency and save costs; statement of work invites new opportunities to link to other federal databases with similar content. | Steering committee will evaluate these options annually. |
| Reduces risk |
| Buying contract services for the database is less risk for the government. | |
| Eliminates duplicate assets |
| By consolidating from 19 contracts to 1 contract, there will be less duplication. | Database building will be centralized with one contractor. |
| Improves reliability |
| Consolidated supervision and quality control assurance. | |
| Reduces manual operations |
| Existing database model relies on paper publications and microfiche, paper, and electronic production. | New database building will be faster than the paper processing that has usually taken six to eight months from the time a document was published. New database will accession materials within one month of publication. |
| Improves efficiency |
| Internet-based database includes links to full-text journal articles for purchase and free full-text of non-journal materials to the extent feasible. | |
| Other |
The ERIC database supports all ED offices by providing a centralized database of journal articles and other published and unpublished research and information materials that are focused on 16 ERIC topics, along with topics related to the core academic areas, practices that improve academic achievement and close the achievement gap, and education technology.
&A &F
Performance Measures
4. Performance Measures (Minimum of 3; maximum of 6) (Press ALT-Enter to add a return within a cell)
| Instructions: Include at least one measure of Information Technology performance, at least one measure of Business Process performance and at least one customer-based performance measure. | |||||||
| For more detailed instructions, refer the Business Case Instructions, Appendix B | |||||||
| Fiscal Year | Measurement | Measurement | Measurement | Baseline | Planned | Actual | |
| Area | Category | Indicator | Improvements | Results | |||
| to the Baseline | |||||||
| 2005 | Mission and Business Results | Education | All areas of information mandated (content areas specified in IES legislation Section 172) by legislation be availabe to the public. | 85% | 85% | TBD | |
| 2005 | Customer Results | Customer Benefit | All areas of information mandated (content areas specified in IES legislation Section 172) by legislation be availabe to the public. | Four or less | Four or less | TO BE DETERMINED (TBD) | |
| 2005 | Processes and Activities | Cycle Time and Resource Time | Draft reports on (1) standards and criteria, (2) types of database materials, (3) journals, and (4) information sources are submitted on or before schedule. | 95% | 95% | TBD | |
| 2005 | Technology | Reliability and Availability | The online system (website, database, and search engines) is available to the public. | 90% | 90% | TBD | |
| 2006 | Mission and Business Results | Education | 27All areas of information mandated (content areas specified in IES legislation Section 172) by legislation be availabe to the public. | 90% | 90% | TBD | |
| 2006 | Customer Results | Customer Benefit | Number of unapproved journals in the database every year | None | None | TBD | |
| 2006 | Processes and Activities | Cycle Time and Resource Time | Draft reports on (1) standards and criteria, (2) types of database materials, (3) journals, and (4) information sources are submitted on or before schedule. | 98% | 98% | TBD | |
| 2006 | Technology | Reliability and Availability | The online system (website, database, and search engines) is available to the public. | 95% | 95% | TBD |
&A &F
Risk Management
5. Risk Management For more detailed instructions, refer the Business Case Instructions, Appendix B (Press ALT-Enter to add a return within a cell)
| Area of Risk | Risk Description | Date Identified | Risk Probability (Zero, Low, Medium, High) | Risk Impact (Zero, Low, Medium, High) | Management Strategy | Status of Risk | Responsible Party | |
| Project Resources | Skills of project management team; length of time for project implementation; staffing resources | 04/22/2003 | Medium | High | Avoidance strategy: contractor (technology expertise) is hired to review deliverables along with project mgt team. | Risk has not occurred | Program Manager | |
| Technical / Technology | Project team knowledge of the technical environment; ability to upgrade key technologies; dependency on other systems | 04/22/2003 | Medium | High | Avoidance strategy: monthly COR briefings, project mgt plan, quality control plan for indexing allows close tracking of performance so that system failure can be avoided | Risk has not occurred | Project Manager | |
| Business / Operational | Impact of system failure on organization without benefit of a distributed system of database building; ability to deliver a search engine that users find easy and accessible | 04/22/2003 | Medium | High | Transference strategy: close monitoring enables a separate contract vehicle (e.g., GSA schedule or NIH A-Tek schedule to procure IT ) | Risk has not occurred | COR | |
| Organizational & Change Management | Improper use or adherence to new systems and processes due to organizational structure and culture | 04/22/2003 | Medium | Medium | Reduce Risk Strategy: Revise project management plan to increase public forums | Risk has not occurred | COR | |
| Data / Information | Substantial data migration required; conversion from paper records and processes to electronic record-keeping, central to project | 04/22/2003 | Medium | High | Avoidance strategy: contractor (technology expertise) is hired to review deliverables along with project mgt team. | Risk has not occurred | COR | |
| Security | ||||||||
| Connectivity to other systems; unforeseen vulnerabilities | 04/22/2003 | Medium | Medium | Transfer the risk strategy: increase labor hours and number of quality assurance staff; exercise financial performance deductions | Risk has not occurred | COR | ||
| Strategic | ||||||||
| Degree of alignment between project objectives and ED's Strategic Performance Plan | 04/22/2003 | Low | Low | Mitigate Risk Strategy: Revise project management and communications plans | Risk has not occurred | COR | ||
| Privacy | ||||||||
| Theft, misuse, or unauthorized access to personal information contained or processed by a system | 04/22/2003 | Low | Low | Mitigate Risk Strategy: monitor trends in web metrics and use data to assess privacy risks | Risk has not occurred | Project Manager |
&A &F
ERIC EVM
| Contract EVM for IT for Tasks XXX | |
| DME | |
| October 20XX to March 20XX Period | Method: Taking Interim EVM |
| Developmental, Modernization and Enhancement | Actual Cost Determination | Planned Start Date | Planned Completed Accepted Date | Planned Duration (Days) | Total Milestone Cost | |||||||||
| (Planned Value or BCWS) | Planned Units | Planned Percentage of Milestone Completed as of Analysis Date | Planned Value of Work Scheduled as of Analysis Date (BCWS to date) | Actual / Forecasted Start Date | Actual / Forecasted Acceptance Date | Actual Duration (Days) | Completed Units | Actual Percentage of Milestone Completed | Actual Costs of Work Performed (ACWP) | Earned Value Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP) | Percentage Cost Variance | Cost Variance | Percentage Schedule Variance | Schedule Variance |
| All IT Tasks TOTALS REPORTING LEVEL |
| Task X Totals |
Task Y Totals
Task Z Total
Task 16 Totals
Task A Totals
| Project Total |
| DME Total |
Planned Value of Work Scheduled as of Analysis Date $ - 0 Analysis Date 12/31/15
| Project Summary (Development, Modernization, and Enhancements) | Value | |
| Cost Variance = (BCWP-ACWP) | $ - 0 | Explanations for Variances: |
| % Cost Variance = (CV/BCWP) | 0.00% | |
| Schedule Variance = (BCWP - BCWS to date) | $ - 0 | |
| % Schedule Variance (SV/BCWS to date) | 0.00% |
| Project Summary (Total) | Value |
| Cost Variance = (BCWP-ACWP) | $ - 0 |
| % Cost Variance = (CV/BCWP) | 0.00% |
| Cost Performance Index (CPI) = (BCWP/ACWP) | 0.00 |
| Schedule Variance = (BCWP - BCWS to date) | $ - 0 |
| % Schedule Variance (SV/BCWS to date) | 0.00% |
| Schedule Performance Index (SPI) = (BCWP/BCWS to date) | 0.00 |
| Estimate at Completion PF1 = (ACWP+(1/CPI)*(BAC-BCWP)) | $ - 0 |
| Estimate at Completion PF2 = (ACWP+(1/(CPI*SPI))*(BAC-BCWP)) | $ - 0 |
| Variance at Completion PF1 = (BAC - EACPF1) | $ - 0 |
| Variance at Completion PF2 = (BAC - EACPF2) | $ - 0 |
| % Variance at Completion PF1 = (VACPF1 / BAC) | 0.00% |
| % Variance at Completion PF2 = (VACPF2 / BAC) | 0.00% |
| Expected Funds to Completion | $ - 0 |
| Expected Completion Date | 03/31/16 |
| Project % | 0.00% |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .