Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-082P.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Blue Ridge Parkway Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-17-B-00020
About this file
Bridge Inspection Report_5140-082P
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ADV_Subcontracting_plan.doc | DOC document | |
| Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-088P.pdf | ||
| Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-132P.pdf | ||
| Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-083P.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-077P.pdf | ||
| Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-078P.pdf | ||
| Report_NEPA.pdf | ||
| Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-081P.pdf | ||
| Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-076P.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-079P.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212_Form.pdf | ||
| Report_Pavement.pdf | ||
| Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-075P.pdf | ||
| Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-074P.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_FTNP-BLRI_2A15.pdf | ||
| Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-084P.pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_FTNP-BLRI_2A15.pdf | ||
| Bridge_Inspection_Report_5140-080P.pdf |
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CULVERT INSPECTION REPORT
LITTLE GLADE CREEK CULVERT #1
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY OVER LITTLE GLADE CREEK
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5140-082P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/10/15
Report prepared by: WD
MILE POINT: 228.20
Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 367.08 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-082P
LITTLE GLADE CREEK CULVERT #1 INSPECTION DATE: 6/10/15
CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ........ CONCRETE NO. OF BARRELS:
FOUNDATION: ....................... SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L BARREL LENGTH: ............... 66 FT (20 M)
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ... 23.2 FT (7.1 M) SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ............ 23.2 FT (7.1 M) YEAR BUILT:
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: .......... 2A2 / NONE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
NPS ROAD CLASS: ............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ....... NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT OVER STRUCTURE- 2014
LOCATION
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 228.20 (KM PT 367.08)
STATE: .................................. NORTH CAROLINA LOCATION: 1.1 MILES FROM NC ROUTE 1468
FACILITY CARRIED: ............. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: ... LITTLE GLADE CREEK
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This single barrel concrete culvert is in good condition overall. Problems include several loose masonry stones on top of the northeast wingwall and parapet, and severe vegetation growth along the headwalls and wingwalls. Other problems include cracking with efflorescence along the barrel, and heavy efflorescence on ring stones. In addition, consideration should be given to installing a guardrail system over the structure and approaches along the west side.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: M. REGER, H. SALAD
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
MICHAEL REGER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-948-1424
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/31/15
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-082P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
62.3,4 REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG HEADWALLS, WINGWALLS AND
DRAINAGE DITCHES.
1 LS
62.4 RESET AND REPOINT LOOSE CAP STONES. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS) QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
36 INSTALL GUARDRAIL SYSTEM OVER STRUCTURE AND
APPROACHES, WEST SIDE.
1 LS
36 CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND
DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-082P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
STREAM BED COMPOSITION :9.
AVG. CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL 7
G G N G
12 FT.
MED
SUFF
N
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
62. CULVERT 7
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS9.
ADEQUACY OF COVER8.
SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION7.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR6.
DEBRIS AND/OR SILT 5.
WINGWALLS 4.
HEADWALLS 3.
FOOTINGS 2.
BARREL(S)1.
ROADWAY SURFACE 10.
RIDEABILITY 11.
OTHER 12.
G N G F G G G N P G G N
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT8.
SIGNS 7.
SETTLEMENT6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS2.
1. APPROACH SLABS N
N N G F G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
N N N
GRAVEL, SILT
61.4, 62.5 FALLEN TREES ACROSS CHANNEL ON UPSTREAM SIDE.
62.1 MINOR CRACKING WITH MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON BARREL.
MOST WEEP HOLES ON NORTH SIDE OF BARREL ARE BELOW
GROUND. MINOR TO MODERATE SCALING AT BASE OF BARREL
WALLS AND BOTTOM SLAB.
FORMS AT BASE OF BARREL HAVE BEEN REMOVED.
62.3, 4 MODERATE TO SEVERE EFFLORESCENCE ON RING STONES.
SEVERAL LOOSE STONES ON TOP OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL.
MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS.
SEVERE VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG WINGWALLS AND
HEADWALLS.
VEGETATION GROWTH BETWEEN EAST PARAPET AND HEADWALL
HAS BEEN REMOVED.
62.6 MINOR EROSION AT UPSTREAM END OF CULVERT, NORTH BANK.
MINOR EROSION AT EAST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT.
62.9, 222.3, 36.A
STONE GUARDWALL ON EAST SIDE ONLY. GROUTED AND RESET
STONE GUARDWALL SINCE LAST INSPECTION. GUARDWALL
HEIGHT OF 2'-0" DOES NOT MEET AASHTO MINIMUM
RECOMMENDED HEIGHT OF 2'-3".
222.5 CAVE LIKE EROSION HOLE, 50 FEET SOUTH OF BRIDGE AND 15'
WEST OF ROADWAY, APPEARS TO BE CAUSED BY RUNOFF.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required. 3 OF 20
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-082P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 27 24 45 41
TYPE 3 21 19 35 32
TYPE 3S2 32 29 54 49
TYPE 3-3 41 37 68 62
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-082P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 374 - NORTH CAROLINA (NC)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... LITTLE GLADE CREEK CULVERT #1 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............2 - CULVERT (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 005 - ALLEGHANY
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-082P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... LITTLE GLADE CREEK
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 082P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140082P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.1 MILES FROM NC ROUTE
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. BLUFFS (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 2A2 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 228.20 (KM PT 367.08)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
19 - CULVERT
23.2 FT (7.1 M)
23.2 FT (7.1 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 26.9 TONS (24.4 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 44.8 TONS (40.7 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/15 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-082P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 36°27'49.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 81°00'34.10" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 25 MI (40 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 20.0 FT (6.1 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 4.0 FT (1.2 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 4.0 FT (1.2 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 1347 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 1482 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 35.0 FT (10.7 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 9 - OTHER
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.00 FT (0.61 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: .........N
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: ..............N
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT:
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
8 - Stable; scour above top of fo
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
$0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT OVER STRUCTURE- 2014
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-082P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-082P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTHBOUND TOWARD CUMBERLAND KNOB
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH; ALSO NOTE
RESURFACED PAVEMENT OVER STRUCTURE
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL VIEW OF CLEAR ZONE AND GUARDWALL
TERMINAL END, SOUTH END OF EAST GUARDWALL
PHOTO #5 - PREVIOUSLY NOTED SHIFTED AND DISPLACED STONES IN
GUARDWALL HAVE BEEN REPAIRED
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF STONE GUARDWALL
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG HEADWALLS
PHOTO #8 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #9 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #10 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF
ARCH ON NORTHWEST END OF STRUCTURE
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE
ALONG RING STONES, NORTHWEST SIDE
SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - FULL LENGTH CRACK ALONG
MIDSPAN JOINT, NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - EFFLORESCENCE ALONG RING STONES ON NORTH
ABUTMENT, EAST SIDE SHOWN; ALSO NOTE CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE AT BASE OF NORTH ENDWALL
PHOTO #14 - SCOUR AND EROSION AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF
NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE
ALONG RING STONES, SOUTHWEST SIDE
SHOWN
PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF WEEP HOLES, SOUTH ABUTMENT
NEAR EAST SIDE SHOWN; NOTE SCALING ALONG WATERLINE
PHOTO #18 - VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE
OF ARCH ON SOUTH ABUTMENT NEAR WEST SIDE
PHOTO #19 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF
ARCH ON SOUTH ABUTMENT, EAST SIDE SHOWN; ALSO NOTE
CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT BASE OF ABUTMENT
PHOTO #20 - EFFLORESCENCE ALONG RING STONES ON SOUTHEAST
CORNER; NOTE EROSION ALONG SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #21 - EROSION AND SCOUR HOLE AT EAST END OF SOUTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #22 - MOSS GROWTH AND EFFLORESCENCE ON RING STONES
AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #23 - DISPLACED CAPSTONE ON TOP OF NORTHEAST
WINGWALL
PHOTO #24 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #25 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .