Report_5_Bridge_Inspection_5280-004P.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Everglades National Park Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
DTFH71-17-B-00005
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

Report 5_Bridge Inspection_5280-004P

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Everglades National Park, newest first.
File Type Posted
ROBO_-_NP-EVER_10(4).pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
VETS-4212.pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-EVER_10(4).pdf PDF
Report_1_NEPA.pdf PDF
Report_3_Bridge_Inspection_5280-002P.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
Report_2_Pavement.pdf PDF
Report_4_Bridge_Inspection_5280-003P.pdf PDF
Plans_-_NP-EVER_10(4).pdf PDF
Synopsis_-_NP-EVER_10(4).doc DOC document
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

TAYLOR SLOUGH BRIDGE #2

MAIN PARK ROAD OVER TAYLOR SLOUGH

EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK

LW

STRUCTURE NO. 5280-004P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 4/28/15

Report prepared by: NU

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5280-004P

TAYLOR SLOUGH BRIDGE #2 INSPECTION DATE: 4/28/15

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

CONCRETE

SLAB

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

NOT APPLICABLE

PILE BENT

PILE BENT

CONCRETE

498-37,324 /

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK W IDTH:

CURB TO CURB W IDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

376.0 FT (114.6 M)

25.0 FT (7.6 M)

36.0 FT (11.0 M)

34.0 FT (10.4 M)

N/A

0 °

NO

LOCATION

EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 1.10 (KM PT 1.77)

STATE: ................................. FLORIDA LOCATION: 1.1 MILES FROM PARK ENTRANCE

STATION FACILITY CARRIED: ............ MAIN PARK ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. TAYLOR SLOUGH

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete slab bridge is in good condition overall. Problems noted include adhesion failure of several joint seals, resulting in leakage and heavy staining of the bent caps below; the joints seals over Bents #5 and #13 are depressed up to 1" below the deck. Other problems include vegetation growing from the bearing seats at Bent #2 and #10, and deteriorated double yellow centerline striping. Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

In addition, some concrete deterioration was observed at the Bent #2 and #13 caps. The Bent #2 cap exhibits a large spall with exposed rebar; the rebar should be cleaned and sealed with an approved coating to prevent corrosion and further damage to the surrounding concrete. the Bent #13 cap has several areas of spalling and delamination; repairs are not currently deemed necessary, but this condition will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.

It should also be noted that the deck slab is exhibiting cracks in several locations. This condition is not considered a serious problem at this time, but will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.

INSPECTION TEAM: M. MILLER, R. SILVESTRY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/12/15

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5280-004P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.2 CLEAN JOINTS FROM DEBRIS AS NECESSARY. RESET JOINT SEALS OVER BENTS

#2, #5, #10, AND #13.

1 LS

60.15 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST FACE OF BENT #2 CAP WITH

APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING.

4 SF

60.12,15 REMOVE/TRIM VEGETATION GROWTH AS NECESSARY. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5280-004P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

(STRIPING)

N N G N N N N N G

N G

G N G N N G N N G G N

F(TREES)

N G F N G G N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

(BURIED)

58.1, 59.3 WIDESPREAD HAIRLINE RANDOM CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE.

WIDESPREAD TRANSVERSE CRACKING (UP TO 0.03" WIDE) OVER

PILE BENTS. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING (UP TO 0.03" WIDE)

OF DECK SURFACE OVER BENTS #3 AND #4. MINOR RANDOM

CRACKING (UP TO 0.03" WIDE) OF DECK IN SEVERAL OTHER

LOCATIONS.

MINOR CRACKING AND SPALLING OF PATCHED AREAS ALONG

POURED JOINT AT WEST ABUTMENT.

MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN SPAN #5

(AT CENTERLINE AND UNDER WESTBOUND LANE) AND SPAN #11 (AT

CENTERLINE AND UNDER EASTBOUND LANE).

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SIDES OF

DECK AT SEVERAL PILE BENTS.

58.2 EXPANSION JOINTS AT PILE BENTS #2, #5, #10, AND #13;

SUPERSTRUCTURE IS CONTINUOUS OVER ALL OTHER BENTS.

HEAVY LEAKAGE THROUGH ALL EXPANSION JOINTS IS EVIDENT.

MODERATE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN JOINTS AT CURBLINES WITH

MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH. MINOR TO MODERATE LOSS OF

ADHESION BETWEEN JOINT WALLS AND SEALANT. JOINT SEAL AT

BENT #13 IS DEPRESSED APPROXIMATELY 1" INTO JOINT; 1/2" AT

BENT #5. POURED JOINT AT ABUTMENTS.

58.7 VEGETATION GROWING UP THROUGH SEVERAL DECK DRAINS ON

SOUTH SIDE.

58.10 DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE STRIPING HAS RECENTLY BEEN

REPAINTED.

60.1 HAIRLINE MAP CRACKING OF ABUTMENT SLABS. MINOR

DELAMINATION ON NORTH FACE OF WEST ABUTMENT SLAB.

60.1, 222.1 MINOR CRACKING BETWEEN APPROACH SLABS AND ABUTMENT

WALLS; MINOR SPALLING AT SOUTHEAST CORNER.

N G N G F N

G

F

G

G

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5280-004P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G G N F N

LOW

SUFF

5 FT.

SAND, SILT

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS N

N N G G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

60.12 SMALL TREES CROWD BOTH SIDES OF WEST END OF BRIDGE.

60.15 MODERATE SPALLING (2.5'L X 1.3'H X 0.4'D) WITH EXPOSED REBAR

ON EAST SIDE OF BENT #2 CAP, NORTH END. LARGE (6.5'L X 2.2'H)

SPALLED AND DELAMINATED AREA ON WEST SIDE OF BENT #13 CAP

UNDER NORTH SHEAR KEY; TWO SHALLOW SPALLS (1.8'L X 1.4'H

AND 10"L X 8"H) ON WEST SIDE NEAR SOUTH SHEAR KEY.

VEGETATION GROWING FROM BENT #2 AND #10 CAPS BEARING

AREAS, SOUTH SIDE. RUSTED THREADED FORM RODS REMAIN AT

UNDERSIDE OF SEVERAL BENT CAPS.

61.4 FLAT TOPOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION GROWTH HINDER WATER

FLOW. WATER SEEMED STAGNANT BENEATH ENTIRE BRIDGE AT

TIME OF INSPECTION.

222.4 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG EDGES OF PAVEMENT AT

APPROACHES AND IN JOINT BETWEEN EAST ABUTMENT SLAB AND

APPROACH.

222.6 1/4" SETTLEMENT OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT AT APPROACHES.

222.7 TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS (B/Y) PRESENT BEHIND APPROACH

BARRIERS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5280-004P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 21 19 35 32

HS 36 33 60 55

TYPE 3 29 26 48 43

TYPE 3S2 44 40 73 67

TYPE 3-3 57 52 95 87

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5280-004P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 124 - FLORIDA (FL)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... TAYLOR SLOUGH BRIDGE #2 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 087 - MONROE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5280-004P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... TAYLOR SLOUGH

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 004P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. MAIN PARK ROAD

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5280004P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.1 MILES FROM PARK ENTR

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 498-37,324 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 1.10 (KM PT 1.77)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

01 - SLAB

25.0 FT (7.6 M)

376.0 FT (114.6 M)

4 - PILE BENT

4 - PILE BENT

4 - PILE BENT

4 - PILE BENT

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (33.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.0 TONS (55.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 4/15 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5280-004P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 25°24'08.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 80°36'24.40" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 36.0 FT (11.0 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 6.0 FT (1.8 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (1.8 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 871 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 1045 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... 1 - NAV PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED MATERIAL: .............................. 2 - CONCRETE/ALUMINUM

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.71 FT (0.83 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: .. 376.0 FT (114.6 M)

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5280-004P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5280-004P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST TOWARD PARK ENTRANCE

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #5 - NEW CENTERLINE STRIPING

SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION

PHOTO #6 - CRACKING AND SPALLING OF

CONCRETE ALONG POURED JOINT SEAL AT

EAST END OF BRIDGE

PHOTO #7 - CRACKING AND SPALLING ALONG

POURED DECK JOINT SEAL AT WEST END OF

BRIDGE

PHOTO #8 - WATER PONDING ALONG NORTH

CURB AT WEST APPROACH

PHOTO #9 - CRACKING OF DECK IN EASTBOUND LANE IN SPAN #2

PHOTO #10 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF DECK IN EASTBOUND LANE

IN SPAN #11

PHOTO #11 - EXPANSION JOINT OVER BENT

#11

PHOTO #12 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND

DETERIORATION OF JOINT SEAL AT

EXPANSION JOINT OVER BENT #14

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #14 - SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON BENT #2 CAP, EAST

SIDE AT NORTH END; NOTE ALSO THREADED FORM RODS

PROTRUDING FROM BENT CAPS

PHOTO #15 - CRACKING, SPALLING AND WATER STAINING AROUND

SHEAR KEY ON NORTH SIDE OF BENT CAP #2

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL WATER STAINING ON SHEAR KEYS; EAST FACE

OF PILE BENT #10 SHEAR KEY SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - CONCRETE SPALLING ON WEST SIDE SOUTH END OF

BENT CAP #13; NOTE ALSO THREADED FORM RODS PROTRUDING

FROM BENT CAPS

PHOTO #18 - SPALLING AND DELAMINATION AT NORTH END OF BENT

CAP #13, WEST FACE SHOWN; NOTE ALSO RUSTED BOLTS

PROTRUDING FROM UNDERSIDE OF BENT CAP

PHOTO #19 - CRACKING, WATER STAINING, AND EFFLORESCENCE ON

NORTH SIDE OF BENT #14

PHOTO #20 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #21 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .