Turpentine_Run_Bridge_Approaches_Design-Scoping-Report_Redacted.pdf

Page 1 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

DESIGN SCOPING REPORT

PROJECT VI A30(001)

Turpentine Run Road (Route 32) Bridge Approaches for

U.S. Virgin Islands

St. Thomas U.S. Virgin Islands

Federal Highway Administration Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division

Sterling, Virginia March, 2014

Page 2 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

DESIGN SCOPING REPORT

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

A. Purpose and Need for the Project

1. General Project Description and Nature of Work (see attached Location and Project Map):

Summary:

The Turpentine Run Bridge was constructed in 1996 in an emergency project to coordinate with an Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) flood control project. However, the bridge approaches and associated roadway work on Bolongo Bay Road and Turpentine Run Road were never constructed. This project will complete the roadway work necessary to move traffic to the new bridge structure.

Scope of Work

The Bolongo Bay Road/Turpentine Run Road Bridge project consists of roadway and drainage improvements to Bolongo Bay Road (Route 30) and Turpentine Run Road (Route 32) on the island of St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands.

The project involves relocating a section of Bolongo Bay Road from a point along the existing roadway approximately 600 feet from the existing intersection south to a new intersection with Turpentine Run Road. The new intersection is located approximately 140 feet southeast of the existing intersection. In addition, the project includes relocation of a 1,200 foot section of Turpentine Run Road extending on both sides of the existing intersection. The relocation involves a change in horizontal alignment and a significant vertical alignment change. Other work will include removal of the existing Bolongo Bay Road Bridge, removal of an existing gas station building (underground storage tanks have already been removed), construction of two proposed bus stops, signing, pavement markings, and construction of a signalized intersection. Although the structure is in fair condition, minor joint rehabilitation will be required and trees will need to be removed from the abutments. Project plans have been provided to EFLHD, and these will be utilized to the maximum extent possible. The project will be delivered using design build delivery.

Alternatives

The delivery of the project using either a design build contract or design-bid-build has been evaluated, and a decision made to use design build delivery. Design alternatives are not being considered at this time.

2. Major Issues and Concerns:

Potential issues with this project include unknown or undiscovered utilities, difficult site conditions and the condition of the existing Turpentine Run Bridge, and coordination with several partners. See the risk register for additional concerns.

3. Relevant Project History

The Bolongo Bay Road/Turpentine Run Road Bridge Approach project was planned, mapped and designed in the early 1990’s by a consultant under contract with the Virgin Islands Department of Public Works (VIDPW or DPW).

The bridge was constructed in 1996 in an emergency project to coordinate with an Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) flood control project. However, the bridge approaches and roadway work on Bolongo Bay Road and Turpentine Run Road were never built. The project was placed on hold as a result of right of way acquisition issues and environmental concerns.

Page 3 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

B. Project Identification

Type: New Construction Award Fiscal Year: 2015 Partner Agency: Virgin Islands Department of Public Works (VIDPW) Maintaining Agency: VIDPW Unit Name: VIDPW

County: St. Thomas State: U. S. Virgin Islands Region: N/A

Road Name and Route ID Number: Turpentine Run Road (Route 32) GPS Coordinates START: 18.322259N, 64.878381W GPS Coordinates END: 18.319842N, 64.876317W Length: 0.23 miles Functional Classification:

System Designation: Road is ON NOT ON the NHS.

Design Speed: 25 mph

Source: Existing Plans Special Use: Public transit: bus Terrain: Flat Rolling Mountainous Number of Lanes: 2, Divided Undivided Shoulders: Full Partial None Shoulder Type: Paved Unpaved Turf N/A Major Intersecting Roads: Bolongo Bay Road

Road Name and Route ID Number: Bolongo Bay Road (Route 30) GPS Coordinates START: 18.319914N, 64.878634W GPS Coordinates END: 18.321267N, 64.877676W Length: 0.11 miles Functional Classification:

System Designation: Road is ON NOT ON the NHS.

Design Speed: 25 mph

Source: Existing Plans Special Use: Public transit: bus Terrain: Flat Rolling Mountainous Number of Lanes: 2, Divided Undivided Shoulders: Full Partial None Shoulder Type: Paved Unpaved Turf N/A Major Intersecting Roads: Turpentine Run Road

Page 6 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

IV. PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS

A. Roadway Alignment/Typical Sections

1. Any realignment or grade changes?

YES NO?

Bolongo Bay Road will be realigned to match the Turpentine Run Bridge. The bridge has a higher profile than the existing roadway so realignment of Bolongo Bay Road will begin in the curve approximately 400’ before the bridge. Turpentine Run Road will be realigned to transition to the new intersection with Bolongo Bay Road. This is necessary due to the proximity of the bridge to Turpentine Run Road and the higher profile of the bridge. Source: existing consultant realignment (URS) plans.

2. Typical Sections (see attached)

Road Name and Route ID Number: Bolongo Bay Road (Route 30)

From the beginning of the alignment to station 484+33 (approximately), proposed typical section features two 12’ lanes with 4’ paved shoulders. For the rest of the alignment across the bridge to the intersection with Turpentine Run Road, the typical section will consist of two 16’ lanes with curb, 5’ sidewalk and guardrail (both sides). Source: existing consultant (URS) realignment plans.

Road Name and Route ID Number: Turpentine Run Road (Route 32)

For most of the length of the project, the typical section for Turpentine Run Road features two 12’ lanes with 4’ paved shoulders. Guardrail is included on the right side (looking upstation) above a 1H:2V slope.

Paved width and lane configuration will vary between stations 6+89 and 11+00 due to the addition of bus lanes, a center turn lane, and the right intersection with Bolongo Bay Road. Sidewalk is also proposed between the right side bus station (approx. station 8+50) and the intersection with Bolongo Bay Road.

Source: existing consultant (URS) plans.

NOTE: Alignment, profile, and typical sections may change as design progresses.

Is lane widening required?

YES NO

See above.

B. Special Purpose Use/Areas

1. Attractions/Other Developments of Concerns:

Are there any roadside developments such as point of attractions, visitor centers, motorist facilities, lodging, private property access, or other notable development that might affect design decisions?

YES NO

One property on Turpentine Run Road is currently under redevelopment. A new gas station and retail space is proposed on the property. Development plans have been provided to EFL. In addition, there are several private properties along both routes. Driveways connect directly to Turpentine Run Road and an intersection with the existing Bolongo Bay Road alignment will have to be constructed to provide access to the adjacent neighborhood. Source: existing consultant (URS) plans and Google Earth.

2. Off-Street and Pull-Off Parking Areas Are existing parking layouts and configurations in need of improvement?

YES NO

Page 7 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

3. Visitor Amenities Will any picnic areas, entrance gates, concession areas, rest areas, bus shelters, etc. be required?

YES NO

Two new bus shelters are to be installed near station 8+50 on either side of Turpentine Run Road.

4. Accommodation for the Disabled Are additional improvements needed to meet US Access Board standards (street crossings, wheelchair accessible ramps, truncated domes, pedestrian signals, trail access, etc.)?

YES NO

There are no parking spaces nearby; however, sidewalk is currently planned for both sides of Bolongo Bay Road and is already constructed on the bridge. Therefore, a crosswalk may be required at the intersection of Bolongo Bay Road and Turpentine Run Road to provide access to the bus stops.

C. Safety

1. Traffic Compliance Are there reports of traffic failing to comply with traffic regulations including speed limits?

YES NO

2. Seasonal Traffic Is the project in a high recurring or seasonal traffic area?

YES NO

3. Pedestrian/Bicycle Accommodation Are there pedestrian/bicycle activities and concerns?

YES NO

The addition of bus stops may cause an increase in pedestrian activity in the area; pedestrian traffic and safety will need to be considered during design.

4. Roadside Safety Are clear zone guidelines met along all roadways within the project limits, for adjacent and opposing traffic?

YES NO

Minimum clear zone is not met in many locations along both alignments due to the presence of homes, driveways, and other roadside features. Proposed design will provide clear zone to the greatest extent practical given existing site conditions.

Are roadside/median barriers and sign supports that are located within the clear zone crashworthy?

YES NO

Existing guardrail is w-beam type with a flared end guard. Not all sign supports appear to be crashworthy; however, as both roadways are being realigned, signs and guardrail will be replaced with crashworthy types.

5. Sight Distances Are there adequate stopping sight distances along the roadway?

YES NO

Sight distance will be further evaluated as design progresses.

Are there safe opportunities for vehicle passing; are passing sight distances adequate?

Page 8 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

Both routes are two-lane facilities so passing only seems to occur in case of stopped or broken down vehicles. Sight distances appear adequate everywhere except in the curve at the beginning of the Turpentine Run Road alignment.

Are there adequate sight distances (stopping, decision, approaching and departing) at intersections?

YES NO

Visibility and sight distances appear adequate at the existing intersection. The proposed intersection will raise the profile of both roads and should provide good sight distance in all directions.

6. Traffic Control Devices/Barriers Are existing traffic control devices adequate, properly located, and visible? Are they functionally meeting current and anticipated traffic conditions?

YES NO

Current signs are adequate for the existing intersection, but will be replaced as part of the proposed realignment. A signalized intersection is being considered.

If the scope of the project is 3-R and the profile of the roadway(s) is raised, will the height of roadside and median barriers need to be corrected?

YES NO

As both routes are being realigned horizontally and vertically, existing guardrail will be replaced and height will be corrected.

7. Pavement Edge Are existing pavement edge drop-offs, and future drop-offs created by the project, less than 2-inches in height?

YES NO

There do not appear to be any hazardous drop-offs; however, as both roadways are being realigned, drop-offs in the proposed roadway will be less than 2” in height.

8. Railroad Crossings Are there any railroad crossings along the route?

YES NO

D. Historical, Natural, Architectural, or Aesthetic Controlling Features:

1. Historical Features Any existing historic structures and features that must be considered in this project? (attach photos)

YES NO

2. Natural Features Any existing unique natural features (e.g., vistas, viewshed, vegetation) outside the limits of pavement, that define the context of the roadway environment that should be preserved or avoided? (attach photos)

YES NO

3. Architectural/Aesthetic Any special architectural, decorative or aesthetic aspects to be incorporated in the design (e.g. stone masonry guardwall, stone curb)?

Page 9 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

E. Permanent Traffic Management

Describe any special permanent signing considerations, special signs, sign supports, traffic signal requirements, or changes in traffic patterns

A permanent traffic signal is proposed at the intersection of Turpentine Run Road and Bolongo Bay Road.

VIDPW has requested that signals use video detection, not loop detectors. Traffic in the Virgin Islands drives on the left side of the road so signals and markings will need to be verified to ensure that they are configured properly.

F. Temporary Traffic Management

1. Maintenance and Protection of Traffic Can the roadway(s) be closed to traffic?

YES NO

Both roadways must remain open to traffic.

Are lane closures required to perform the work?

YES NO

Single lane closures may be required and temporary lanes and detours may need to be constructed to complete the work.

Will the road(s) be open to all types of traffic without restrictions of use?

YES NO

Will work be restricted by time/day to accommodate traffic, e.g., rush hours, weekends and holidays?

YES NO

Are traffic detours necessary?

YES NO

Traffic detours, most likely temporary widening or detour lanes, will be required but the specific approach will be suggested by the Design/Build firm designing the project.

2. Transportation Management during Construction Will a Transportation Management Plan (traffic control strategies/operational improvements/public information) be required to address traffic operations and/or travel recreation affected during construction?

YES NO

G. Adjacent/Previous/Future Projects

1. Current Projects Is this project part of a series of projects or a completion of a defaulted Contract?

YES NO

This project is for the construction of approaches to the Turpentine Run Bridge, which was built in the 1990s. VIDPW contracted with URS to complete design for the approaches and realignment of both roads but, due to issues that could not be resolved at the time, the project was placed on hold. EFLHD will assume management responsibilities for the project and administer the contract to completion.

Are there any other current projects, under design or construction, by any agency, which may affect or be affected by this project?

Page 10 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

2. Previous Projects Have there been any construction problems on previous or similar projects?

YES NO

3. Future Projects Are there any future projects or connections to be made by others, which will affect or be affected by traffic patterns or operations associated with this project?

YES NO

The planned redevelopment on Turpentine Run Road will need to be considered during project design.

H. Work Limitations

1. Time Restrictions Would there be any construction activity or time/sequence restrictions (e.g. no blasting on weekends, or must complete project in phases)?

YES NO

The project site is in a residential neighborhood; therefore, loud construction activities should not be allowed to take place at night. Also, due to concerns with access described in H.2 below, night work should be discouraged.

2. Access/Staging Any access or staging restrictions for construction equipment?

YES NO

Sections of Bolongo Bay Road approaching the bridge site are on very steep grades and, according to the Project Engineer, trucks have been unable to traverse the steep inclines when roads are wet. The contractor will need to be prepared to use alternate routes to access the project site.

Provide locations of borrow pits, stone quarries or any other material sources, and describe any access restrictions to them.

Any partner/owner restrictions or preferences regarding the location of staging areas or project engineer’s field office?

YES NO

Is the partner agency able to provide office space for the project engineer?

YES NO

I. Geotechnical

1. Drilling Access:

Do we have drilling access to the project?

YES NO

As this is a design/build project, the D/B contractor will be responsible for any geotechnical investigation at the project site. However, the site presents no access problems for drilling.

Will existing roads or trails provide access?

Can tree clearing for drilling access be avoided?

Page 11 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

Is drilling allowed without any permits, agreements, or easements?

YES to all of the above NO to any of the above

Existing roads should provide sufficient access for drilling. The area in the vicinity of the intersection is mostly clear of trees. Necessary Right of Way for the project has already been acquired so no easements or permits are anticipated.

2. Geological Features Are there any obvious geological features on the project (sinkholes, slides, bogs or muck, standing water, wetlands, etc.)?

YES NO

A dirt clearing to the North of the existing Bolongo Bay Road, which appears to be used as a temporary parking area, has several spots with standing water but, as the road is being relocated away from the clearing, this will not impact the project.

J. Pavements

Describe pavement condition and distress (attach photos). How extensive, in percent, is distress? Note any limits of obvious changes in affected areas.

This project will feature new construction; however, pavement surrounding the project area appears to be in fair condition.

Was a Pavement Management analysis performed?

No

Is raising the grade possible, and if so, how much?

The grade will be raised several feet as both roads are realigned.

When was the road last rehabilitated and/or maintenance activities performed, and what was done?

K. Structures

Describe any existing structures (retaining walls, tunnels etc.) on the project (attach photos).

The existing Bolongo Bay Road bridge is a small, concrete structure (see photos). The bridge superstructure is to be removed.

The Turpentine Run Bridge is a three-span concrete structure (see photos) built during the mid-1990s.

Inspection reports (attached) have noted that it is in generally good condition, requiring only some joint repairs and removal of trees growing in the abutments.

Describe any existing bridges or box culverts over water, over roadways, or over something else.

Both structures described above cross Turpentine Run.

Is there existing abutment, pier or channel scour (attach photos)?

Page 12 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

The sides of the channel at Turpentine Run Bridge have been protected with riprap. No channel work is anticipated.

Describe any bridges that will need to have the substructure constructed or replaced or rehabilitated. Can bridge(s) be replaced on existing foundations? Give approximate length and width of the bridge(s), number of foundations (existing and/or proposed). Any special structural features, unusual loads or unusual span lengths anticipated?

The existing Bolongo Bay Road bridge superstructure is to be removed. It is anticipated that the abutments will remain in place. The center support will be evaluated for removal so that debris is not caught in the remaining supports.

Will any miscellaneous structures (tunnels, box culverts, building, etc.) be required? Will retaining walls be required?

YES NO

Two new bus stops are to be installed along Turpentine Run near the location of the existing Esso gas station.

L. Hydraulics

Any existing drainage problems or needed improvements (attach photos)?

YES NO

Turpentine Run is part of a FEMA/USACE management project and the Turpentine Run Bridge was built as part of that effort. No channel work or realignment is anticipated as part of this project.

Any extensive channel stabilization required? Existing unstable stream banks (fallen trees, exposed, sloughing banks etc.)? (attach photos)

YES NO

Turpentine Run flows through a concrete channel North of the existing Bolongo Bay Road bridge. The channel in the area of Turpentine Run Bridge has been stabilized with riprap and no channel work is anticipated as part of this project.

Any floodplain(s) regulated by FEMA?

Floodplain encroached by roadway fill?

Will the existing profile grade be raised within a floodplain?

YES to any NO to all

Most, if not all, of the project area appears to be within a Zone AE floodplain according to FEMA NFIP Map #7800000028G. Although some fill has been previously placed at the ends of the abutments of Turpentine Run Bridge, the current project will raise existing grades within the floodplain.

Any overriding (i.e. superseding our design manual) local or state requirements on bridge overtopping, backwater, freeboard, design floods, hydrologic methods, erosion control, or floodplain regulations known?

YES NO

Identify state erosion control specifications and manuals.

Is a water quality monitoring program necessary?

YES NO

Are permanent Storm Water Quality or Storm Water Quantity treatments required?

M. Environmental

Page 13 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

Environmental tasks and requirements are identified in the following table. Also see the attached Environmental Livability Checklist.

TASK REQUIRED? COMPLETED

BY:

CONTACT PERSON

(Provide full contact info in

Section S)

NEPA Document

Type of NEPA Document Anticipated: CE EFLHD Determined by:

Jack VanDop EFLHD/Environment

FWS - Section 7 Concurrence

Are there any threatened/endangered species in the project area?

Is a Biological Assessment required?

NO

NO

EFLHD

Jack VanDop EFLHD/Environment

SHPO - 106 Concurrence

Are any sites/properties within the project area on or eligible for listing on the National Historic Register?

Is a Cultural Resource Survey required (Will the project impact previously undisturbed land)?

NO

NO

EFLHD Jack VanDop EFLHD/Environment

Floodplains, Waters of the U.S., and Wetlands

Is any work occurring in a 100-year floodplain?

Is any work occurring in a stream or river?

Is the stream or river utilized for boating?

Will there be any work in wetlands?

YES

NO

NO

NO

EFLHD Jack VanDop EFLHD/Environment

Erosion and Sediment Control Will more than 1 acre of ground be disturbed? YES EFLHD Jack VanDop

EFLHD/Environment

Stormwater Are we adding any new impervious areas (pavement) or changing the existing roadway drainage (e.g. adding curb where curb did not previously exist)?

YES EFLHD Jack VanDop EFLHD/Environment

Page 14 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

TASK REQUIRED? COMPLETED

BY:

CONTACT PERSON

(Provide full contact info in

Section S)

Other Concerns

Are there any seasonal construction restrictions due to trout waters, nesting seasons, hunting seasons, visitation, etc.?

Are there any recent environmental documents that we can use for reference?

NO

YES

EFLHD Jack VanDop EFLHD/Environment

Hazardous Waste

Is there any known or possible hazardous waste on the project? (lead paint, asbestos, underground storage tanks, unidentified 55 gallon barrels, abandoned buildings, etc.)

NO VIDPW Wystan Benjamin

VIDPW

Section 4(f) Is the road/facility on, adjacent to, or providing access to Federal lands?

NO EFLHD Jack VanDop EFLHD/Environment

N. Right-of-Way/Federal Lands Transfer

ROW contact person(s) is listed in Section S.

Are right-of-ways or easements needed?

YES NO

All ROW has been acquired for the project. The need for additional utility easements for connecting facilities to private properties is under review.

Do ROW plans need to be prepared?

YES NO

ROW plans were included as part of the URS plans received from VIDPW; however, the design/build Statement of Work should require the contractor to update these plans as needed.

Is a RR Permit or Special Highway Occupancy Permit required for the project?

YES NO

O. Utilities

List existing utilities:

Virgin Islands Next Generation Network (VINGN) – Broadband internet access Innovative – Cable TV, Internet, Telephone, Wireless

Page 15 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

US Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority (WAPA)

Does the partner have an agreement in place with a locating service to locate underground utilities?

YES NO

Will any utilities need to be relocated or avoided?

YES NO

Most of the utilities listed above have lines which will require relocation. New utility lines should be underground to the greatest extent possible. VIDPW will assist with utility coordination but the scope of coordination requires a joint effort between VIDPW, EFLHD, and the design/build contractor. Exact dates of relocation unknown but a preliminary meeting with the above utility companies was held during the scoping field review and VIDPW instructed the utility companies that we will need updated utility scope and relocation plans by summer 2014.

Any special considerations regarding utilities (i.e. any hazardous or environmentally-sensitive situations, any time restrictions on the interruption of utility service, any security-sensitive utilities, etc.)?

YES NO

As utilities in the area feed local residences, outages should be kept to a minimum and local residents should be notified in advance of any planned outages.

During the scoping meeting, the representative from Innovative informed us that they cannot build conduits on private property as it is considered betterment for the property owner.

Any existing utility agreements between the roadway owner and utility owner? Who has prior rights?

YES NO

Existing utility agreements between VI and both Innovative and WAPA have been obtained. Utilities will be relocated underground as approved by the VI Division office.

P. Applicable Design Standards/Regulations

For each roadway, identify the applicable highway design standard in accordance with Section 4.4 and 9.1.2 of the FLH Project Development and Design Manual.

Per Exhibit 4.4-A of the PDDM, this project will use 23 CFR 625 listed standards and FHWA approved standards (the AASHTO Green Book).

Identify other applicable design criteria to be followed such as NPS Park Road Standards; AASHTO “Green” book;

AASHTO Roadside Design Guide; FLH Barrier Guide For Low Volume and Low Speed Roads; and the MUTCD.

In addition to the AASHTO Green Book, the design/build contractor will be required to use the MUTCD, AASHTO Roadside Design Guide, and other criteria as identified in the RFP.

Will local or state design procedures be used on this project?

YES NO

Sample plans obtained?

YES Will Obtain N/A

Q. Technology Delivery (TD)

Page 16 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

Identify or recommend potential highway engineering (e.g., methods, materials) TD items to be incorporated in this project. Are any items or products eligible for funding under the Coordinated Technology Implementation Program

(CTIP)?

This project is proposed to be delivered using a Design-Build Contract.

Identify or recommend potential highway operational (eg., ITS technologies) TD items to be incorporated in this project.

Are any items or products eligible for funding under the Coordinated Technology Implementation Program (CTIP) or other special category funding, e.g., PRP Category III?

No highway operational TD items are proposed for this project.

EDC INITIATIVE

www fhwa.dot.gov/everydaycounts/

CONSIDERED

FOR THIS

PROJECT

(Check if applicable)

NOT CONSIDERED

(provide reasoning)

Innovative Bridge Design and Construction

Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil – Integrated Bridge System

No bridge work.

Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems

No bridge work.

Slide-in Bridge Construction No bridge work.

Intersection and Interchange Geometrics

Displaced Left Turns/Variations Intersection too small

Roundabouts or Mini Roundabouts Not sufficient distance between the existing bridge, intersection, and proposed gas station. Proposed grades are also too steep.

Diverging Diamond Interchange Intersection too small

Innovative Pavement Methods

Intelligent Compaction Alignments too short

High Friction Surface Treatment Relatively low speeds; traffic signal installation will require vehicles to slow/stop.

Safety Edge

Page 17 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

EDC INITIATIVE

www fhwa.dot.gov/everydaycounts/

CONSIDERED

FOR THIS

PROJECT

(Check if applicable)

NOT CONSIDERED

(provide reasoning)

Warm Mix Asphalt

Other

Three-Dimensional Modeling

Programmatic Agreements Project is covered under an existing Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for engineering and construction services for Federal-Aid highway and bridge projects on the islands of St. Thomas, St.

Croix, St. John, and Water Island in the U.S. Virgin Islands

Implementing Quality Environmental Documentation

Geospatial Data Collaboration

Innovative Contracting

Construction Manager/ General Contractor

N/A – Design Build has been selected as the innovative contracting method.

Design Build

Alternative Technical Concepts The existing bridge location and limited right of way restricts design alternatives.

R. Risk Management

See attached Risk Management Register

Page 18 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

S. PRINCIPAL CONTACTS

Project Role: Virgin Islands DPW Primary Point of Contact Contact and Title: Wystan Benjamin, P.E. - Highway Program Manager Agency: VIDPW Phone Number: 340-776-4844 x263 Email Address: Wystan@vipowernet net

Project Role: Virgin Islands DPW Point of Contact Contact and Title: Jomo McClean, P.E. Design Program Manager Agency: VIDPW Phone Number: 340-776-4844 x4269 Email Address: Jomo.McClean@dpw.vi.gov

Project Role: Project Manager Contact and Title: Kimberly McCool, P.E. Project Manager Agency: EFLHD Phone Number: 571-434-1569 Email Address: Kimberly.McCool@dot.gov

Project Role: Highway Design Manager Contact and Title: Alazar Feleke, P.E.

Agency: EFLHD Phone Number: 703-404-6319 Email Adress: Alazar.Feleke@dot.gov

Project Role: Lead Designer Contact and Title: Jim Talley, P.E.

Agency: EFLHD Phone Number: 703-404-6317 Email Address: James.Talley@dot.gov

Project Role: Construction Operations Engineer Contact and Title: Jameel Siddiqi, COE Agency: EFLHD Phone Number: 703-404-6259 Email Address: Jameel.Siddiqi@dot.gov

Project Role: Project Engineer Contact and Title: Jose David, Highway Engineer Agency: EFLHD Phone Number: 340-642-9232 Email Address: Jose.David@dot.gov

Project Role: Environmental Compliance Contact and Title: Jack VanDop, Engineer Tech Agency: EFLHD Phone Number: 703-404-6282 Email Address: Jack.VanDop@dot.gov

Project Role: Utility Company Contact and Title: Claude Richardson, Engineer Tech Agency: VI WAPA

Page 19 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

Phone Number: 340-774-1424 Email Address: Claude.Richardson@viwapa.vi

Project Role: Utility Company Contact and Title: David Livingston, Engineer Agency: Innovative Phone Number: 340-775-1799 Email Address: David.Livingston@InnovativeVI.net

Project Role: Utility Company Contact and Title: Patrick Williams, Project Manager Agency: Virgin Islands Next Generation Network (VINGN) Phone Number: 340-715-8581 Email Address: PWilliams@vingn.com

Page 20 of 20 Project VI A30(001)

T. CERTIFICATION

Prepared by: Jim Talley, P.E. Date: March 24, 2014 Lead Designer

Recommended by: Kimberly McCool, P.E Date:

Project Manager

Approved by:

Highway Design Engineer

Appendix A Location and Project Map

Location Map St. Thomas, USVI

Project Location Turpentine Run Bridge Approaches

Appendix C

General Photographs

General condition of new Turpentine Run Bridge, facing Southwest. Note trees to be removed from Southeast and Southwest ends of abutment.

General condition of new Turpentine Run Bridge abutment, facing Northeast toward Turpentine Run Road.

Note exposed rebar.

Existing intersection of Bolongo Bay Road (left) and Turpentine Run Road (center), taken from the Northeast abutment of the new Turpentine Run Bridge. Note existing bus stop to be removed (foreground) and existing Esso station to be removed (background). Note also significant quantities of overhead utilities to be relocated.

Tree to be removed from Southeast corner of abutment

Typical condition of joints on new Turpentine Run Bridge.

Existing Bolongo Bay Road bridge over Turpentine Run, taken from new Turpentine Run Bridge. Note concrete channel and riprap protected slope.

Small power station, newly built to match the proposed grade of Turpentine Run Road.

Panoramic view of new Turpentine Run Bridge taken from existing bridge.

Northeast end of new Turpentine Run Bridge taken from existing Turpentine Run Road. Note difference in elevation between the two.

Appendix D

Typical Sections

Appendix E

Environmental Sustainability Checklist

Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division

Environmental Sustainability - Sustainable Highways

SCOPING REPORT CHECKLIST (Extended Project)

Action Possible Not Possible

Not Applicable

Cost Benefit Analysis X Highway and Traffic Safety X Context Sensitive Project Development X Lifecycle Cost Analysis X Freight Mobility X Educational Outreach X Tracking Environmental Commitments X Habitat Restoration X Stormwater X Ecological Connectivity X Recycle and Reuse Materials X Create Renewable Energy X Site Vegetation X Pedestrian Access X Bicycle Access X Transit and HOV Access X Historical/Archaeol./Cultural Preservation X Scenic/ Natural/Recreational Qualities X Low-Emitting Materials X Energy Efficient Lighting X ITS System for Operations X Long-Life Pavement Design X Reduce Energy & Emissions in Pavement X Contractor Warranty X Earthwork Balance X Construction Environmental Training X Construction Equipment Emission Reduct. X Construction Noise Mitigation X Construction Quality Control Plan X Construction Waste Management X

Sustainability Reviewer:

Name Date