AMENDMENT 1 008.doc

DOC document 44 KB Posted

Attached to
Financial Advisory Services for TIFIA Loan Projects
Solicitation number
DTFH61-08-R-00008
Issued by

About this file

Q A and corrections

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
AMENDMENT 5 008.doc DOC document
AMENDMENT 4 008.doc DOC document
AMENDMENT 3 008.doc DOC document
AMENDMENT 2 008.doc DOC document
08-R-00008.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DTFH61-08-R-00008 Amendment 1

AMENDMENT 1

RFP DTFH61-08-R-00008

Financial Advisory Services

Q&A

QUESTION: The subject solicitation is marked “Unrestricted” yet the size standard is $7.5M. It would seem that the solicitation should be marked “Set-Aside for Small Business”?

RESPONSE: It is unrestricted. However, given that small businesses are encouraged to submit, that they must certify to being small, and that a company can be small or not small depending on the size standard used, we must announce the standard. It is our intention to make as many awards to responsible qualified small businesses as possible up to the number needed to support our programs. Also, we collect and report data on small business awards so their certification is important.

QUESTION: The RFP states to include Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) to be filled out by the prime as well as the subcontractors. Does this rule apply to any independent retained consultants that we may use for some specialized projects?

RESPONSE: We are looking to the prime contractor as responsible for successful performance. Therefore, you should have 3 questionnaires for yourself, and may choose to have one or more for a consultant or sub if you believe it will enhance your proposal.

QUESTION: Can we use Project Experiences in the content of our technical proposal to refer some relevant work that had been completed more than three years ago?

RESPONSE: Yes, but it will have less impact than current work.

QUESTION: While we understand that when hand carrying proposals, “FHWA is not responsible if someone is not immediately available to pick up your proposal.” Since this seems to be the most reliable way of delivering our proposal, can you make someone available certain times for proposal delivery?

RESPONSE: We do not necessarily agree that hand carried is the most reliable method. Traffic and parking around the building are a challenge. Hand carried packages still must go through security screening before they can be picked up and that can take awhile. We do not have the ability to have people sitting by the telephone over several days waiting for a call from the guard. One cannot predict what they will experience simply getting to the building entrance, nor how backed up the guards may be, or if the x-ray equipment is working at that moment, nor how many others are attempting to process packages at that time, or whether someone from our office will be able to stop what they are doing and make the trip down to the security office and get back to our office in time. There always seems to be someone who shows up minutes before the deadline and ends up angry because their proposal is deemed untimely when things took longer than they imagined.

QUESTION: Is there an official end date to submit questions regarding the RFP?

RESPONSE: No. However, keep in mind that questions posed close to the deadline for submission of proposals may not be answered. We need time to review and research the questions and our response, and then post them on the FedBizOpps site for the benefit of all. It is not our practice to respond directly to the questioner without providing the same information to all interested parties.

QUESTION: Can we submit our proposal electronically?

RESPONSE: No. The proposal must be signed by an official authorized to bind your organization and must stipulate that it is predicated upon all the terms and conditions of this RFP. Your proposal must be submitted in the number of copies, to the address specified, and marked as indicated below. Proposals shall be typewritten, paginated, reproduced on letter-sized paper, and legible in all required copies.

QUESTION: Should I use any special markings on my proposal?

RESPONSE: Be sure to prominently mark the outside of the package as follows:

“Proposal in response to RFP DTFH61-08-R-00008 To be opened by authorized personnel in the Office of Acquisition only”.

QUESTION: May I hand carry my proposal, or send a courier?

RESPONSE: Yes. However, please be aware that the security procedures in the DOT Building prohibit individuals from delivering material directly to offices in the building. Individuals dropping off a package must report to the guard station at the DOT Building. The guard will accept the material and dismiss the individual. The material will be examined and x-rayed prior to being delivered to Room E66-310. Material left with the guard will then be delivered through the normal internal mail delivery procedures. As this can take up to several working days, offerors must make allowances to assure that offers arrive in Room E66-310 on time. Offers must be received and date/time stamped in Room E66-310 by the prescribed date and time to be considered timely, not just delivered to the guard station, the mailroom or loading dock.

QUESTION: I see there are elements dealing with small business. Do I have to meet the requirements of a small business?

RESPONSE: No. This solicitation has been issued unrestricted. It is open to all who wish to participate.

QUESTION: Are we required to return all of the pages of the RFP?

RESPONSE: That is preferred. You need only send in one copy of the completed RFP packaged with the original of your proposal. Be sure to fill in all of the requested information and sign it. We ask for it because we need it, and need it in your response. Failure to do so may result in no award, or at best, a delayed award which may prevent your participation in the initial task order solicitations. Also, be sure to acknowledge all amendments to the RFP.

QUESTION: Is there a preferred or sample format for proposals in regards to this solicitation?

RESPONSE: No. For clarity, the “original proposal” includes: 1. the RFP filled in and signed, 2. the past performance questionnaires, 3. the proposal and 4. a pdf copy of the proposal. Unless you are a small business concern, you must also include your subcontracting plan. The 6 additional copies for the evaluation team should only include the proposal you are submitting. Be very careful to address the evaluation factors as that is how you will be evaluated and determined to be eligible or ineligible for award.

QUESTION: Will an oral presentation be required?

RESPONSE: Most likely yes, for those who are rated most highly and placed in the competitive range.

QUESTION: The RFP requests original letter of commitment and agreement to serve from the proposed people not currently members of the offeror's staff. Does this also apply to our key personnel who are currently the members of our staff or such letters are needed from them at the time of responding to a task order if selected?

RESPONSE: At this point we assume you can and will assign current employees as proposed, however, as to whether an outsider really intends to join you is a different matter. Thus, we ask for letters only from non-employees. When task order RFPs are issued, we will again ask contractors to address the key personnel they would use if awarded that specific task order.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

The following companies currently have ID/IQ contracts for financial advisory services:

Contract Number

Contractor

DUNS

DTFH61-05-D-00010

Montague DeRose & Assoc.

152996682

Walnut Creek, CA 94597

DTFH61-05-D-00011 Scully Capital Services, Inc.

191901107

Washington, DC 20005

DTFH61-05-D-00012 Infrastructure Management Group, Inc.

926986794

Bethesda, MD 20814

DTFH61-05-D-00013 Taylor-DeJongh, Inc.

619780448

Washington, DC 20036 DTFH61-05-D-00014 Seneca Group, LLC

02305269

Washington, DC 20001

DTFH61-05-D-00015

Vanness Company

148549491 Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32082

DTFH61-05-D-00016 BearingPoint, Inc. 125590674

McLean, VA 22102

CORRECTIONS

Page 1, Block 10, correct the NAICS code to read: 541211 and the size standard to read: $7.5 million.

Page 2, 1st paragraph, delete and replace it with the following:

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), on behalf of the US Department of Transportation (DOT), intends to award multiple Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contracts to provide financial advice and assistance to two DOT credit programs: the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovative Act (TIFIA) Program and the Maritime Administration (MARAD) Title XI Program. Selected firms will assist the DOT to evaluate applications and negotiate agreements for Federal credit assistance. Firms may propose to provide services to one or both programs.

Page 2, 3rd paragraph, last sentence, change “legal” to “financial.”

Page 9, 1st paragraph, change the end of the 2nd sentence to read: “…the required financial advisory services.” Also, change the end of the last sentence to read: “…address specific financial issues related to the application.”

Page 9, 3rd paragraph, change the word “legal” to “financial” in the 2nd and 8th lines.

Page 9, last paragraph, change the term “legal counsel” to ” financial advisory” in the 2nd and 3rd lines.

Page 35, paragraph A, correct the NAICS code to read: 541211 and the size standard to read: $7.5 million.

Page 47, 1st paragraph, 4th line, change the word “legal” to “financial”

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .