Deparmtent of Education- request-for-proposals-30DOE-S3449.docx
DOCX document 59 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Pupil Centered Funding Plan (PCFP) Effectiveness - Competency Based Education State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 30DOE-S3449
- Issued by
- Nevada
About this file
This is a Request for Proposals (RFP) 30DOE-S3449 issued by the Nevada Department of Education, seeking a consultant to conduct a comprehensive study on competency-based education funding approaches. The project aims to review policy strategies, convene stakeholder meetings, create a cost model estimating per-pupil funding impact, and develop recommendations for implementing a Competency Based Education program within Nevada's current K-12 funding model. The solicitation was released on August 18, 2025, with proposals due by September 26, 2025. The contract is expected to be a one-year term, pending Clerk of the Board approval, with an estimated start date following board approval in November 2025.
The RFP includes a complex evaluation process with scoring across five weighted categories: demonstrated competence (20%), experience in education funding methodologies (20%), RFP conformance (20%), key personnel expertise (20%), and cost factor (20%). There is a 5% preference for Nevada-based businesses, and the state reserves the right to award to a single vendor. The cost evaluation will be based on a comparative calculation between the highest and lowest proposed costs. The project is fully funded by the state, with an expectation that the selected vendor will provide a comprehensive report analyzing the potential implementation of a Pupil Centered Funding Plan (PCFP) and its implications for Nevada's education funding structure.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Quote Instructions.pdf | ||
| 30DOE-S3449-cost-schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 30DOE-S3449.docx | DOCX document | |
| Terms-and-conditions-for-services~1.pdf | ||
| 30DOES3449 Q and A.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Certification-regarding-lobbying.pdf | ||
| Department of Education -reference-questionnaire-30DOE-S3449.pdf | ||
| Standard form-contract.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Nevada State Purchasing Division Department of Administration 515 E Musser St Ste 300 Carson City, NV 89701 purchasing.nv.gov nevadaepro.com
Request for proposals 30DOE-S3449
Release Date August 18, 2025
Solicitation number 30DOE-S3449
Single point of contact name Kaylene Hoyt
Single point of contact email ndecontracts@doe.nv.gov
Single point of contact phone 775-687-9101
Soliciting agency Department of Education
Contracting agency Department of Education
Solicitation title Pupil Centered Funding Plan (PCFP) Effectiveness - Competency Based Education
Deadline for submissions September 26, 2025
For deaf and hard of hearing, call 711 and ask the relay agency to dial the single point of contact phone number above.
This request for proposals is available at nevadaepro.com as a bid solicitation.
Table of Contents
| 1. | Applicable regulations governing procurement | 2 |
| 2. | Project overview | 2 |
| 3. | Scope of work | 2 |
| 4. | Attachments | 3 |
| 5. | Timeline | 3 |
| 6. | Evaluation | 3 |
| 7. | Mandatory minimum requirements | 4 |
| 8. | Critical items | 5 |
| 9. | Submission checklist | 7 |
Applicable regulations governing procurement
Statute and code. All applicable Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) and Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) documentation can be found at: www.leg.state.nv.us/law1.cfm.
Single point of contact. Vendors and their representatives shall only contact the single point of contract or use the electronic procurement system regarding this solicitation until after a notice of award (NOA) has been issued. Failure to observe this restriction may result in disqualification of a response per NAC 333.155(3).
Ethics. Prospective vendors are advised to review Nevada’s ethical standards requirements, including but not limited to NRS 281A, NRS 333.800, and NAC 333.155.
Project overview
The Nevada Department of Education, on behalf of the Nevada Department of Education is seeking proposals from qualified vendors to conduct a study and policy review on competency-based education funding approaches, research and collect stakeholder input, create a cost model to estimate the impact on per pupil funding, and develop a report or memo of findings back to the department. services as described below and in the scope of work and attachments.
The State intends to award one contract in conjunction with this request for proposals (RFP), as determined in the best interests of the State. Nevada Department of Education shall administer contract(s) resulting from this solicitation. The resulting contract(s) are expected to be for a contract term of one year, subject to Clerk of the Board approval.
Contracting agency background
The current K-12 funding model is based on assumptions that students’ progress against grade level standards within their grade level cohort throughout the course of a given school year. Funding is provided within this context on a per pupil basis. This study aims to utilize experts in this field to conduct a policy review on funding strategies appropriate to implement a Competency Based Education program, convene state holder meetings to discuss implications of such approaches and to develop an impact analysis on the Pupil Centered Funding Plan (PCFP).
Goals and objectives
The primary objectives of this project are to identify strategies and approaches to implementing a competency-based education program within Nevada’s current funding model.
Scope of work
Conduct a policy review on funding strategies appropriate to implement a Competency Based Education program, convening state holder meetings to discuss implications of such approaches and to develop an impact analysis on the PCFP.
The Consultant will provide technical and expert assistance in the following areas:
| • | Conduct a literature/policy review on competency-based education funding approaches |
| • | Convene meetings/panels with state and district leaders to discuss assumptions and implications |
| • | Create a cost model to estimate the impact on per pupil funding |
| • | Summarize findings, implications and recommendations |
The Consultant will provide a summary of the recommended funding approaches and implications discussed with stakeholders and a cost model estimating the impact on per pupil funding in the state of Nevada.
Attachments
Attachments incorporated by reference. To be read and not returned.
Terms and conditions for services
Attachments for review. To be read and not returned (unless redlining).
Standard form contract Insurance schedule
Attachments for response. To be completed and returned.
Cost schedule Certification regarding lobbying
Timeline
Questions. All questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted using the bid Q&A feature at nevadaepro.com.
Timeline. The following represents the proposed timeline for this project.
All times stated are Pacific Time (PT).
These dates represent a tentative schedule of events.
The State reserves the right to modify these dates at any time.
The deadline for submissions is the nevadaepro.com bid opening date and time. Late quotes will not be accepted.
| Deadline for questions | No later than 5:00 pm on 09/05/2025 |
| Answers posted | On or about 09/12/2025 |
| Deadline for references | No later than 5:00 pm on 09/19/2025 |
| Deadline submissions and opening | No later than 5:00 pm on 09/26/2025 |
| Evaluation period (estimated) | 09/29/2025-10/10/2025 |
| Notice of intent (estimated) | On or about 10/13/2025 |
| Notice of award (estimated) | On or about 10/31/2025 |
| Clerk of the Board approval (estimated) | 11/28/2025 |
| Contract start date (estimated) | Upon approval of the Contract by Clerk of the Board |
Evaluation
Evaluation and scoring are conducted in accordance with NRS 333.335 and NAC 333.160-333.165.
Responses shall be kept confidential until a contract is awarded.
In the event the solicitation is withdrawn prior to award, responses remain confidential.
The evaluation committee is an independent committee established to evaluate and score qualitative evaluation factors for the solicitation.
The State, at its option, may limit participation in cost scoring, presentations, or both to vendors above a natural break in relative scores.
Financial stability shall be scored on a pass or fail basis.
Responses shall be consistently evaluated and scored based upon the following factors and relative weights.
Demonstrated Competence in the Evaluation of National and State Educational and Financial Frameworks..20%
| Experience in evaluation and development of competency-based education funding methodologies | 20% |
| Conformance with the terms of this RFP | 20% |
| Expertise and availability of key personnel | 20% |
| Cost factor | 20% |
Cost factor. The cost factor score will be based on the following equation. The highest proposed cost from any vendor and the lowest proposed cost from any vendor will be added together to generate a combined total. For each vendor, that proposed cost will be subtracted from the previously combined total. This number is then divided by the highest proposed cost. The resulting number is multiplied by the cost factor weight to generate a weighted cost score.
Presentations. The State may require vendors to make a presentation. The State reserves the right to add additional criteria for presentations. The State reserves the right to forego presentations and select vendor(s) based on written responses submitted.
Best and final offers. Pursuant to NAC 333.165, the State reserves the right to permit revised responses or add criteria to obtain the best offers.
Nevada-based business preference
The State awards a five percent (5%) preference to Nevada-based businesses pursuant to NRS 333.3351 to 333.3356, inclusive.
Nevada-based business is defined in NRS 333.3352(1).
The term ‘principal place of business’ has the meaning outlined by the United States Supreme Court in Hertz Corp v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77 (2010), typically meaning a business’s corporate headquarters.
To claim this preference a vendor must indicate it on their vendor account and submitted quote in nevadaepro.com.
This preference cannot be combined with any other preference, granted for the award of a contract using federal funds, or granted for the award of a contract procured on a multi-state basis.
Inverse preference
The State applies an inverse preference to vendors that have a principal place of business in a state other than Nevada and that state applies an in-state preference not afforded to Nevada based vendors, pursuant to NRS 333.33695.
The amount of the inverse preference is correlated to the amount of preference applied in the other state.
Vendors who meet this criterion must indicated it on their submitted quote in nevadaepro.com.
This preference cannot be combined with any other preference, granted for the award of a contract using federal funds, or granted for the award of a contract procured on a multi-state basis.
Mandatory minimum requirements
Pursuant to NRS 333.311 a contract cannot be awarded to a response that does not comply with the requirements listed in this section. Response shall include confirmation of compliance with all mandatory minimum requirements.
Nevada Law and State indemnity. Pursuant to NRS 333.339, any contract that is entered into may not: (1) require the filing of any action or the arbitration of any dispute that arises from the contract to be instituted or heard in another state or nation; or (2) require the State to indemnify another party against liability for damages.
No Boycott of Israel. Pursuant to NRS 333.338, the State of Nevada cannot enter a contract with a company unless that company agrees for the duration of the contract not to engage in a boycott of Israel. By submitting a response, vendor agrees that if it is awarded a contract, it will not engage in a boycott of Israel as defined in NRS 333.338(3)(a).
nevadaepro.com vendor registration. Pursuant to NRS 333.313, vendor must be registered at nevadaepro.com to respond to the solicitation. Vendor information must match Nevada business license and sam.gov entity registration. Vendor information in nevadaepro.com will be used for contract formation. Email address(es) associated with general mailing address or default bid mailing address (if different from general mailing address) in nevadaepro.com will be used for formal notifications. If a vendor has a different contact name and email for negotiations, that should be indicated on the title page(s) of their response.
Nevada business license. Pursuant to NRS 353.007, prior to contract execution awarded vendor must hold a state business license pursuant to NRS chapter 76 unless exempted by NRS 76.100(7)(b). Business license must match nevadaepro.com vendor registration.
System for Award Management (sam.gov) Prior to contract award vendor must hold an active entity registration in sam.gov. Entity registration must match nevadaepro.com vendor registration.
Contract responsibility. Awarded vendor shall be the sole point of contract responsibility. The State shall look solely to the awarded vendor for the performance of all contractual obligations which may result from an award based on this solicitation, and the awarded vendor shall not be relieved for the non-performance of any or all subcontractors.
Data encryption and stateside data. State IT requires that data be encrypted in transit and in rest. State IT requires that State data assets must be maintained in the United States and data will not be held offshore.
Confidentiality and certification of indemnification
Submitted responses, which are marked confidential in their entirety, or those in which a significant portion of the submitted response is marked confidential shall not be accepted. Pursuant to NRS 333.333, only proprietary information may be labeled a trade secret as defined in NRS 600A.030(5). All proposals are confidential until the contract is awarded; at which time, both successful and unsuccessful vendor proposals become public information.
Vendors shall submit proprietary information and confidential business information in separate files, flagged as confidential in nevadaepro.com. The State shall not be responsible for any information contained within a response; responses shall be released as submitted.
By submitting a response vendor acknowledges its responsibility to act in protection of labeled information and agrees to defend and indemnify the State of Nevada for honoring such designation. Failure to so act shall constitute a complete waiver, and all submitted information shall become public information; additionally, failure to label any information that is released by the State shall constitute a complete waiver of any and all claims for damages caused by the release of the information.
Vendor certifications
Vendor understands and acknowledges that the representations within their response are material and important and shall be relied on by the State in evaluation of the response. Any vendor misrepresentations shall be treated as fraudulent concealment from the State of the true facts relating to the response.
Any and all prices that may be charged under the terms of the contract do not and shall not violate any existing federal, State, or municipal laws or regulations concerning discrimination or price fixing. Vendor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the State harmless from liability for any such violation.
All response terms, including prices, shall remain in effect for a minimum of 180 days after the response due date. In the case of the awarded vendor, all response terms, including prices, shall remain in effect throughout the contract term.
The price(s) and amount of this response have been arrived at independently and without consultation, communication, agreement or disclosure with or to any other contractor, vendor, or potential vendor. No attempt has been made at any time to induce any firm or person to refrain from proposing or to submit a response higher than this response, or to submit any intentionally high or noncompetitive response. All responses shall be made in good faith and without collusion.
The information included in this response has been arrived at independently and without non-public information obtained from State officials, staff, or their agents.
All employees and contractors assigned to the project are authorized to work in this country.
Vendor has a written equal opportunity policy that does not discriminate in employment practices with regard to race, color, national origin, physical condition, creed, religion, age, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, developmental disability or disability of another nature.
Vendor has a written policy regarding compliance for maintaining a drug-free workplace.
Critical items
In addition to the scope of work and attachments, the items listed in this section are critical to the success of the project. These items will be used in evaluating and scoring responses. Vendor response should address items in this section in enough detail to provide evaluators an accurate understanding of vendor capabilities. Responses that fail to sufficiently respond to these items may be considered non-responsive.
Standard form contract. The State strongly prefers vendors agree to the terms of the attached standard form contract as is. Ability to agree to contract terms is a high priority to the State. Vendors who cannot agree to the contract as is must include a redlined Word version of the attached standard form contract with their response, with comments justifying the benefit to the State for each requested change. To the extent a vendor has prior contractual dealings with the State, no assumption should be made that terms outside those provided herein have any influence on this project.
Indemnification. Required contract terms on Indemnification: "To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend, not excluding the State’s right to participate, the State from and against all liability, claims, actions, damages, losses, and expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, arising out of any breach of the obligations of Contractor under this contract, or any alleged negligent or willful acts or omissions of Contractor, its officers, employees and agents. Contractor’s obligation to indemnify the State shall apply in all cases except for claims arising solely from the State’s own negligence or willful misconduct. Contractor waives any rights of subrogation against the State. Contractor’s duty to defend begins when the State requests defense of any claim arising from this Contract."
Limited liability. Required contract terms on Limited Liability: "The State will not waive and intends to assert available NRS Chapter 41 liability limitations in all cases. Contract liability of both parties shall not be subject to punitive damages. Damages for any State breach shall never exceed the amount of funds appropriated for payment under this Contract, but not yet paid to Contractor, for the Fiscal Year budget in existence at the time of the breach. Contractor’s tort liability shall not be limited."
Insurance schedule. The State strongly prefers vendors agree to the terms of the attached insurance schedule as is. Vendors who cannot agree must explain which areas are causing non-compliance and attach a redline if necessary. Awarded vendor shall maintain, for the duration of the contract, insurance coverages as set forth in the fully executed contract. Work on the contract shall not begin until after the awarded vendor has submitted acceptable evidence of required insurance. Failure to maintain any required insurance coverage or acceptable alternative method of insurance shall be deemed a breach of contract.
Vendor background
Provide a background, history, and why vendor is qualified to provide the services described in this solicitation. Background should include, at a minimum, the location(s) of the office(s) that would perform the work and the number of employees locally and in total. History should include, at a minimum, the number of years in business and company headquarters location. Provide a brief description of the length of time vendor has been providing services described in this solicitation to the public or private sector. If your company has worked with the State previously, include information about those engagements.
Key personnel. Provide a resume free of photos or overly stylized formatting for proposed key personnel, whether employed directly or through a subcontractor.
Current or former employees. If you employ (a) any person who is a current employee of an agency of the State of Nevada, or (b) any person who has been an employee of an agency of the State of Nevada within the past two (2) years, and if such person shall be performing or producing the services which you shall be contracted to provide under this contract, you shall disclose the identity of each such person in your response, and specify the services that each person shall be expected to perform.
Exclusions. All conditions and provisions of this solicitation are deemed to be accepted by the vendor and incorporated by reference in the response, except such conditions and provisions that the vendor expressly excludes in the response. Any exclusion shall be in writing and included in the response at the time of submission.
Subcontractors
Subcontractors are defined as a third party, not directly employed by the contractor, who shall provide services identified in this solicitation. This does not include third parties who provide support or incidental services to the contractor.
Vendor shall disclose all proposed subcontractors. Response should include a vendor information response form for each proposed subcontractor.
Vendor shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all insurance required of the subcontractor is provided to the vendor.
Vendor shall certify that subcontractors comply with mandatory minimum requirements except contract responsibility.
Vendor response shall identify specific requirements of the project for which each subcontractor shall perform services.
How the work of any subcontractor(s) shall be supervised How channels of communication shall be maintained How compliance with contracts terms and conditions will be assured Previous experience with subcontractor(s)
Confidential business information
The information requested in this section is designated as confidential business information by the Administrator pursuant to NRS 333.020(5)(b) and is not public information pursuant to NRS 333.333.
This information should be submitted as a separate attachment, flagged as confidential in nevadaepro.com.
Dun and Bradstreet number. Vendor shall provide their Dun and Bradstreet Number.
Financial information. Vendor shall provide the last two full years and current year interim (a) profit and loss statements and (b) balance statements.
Disclosure. Vendor shall provide complete disclosure of any alleged significant prior or ongoing contract failures, contract breaches, any civil or criminal litigation or investigations pending which involves the vendor or in which the vendor has been judged guilty or liable.
Conflict of interest. Vendor shall disclose any existing or potential conflict of interest relative to the performance of the contractual services resulting from this solicitation. Any such relationship that might be perceived or represented as a conflict shall be disclosed. By submitting a response in response to this solicitation, vendors affirm that they have not given, nor intend to give at any time hereafter, any economic opportunity, future employment, gift, loan, gratuity, special discount, trip, favor, or service to a public servant or any employee or representative of same, in connection with this procurement. Any attempt to intentionally or unintentionally conceal or obfuscate a conflict of interest shall result in disqualification of a vendor response. An award shall not be made where a conflict of interest exists. The State shall determine whether a conflict of interest exists and whether it may reflect negatively on State vendor selection. The State reserves the right to disqualify any vendor on the grounds of actual or apparent conflict of interest.
Client references
Vendor shall provide reference questionnaire attachment to client references from similar projects performed for private or public sector clients within the last five years.
The single point of contact must receive at least three complete reference questionnaire documents directly from the client references via email.
The purpose of these references is to document relevant experience and aid in the evaluation process.
Reference questionnaire will not be accepted directly from proposing vendors.
Client references shall not be requested from the contracting agency.
The State will not disclose client references, but may confirm if a reference questionnaire has been received.
The State reserves the right to contact client references during evaluation or negotiations.
Submission checklist
This section identifies documents that vendors shall submit to be considered responsive. Vendors are encouraged to review all requirements to ensure all requested information is included in their response.
Responses must be submitted as a quote through nevadaepro.com.
Vendors are encouraged to submit a single file attachment per section where possible.
Technical proposal information and cost proposal information shall not be included in the same attachment.
Cost proposal attachment shall not be flagged as confidential in nevadaepro.com.
Additional attachments may be included, but are discouraged and should be kept to a minimum.
Technical proposal
Title page Table of contents Signed certification regarding lobbying Response to mandatory minimum requirements Response to critical items Response to scope of work Other informational material
Proprietary information. If necessary. Attachment should be flagged confidential in nevadaepro.com.
Title page Table of contents Trade secret information, cross referenced to the technical proposal (alternatively, a redacted technical proposal and a full confidential technical proposal can be submitted)
Cost proposal
Confidential business information. Attachment should be flagged confidential in nevadaepro.com.
Other attachments. If necessary, not recommended.
Client references. Not submitted directly by vendor.
Revised 2024-10 Page 2 of 6
Page 1 of 1 Request for proposals 30DOE-S3449 image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .