Combined_Synopsis_N0024421Q0288.pdf

PDF 201 KB Posted

Attached to
Material Handling Equipment (MHE) Repair
Solicitation number
N0024421Q0288
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Combined Synopsis_SOW.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

N00244‐21‐Q‐0288

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with FAR Part 13 Simplified Acquisition Procedures and 12.6 Streamlined Procedures for Evaluation and Solicitation for Commercial Items.

This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; a Request for Quotation (RFQ) is being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. The Solicitation number is N00244-21-Q-0288. The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through latest Federal Acquisition Circular and DFARS change notices. This solicitation is issued as full and open competition.

NAICS Code 811310 Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance is applicable and business size is $8 millions of dollars.

The solicitation will start on the date this solicitation is posted and will end on 23 September 2021 9:00 AM Pacific Standard Time.

Contractor must complete all Representations and Certifications found in the provisions listed below within their profile in the System for Award Management (SAM) at http://www.sam.gov to be considered for this solicitation.

Requirements

Naval Construction Group One (NCG-1) of Port Hueneme, CA require a contractor to provide repair a Hyster HS0FT with serial U005V02579N. The work will require the contractor to collect the Material Handling Equipment and transport to their own facility, utilizing their personnel, tools, parts/ materials.

Refer to statement of work for full detail.

Qty. 1 Group

Period of Performance:

FY21 Base Year: 30 September 2021

Delivery: FOB Destination.

Inspection and acceptance: At Destination by the Government.

Contract Type: Order/ Contract resulting from this solicitation will be Firm Fixed Price (FFP).

Performance Work Statement Naval Construction Group ONE

Material Handling Equipment (MHE) Repair Port Hueneme, CA

Introduction

Naval Construction Group ONE (NCG1), Ventura County is located on Naval Base Ventura County (NBVC) in Port Hueneme, California. NCG1 lends and manages the overall capability and readiness of six NMCBs located in Port Hueneme, CA. NMCBs engage in peacetime and wartime contributory construction in support of US and Allied Forces worldwide.

Scope

The purpose of this effort is to provide repair to one of the Material Handling pieces of Equipment (MHE) used to sustain movement and storage of material and equipment for NCG1 and subordinate units. Due to the condition of the equipment, the repairs will be need to be completed at an off-base facility using the contractor’s personnel, tools, and replacement parts and material. The contractor will organized the transport of the MHE and delivery back to Port Hueneme, CA. Through normal wear and tear, the MHE in question (U005V02579N HS0FT Forklift) has become inoperable due to a number of problems that need service.

According to NCGl’s N436 Maintenance shop, following repairs and services must be completed with OEM parts:

Year: 2015 Make: Hyster Model: HS0FT

Serial: U005V02579N

Description: Truck, Lift, Fork, Diesel Engine 6K. 240" Lift

1. Transmission system service and fluid replacement. Including oil filter

2. Antifreeze replacement

3. Hydraulic oil and filter replacement

4. Fuel-water separator replacement

5. In-line filter replacement

6. Battery replacement

7. Catalytic converter and catalytic filter replacement (gaskets included)

8. Freight costs for equipment transportation (Pick-up and Return)

9. Labor costs

A government point of contact (POC) will be assigned and utilized by the contractor to coordinate and initiate any work being competed, and any transportation of the equipment on and off NBVC. The forklift is currently located at a 3-party facility in Oxnard, CA.

Applicable Document/ Directives

All work performed by the contractor shall be accomplished in accordance with applicable publications, technical directives, instructions, standards, and procedures contained in pertinent manuals utilizing blueprints, drawings or schematics as provided by the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM). Additional documentation may be provided by NCGl as needed by contractors

End

This solicitation documents and incorporates provisions and clauses in effect through the latest FAC and DFARS change notices. It is the responsibility of the contractor to be familiar with the applicable clauses and provisions. The clauses may be accessed in full text at these addresses: https://www.acquisition.gov

Post Award Contract Administration will be performed by NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center San Diego, Code 240.

Payment: The US Navy anticipates using Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) to pay invoices IAW DFAR 252.232-7003 and DFARS 252.232-7006.

Requests for technical and or contractual clarification are to be submitted in writing. TECHNICAL QUESTIONS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL to nelson.arias@navy.mil received no later than 22 September 2021 9:00:00 AM Pacific Standard Time. Answers to questions will be provided in the form of an amendment to this solicitation.

THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS AND CLAUSES ARE APPLICABLE AND ARE HEREBY

INCORPORATED INTO THE SOLICITATION BY REFERENCE AND BY FULL TEXT.

It is the responsibility of the interested contractors to obtain copies of the necessary provisions and or clauses that are required as a part of this solicitation. Required clauses/provisions that are not submitted may render a quote not to be accepted by the Government.

REVIEW OF AGENCY PROTESTS

The contracting activity, Fleet Logistics Center San Diego (FLCSD) will process agency protests in accordance with the requirements set forth in FAR 33.103(d).

Pursuant to FAR 33.103(d)(4), agency protests may be filed directly with the appropriate reviewing authority; or, a protester may appeal a decision rendered by a contracting officer to the reviewing authority.

The reviewing authority for FLCSD is the Director, Regional Contracts Department, Fleet Logistics Center San Diego at 3985 Cummings Road, San Diego, CA 92136-4200. Agency procurement protests should clearly identify the initial adjudicating official, i.e., the "contracting officer" or "reviewing official".

Offerors should note this review of the Contracting Officer's decision will not extend GAO's timeliness requirements. Therefore, any subsequent protest to GAO must be filed within 10 days of knowledge of initial adverse agency action.

WAGE DETERMINATION

Reference WD 2015-5626 (Rev.13) dated August 2, 2021. To view the Ventura County, CA Wage Determination-please visit https://sam.gov/

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFEROR

The government intends to award a single Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract resulting from this solicitation to a capable vendor. It will be awarded competitively, using price and other factors under FAR Part 13.

The nature of this contract is for a non-personal services for a repair of Material Handling Equipment (MHE) at Port Hueneme, CA.

All proposals must fully-comply with these instructions and address all solicitation requirements to be eligible for award. As such, proposals that take exception to any term or condition of this solicitation, propose any additional term or condition, or omit any required information, may not be considered for award. Alternate proposals are not authorized and will be rejected.

Each initial offer should contain the Offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that there are no discrepancies presented within the information contained in its offer.

Potential Offerors are hereby notified that in the event there are discrepancies within the information received by the Government, or in comparison to Government information provided in the solicitation, the Government reserves the right to apply its judgment to resolve such discrepancies during the evaluation of the proposals without conducting discussions.

An Offeror’s proposal is presumed to represent the Offeror’s best efforts to comply with the solicitation requirements. Clarity and completeness of the proposal are of the utmost importance. The proposal must be written in a practical, clear, and concise manner. It must use quantitative terms whenever possible and must avoid qualitative adjectives to the maximum extent possible. Proposal volumes must be internally consistent or the proposal may be considered unrealistic, precluding further consideration for award. The offer should be complete as submitted and not include references to data or information previously submitted. Data previously submitted to the Navy, if any, will not be incorporated “by reference” into the offer and will not be considered in the evaluation of the proposal.

The proposal must demonstrate that the Offeror understands all requirements in the Statement of Work (SOW). It must demonstrate the Offeror’s familiarity with the detailed aspects of the requirements, and clearly show that the Offeror correctly interpreted all of the requirements. Offerors are cautioned against restating SOW requirements in their proposal, particularly with regard to technical requirements and must state how all requirements will be met. Statements such as "the Offeror understands" and "the Offeror shall/can comply," along with responses that paraphrase the SOW, are inadequate. The use of phrases such as "standard practices" (with a specific government reference or industry reference) does not indicate that an Offeror understands the requirements and will likely result in a diminished evaluation rating.

At the Government’s discretion, the Contractor’s proposal may be incorporated into the final contract, either in whole or in part.

The Government will make every attempt to answer all questions in a timely manner. All questions related to the solicitation must be submitted to the Contract Specialist, Nelson Arias at nelson.arias@navy.mil by the prescribed date in soliciation.

Proposal Format and Content: All offers may be submitted in a format of the Contractor’s choosing that reflects their ability to deliver this effort.

Electronic copies of all offers are to be submitted to the contract specialist, Nelson Arias, at e-mail nelson.arias@navy.mil. Copies must be able to be printed out single-sided, on either an 8.5” by 11” paper or 11’ by 17’ paper for diagrams, charts, or graphic materials; type size 10, Times New Roman font.

Pages of each volume must be numbered consecutively. All offers must be received by closing date of the solicitation. This posted closing date and time applies to all electronic copy submissions.

Data submitted directly to the Government by subcontractors in support of the prime offeror’s cost proposal shall all be prominently identified. All submissions are subject requirements including the posted closing date and time.

PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting JUL 2019 52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and

Video Surveillance Services or Equipment

DEC 2019

52.209-11 Representation by Corporations Regarding Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law

FEB 2016

52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Items (CD 2018-O0018) JUN 2020 52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Items OCT 2014 52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications—Commercial Items JUN 2020 52.252-5 Authorized Deviations in Provisions APR 1984 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

NOV 2011

252.204-7008 Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls

OCT 2016

252.204-7016 Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services-- Representation

DEC 2019

252.204-7017 Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services--Representation

DEC 2019

252.225-7973 Prohibition on the Procurement of Foreign-Made Unmanned Aircraft Systems—Representation. (DEVIATION 2020-O0015)

MAY 2020

252.225-7974 Representation Regarding Persons that have Business Operations with the Maduro Regime (DEVIATION 2020-O0005)

FEB 2020

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.203-19** Prohibition on Requiring Certain Internal Confidentiality

Agreements or Statements

JAN 2017

52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2018 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance JUL 2016 52.204‐19 Incorporation By Reference Of Representations And

Certifications

DEC 2014

52.204-23** Prohibition on Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Services Developed or Provided by Kaspersky Lab and Other Covered Entities

JUL 2018

52.204-25** Prohibition of Contracting for Certain Telecomunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment

AUG 2019

52.209-10*** Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations

NOV 2015

52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions—Commercial Items OCT 2018 52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement

Statutes or Executive Orders—Commercial Items (CD 2018-O0021)

52.219-4 Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns (CD 2020-O0008)

52.219-28* Post-Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation NOV 2020 52.219-33* Non-Manufacturer Rule (Deviation 2020-O0008) MAR 2020 52.222-3* Convict Labor JUNE 2003 52.222-21* Prohibition of Segregated Facilities APR 2015 52.222-26* Equal Opportunity SEP 2016 52.222-41* Service Contract Labor Standards AUG 2018 52.222-42* Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires MAY 2014 52.222-50* Combating Trafficking in Persons OCT 2020 52.222-55* Minimum Wages Under Executive Order 13658 DEC 2015 52.222-62* Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706 JAN 2017 52.223-18* Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging

While Driving

JUN 2020

52.232-33* Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer—System for Award Management

OCT 2018

52.232-18 Availability of Funds APR 1984 52.232-36* Payment by Third Party MAY 2014 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

DEC 2013

52.233-4** Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004 52.245-1 Government Property JAN 2017 52.245-9 Use and Charges APR 2012 52.246-4 Inspection of Services-Fixed-Price AUG 1996 52.247-34 F.o.b. Destination NOV 1991 52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated By Reference FEB 1998 52.252-6 Authorized Deviations in Clauses NOV 2020 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203‐7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights

SEP 2013

252.204-7015 Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation Support

MAY 2016

252.204-7018 Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services

DEC 2019

252.211-7007 Reporting of Government-Furnished Property AUG 2012 252.223-7008 Prohibition of Hexavalent Chromium JUN 2013 252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUNE 2013 252.225-7972 Prohibition on the Procurement of Foreign-Made

Unmanned Aircraft Systems. (DEVIATION 2020-O0015)

252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports

DEC 2018

252.232-7009 Mandatory Payment by Governmentwide Commercial MAY 2018

Purchase Card 252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.232-7017 Accelerating Payments to Small Business Subcontractors--

Prohibition on Fees and Consideration

APR 2020

252.237-7010 Prohibition on Interrogation of Detainees by Contractor Personnel

JUN 2013

252.243-7001 Pricing of Contract Modifications DEC 1991 252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items JUN 2013 252.246-7003 Notification of Potential Safety Issues JUN 2013 252.246-7004 Safety of Facilities, Infrastructure, and Equipment for

Military Operations

OCT 2010

252.247-7023 Transportation of Supplies by Sea--Basic FEB 2019

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

I. Technical Capability II. Price III. Past Performance

Technical and past performance, when combined, are approximately equal to total price

(b) Options. No options for this award.

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(d) Basis for Award:

The government intends to award a single Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract resulting from this solicitation.

It will be awarded competitively, using price and other factors under FAR Part 13.

To be eligible for award, the Offeror must fully comply with the “Instructions to Offerors” section above, and sufficiently address all solicitation requirements. As such, offers that take exception to any term or condition of this solicitation, propose any additional term or condition, or omit any required information, may not be considered for award. Alternate proposals are NOT authorized and will be rejected.

The Government reserves the right to conduct discussion if the Contracting Officer deems it necessary.

Offerors that take exception to the Government’s technical requirements in the technical volume will not be considered for award; therefore, any exception to the Government’s technical requirements must be resolved prior to the solicitation closing date.

To be considered eligible for award, each Offeror must submit a single proposal that contains a complete and accurate response to the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will accept only one offer.

Any inconsistency, within the price proposal or between the technical or price proposals, should be fully explained, or it may be considered a discrepancy within the offer and a risk in the Offeror’s ability to perform, which may affect the acceptability rating of the proposal. The proposal shall be in the format prescribed by, and shall contain a response to each of the areas identified in “Instructions to Offeros.”

Offers will be evaluated on each of the following evaluation factors:

Factor I – Technical Factor II - Past Performance Factor III – Price

Factor I - Technical Grading Criteria

Factor I, represents minimum acceptable criteria. Offerors’ technical information will be used to determine whether the services proposed meet the specifications included in this solicitation. Services offered, as provided in Offerors’ technical information, will be evaluated as technically acceptable or technically unacceptable. Offers which are determined to be technically unacceptable will not be considered further for award. Offerors must be rated technically “Acceptable” for each sub-factor listed above to receive an overall technically “Acceptable” and in order to be evaluated for Past Performance (Factor II). Failure to meet technically acceptable standards in any sub-factor may result in a finding of technically “Unacceptable” and will not be considered for award.

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation.

Factor II: Past Performance Grading Criteria

The Offeror shall list no more than three relevant contracts and/or subcontracts (not limited to Government contracts) within the last five years that demonstrate the ability to handle requirements of the same scope, magnitude and complexity to that which is detailed in the SOW. Relevancy shall be based on the type of tasks performed, and complexity. Include a discussion of how the references provided are relevant to the work being proposed.

Past performance will be rated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis using the ratings in Table M-2 below.

Overall Rating Definition

Acceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below including Neutral.)

Unacceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

NOTE: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”

Aspects of Past Performance Evaluation. The past performance evaluation results is an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the solicitation requirements.

Sources of Past Performance Information for Evaluation are as follows:

Past performance information may be provided by the offeror, as solicited Past performance information shall be obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency.

The evaluation team will review this past performance information and determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to performance competence assessment.

Factor III – Price Grading Criteria

Contract will be awarded to the lowest price offer that is rated acceptable in both Factors I and II.

End of Clauses/Provisions.

Contractor must complete all Representations and Certifications found in the provisions listed below within their profile in the System for Award Management (SAM) at http://www.sam.gov to be considered for this solicitation.

Quotation information may be submitted via email. Submit responses to: nelson.arias@navy.mil Reference solicitation number: N00244-21-Q-0288 on all documents and requests for information.

Quotes must be received no later than 22 September 2021 9:00 AM Pacific Standard Time.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .