CN-550000-C9O69-00010000.pdf

EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES

FOR

FINANCIAL PROJECT ID: 433797-1-32-01

FEDERAL PROJECT NO. N/A

US 19 (SR 55) FROM N. OF NEBRASKA AVE. TO S. OF TIMBERLANE RD.

DISTRICT SEVEN

PINELLAS COUNTY

Revised: 03/10/16 03/03/16 02/08/16 09/22/15

FP ID: 433797-1-32-01

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 PURPOSE __________________________________________________________________________ A-1

2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ____________________________________________________________ A-2

3 PROJECT COMMON AND PROJECT GENERAL TASKS _______________________________ A-24

4 ROADWAY ANALYSIS _____________________________________________________________ A-31

5 ROADWAY PLANS _________________________________________________________________ A-35

6a DRAINAGE ANALYSIS _____________________________________________________________ A-37

6b DRAINAGE PLANS _________________________________________________________________ A-39

7 UTILITIES ________________________________________________________________________ A-39

8 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS, COMPLIANCE AND CLEARANCES _____________________ A-42

9 STRUCTURES – SUMMARY AND MISC. TASKS AND DRAWINGS ______________________ A-46

10 STRUCTURES – BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT REPORT ___________________________________ A-47

11 STRUCTURES – TEMPORARY BRIDGE – N/A _________________________________________ A-48

12 STRUCTURES – SHORT SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE __________________________________ A-49

13 STRUCTURES – MEDIUM SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE _________________________________ A-50

14 STRUCTURES – STRUCTURAL STEEL BRIDGE ______________________________________ A-52

15 STRUCTURES – SEGMENTAL CONCRETE BRIDGES– N/A _____________________________ A-55

16 STRUCTURES – MOVABLE SPAN– N/A ______________________________________________ A-55

17 STRUCTURES – RETAINING WALLS ________________________________________________ A-55

18 STRUCTURES - MISCELLANEOUS __________________________________________________ A-56

19 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING ANALYSIS ____________________________________ A-58

20 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS ________________________________________ A-59

21 SIGNALIZATION ANALYSIS ________________________________________________________ A-61

22 SIGNALIZATION PLANS ___________________________________________________________ A-63

23 LIGHTING ANALYSIS ______________________________________________________________ A-64

24 LIGHTING PLANS _________________________________________________________________ A-67

25 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ANALYSIS – N/A _____________________________________ A-68

26 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANS – N/A _________________________________________ A-68

27 SURVEY __________________________________________________________________________ A-68

28 PHOTOGRAMMETRY ______________________________________________________________ A-73

29 MAPPING _________________________________________________________________________ A-74

30 TERRESTRIAL MOBILE LiDAR _____________________________________________________ A-76

31 ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT – N/A _____________________________________________ A-76

32 NOISE BARRIERS IMPACT DESIGN ASSESSMENT IN THE DESIGN PHASE _____________ A-76

FP ID: 433797-1-32-01

ii

33 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS _____________________________ A-79

34 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PLANS _________________________________ A-84

35 GEOTECHNICAL __________________________________________________________________ A-87

36 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS ________________________________________________________ A-95

37 INVOICING LIMITS ________________________________________________________________ A-96

Stage III A-1 March 10, 2016

EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES

HIGHWAY AND BRIDGE/STRUCTURAL DESIGN

This Exhibit forms an integral part of the agreement between the State of Florida Department of Transportation (hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT or FDOT) and H.W. Lochner, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT) relative to the transportation facility described as follows:

Financial Project ID: 433797-1-32-01 Federal Aid Project No.: N/A County Section No.: 15150 000 Description: US 19 (SR 55) from N. of Nebraska Ave. to S. of Timberlane Rd.

Pinellas County Bridge No(s): No Existing Bridges, New Bridge Numbers To Be Determined Railroad Crossing No(s): N/A

1 PURPOSE

The purpose of this Exhibit is to describe the scope of work and the responsibilities of the CONSULTANT and the DEPARTMENT in connection with the design and preparation of a complete set of construction contract documents and incidental engineering services, as necessary, for improvements to the transportation facility described herein.

Major Work Mix includes: Add Lanes and Reconstruct Major Work Types include: 3.2 Minor Work Types include: 2.0, 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.2.2, 6.3.1, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4.1

Known Alternative/Innovative Construction Contracting Methods: None at this time

The general objective is for the CONSULTANT to prepare a set of contract documents including plans, specifications, supporting engineering analysis, calculations and other technical documents in accordance with FDOT policy, procedures and requirements. These Contract documents will be used by the construction contractor to build the project and test the project components. These Contract documents will be used by the DEPARTMENT or its Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) representatives for inspection and final acceptance of the project. The CONSULTANT shall follow a systems engineering process to ensure that all required project components are included in the development of the Contract documents and the project can be built as designed and to specifications.

The Scope of Services establishes which items of work in the Plans Preparation Manual and other pertinent manuals are specifically prescribed to accomplish the work included in this contract, and also indicates which items of work will be the responsibility of the CONSULTANT and/or the DEPARTMENT. Where a type of service is noted herein to be provided by the DEPARTMENT, the CONSULTANT shall communicate to the DEPARTMENT in writing the specific nature of such DEPARTMENT services as are necessary to support the CONSULTANT’s responsibilities under this contract, and shall do so by such time as will support the DEPARTMENT’s original project schedule or any subsequent DEPARTMENT-approved revisions thereto.

The CONSULTANT shall be aware that as a project is developed, certain modifications and/or improvements to the original concept may be required. The CONSULTANT shall incorporate these refinements into the design and consider such refinements to be an anticipated and integral part of the work. This shall not be a basis for any supplemental fee request(s).

The CONSULTANT shall demonstrate good project management practices while working on this project.

These include communication with the DEPARTMENT and others as necessary, management of time and

FPN: 433797 1 32 01

Stage III March 10, 2016 A-2 resources, and documentation. The CONSULTANT shall set up and maintain throughout the design of the project a contract file in accordance with DEPARTMENT procedures. CONSULTANTs are expected to know the laws and rules governing their professions and are expected to provide services in accordance with current regulations, codes, ordinances and recognized standards applicable to such professional services. The CONSULTANT shall provide qualified technical and professional personnel to perform to DEPARTMENT standards and procedures, the duties and responsibilities assigned under the terms of this agreement. The CONSULTANT shall minimize to the maximum extent possible the DEPARTMENT’s need to apply its own resources to assignments authorized by the DEPARTMENT.

The DEPARTMENT will provide contract administration, management services and technical reviews of all work associated with the development and preparation of contract documents, including Construction documents. The DEPARTMENT’s technical reviews are for high-level conformance and are not meant to be comprehensive reviews. The CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible for all work performed and work products developed under this Scope of Services. The DEPARTMENT may provide job-specific information and/or functions as outlined in this contract, if favorable.

2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The CONSULTANT shall investigate the status of the project(s) and become familiar with concepts and commitments (typical sections, alignments, etc.) developed from prior studies and/or activities. If a Preliminary Engineering Report is available from a prior or current Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) study, the CONSULTANT shall use the approved concepts as a basis for the design unless otherwise noted herein or directed by the DEPARTMENT.

The purpose of this project is to add lanes and reconstruct US19 (SR55) from N. of Nebraska Ave. to S. of Timberlane Road. US19 (SR55) is an urban principal arterial on the SIS. The existing typical section for US19 (SR55) has 8 lanes divided with a raised median, 12 foot travel lanes, 4-5 foot paved shoulders with bike lanes and 5 foot sidewalks. A new single point urban interchange (SPUI) is proposed at US19 and Alderman Road. US19 will overpass Alderman Road. A new mainline overpass of a northbound directional left turn/u-turn is proposed at Sly Fox Run. A new tight urban diamond interchange (TUDI) is proposed at US19 and Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Drive. US19 will overpass Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr. With the addition of the proposed median barrier wall, the median openings will be closed from Nebraska Ave.

to S. of Timberlane Road. This project is within the Pinellas County urban area boundary.

The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the design and construction (by others) of both FPIDs 433796- 1-52-01 and 433799-1-52-01.

This roadway has been designated as a Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) facility. SIS/NHS (National Highway System) standards shall be followed to the greatest extent feasible in the design of specific improvements. Detailed design criteria for the development and modernization of the SIS/NHS are based on standards established in the DEPARTMENT’s Plans Preparation Manual. Specific SIS criteria can be found in Strategic Intermodal System Highway Component Standards and Criteria Procedure 525-30- 260-a.

At the option of the CONSULTANT with the approval of the DEPARTMENT Project Manager, this project may be designed and delivered using either 1) Autodesk AutoCAD Civil 3D 2014, or the DEPARTMENT’s current Autodesk AutoCAD Civil 3D standard, or 2) Bentley MicroStation GEOPAK Corridor Modeler, or the DEPARTMENT’s current MicroStation/GEOPAK Corridor Modeler standard. See http://www.dot.state.fl.us/ecso/main/Version/CurrentVersions.shtm for current versions of acceptable software. In either case, the project shall be designed, delivered and signed and sealed in compliance with the DEPARTMENT’s CADD Production Criteria Handbook (CPCH) published at http://www.dot.state.fl.us/ecso/downloads/publications/CriteriaHandBook/CPCH2010MR4/CPCHFDOT 2010MR4.shtm. The DEPARTMENT provides a “State Kit” for both Autodesk and Bentley products that can be downloaded from http://www.dot.state.fl.us/ecso/downloads/software.

A-3

The CONSULTANT shall deliver a Three-Dimensional (3D) Model of the design project in accordance with the specifications/criteria defined within the CPCH, specifically in Chapter 8 (Section 8.6.5.).

One or more Optional Services Authorizations may be issued to the CONSULTANT for the design of one or more pedestrian/bicycle/multi-use/shared-use overpass bridge structures spanning transversely across the US 19 right-of-way corridor within the begin/end limits of this project. Such design services shall be construed to potentially include all incidental technical discipline services necessary to accomplish this generally-stated purpose, whether or not specifically described herein.

2.1 Project General and Roadway (Activities 3, 4 and 5)

Public Involvement:

Community Awareness Plan

Fact Sheet (internal use only): A fact sheet will be created and forwarded to District Public Information Office.

YES NO - Explain:

Project Brochure (public distribution): An informational brochure will be created for this project.

YES Not Applicable

Elected Officials Design Phase Submittal Notification:

An email notification will be sent from the District Secretary to local elected officials at each phase review.

YES NO - Explain:

Maintenance of Access Plan (business & residential): - Access to the State Highway System will be maintained.

Local events will be considered when implementing the MOT plan.

A list of driveways and the hours of operation for the businesses affected by this project will be provided.

YES NO

Blue business specific signs will be used. YES NO - Explain:

This Project Is Located Near:

Raymond James Stadium YES NO Ybor City YES NO Tropicana Field YES NO Plant City YES NO Downtown Tampa YES NO Gulf Blvd. in Pinellas County YES NO Downtown St. Petersburg YES NO Florida State Fairgrounds YES NO

If YES to any of the above a special events traffic control plan will be needed.

Median Modification:

In accordance with Florida Statutes 335.199 written notification regarding proposed median changes will be made to all affected property owners and tenants at least 180 days prior to final design. A public hearing will also be held at this time. Graphics including aerial overlays will be created by the EOR and included in the notification. These graphics will also be used during the public hearing. YES

Driveway Letters:

Driveway letters will be sent to each property owner if changes are anticipated.

YES NO - Explain:

Encroachment Letters:

A-4

Encroachment letters will be sent during design. YES NO Optional Service

Design Open House:

This project will require a design open house. YES NO

Roll Plot w/Design Overlay:

A roll plot with design overlay will be created and used at the open house. YES NO

Frequently Asked Questions Handout:

A frequently asked questions handout will be created and used at the open house. YES NO

Other: N/A

Other Agency Presentations/Meetings: The CONSULTANT shall attend and/or provide support to the DEPARTMENT for any MPO meetings. See Section 3.1.11.

Joint Project Agreements: Optional Services

Specification Package Preparation: The CONSULTANT shall prepare the specifications package.

Value Engineering: One Value Engineering review shall be required for this project.

Risk Assessment Workshop: N/A

Plan Type: The roadway plans shall be prepared in a Plan format. Profile sheets shall be provided, if necessary, to show the vertical controls that are needed for the construction of these projects. The plan (and profile) sheets shall be plotted at a horizontal scale of 1" = 40'.

Limits: US 19 (SR 55) from N of Nebraska Ave (MP 26.700) to S of Timberlane Rd (MP 29.100).

Project Length = 2.400 miles.

Typical Section:

1. US19 Mainline: 6 lane divided with 18 foot median with, 8 foot paved shoulders inside and median barrier wall, 11 foot travel lanes, 10 foot paved shoulders outside with 2 lane, one way frontage roads (NB & SB), curb and gutter inside, 10 foot travel lanes, *4 foot bike lanes, curb and gutter outside and **6 foot sidewalk.

2. Alderman Road: 4 lane divided, 26 foot raised median, curb and gutter inside, 11 foot travel lanes, 4 foot bike lanes, curb and gutter outside, sidewalks on both sides.

3. Single lane ramp with 15 foot lanes, curb and gutter inside and 6 foot paved shoulders outside.

4. US19 Bridges: 6 lane divided with 8 foot shoulders inside, median barrier wall, 11 foot travel lanes, 10 foot shoulder outside with traffic railing barrier.

*7 foot buffered bike lanes are preferred whenever feasible.

** 8 foot sidewalk along east side of the roadway north of Alderman Road where feasible.

Pavement Design: Seven pavement designs (inclusive of shoulders) are anticipated for the US19 mainline, frontage roads, U-turns, ramps and side roads.

Pavement Type Selection Report(s): The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Pavement Type Selection Report and submit to the DEPARTMENT for approval. The report shall include pavement for US19 and the proposed frontage roads.

Cross Slope: N/A.

A-5

Access Management Classification: 3

Transit Route Features: Coordinate with Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) and design as requested their proposed engineering and right-of-way-feasible, ADA-compliant bus landing pads, rider shelter pads and incidental universal sidewalk connections, etc. All transit agency contact shall be coordinated in advance with the DEPARTMENT’s Public Transit Coordinator.

The CONSULTANT shall evaluate and design a high profile median barrier for the prevention of pedestrian crossing at prohibited locations on US19, typically in those areas where the mainline roadway grade is similar to the grade of the adjacent frontage road.

The CONSULTANT shall verify horizontal clearance requirements are satisfied and design guardrail and end treatments to current standard for this facility.

Major Intersections/Interchanges: Interchanges at US19 at Alderman Road and at Innisbrook/Citrus Ave.

Roadway Alternative Analysis: N/A

Level of TCP Plans: III

Temporary Signals: Temporary signals shall be required at US19 at Alderman R. and US19 at Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr.

Temporary Lighting: Temporary lighting shall be provided through all phases of construction throughout the project limits including US19 and Alderman Rd. The lighting shall be consistent, with no gaps between limits of this project and existing adjacent roadways and intersections.

Temporary Drainage: A temporary drainage design shall be prepared to ensure the project drains according to standards during all phases of construction.

Design Variations/Exceptions: Design variation and/or exception requests shall be prepared for any situations not meeting current DEPARTMENT and/or FHWA requirements, as appropriate.

The CONSULTANT shall prepare design Variation and Exception reports for the purpose of estimating design and construction needs based on initial observations. The CONSULTANT shall recommend, to the DEPARTMENT, either correction of any deficiencies, or obtaining the appropriate design variations or exceptions, including applicable benefit-cost analyses, in accordance with DEPARTMENT procedures. Anticipated features requiring analysis include:

Shoulder width, median width, lane width for mainline and frontage road, bridge shoulder width, buffered bike lane, and base clearance.

Back of Sidewalk Profiles: Provide back of sidewalk profiles through Phase III Plans or as directed by the DEPARTMENT.

2.2 Drainage (Activities 6a and 6b)

The project consists of roadway reconstruction of US 19 to provide six through lanes and four frontage lanes, two in each direction, an overpass at Alderman Road, Sly Fox Run, and at Innisbrook Drive. Refer to Section 2.1 for detailed descriptions of the proposed project typical sections. The existing typical section includes open conveyance ditches, some with control structures that provide stormwater treatment for a previous continuous right turn lane project.

No other formal treatment is being provided. The reconstruction of US 19 will result in total impacts to the existing roadside ditches and treatment facilities. Existing environmental resource permits (ERP) No. 22085.00 and .01 were issued by the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) in 2001 for the continuous right turn lane projects. Permit 25443.00 was

A-6 issued for the addition of sidewalks in 2003, and an exemption was granted for a RRR project in 2012.

Runoff from the proposed roadway surfaces will be conveyed via an enclosed storm sewer system to stormwater management facilities (SMF).

The project area is located on Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) community 12103C, panels 0076G and 0078G. The project could impact floodplain areas in Zones AE and X associated with Lake Tarpon, north of Cypress Drive to the end of the project. It is the CONSULTANT’s responsibility to determine the location and volume of floodplain impacts within the project limits. In areas designated as Zone X Other Flood Areas, where the existing flood elevation is not known, and all existing high water elevations within the low/depression areas impacted shall be established and documented. There are numerous adjacent stormwater management facilities, some of which appear to receive discharges from US 19 and others that discharge to the US 19 right of way, which will need to be assessed as well to determine their current design high water stages. The proposed design shall document no increase in high water elevations (3-year thru 100-year) in offsite low/depression and stormwater management areas adjacent to and along the DEPARTMENT’s right-of-way.

According to the 2013 resurfacing plans FPID 429005-1-52-01, there are three cross drains within the project limits. The CONSULTANT shall verify that all existing cross drains and storm sewers that are to remain have adequate hydraulic capacity and design life. Determination of the exact number of cross drains and potential cross drain extensions shall be the responsibility of the CONSULTANT. The cross drain evaluation shall consider alternatives to extending a cross drain and shall be based upon horizontal clearances and clear zone criteria, barrier costs, cross drain costs, and risk. The design flow analysis shall be performed in accordance with the DEPARTMENT’s procedures.

An Alternative Stormwater Management Facility Report (Pond Siting Report or PSR) shall be prepared to determine cost effective pond sites or stormwater management methods. At least three valid SMF alternatives shall be evaluated for each of the four roadway drainage basins.

Alternatives include conventional SMF’s or alternative stormwater management methods, including joint use or regional ponds, necessary to comply with current permitting requirements.

The PSR shall also include three floodplain compensation site alternatives for the one anticipated FPC for floodplain impacts associated with Lake Tarpon. Compensation site alternatives shall be explored away from the commercial areas in the vicinity of US 19. Incorporation of floodplain compensation within an SMF site, and non-lake frontage properties with equalizing pipe connections to the lake should also be considered to reduce cost. Geotechnical borings shall be performed for each SMF alternative; however, environmental clearances (wetlands, protected species, cultural resources, and contamination) for the SMF alternatives shall be included as an optional service.

After the project’s stormwater management needs have been determined, an Environmental Look Around (ELA) meeting shall be held with regional stakeholders to discuss watershed wide stormwater needs and alternative permitting approaches. Stakeholders include but are not limited to SWFWMD, Pinellas County, and the Lake Tarpon Management Committee.

New stormwater management facilities shall be designed with the FDOT Critical Duration using the peak discharge approach (3-year through 100-year). The CONSULTANT may recommend only utilizing the Water Management District criteria, but must obtain approval from the District Drainage Engineer.

The project area is within the Tampa Bay and Spring Coast Watersheds, and drains to Cow Branch, Bee Branch, Lake Tarpon Outlet, and Klosterman Bayou Run basins. The assigned Water Body Identification (WBID) number associated with these basins are 1529, 1527B, 1486, and 1508A respectively. WBID’s 1529, 1527B, and 1508A are listed as impaired for fecal coliform. WBID 1480 is not listed as impaired, however, Lake Tarpon (WBID 1486A) is listed as

A-7 impaired for dissolved oxygen and nutrients. SMF’s with direct outfalls to Lake Tarpon will be required to demonstrate no net increase in pollutant loading to Lake Tarpon. It is the CONSULTANT’s responsibility to verify the impairments listed for each basin within the project limits. Lake Tarpon is an Outstanding Florida Waters.

The general goals for the project drainage design are as follows:

Provide the most economical and practical drainage design for the proposed project.

The drainage concept shall consider the impacts by adjacent offsite conveyances to the

DEPARTMENT’S drainage system and outfalls.

Provide assurance that the proposed drainage design does not create significant additional floodplain impacts and meets the regulated water quality and attenuation requirements.

The extent of the existing and proposed conditions shall be documented in the Drainage Design Hydraulic Study. The drainage documentation shall follow the latest update of the District 7 preferred Design Standards and Criteria.

A search of the DEPARTMENT’s District 7 Flood Data Inventory was conducted for this project.

Four active and one inactive flooding complaints were found within the project limits. US 19 has a history of overtopping near the north end of the project. There is also a history of erosion and sedimentation issues within the project limits. There is one known active sinkhole adjacent to the west side of US 19 north of Walmart. The CONSULTANT shall discuss these issues with Department Maintenance personnel to become familiar with these issues and incorporate solutions into their drainage design where feasible.

If the proposed drainage design concept incorporates existing cross drains or existing storm sewer pipes, the CONSULTANT shall notify the DEPARTMENT if video inspection of the storm sewer system is recommended. Video inspection services will be performed by others under the DEPARTMENT’s Districtwide video inspection contract. Within three weeks following the Notice-To-Proceed, the CONSULTANT shall provide to the DEPARTMENT figures showing the locations of the pipes to be inspected, and shall quantify the length and pipe sizes for the required work. Prior to the first phase submittal of plans, the CONSULTANT shall review the inspection report and provide to the DEPARTMENT recommendations and construction cost estimates for any pipe repair. The design implementation of any approved recommendations not included in this Scope of Services may be added to the Agreement as an Optional Service.

2.3 Utilities Coordination (Activity 7)

Utilities anticipated on the project: Duke Energy Distribution, , Bright House Networks, Verizon FL, Clearwater Gas Systems, Pinellas County Utilities, Time Warner (Level 3 Communications), Wide Open West (formerly Knology) Utilities Inc.. 8 UAO’s

2.4 Environmental Permits, Compliances, and Clearances (Activity 8)

Expected permits:

The anticipated permitting involvement for this project includes obtaining a SWFWMD Environmental Resource Permit and an Army Corp of Engineers 404 permits.

The CONSULTANT shall delineate wetlands and surface waters in accordance with Section

8.3.2. Season High Water Levels points will be necessary, one for each cross drain, one for each of the pond outfalls and for the proposed Floodplain compensation pond sites.

The CONSULTANT shall conduct a desktop review to determine which species are of concern within the project boundaries. A field review will follow to determine potential habitat for these species. It is anticipated that the proposed project will not likely impact any listed species. These efforts will be documented in an environmental memorandum in accordance with 8.3.3.

A-8

The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the DEPARTMENT on the amount of proposed impacts. The DEPARTMENT will direct the use of a mitigation site or Florida Statutes if necessary.

2.5 Structures (Activities 9 – 18)

Bridge(s): New bridges are required at the following locations:

US 19 over South Pedestrian Thruway south of Pine Ridge Way – Single span bridge approximately 35 feet long

US 19 over Alderman Road – 3 span SPUI approximately 600 feet long including Pile Supported Cantilevered Slab Sections at approaches.

US 19 over Sly Fox Run – Single span bridge approximately 80 feet long providing an access to future Palm Harbor ER and pedestrian crossing. (Optional Service)

US 19 over North Pedestrian Thruway north of Cyprus Dr. – single span bridge approximately 35 feet long

US 19 over Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr. – single span TUDI approximately 120 feet long.

(Optional Service)

Pedestrian/Bicycle Overpass at Lake Tarpon Dr. (Optional Service)

All bridges, with the exception of the pedestrian/bicycle overpasses, will have three (3) through lanes in each direction, 8 foot wide inside and 10 foot wide outside shoulder, 2 foot wide median barrier, and outside traffic railing.

All structures tasks other than BDRs are optional services. They will be negotiated once the BDRs are approved by the Department.

Type of Bridge Structure Work:

BDR – US 19 over South Pedestrian Thruway, US 19 over Alderman Rd. and US 19 over North Pedestrian Thruway. BDR for US 19 over Sly Fox Run, US 19 over Innisbrook Dr., and pedestrian overpass will be included in Optional Services.

Temporary Bridge – N/A Short Span Concrete - Optional Services Medium Span Concrete – Optional Services Structural Steel – Optional Services Segmental Concrete – N/A Movable Span – N/A

Retaining Walls: Optional Services - Permanent wrap-around retaining walls at each end bent of the US 19 bridge over Alderman Rd.; Permanent wrap-around retaining walls at each end bent of the US 19 bridge over Sly Fox Run; . Permanent wrap-around retaining walls at each end bent of the US 19 Bridge at Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr.; and Permanent wrap-around retaining walls at each end bent of two (2) pedestrian thruway bridges. Temporary MSE walls for phased construction of each bridge (9 walls for 5 bridges). Permanent sheet pile walls along the outsides of the frontage road at the R/W. Temporary critical sheet pile walls for bridge footing construction at the US 19 over Alderman Rd. bridge and along the R/W for utility relocation.

Temporary Critical Sheet Pile Walls: Optional Services - for pier footings, drainage and utility relocation along R/W, Temporary MSE Walls, Permanent MSE Walls, and Permanent Sheet Pile Walls.

Noise Barrier Walls: Optional Services - to be determined after noise study.

Miscellaneous: Optional Services - The following miscellaneous structures are anticipated:

A-9

Mast arms at the intersection of: US 19 and Alderman Road; US 19 and Sly Fox Run; US 19 and Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr.; and US 19 and Eagle Chase Blvd.

Twenty (20) overhead cantilever sign structures Two (2) overhead span sign structures Two (2) bridge mounted signs at US 19 and Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr. overpass bridge Light pole special spread footing foundations Ground mounted sign special spread footing foundations. Coordinate with EOR and structural engineer (when applicable) to identify and develop mitigation strategies for sensitive structures and facilities which require special considerations for settlement, vibration and/or groundwater monitoring by the contractor during construction. When there is risk of damage to the structure or facility, provide recommendations in the geotechnical report addressing project specific needs and coordinate those locations with the EOR. See PPM Volume I Chapter 34 and Chapter 9 of the Soils and Foundations Handbook.

Two overhead span DMS structures – Optional Services.

FOUR CCTV poles

2.6 Signing and Pavement Markings (Activities 19 & 20)

The CONSULTANT shall develop a Master Signing Plan for the proposed roadway geometry depicting proposed guide signs. The Master Signing Plan, at a minimum, shall include the following guide signs.

Northbound US 19/ SR 55:

One (1) overhead cantilever sign assembly at approximately one-half (1/2) mile in advance of theoretical gore of Alderman Rd exit ramp.

One (1) overhead cantilever sign assembly at theoretical gore of Alderman Rd exit ramp.

One (1) overhead cantilever sign assembly at approximately one-half (1/2) mile in advance of theoretical gore of Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr. exit ramp.

One (1) overhead cantilever sign assembly at theoretical gore of Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr. exit ramp.

Southbound US 19/ SR 55:

One (1) overhead cantilever sign assembly at approximately one-half (1/2) mile in advance of theoretical gore of Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr. exit ramp.

One (1) overhead cantilever sign assembly at theoretical gore of Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr. exit ramp.

One (1) overhead cantilever sign assembly at approximately one-half (1/2) mile in advance of theoretical gore of Alderman Rd exit ramp.

One (1) overhead cantilever sign assembly at theoretical gore of Alderman Rd exit ramp.

One (1) overhead cantilever sign assembly at approximately one-half (1/2) mile in advance of theoretical gore of Nebraska Ave. exit ramp.

One (1) overhead cantilever sign assembly at theoretical gore of Nebraska Ave. exit ramp.

Northbound Frontage Rd:

Two (2) ground mounted sign assembly approaching Alderman Rd intersection.

One (1) overhead cantilever sign assembly approaching Alderman Rd intersection.

A-10

Two (2) ground mounted sign assembly approaching Sly Fox Rd intersection.

Two (2) overhead cantilever sign assemblies north of Alderman Rd, one at the theoretical gore of the On-Ramp to northbound US 19/SR 55 and one in advance of the on-Ramp.

Two (2) ground mounted sign assembly approaching Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr. intersection.

One (1) overhead cantilever sign assembly approaching Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr. intersection.

Two (2) overhead cantilever sign assemblies north of Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr., one at the theoretical gore of the On-Ramp to northbound US 19/SR 55 and one in advance of the on-Ramp.

Southbound Frontage Rd One (1) ground mounted sign assembly approaching Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr. intersection.

One (1) overhead cantilever sign assembly approaching Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr. intersection.

Two (2) overhead cantilever sign assemblies south of Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr., one at the theoretical gore of the On-Ramp to southbound US 19/SR 55 and one in advance of the On- Ramp.

One (1) ground mounted sign assembly approaching Alderman Rd intersection.

One (1) overhead cantilever sign assembly approaching Alderman Rd intersection.

Two (2) overhead cantilever sign assemblies south of Alderman Rd one at the theoretical gore of the On-Ramp to southbound US 19/SR 55 and one in advance of the On-Ramp.

One (1) ground mounted sign assembly approaching Nebraska Ave. intersection.

Provide block number signs identified as required during the development of master signing plan.

Alderman Rd:

One (1) overhead span sign assembly on eastbound Alderman Rd approaching US 19 One (1) overhead span sign assembly on westbound Alderman Rd approaching US 19

Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr.:One (1) bridge mounted sign assembly on westbound Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr. approaching US 19 One (1) bridge mounted sign assembly on westbound Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr. approaching US

The locations of the proposed sign assemblies and structures, number of sign panels per structure, and the development of the specific sign panel legends shall be coordinated with the

DEPARTMENT.

2.7 Signals (Activities 21 & 22)

The CONSULTANT shall design signal system with mast arm assemblies, LED traffic signal heads, vehicular detection, emergency vehicle preemption detectors (if required), LED internally illuminated overhead street name signs (servicing all applicable directions), full pedestrian features, and uninterrupted power supply (UPS) at the interchanges of US 19/ SR 55 and Alderman Rd and Innisbrook Dr./Citrus Dr., US 19 SB Frontage Rd at Sly Fox Run and Eagle Chase. The Eagle Chase signal shall be designed as emergency signal that flashes yellow for SB Frontage Rd approach and red for Eagle Chase approach.

A-11

The CONSULTANT shall determine the materials needed at each intersection, and coordinate with the Maintaining Agency to determine the preferred type of vehicular detection (video or loop assembly) and whether emergency vehicle preemption is required.

Traffic Data Collection: N/A

Traffic Studies: CONSULTANT shall prepare a technical memorandum documenting the results of an alternative evaluation of the interchange type at Innisbrook Drive/Citrus Drive. Traffic analysis shall also provide recommended turn lane lengths for all proposed signalized intersections.

Count Stations: N/A

Traffic Monitoring Sites:

There are two (2) portable traffic monitoring sites within the limits of this project:

Site Number: 155503, located on US 19/ SR 55, north of Highland Blvd, at milepoint 26.900.

Site Number: 159007, located on Alderman Rd. east of US 19/ SR 55, at milepoint 0.087.

The CONSULTANT shall also install following two additional portable traffic monitoring sites within US 19 mainline.

1) South of Citrus/Innisbrook Dr, north of the NB off ramp

2) South of Citrus Pond Rd, north of the NB off ramp

The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the District Seven Traffic Counts Coordinator, to determine the actual location of the portable traffic monitoring sites.

Optional Services: Includes technical special provisions.

2.8 Lighting (Activities 23 & 24)

The CONSULTANT shall design a conventional LED highway lighting system along US 19/ SR 55 including ramps and Frontage Roads throughout the project limits. The lighting design shall also include replacing existing lighting on Alderman Rd within the project limits. The lighting design shall also include underdeck lighting and pedestrian lighting in accordance with FDOT’s

PPM.

The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the DEPARTMENT Project Manager regarding confirmation that the local government with jurisdiction will commit to maintaining or funding the maintenance of the additional highway lighting provided by this project.

2.9 Landscape Architecture (Activities 25 & 26) – N/A

2.10 Survey (Activity 27)

The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for updating and/or merging, or otherwise making use of, existing Design Survey and R/W Control Survey information available from prior US 19/SR 55 project FP ID 429005-1.

Design Survey:

The DEPARTMENT will provide Horizontal and Vertical Project Control.

A-12

The CONSULTANT shall recover/re-establish the historic alignment, reference the alignment control points, may provide aerial or terrestrial LiDAR targeting, provide 3D topographic/DTM survey through the project limits including void area densification and 25 feet beyond proposed R/W, provide check cross sections to verify the accuracy of the DTM, provide drainage survey, provide geotechnical support, and provide spot elevations for noise barrier analysis as directed.

The final Survey Line shall be recorded in field books furnished by the CONSULTANT. Field books shall be 6-1/2" by 8-3/4" cross section book with 10 by 10 grid on both sides of opening.

The methodology that is proposed to perform and prepare the topographic/DTM survey is at the discretion of the CONSULTANT. This methodology must be approved by the District Surveying and Mapping Dept., the District Location Surveyor, or his designee. When utilizing conventional survey instruments and technologies, the CONSULTANT shall follow the FDOT Surveying and Mapping Procedure, Topic No. 550-030-101. If Terrestrial Static LiDAR instruments and technologies are utilized, the CONSULTANT shall follow the applicable FDOT Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR Surveying & Mapping Guidelines, dated July 1, 2015.

Subsurface Utility: All SUE will be done in accordance with Sections 5.3 and 5.3.1 of the PPM as well as the District 7 Guidelines for Utility Designation and Locates on Construction Projects.

SUE Designation shall be for all underground Utilities where any sign post, lighting, signals and components, drainage and any construction activities that may have a possible impact to Utilities.

The DUO has determined the needs for utility designation (B), SUE (A) for the CONSULTANT based on existing utility permit information and SUE information from previous project plans 429005-1. The DUO has made those plan sheets available to the CONSULTANT through the FDOT Project Manager. The DUO recommends the CONSULTANT use this recent information in determining the verified locations of existing UAO facilities. Designate (SUE Level B) all known utilities in the project limits ( 2.4 miles on US 19 and 500' east and west on Alderman, 12 utilities) and Locate (SUE Level A) 50 test holes to verify designation and untonable utilities and to investigate (8) mast arm foundations =40, (200) street light foundations = 400, (1) ITS pole = 5, (20) cantilever signs = 100 and (300) drainage = 600 for a total of 1,195 locates.

Right-of-Way Survey:

Provide updates, if necessary, to the existing Right of Way Control Survey (FP ID 429005-1) for the limits of the project as required. The Right of Way Control Survey shall abut and be in complete agreement with existing Right of Way Control Survey(s). Existing monumentation shall be held unless it is in the signing surveyor’s opinion the previous Control Survey is in error.

a. Tie section lines, quarter section lines, (and quarter-quarter section lines when pertinent) to the Survey Line. Ties shall be made by closed traverse, appropriate redundancy, or an approved procedure. All corners shall be found or set in the field with corners properly identified with size and type and recorded in the field book.

b. Tie all subdivisions including condominium boundaries, at the beginning and end; block lines, and street right of way lines to the Survey Line. Ties shall be made by closed traverse, appropriate redundancy, or an approved procedure. All block corners shall be found or set in the field with corners properly identified with size and type and recorded in a field book. A sufficient amount of field ties must be made in order to establish the original block boundaries or existing right of way as shown on existing right of way maps in each subdivision and or condominium. Efforts should be made to identify all vacated streets within a subdivision, along with the recording data of vacation. It should be noted that 90º ties from the centerline of the side streets or radial ties to any corner will not be accepted by the DEPARTMENT. All ties must be shown as intersecting the Survey Line with the respective subdivision lines.

A-13

c. Make individual property line ties where apparent property line disputes may occur. If information is available from local surveyors, submit copies of their surveys.

2.11 Photogrammetry (Activity 28)

The Surveyor shall furnish to the Photogrammetrist the supplemental topographical survey.

Photogrammetrist shall merge the data into the previous topographic and digital terrain models.

2.12 Mapping (Activity 29) -

Control Survey Map: (Optional Service)

If necessary, the field Control Survey may be presented in the form of a 24” x 36” certified drawing. The CONSULTANT shall certify this drawing as a Control Survey, which meets the Standards of Practice adopted by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers, Chapter 5J-17 of the Florida Administrative Code. These survey drawings shall be at a scale of 1 inch = 400 feet for a key map and a scale of 1 inch = 40 feet for detail sheets or a scale acceptable to the DEPARTMENT. Unless otherwise directed, the surveyor shall furnish the DEPARTMENT with a signed, sealed and certified copy of the above map along with the CADD drawing files on disk.

The Right of Way Control Survey shall abut and be in complete agreement with existing Right of Way Control Survey(s). Existing monumentation shall be held unless it is in the signing surveyor’s opinion the previous Control Survey is in error.

The CONSULTANT shall acquire a last deed of record for each property adjoining the project limits and research any additional rights of way that may have been acquired by a local governmental agency (i.e. city or county). All existing right of way shall be plotted on the Control Survey with ties by station/offset to the Survey Line at all breaks in the right of way, including any maintained right of way. Utilize existing monumentation, if apparent. All deeds and/or any documentation acquired from local governmental agencies must be delivered to the DEPARTMENT upon completion of the Control Survey.

a. The Cover Sheet (sheet one) shall contain among other things a vicinity map, legend, index of sheets, all pertinent general survey notes, and the Certification that the Control Survey was made for the purpose of surveying, referencing, describing and mapping the Survey Line and providing horizontal position data for the support or control of right of way related maps for the transportation facility shown and depicted hereon. “I further certify said survey was done under my responsible charge and meets the Standards of Practice set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers in Chapter 5J-17 Florida Administrative Code pursuant to Section 472.027 Florida Statutes.”

b. The Key Sheet(s) shall be at a scale of 1 inch = 400 feet, or a scale acceptable to the DEPARTMENT, and shall depict the following:

1) Complete Survey Line alignment data, including beginning of survey station, all curve data, bearings on all tangent lines along the Survey line, all intermediate control point stations, and end of survey station. All control points must be identified as to type and size of material found or set at each respective point;

2) All section lines, all quarter section lines, (and all quarter-quarter section lines when pertinent) must be shown with the station where their intersection with Survey Line occurs, a distance from the nearest corner to Survey Line, and bearings and distances between all corners. Type of corner, either found or set, should be spelled out or identified by a legend. All ties shall be shown to depict a closed traverse to assure acceptable closure.

A-14

c. The Detail Sheet(s) shall be at a scale of 1 inch = 40 feet, or a scale acceptable to the

DEPARTMENT, and along with information shown on the Key Sheets shall depict the following:

1) All existing right of way shall be shown with ties to all breaks in the right of way, including any maintained right of way;

2) All subdivisions, including condominium boundaries, must be shown with a station where the Survey Line and each subdivision line intersect. A distance from Survey Line to the existing right of way line or nearest found or set corner, and bearings and distances on all subdivision lines which were intersected with the Survey Line.

All lot and block numbers, street names, plat book, page, recording date, and name of each subdivision must be shown. All ties shall be shown to depict a closed traverse to assure acceptable closure.

d. The Reference Sheet(s) shall be separate sheet(s), does not need to be plotted to scale, and shall depict the following:

1) All of the Survey Line control points and reference lines/points, along with the type and size of material used for each respective reference point;

2) Reference points for Public Land Survey corners that may potentially be removed during planned construction if any, along with the type and size of material used for each respective reference point shall be shown.

The complete Control Survey shall be submitted to the DEPARTMENT for review and approval.

Right-of-Way Map: (Optional Service)

Right-of-Way Maps shall be prepared for current limits of the project and shall follow District Seven’s Guide For Right of Way Maps and Legal Descriptions, dated January 30, 2013. Base Maps shall be prepared directly from the Control Survey and existing Project DGN and Geopak files.

A Title Search Map shall be prepared and submitted to the DEPARTMENT prior to the 30% Phase submittal below. The Title Search Map shall include the County tax parcel, or folio identification, sufficient to enable the DEPARTMENT to begin Title Search Report procurement and parcel numbering.

Phase submittals shall be as follows:

30% Submittal depicting preliminary property lines based upon adjacent last deeds of record and/or available tax or property appraiser information, and merged topographic information.

60% Submittal depicting accurate property lines for properties identified to have right-of-way acquired, derived from review of Title Search Reports provided by the DEPARTMENT, with complete geometry for the parent tracts; parcel bubbles identifying parcel numbering for proposed take areas; proposed right-of-way lines; ties to topographic information; Table of Ownership Sheet with Parcel No., Sheet No., and Ownership columns completed.

A field review shall be conducted immediately after the 60% Submittal to verify topographic information; identify parcel specific design impacts; determine field work necessary to verify parent tracts; and identify appraisal/acquisition issues. This review shall be attended by the CONSULTANT mapper.

90% Submittal depicting complete geometry for all take areas and remainders; legal descriptions for all take areas; completed Table of Ownership Sheets showing areas of takes and remainders.

A-15

100% Submittal shall include final electronic map and legal description files and Certification of legal descriptions.

Legal Descriptions: (Optional Service)

Legal Descriptions shall be prepared for right-of-way acquisition parcels and shall follow the most current version of District Seven’s Guide For Right of Way Maps and Legal Descriptions.

Maintenance Map: N/A

Miscellaneous Items: N/A

2.13 Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR (Activity 30) – N/A

2.14 Architecture (Activity 31) – N/A

2.15 Noise Barriers (Activity 32) - See Section 32

2.16 Intelligent Transportation Systems (Activities 33 & 34)

Replace the existing fiber optic trunk line along US 19/ SR55 with new 96-count fiber optic cable throughout the project limits.

Replace the existing CCTV camera and structure at the intersection of US 19/ SR 55 and Alderman Rd.

Replace the existing CCTV camera and structure at the intersection of US 19/ SR 55 and Innisbrook Dr/Citrus Dr.

Install two new CCTVs to obtain full coverage of standalone pedestrian underpasses/crossings at three locations along US 19, and to obtain full coverage at signalized underpass at Sly Fox Run.

Add additional CCTVs as necessary to get full coverage of the US 19 corridor including mainline, NB &…