Amendment 00002 JD_04.19.10.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DME MAC Jurisdiction D
- Solicitation number
- CMS-RFP-2010-0016
About this file
Amendment 000002 pages 2-3
View the file
Other files
Show all 44
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
| CMS-RFP-2010-0016 | DME MAC Jurisdiction D |
| Amendment 000002 | Dated April 19, 2010 |
The purpose of Amendment 000002 is to incorporate the following changes to the solicitation and provide responses to certain industry questions. As a result, the solicitation is amended as follows:
1. This amendment corrects SECTION A – SF-33, Item 3, Solicitation Number, which was inadvertently issued as RFP-CMS-2010-0016. The correct Item 3, Solicitation Number, is CMS-RFP-2010-0016. Therefore, the SF33 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the revised SF 33. See Attachment 1.
2. This amendment corrects SECTION A – SF-30, ITEM 9A, Amendment of Solicitation No., which was inadvertently listed in Amendment 000001 as RFP-CMS-2010-0016. The correct Item 9A, Amendment of Solicitation No., is CMS-RFP-2010-0016. Therefore, the SF30 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the revised SF 30. See Attachment 2.
3. This amendment corrects SECTION L.11. d, Workload Assumptions, to correct a mathematical error in the total of the DME Claims row. Therefore, the SECTION L.11. d, Workload Assumptions PM Bills/Claims section of the worksheet only, is hereby deleted to be replaced with the following:
| Workload – DME MAC |
| Base Period |
(8 months)
| Option Period One |
| Option Period Two |
| Option Period Three |
| Option Period Four |
PM Bills/Claims
| Electronic Claims |
| 9,813,076 |
| 15,161,202 |
| 15,616,038 |
| 16,084,519 |
| 16,567,055 |
| Paper Claims |
| 145,076 |
| 224,142 |
| 230,866 |
| 237,792 |
| 244,926 |
| Total DME Claims |
| 9,958,152 |
| 15,385,344 |
| 15,846,904 |
| 16,322,311 |
| 16,811,981 |
| Pending Claims at Initial Cutover ** |
| 115,292 |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
4. This amendment revises M.4, Capabilities Determination For Award And Proposal Instructions, which is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
M.4, Capabilities Determination For Award And Proposal Instructions The evaluation of the Offeror’s proposal will result in a three-level adjectival rating (Green, Yellow, and Red) to be evaluated based on a single capability determination (High Expectation of Successful Performance, Reasonable Expectation of Successful Performance, and Low Expectation of Successful Performance). The highest adjectival rating is Green and the lowest rating is Red.
This single overall rating – Offeror Capability – is comprised of two subfactors which are equal in order of importance:
1. Past Performance
2. Technical Understanding
CMS will consider the subfactor findings to assign the single Capability Determination rating to the entire proposal.
5. This amendment provides industry questions and CMS’ answers. See attachment 3.
End of Amendment 000002, all other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 – SF33 Attachment 2 – SF30 Attachment 3 – DME MAC JD Solicitation Question Responses
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .