CCSQ-393-2017-0118_tech_eval.docx

EVALUATION CRITERIA

A. Soundness of Approach to CMS’s Effort

The offeror’s quotation is complete and demonstrates an understanding of the SOW. including an awareness of the contract objectives and the tasks required that produce the desired product. The proposed approach must be (i) sound, (ii) sufficiently documented; (iii) incorporate appropriate use of actuarial resources, and other professionals, if applicable; and (iv) and ensure the achievement of timely and acceptable performance.

B. Personnel

The offeror’s quotation shall demonstrate a staff with the necessary skills to meet all requirements for this task order. Key personnel must be available to support all work under the effort and resumes of staff and consultants shall demonstrate not only academic / professional qualifications but also actual experience in similar tasks. If subcontractors are proposed, information is provided to support the qualifications of the subcontractors.

C. Management

The response shall demonstrate the offeror’s ability to manage all aspects of the proposed effort including technical performance, time and delivery constraints, cost, status reporting, and subcontractor(s). Ability to identify, address, resolve, and communicate problems (including conflicts of interest), and to maintain a positive working relationship with CMS staff are important.

D. Past Performance

The evaluation of past performance shall consider the offeror’s successful performance in a variety of projects of a similar magnitude and type (size and technical area) as defined in this SOW.