Caltrans_Evaluation_Form_10b.pdf
PDF 162 KB Posted
- Attached to
- San Mateo County Transportation Infrastructure Adaptation and Resilience Improvement Plan
- Solicitation number
- E5121000
- Issued by
- San Mateo County, California
About this file
This is a Caltrans Evaluation Form 10-B suggested consultant evaluation sheet used by San Mateo County's Department of Public Works for a Request for Proposals to develop a comprehensive Transportation Infrastructure Adaptation and Resilience Improvement Plan. The project focuses on identifying, prioritizing, and designing climate-resilient transportation infrastructure solutions for multimodal systems including roads, bridges, public transit, bikeways, and pedestrian pathways, with emphasis on vulnerable and disadvantaged communities. Primary deliverables include an existing conditions analysis, stakeholder engagement plan, project prioritization criteria and ranking framework, 30% conceptual designs for 3-7 selected projects, advisory committee documentation, and draft and final reports for Board of Supervisors adoption. Proposers must demonstrate a minimum of four years of similar services experience within the last seven years, with an account manager possessing at least two years of relevant experience within the last five years. Proposals must be submitted through OpenGov's eProcurement system by March 4, 2026, at 4:00 p.m., with contract award anticipated on May 5, 2026, and all project work to be completed by June 30, 2027. The contract is structured as a lump-sum arrangement organized by seven primary tasks with a two-year initial term and renewal option of up to five additional years at the County's discretion.
The evaluation will be conducted on a best-value basis using a 100-point scale assessing understanding of work (25 points), experience with similar work (20 points), quality of staff (15 points), capability for innovative techniques (10 points), familiarity with state and federal procedures (10 points), financial responsibility (10 points), and demonstrated technical ability (10 points). San Mateo County offers procurement preference to local businesses and local non-profits under County Ordinance Code Chapter 2.89, requiring self-attestation forms; however, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) participation requirements do not apply to this project. The contractor will be classified as an independent contractor and must comply with all applicable federal, state, county, and municipal laws, including prevailing wage requirements and living wage ordinances, and obtain all required licenses and permits at their own expense. Contractors must maintain comprehensive insurance coverage including $1,000,000 general liability, $1,000,000 motor vehicle liability, and $1,000,000 professional liability, naming the County as additional insured. Project funding derives from state and local sources, and all work products and deliverables become the exclusive property of the County. The specific contract value is not disclosed in the available RFP documentation and will be determined during final agreement negotiations.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet
EXHIBIT 10-B SUGGESTED CONSULTANT EVALUATION SHEET *
CONSULTANT/FIRM NAME:
Criteria Max Points Rating
Understanding of the work to be done 25
Experience with similar kinds of work 20
Quality of staff for work to be done 15
Capability of developing innovative or advanced techniques 10
Familiarity with state and federal procedures 10
Financial responsibility 10
Demonstrated Technical Ability 10
Total 100
Evaluator Contract Office
Print Name: Initials:
Signature: Date:
Date:
*Notes:
1. To maintain the integrity of a competitive negotiation/qualifications based selection procurement, the total of all allowable non-qualifications based evaluation criterion (such as local presence or DBE participation) cannot exceed ten (10) percent of the total evaluation criteria. The ten percent limitation applies only to non-qualifications based evaluation criterion and should not be considered as a limitation for specific DBE contract goals established by a contracting agency in accordance with its approved DBE program.
(see http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/172qa_07.cfm).
2. For projects other than “Architectural & Engineering” services, as defined in Section 10.1, cost is one of the criteria, or may be the sole criterion. DBE participation by the consultant shall not be used as one of the criteria listed above.
3. The evaluation criteria and suggested maximum points shown above are not mandatory, but are recommended in the interest of maintaining consistency among the hundreds of agencies utilizing federal or state funds.
4. The evaluation criteria and weighted values must be identified in the RFP. If the RFP has different evaluation criteria or weighted values then the information above would have to be changed to match. The Contract Office is to initial and date in the space provided to verify that the criteria and weighted values used in the evaluation sheet are appropriate and that the sheet has been completed correctly.
5. Caltrans participation on the interview panel does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and requirements are met.
Distribution: Local Agency Project Files
Last Updated February 12, 2015 http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/172qa_07.cfm http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/172qa_07.cfm http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/172qa_07.cfm http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/172qa_07.cfm
| CN: |
| R1: |
| R2: |
| R3: |
| R4: |
| R5: |
| R6: |
| R7: |
| R8: |
| PN: |
| I: |
| D2: |
| D1: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .