The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park
Post KNP Complex Fire Replacement of Damaged Structures
140P2026R0015
SEKI 332393
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
(RFP)
Proposal Submission Package
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
DENVER SERVICE CENTER
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NO. 140P2026R0015
INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.
Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.
Notice to Contractor Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise. This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.
The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.
A. OFFEROR INFORMATION
| Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number / SAM |
| XXXXXXX |
| Point of Contact |
| Name, Email, Phone |
B. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PAST PROJECT (PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER PROJECT EXPERIENCE)
| Contract Number |
| XXXXXXXXXX |
| Contract Type |
| Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other |
| Awarded Contract Price |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| Current / Final Price |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| Contract Award Date |
| XX/XX/XXXX |
| Contract Completion Date |
| XX/XX/XXXX |
| Period of Performance |
| XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX |
| Project Location |
| Park or Street address, City, State |
| Brief description of the contract & work effort: |
| Scope of work description |
C. REFERENCE:
| Organization |
| Agency or Company |
| Phone Number |
| XXX-XXX-XXXX |
D. EVALUATION
| Exceptional |
| Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Quality
| Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality of and adherence to quality control plan? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality of informational and technical submittals? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Quality Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Schedule (& Time Management)
| Met project schedule milestones? |
| Choose an item. |
| Responded to owner requests in a timely manner? |
| Choose an item. |
| Informational and technical submittals submitted timely? |
| Choose an item. |
| Promptly addressed scheduling issues? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Cost Control
| Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs? |
| Choose an item. |
| Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications? |
| Choose an item. |
| Submitted accurate and complete invoices? |
| Choose an item. |
| Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Cost Control Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Management
| General oversight by project manager and superintendent? |
| Choose an item. |
| Coordination with and control of subcontractors? |
| Choose an item. |
| Avoidance of accidents & safety violations? |
| Choose an item. |
| Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)? |
| Choose an item. |
| Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives? |
| Choose an item. |
| Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Management Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)
| Met regulatory and contractual labor standards? |
| Choose an item. |
| Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Regulatory Compliance
| Met building and life safety codes? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Recommendation: |
| Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts: |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Comments: |
E. RETURN:
| Return by |
| Proposal due date |
| Title |
| Contracting Officer |
| Organization |
| National Park Service – Denver Service Center |
| Email |
| Tony_Jasper@nps.gov |
Contract Price Schedule
| Solicitation Number: |
| 140P2026R0015 |
(Project Management Information System)
| Developed Area: |
| Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park |
| Project Title: |
| Post KNP Complex Fire Replacement of Damaged Structures |
Notice: Offerors are required to submit, a minimum, an offer that conforms to the solicitation documents with pricing for Base line items and all option line items. Failure to do so may render the proposal unacceptable. On lump-sum line items, provide the total price only. For all unit-priced line items, provide the unit price and the extended total price. If no specific line item exists for a portion of the work, include the costs in a related item. In case of error in calculation of extended prices, the unit price governs. In case of error in summation, the total of the corrected amounts govern. Round totals and extended prices to whole dollars.
| Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) |
| Contract Line Item (CLI) Title |
| Quantity |
| Unit of Measure |
| Unit Price |
| Total Price |
| 1 |
| Design Development |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 2 |
| Construction Documents |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 3 |
| Construction - Modified Prototype Building #2 |
| 1635 |
| SF |
| 4 |
| Construction - Garages |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 5 |
| Construction - Site Work |
| 1 |
| LS |
TOTAL PROPOSED BASE PRICE (Contract Line Item Number 1 through 5) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All measurement and payment information is included in Division 01 Specifications Section 01 27 00 Definition of Contract Line Items.
Report on Limitations on Subcontracting [Template Version 7/25/19]
This report is required for small business, 8(a) or other socio-economic set-aside service contracts (including construction) priced at or above $150,000.
Contract Number:
Prime Contractor:
Current Total Contract Price:
| Type of Set Aside: |
| Total Small Business Set-Aside |
| Period of Performance |
| 365 Calendar Days |
Type of Service (Required Participation):
1) Services (except construction). 50% maximum may be subcontracted to non-similary situated Subcontractors
| X |
| 2) General construction. 85% maximum may be subcontracted to non-similary situated Subcontractors |
3) Construction by special trade contractors. 75% maximum may be subcontracted to non-similary situated Subcontractors
Participartion Calculation as of the Current Invoice
Amounts shown below shall include amounts from all previous invoices and the current invoice. Exclude the cost of materials.
| 1) Amount Invoiced by the Prime Contractor: |
| $0 |
| 2) Portion of Amount Invoiced for All Similarly Situated Subcontractors (SSS)* |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| 3) Portion of Amount Invoiced for Non-Similarly Situated Subcontractors (NSS) |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert NSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert NSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert NSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| 4) Prime & SSS Participation % |
| #DIV/0! |
| 5) % subcontracted to NSS |
| #DIV/0! |
* Similarly Situated Subcontractor (SSS): is a small business subcontractor that is a participant of the same Small Business Administration (SBA) program that qualified the prime contractor as an eligible offeror and awardee of the contract as defined in 13 CFR 125.6 (i.e. Small Business, HUBZone Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDOVB), etc.)
** Limitation on Subcontracting Percentage = (Total amount invoiced by the Prime Contractor - Portion of total amount invoiced for Non-Similarly Situated Subcontractors (NSS)/ Total amount invoiced by the Prime Contractor)
Corrective Action Plan
If the NSS % noted in line 5 above is not in compliance with the % required by contract clause 52.219-3, 14, 27,29,30 then the prime contractor shall provide a written corrective action plan below:
image1.wmf