Attachment_D_BIDDER_5_SECTION_COST_BREAKDOWN.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 31 KB Posted

Attached to
School Apportionment System Modernization State and local contract opportunity
Solicitation number
RFP No. 2026-12
Issued by
Adams County, Asotin County, Benton County, Chelan County, Clallam County, Clark County, Columbia County, Cowlitz County, Douglas County, Ferry County, Franklin County, Garfield County, Grant County, Grays Harbor County, Island County, Jefferson County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Klickitat County, Lewis County, Lincoln County, Mason County, Okanogan County, Pacific County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skagit County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Spokane County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Wahkiakum County, Walla Walla County, Whatcom County, Whitman County, Yakima County, Asotin City, Clarkston City, Clarkston Heights-Vineland CDP, West Clarkston-Highland CDP, Benton City, Chelan City, Chelan Falls CDP, Clallam Bay CDP, Lewisville CDP, Rock Island City, Pacific Beach CDP, Whidbey Island Station CDP, Mercer Island City, Pacific City, Bainbridge Island City, Kingston CDP, Kitsap Lake CDP, Kittitas City, Klickitat CDP, Okanogan City, Anderson Island CDP, Fort Lewis CDP, Fox Island CDP, Herron Island CDP, Ketron Island CDP, North Fort Lewis CDP, Pacific City, Raft Island CDP, Stevenson City, Hat Island CDP, Lake Stevens City, Snohomish City, Spokane City, Spokane Valley City, Puget Island CDP, Garfield Town, Yakima City, Washington

About this file

This document is a cost breakdown attachment (Attachment_D_BIDDER_5_SECTION_COST_BREAKDOWN.xlsx) for the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) School Apportionment System Modernization project. The project seeks to transform the School Apportionment Financial Systems (SAFS) into the School Apportionment System for Quality, Accountability, Transparency, and Calculations Hub (SASQUATCH), which is the primary tool for allocating operating revenue across Washington state's public K-12 education system. The contract spans six fiscal years, with three years of development and three years of maintenance and operations support, and allows for additional optional contracted years at OSPI's discretion.

The cost proposal includes a comprehensive scoring methodology where bidders can earn up to 120 points for cost factors and 80 points for non-cost factors. The lowest total evaluation price will receive the maximum 120 cost points, with other bids receiving proportional points based on a specific calculation formula. The cost breakdown covers various expense categories including development costs, hosting, processing, third-party products, user licenses, ongoing support, and optional services. The document also includes sections for subcontractor costs, in-kind OSPI staffing assumptions, human resource costs, and travel expenses, providing a detailed financial framework for potential bidders to complete.

View the file

Other files for this state and local contract opportunity

Other files attached to School Apportionment System Modernization, newest first.
File Type Posted
Contract_Intake_Form_01.24.docx DOCX document
_Exhibit_A_Assurances_2026-12.docx DOCX document
Attachment_B_High-Level_As-Is_Workflows.pdf PDF
Attachment_C_RFP_Demonstration_Scenarios.docx DOCX document
_Exhibit_F_Contract_Issues_List_2026-12.docx DOCX document
_Exhibit_B_Qualification_Affirmations_2026-12.docx DOCX document
Attachment_A_Sasquatch_System_Requirements.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP_2026-12_Sasquatch_Apportionment.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Scoring Criteria

Cost Factors: up to 120 points
OSPI will evaluate and score Bidder’s cost factors, as provided by Bidder in Bidder’s Financial Proposal as follows:
The bid with the lowest total evaluation price will receive 120 points. Bids with a higher evaluation price will receive proportionately fewer evaluation points based upon the bid with the lowest total evaluation price, using the following formula:
Lowest total bid evaluation price divided by a higher total bid evaluation price (i.e., the bid that is being evaluated) multiplied by the total number of available points equals the cost factor evaluation points. Points will be rounded to three places to the right of the decimal point using standard rounding method.
Sample Calculation:
Using Bidder A = $100,000 (lowest total evaluation price) and Bidder B = $110,000
Bid B calculation: $100,000 (Bidder A, lowest total evaluation price) / $110,000 (Bidder B’s evaluation price) = 0.909 x 120 (maximum points available) = 109.09
Bidder A is the bid with the lowest total bid evaluation price, so it would be assigned the maximum available points, 120.00 points. Bidder B would be assigned 109.09 points based on the formula above.
Non-Cost Factors: up to 80 points
OSPI will evaluate and score Bidder’s non-cost factors, as provided by Bidder in Bidder’s Financial Proposal as follows:
Up to 80 points will be awarded to the proposal that shows:
Clearly addresses all sections of requested information in Section C7, including evidence that the cost proposal encompasses all costs to perform the services necessary to accomplish the objectives in the contract.
In Kind OSPI Staffing Title/Descriptions
<add in kind staff type here>
Subject Matter Expert Consulting
Business Analyst
App Architect
App Developer
Data Analyst
Data Architect
Data Management
Data Specialist
Network Specialist
Software Tester
Technical Coordinator
Technical Lead Developer

Cost Proposal Breakdown

Fiscal Year 1Fiscal Year 2Fiscal Year 3Development TotalsFiscal Year 4Fiscal Year 5Fiscal Year 6Maint TotalsTotal Project Costs
Your Description of/Comments Regarding Model/ServicesDevelopmentDevelopment/DeploymentSupportTotal Costs for Development Phase (Fiscal Years 1 - 3 )M&O Support (Additional contracted years at OSPI's Option)M&O Support (Additional contracted years at OSPI's Option)M&O Support (Additional contracted years at OSPI's Option)Total Costs for 3 year post project costsTotal Costs for 3 year post project costs
Identify all costs including expenses to be charged for performing the services necessary to accomplish the objectives of the ContractDevelopment Costs$$$0$$$00
Hosting Costs (e.g., Cloud, Servers)$$$0$$$00
Processing Costs: (e.g., per packet, transaction, or MB)$$$0$$$00
Third-Party Products$$$0$$$00
User Licenses: Internal Admin (OSPI)$$$0$$$00
User Licenses: Internal System User (OSPI)$$$0$$$00
User Licenses: External000
User Licenses: Other Partners$$$0$$$00
Ongoing Support (External)$$$0$$$00
Additional, Option Services: BA$$$0$$$00
Additional, Optional Services: PM$$$0$$$00
Additional, Optional Services: Training$$$0$$$00
Additional, Optional Services: OCM$$$0$$$00
$$$0$$$00
000
**Collaboration costs$$$0$$$00
000
Applicable Sales Tax:$$$0$$$00
000
$$$0$$$00
000
ANNUAL TOTALS000000000
**contractors must include in their proposal a section describing additional costs and staffing necessary to collaborate with other contractors employed to complete the remaining work section. These amounts will not be included in the final contract price if the contractor is awarded the work on all three work sections.

SubContractor Breakdown

Fiscal Year 1Fiscal Year 2Fiscal Year 3Development TotalsFiscal Year 4Fiscal Year 5Fiscal Year 6Maint TotalsTotal Project Costs
Indicate if Subcontractor is certified by the Office of Minority and Women’s Business Enterprises.DevelopmentDevelopment/DeploymentSupportTotal Subcontractor Costs for Development Phase (Fiscal Years 1 - 3 )M&O Support (Additional contracted years at OSPI's Option)M&O Support (Additional contracted years at OSPI's Option)M&O Support (Additional contracted years at OSPI's Option)Total Subcontractor Costs for 3 year post project costsTotal Costs for Development and 3 year post project costs
Identify all expected Sub-Contractor costs included in your cost proposal to be charged for performing the services necessary to accomplish the objectives of the ContractDevelopment Costs$$$0$$$00
Hosting Costs (e.g., Cloud, Servers)$$$0$$$00
Processing Costs: (e.g., per packet, transaction, or MB)$$$0$$$00
Third-Party Products$$$0$$$00
User Licenses: Internal Admin (OSPI)$$$0$$$00
User Licenses: Internal System User (OSPI)
User Licenses: External$$$0$$$00
User Licenses: Other Partners$$$0$$$00
Ongoing Support (External)$$$0$$$00
Additional, Option Services: BA$$$0$$$00
Additional, Optional Services: PM$$$0$$$00
Additional, Optional Services: Training$$$0$$$00
Additional, Optional Services: OCM$$$0$$$00
$$$0$$$00
$$$0$$$00
**Collaboration costs$$$0$$$00
$$$0$$$00
Applicable Sales Tax$$$0$$$00
$$$0$$$00
ANNUAL TOTALS000000000

In Kind OSPI Assumptions

Instructions:
This has to be Customize to the specific commodity and evaluation approach for the RFP propoal. Be sure to update the Evaluation workbook categories so that they match before publishing. For multiple categories/regions it may be helpful to have different sheets for each category/region for ease of use.
Goods and ServicesFiscal Year 1Fiscal Year 2Fiscal Year 3Development TotalsFiscal Year 4Fiscal Year 5Fiscal Year 6Maint TotalsTotal Project Costs
Your Description of/Comments Regarding Model/ServicesDevelopmentDevelopment/DeploymentSupportTotal Costs for Development Phase (Fiscal Years 1 - 3 )Support (Additional contracted years at OSPI's Option)Support (Additional contracted years at OSPI's Option)Support (Additional contracted years at OSPI's Option)Total Costs for 3 year post project costsTotal Costs for 3 year post project costs
Provide a breakdown of any assumptions of costs or supports that your proposal expects OSPI's to fulfil during and after the projectDevelopment Costs$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0
Hosting Costs (e.g., Cloud, Servers)$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0
Processing Costs: (e.g., per packet, transaction, or MB)$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0
Third-Party Products$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0
Additional Costs for OSPI to Absorb (e.g., Update Support, hosting) - please specify$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0
$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0
Applicable Sales Tax$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0
$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0
$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0
ANNUAL TOTALS$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0
In Kind Human Resource CostsFiscal Year 1Fiscal Year 2Fiscal Year 3Fiscal Year 4Fiscal Year 5Fiscal Year 6
Resource DescriptionYour Description of/Comments Regarding staff expectationsExpected FTE during projectExpected FTE during projectExpected FTE during projectExpected Ongoing FTE SupportExpected Ongoing FTE SupportExpected Ongoing FTE Support
<add in kind staff type here>
<add in kind staff type here>
<add in kind staff type here>
<add in kind staff type here>
<add in kind staff type here>
<add in kind staff type here>
<add in kind staff type here>
<add in kind staff type here>
<add in kind staff type here>
<add in kind staff type here>
<add in kind staff type here>
<add in kind staff type here>

ANNUAL TOTALS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Proposal Travel Expenses

Fiscal Year 1Fiscal Year 2Fiscal Year 3Development TotalsFiscal Year 4Fiscal Year 5Fiscal Year 6Maint TotalsMaint Totals
CategoriesMultiplier - # of Staff/ InstancesYour Description of/Comments Regarding Travel RequirementsDevelopmentDevelopment/DeploymentSupportTotal Travel Costs for Development Phase (Fiscal Years 1 - 3 )Maintenance & Operations SupportMaintenance & Operations SupportMaintenance & Operations SupportTotal Travel Costs for 3 year post project costsTotal Costs for 3 year post project costs
Meals Per Diem1$0.00$0.00$0.00
Lodging$0.00$0.00$0.00
Travel$0.00$0.00$0.00
Mileage$0.00$0.00$0.00
Other (Please specify below)$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00
ANNUAL TOTALS$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
Instructions:
This has to be Customize to the specific commodity and evaluation approach for the RFP propoal. Be sure to update the Evaluation workbook categories so that they match before publishing. For multiple categories/regions it may be helpful to have different sheets for each category/region for ease of use.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .