Attachment C RST-PROP-LIST- 0115-.pdf
PDF 136 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 80GSFC21R0010
About this file
This document is a Deliverable Items List and Schedule (DILS) for the Roman Space Telescope Propulsion Fill and Drain Valves contract. The DILS defines 48 deliverables required from the contractor, including design documents, hardware, test plans and reports, quality assurance documents, and configuration management items. Key deliverables include the Interface Control Document, Drawing Package, and Structural Analysis Report due 14 calendar days before the Design Conformance Review. The contractor must also deliver 6 Liquid 5/16" AN Fitting Fill and Drain Valves and 2 Gas AN Fitting Fill and Drain Valves within 12 months of contract award. The DILS specifies that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center is the contracting agency and identifies delivery dates, response types, and formats required for each item. Review and approval are required for critical design documents, hardware, and configuration management items, while status updates and lower-level documents require only review.
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Effective Date: November 13, 2020
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland
RST-PROP-LIST-0115, Revision -
Roman Space Telescope (RST), Code 448
Propulsion Fill and Drain Valve Deliverable Items List and Schedule
(DILS)
Roman Space Telescope Reviewed– Not Subject to Export Control
GSFC RST CMO
November 13, 2020
Released
Propulsion Fill and Drain DILS RST-PROP-LIST-0115, Revision-ii
Propulsion Fill and Drain Valve Deliverable Items List and Schedule
(DILS)
Review/Signature/Approval Page
Prepared by:
Eric Golliher
Approved by:
Jason Hylan
Electronic Approval available on-line in the RST CM Tool
Propulsion Fill and Drain Valve DILS RST-PROP-LIST-0115, Revision-iii
Preface This document is a Roman Space Telescope (RST) Configuration Management (CM)-controlled document.
Note: Prior to May 20, 2020, the project name was Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST).
For the purposes of configuration management, the prefixes “WFIRST” and “RST” are completely interchangeable. For example, RST-MGMT-PROC-0024 is the same as WFIRST-MGMT-PROC-0024.
Changes to this document require prior approval of the applicable Configuration Control Board (CCB) Chairperson or designee. Proposed changes shall be submitted to the RST CM Office (CMO), along with supportive material justifying the proposed change.
In this document, a requirement is identified by “shall,” a good practice by “should,” permission by “may” or “can,” expectation by “will,” and descriptive material by “is.”
Questions or comments concerning this document should be addressed to:
RST Configuration Management Office Mail Stop 448 Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 iv
Change History Log
Revision Effective Date Description of Changes (Reference the CCR & CCB/ERB Approval Date)
Revision - November 9, 2020 Per CCR-0291 Initial Release v
Table of TBDs/TBRs/TBSs [optional]
Item No. Location Summary Individual/ Organization
Actionee
Due Date vi
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
1.2 Scope
1.3 Related Documentation
1.3.1 Applicable Documents [and Forms]
1.3.2 Reference Documents
2 DELIVERABLES
APPENDIX A ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
List of Tables
Table 1. Deliverable Items Lists and Schedule
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope (RST) is a mission responding to the 2010 National Research Council New Worlds, New Horizons (NWNH) Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey top priority recommendation in the large space mission category. The science program includes two dedicated investigations to tackle outstanding questions in dark energy research and exoplanet exploration, and includes a substantial General Observer program to enable targeted investigations of astrophysical phenomena to advance other goals from the Decadal Survey. A coronagraph instrument is included in the payload for purposes of advancing the present state of the art of coronagraph technology. This document defines the requirements for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope (RST) Propulsion Fill and Drain Valve.
1.2 Scope
This document lists all of the deliverables for Fill and Drain Valve, the SOW paragraph number where the deliverable is described further, the type of response required from NASA GSFC, the format of the deliverable, and the schedule for delivery.
1.3 Related Documentation
The latest versions of all documents below should be used. RST documents can be obtained in the RST CM Tool.
1.3.1 Applicable Documents [and Forms]
The following documents are referenced within this document and are directly applicable or contain policies or other directive matters that are binding for the contents of this document. In the event of conflict between an Applicable Document and the content of this document, the RST Project Configuration Change Board has the final authority for conflict resolution.
Document Number Title RST-PROP-SOW-0052 RST Fill and Drain Valve Statement of Work (SOW)
1.3.2 Reference Documents
The following documents are referenced herein and amplify or clarify the information presented in this document. These documents are not binding on the content of this document.
Document Number Title RST-PROP-SPEC-0123 RST Fill and Drain Valve Specification
2 DELIVERABLES
Description: Propulsion Fill and Drain Valve
Reference: Statement of Work, RST-PROP-SOW-0052
Category:
A = Approval – Items in this category require approval from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)/Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Contracting Officer (CO). In general, documents shall be provided in contractor format as long as required content, as specified in the Roman Space Telescope (RST) Fill and Drain Valve Statement of Work (RST-PROP-SOW-0052), is addressed. The NASA GSFC CO reserves the time-limited right of disapproval for each submission. The time-limited period is 30 working days from receipt of documents.
R= Review – Items in this category do not require formal NASA GSFC CO approval, but will be reviewed by the GSFC or its designated representatives in order to determine contractor effectiveness in meeting contract objectives. When Government review reveals inadequacies, the contractor may be requested to correct the inadequacies. GSFC will review and comment within 20 working days of receipt.
I = Information – Items in this category are informal and are for information only.
Format: This provides the format for the deliverable. For documents, the following format applies:
E = Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR, and Contracting Officer. The vendor and COR shall jointly determine the type of electronic format (e.g., Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF, MATLAB) acceptable for each deliverable.
Table 1. Deliverable Items Lists and Schedule
Item
Description Reference Category Category/Format
1 SOW Compliance Matrix SOW 2.1 With Proposal Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
2 Program Plan and Schedule with Milestone List
SOW 2.2.1 With Proposal Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
3 Weekly Program Status Update
SOW 2.2.2 Weekly Telecon and Electronic – Provide submitt electronic format to the COR Contracting Officer
For Information Purposes.
4 Notifications SOW 2.3 Seven (7) calendar days in advance of all mandatory hardware inspections, test activities, TIM’s, and deliveries.
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
5 Kick Off Meeting SOW 2.4.1 Fourteen (14) calendar days after contract award
In person at Contractor Facility.
Review Required.
6 Kick Off Meeting Package SOW 2.4.1 Three (3) working days before the meeting Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required
7 Kick Off Meeting Minutes SOW 2.4.1 Three (3) working days after the meeting
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required
8 Design Conformance Review
(DCR)
SOW 2.4.2 Three (3) months after Award of Contract
In person at Contractor Facility.
Review Required.
9 Design Conformance Review
Presentation Package SOW 2.4.2 Fourteen (14) calendar days before DCR Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
10 Design Conformance Review Report
SOW 2.4.2 Fourteen (14) calendar days after completion of DCR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic
Description Reference Category Category/Format format to the COR and Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
11 Qualification Test Readiness Review (QTTR)
SOW 2.4.3 Seven (7) calendar days before start of qualification testing on first Flight Unit
In person at Contractor Facility.
Review Required.
12 Qualification Test Readiness Review (QTRR) Package
SOW 2.4.3 Fourteen (14) days before
QTRR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
13 Qualification Test Procedures SOW 2.4.3 Twenty-eight (28) calendar days before QTRR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
14 QTRR Minutes SOW 2.4.3 Three (3) working days after review
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
15 Acceptance Test Readiness Review (ATRR)
SOW 2.4.4 Seven (7) calendar days before start of acceptance testing on first Flight Unit
In person at Contractor Facility.
Review Required.
16 Acceptance Test Readiness Review (ATRR) Package
SOW 2.4.4 Fourteen (14) days before
ATRR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
Acceptance Test Procedure(s)
SOW 2.4.4 Twenty-eight (28) calendar days before ATRR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
18 ATRR Minutes SOW 2.4.4 Three (3) working days after review
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
19 Flight Unit(s) Pre-Ship Review (PSR)
SOW 2.4.5 Seven (7) calendar days prior to delivery of each
Flight Unit
In person at Contractor Facility.
Approval Required.
20 Flight Unit(s) Pre-Ship Review Presentation Package
SOW 2.4.5 At PSR Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Description Reference Category Category/Format
Review Required.
21 Flight Unit(s) End Item Data
Package(s) (EIDP) SOW 2.4.5 With each delivered Flight
Unit and available at PSR Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
PSR Minutes
SOW 2.4.5 Three (3) working days after review
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
23 Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM)
SOW 2.4.6 As Negotiated In person at Contractor Facility.
Review Required.
Qualification By Similarity Report
SOW 2.7 Fourteen (14) calendar days before DCR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
25 Interface Control Document(s) SOW 3.1 • Preliminary at Kick-off Meeting
• Final at fourteen (14) calendar days before
DCR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
26 Drawing Package SOW 3.2 Fourteen (14) calendar days before DCR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
27 Computer Models SOW 3.3 Fourteen (14) calendar days before DCR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
For Information Purposes.
28 Structural Analysis Report SOW 3.4 Fourteen (14) calendar days before DCR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
29 Reliability Report SOW 3.5 Fourteen (14) calendar days before DCR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Review Required.
Description Reference Category Category/Format
30 FMECA Report
SOW 3.6 Fourteen (14) calendar days before DCR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
31 User/Instruction Manual SOW 3.7 Fourteen (14) calendar days before PSR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required
32 Liquid 5/16”AN Fitting Fill and Drain Valve Flight Hardware Quantity: 6
SOW 4.2 12 months after contract date
As specified in contract.
GSFC 52.247-94
Approval Required
33 Gas ¼” AN Fitting Fill and Drain Valve Flight Hardware Quantity: 2
SOW 4.2 12 months after contract date
As specified in contract.
GSFC 52.247-94
Approval Required
34 Verification Plan (Including Verification Matrix)
SOW 5.1 Fourteen (14) calendar days before DCR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
35 Verification Test Procedure(s) SOW 5.2 Twenty-eight (28) calendar days before start of testing and as changes occur.
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
36 Verification Test Report(s) SOW 5.3 At PSR Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
37 Mission Assurance Implementation Plan / Quality Assurance Plan
SOW 6.1 Twenty-eight (28) calendar days after contract award
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
38 Anomaly/Failure Reports SOW 6.1.5 Deliver initial submission within 24 hours of occurrence for information for Major Anomaly.
Electronic – Provide format to the COR and
Description Reference Category Category/Format
Deliver notice of a change in status within 24 hours of occurrence for information.
Deliver the proposed closure prior to closure for6approval.
39 Class I Configuration Management (CM) Changes
SOW 6.1.6 Seven (7) calendar days after Contractor CM review
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
40 Class II CM Changes SOW 6.1.6 Seven (7) calendar days after Contractor CM review
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
See
As-Built Materials List SOW 6.5.1 As part of EIDP (DILS #21) Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
41 Alternate Workmanship Standards
SOW 6.1.7 On-Site at DCR Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
42 GIDEP Alert Disposition and Preparation
SOW
6.1.10
Three (3) working days after Contractor evaluation
Summary in Monthly Status Report
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
43 Safety/Hazard Controls SOW 6.2 Three (3) working days after Contractor disposition
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
44 Materials Usage Agreement SOW 6.5.4 Fourteen (14) calendar days before DCR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
See
Materials Certificate of Compliance
SOW 6.5.6 As part of EIDP (DILS #21) Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Description Reference Category Category/Format
45 Additive Manufacturing & Qualification Plan SOW
6.5.5.2.2
Thirty (30) calendar days before hardware fabrication
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
See
Cleanliness Certification Report
SOW 6.6.2 As part of EIDP (DILS #21) Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Review Required.
46 Limited Life Items SOW 6.5.5.4.5
Fourteen (14) calendar days before DCR
Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
47 Vendor’s Welding and Inspection Procedure
SOW 6.5.7 At DCR Electronic – Provide submittal in electronic format to the COR and
Contracting Officer.
Approval Required.
48 Contamination Control Plan
SOW 6.6.1 At DCR Electronic – Provide format to the COR and
Approval Required.
Appendix A Abbreviations and Acronyms
Abbreviation/ Acronym
DEFINITION
ACA After contract award CIR Configuration Initial Release CCB Configuration Control Board CCR Configuration Change Request CM Configuration Management CMO Configuration Management Office CO Contracting Officer COR Contracting Officer's Representative DCR Design Conformance Review DILS Deliverable Items List and Schedule EIDP End Item Data Package(s) FMEA Failure Modes and Effects Analysis FMECA Failure Modes and Effects Criticality Analysis GIDEP Government Industry Data Exchange Program GSE Ground Support Equipment GSFC Goddard Space Flight Center NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration NDE Nondestructive Evaluation PCB Parts Control Board PCB Printed Circuit Boards PDL Product Design Lead PSR Pre-Ship Review R Review SOW Statement of Work TBD To Be Determined TBR To Be Resolved TIM Technical Interchange Meeting RST Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope Yrs years
| 1 Introduction |
| 1.1 Purpose |
| 1.2 Scope |
| 1.3 Related Documentation |
| 1.3.1 Applicable Documents [and Forms] |
| 1.3.2 Reference Documents |
| 2 Deliverables |
| Appendix A Abbreviations and Acronyms |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .