Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 430 KB Posted

Attached to
Repair CE Open Storage Canopy Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA301021R0002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and details of a federal contract opportunity for repair work. The opportunity is a solicitation issued by the Air Force Air Education and Training Command to repair an open storage canopy. The magnitude of the proposed construction is between $500,000 and $1,000,000, and the acquisition is set aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. An organized site visit is scheduled for February 4, 2021 at 0900 hours. Offerors are directed to review sections L and M of the solicitation for proposal preparation and evaluation factors. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by references for the prime contractor's previous relevant contracts and submitted with proposals that are due by the date specified in the solicitation.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Repair CE Open Storage Canopy, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 10 - Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA301021R00020001 SF 30.pdf PDF
Site Visit Sign In 4 Feb 21.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - Past Performance Reference List.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - SF 1444.pdf PDF
Attachment 9 - Notice of Compliance.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Repair CE open Storage SOW.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Repair CE open Storage DWG.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA301021R0002.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Repair CE open Storage Specs.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - AF 66.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 5 - Wage Det MS20200050.pdf PDF
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 6

FA301021R0002

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________*

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________

_____________________________ Fax Number: _____________________

_____________________________ Email Address: _____________________

C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: 81st Contracting Squadron, Keesler AFB, MS

Attn: TSgt Andrew Cates Fax # 228-377-3298 Email: andrew.cates@us.af.mil &

81CONS.LGCB.Construction@us.af.mil mailto:maxwell.watanga.1@us.af.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, VG, S, M, U, and N?A) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.

PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E VG S M U N/A

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Applicable

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Unable to provide a rating.

Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available.

Do not know.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: E VG S M U N/A

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their

The contractor: E VG S M U N/A quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules.

14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

15. Was responsive to contract changes.

16. Provided adequate project supervision.

17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” YES/NO

23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

24. Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________

Remarks:______________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .