Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FOSC - Reroof Historic Structures Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P6020R0008
About this file
This document contains a contractor performance evaluation template and information about a related federal contract opportunity to reroof historic structures within the National Park Service Midwest Region. The performance evaluation template includes questions rating contractors on metrics such as adherence to schedule, quality of work, communication, and responsiveness to changed requirements. It collects information on original and final contract costs as well as the interviewer's contact information. The related solicitation is for reroofing historic structures located within the Department of the Interior National Park Service Midwest Region, with the solicitation number provided as 140P6020R0008 and the opportunity type listed as a solicitation. No further details are given on response dates, award timing, or other contractual terms.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QA Document_0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_140P6020R0008_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Site Visit Attendance_0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Wage Determinations - 5 Pages.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Drawings - 10 Pages.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Past Experience Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_140P6020R0008.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - SOW - 38 Pages.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Date____________________ Contractor Name _____________________________ Project Title/Description___________________________________
Contract Type [ ] RFQ [ ] Sealed Bid [ ] Fixed Price [ ] Negotiated
Contract Period ________________________ Cost Original ________________ Current/Final ________________
1. Was the project completed within the allotted time? [ ] Yes [ ] No
2. How effective was the contractor with establishment
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A and execution of the schedule?
3. Contractor’s adherence to plans and specifications
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A
4. Submission of documents and reports (submittals)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A
5. Standards of workmanship/quality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A
6. Completion of final punch-list
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A
7. Supervision
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A
8. Communication, coordination and cooperation (CO, COTR, etc.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A
9. Was the contractor fair/reasonable regarding equitable
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A adjustments and cost proposals in response to changed work requirements?
OTHER COMMENTS
Interviewed by:__________________________________________
Email:
Phone:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .