Attachment 3 - QASP.pdf

Attachment 3: QASP FA3020-21-Q-0021 Page 1 of 14

8OTH OPERATIONS SUPPORT SQUADRON AFI 11-301

AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND (AETC)

SHEPPARD AFB TX

Contracted AFE Operation

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

Certified by: 80 OSS/CC

Pages: 14

80 OSS, AFI 11-301

"THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

AND WILL NOT BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE CONTRACT AWARD"

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) has been developed to evaluate the Service

Provider (SP) actions while implementing the Performance based Work Statement (PWS). It is designed to provide effective surveillance method of monitoring SP performance for each listed objective on the Service Summary (SS). The surveillance plan is based on the premise that the

SP, not the government, is responsible for management and quality control actions. It is designed to provide the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) staff agency an effective and systematic surveillance method for evaluating the service provider's performance. This plan will be used by members of the Multi Functional Team (MFT) to ensure successful SP performance on the

Aircrew Flight Equipment (AFE) Services contract at Sheppard AFB, TX while providing the best quality service within awarded contract costs.

CORs are to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating SP performance against technical and regulatory requirements and the terms of the contract. CORs are not expected to identify all discrepancies that may exist and/or are identified by SP Quality Control (QC). Good management and use of an adequate Quality Control Plan (QCP) that meets the requirements in the PWS will allow the SP to operate within the acceptable quality levels.

Ensure all records created as a result of processes prescribed in this publication are maintained in accordance with AFMAN 33-363, Management of Records, and disposed of in accordance with

Air Force Web-RIMS Records Disposition Schedule (RDS) located at https://www.my.af.mil/afrims/afrims/afrims/rims.cfm.

Section A - Performance Assessment Planning and Preparation.

1. The Functional Commander (FC) along with his/her MFT is responsible for assessing the SP's performance and managing the PWS requirements over the life of the contract.

1.1. MFT Roles & Responsibilities: The purpose of the MFT is to create an environment that shapes and effectively executes acquisitions within their purview. The emphasis is on teamwork, trust, common sense, and agility. These stakeholders are responsible for the acquisition throughout the life of the requirement, instituted under the authority of the senior leadership.

Every representative within the MFT brings to the team their unique level of expertise. The following members will participate in the performance management of this specific contract.

Attachment 3: QASP FA3020-21-Q-0021 Page 2 of 14

Their roles and responsibilities are described as follows:

1.1.1. FC: Inform MAJCOM of contract and PWS proposals, developments and negotiations.

Submit new contracts, proposed amendments/modifications to current contracts, quality surveillance plans and checklists to the MAJCOM AFE FM for review prior to implementing changes. Recommend a Contract Officer Representative (COR) to ensure effective contract oversight. Where AFE services are provided exclusively by a SP, the COR must be a Subject

Matter Expert (SME) on AFE duties and responsibilities. Note: Personnel fulfilling COR positions must meet Air Force Specialty Code 1P071 requirements.

1.1.2. AFE Contract Personnel Management: All PWS/SOW (new/revised) containing AFE services must be reviewed and approved by the MAJCOM AFE FM prior to implementation.

MAJCOM AFE FM will: Act as a member of the multi-functional team for the establishment of new contracts or maintenance of existing contracts. Review and coordinate on any new contract, proposals or amendments/modifications.

1.1.3. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO): Has overall responsibility for overseeing the

SP's performance. The ACO ensures COR are designated and trained IAW MP5301.602-2(d) prior to performing COR duties. The ACO, through designated CORs, monitors SP performance in the areas of contract compliance, contract administration, cost control, reviewing the COR assessment of the SP's performance, and resolving all differences between the COR version and the SP's version of events. The ACO is the only person with the authority to direct the SP in the performance of their duties under the contract and to make interpretations of and changes to the contract.

1.1.4. Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC): The QAPC supports the MFT in the development of contract requirements specifically ensuring that requirements are clearly stated and enforceable. The QAPC also provides training to CORs on the contracting requirements associated with the quality assurance program.

1.1.5. Contracting Officer Representative (COR): The role of the COR is to ensure contract standards are achieved. Appointee must be trained prior to assuming COR duties. COR will assist

CO with the development of AFE PWS. COR will surveil functions and manage performance

(monitor, evaluate, and certify contractor compliance) in accordance with this QASP. Notify the

ACO of any performance deficiencies and follow-up for resolution.

1.1.5.1. DoD has a zero tolerance policy for human trafficking. CORs are the first line of defense in the battle against human trafficking and must complete Combating Trafficking in Persons training annually. As the COR monitors the contractor and its employees, Combating Trafficking in Persons should rank among the COR's chief priorities. CORs must be diligent in ensuring that contractors and contractor personnel are not trafficking in persons. During surveillance, the COR will monitor the contractor's performance regarding trafficking in persons for compliance with all that is required IAW FAR clause 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons. The COR must inform the ACO if the contractor, contractor personnel, subcontractor, or subcontractor personnel have failed to comply with the requirements of the clause at FAR 52.222-50. The COR must report any suspected violations or activities to the ACO (See FAR Subpart 22.17 and DFARS

Attachment 3: QASP FA3020-21-Q-0021 Page 3 of 14

Subpart 222.17). CORs should not personally investigate suspected incidents of Trafficking in

Persons but should forward all reported or suspected violations to the Contracting Officer immediately.

1.1.6. SP: Responsible for complying fully with the terms and conditions of the contract, participating as a member of the MFT in the post-award management phase, maintaining and implementing a QCP that complements the QASP, and ensuring non-conforming contract services are identified and corrected. When necessary, the SP is responsible for revising the QCP to prevent recurrence of deficiencies. The SP is also responsible for tendering to the Government for acceptance, only those services that conform to contract requirements and recommending any changes to the contract that will provide operations that are more effective or eliminate unnecessary costs.

1.1.7. Services Designated Official (SDO): The Services Designated Official is the individual designated in accordance with 10 USC 2330(b) to exercise responsibility for the management of the acquisition of services. These responsibilities include certifying service acquisitions are performance-based during acquisition strategy formulation and approving, in advance, any acquisition that is not performance-based.

1.2. As a minimum, the MFT will meet quarterly to discuss the SP's performance. The ACO is responsible for recording and forwarding the minutes of the MFT meeting. The FC may, with the concurrence of the ACO, adjust the frequency of the program management review/progress meeting.

2. COR Training:

2.1. COR training requirements: COR training will be conducted IAW DoDI 5000.72, dated

06 Nov 20, DFARS 201.602-2, DFARS PGI 201.602-2, AFI 36-2201. Where AFE services are provided exclusively by a contractor, the COR must be a Subject Matter Expert (SME) on AFE duties and responsibilities. Note: Personnel fulfilling COR positions must meet Air Force

Specialty Code 1P071 requirements.

2.2. CORs will attain qualification to the 2b level, per the CFETP, in the appropriate areas as stated in the PWS prior to performing evaluations, inspections, or surveillance duties unsupervised. All qualifications will be documented in Training Business Area (TBA). CORs will be trained, nominated and appointed in accordance with DFARS PGI 201.602-2(d) and maintained in the COR's Surveillance and Performance Monitoring (SPM) folder.

3. Performance Assessment Preparation and Administration:

3.1. Inspection Schedules: Monthly Technical Inspection (TI) and Program Management

Inspection (PMI) schedules will be done on a scheduled time. All scheduled inspections will be accomplished using the periodic surveillance method; see attachment 2.

3.2. TIs are entered into Aircrew Flight Equipment Quality Assurance Program (AFEQAP).

3.3. Changes to monthly surveillance schedules will be forwarded to the ACO, as they occur. If

Attachment 3: QASP FA3020-21-Q-0021 Page 4 of 14 minimum monthly surveillance requirements are not met, the reason will be documented on the end of the month's report and the Staff Summary Sheet (SSS). Signatures on the SSS by the ACO and FC indicate approval of the variances listed in paragraph 2 of the monthly report.

Note: Any changes to this QASP will be coordinated through the MFT.

3.4. When tasked by the MAJCOM AFE FM, the responsible COR will assist with technical evaluation of all SP proposals affecting their assigned area and when required, formulate a

"Government Estimate" for SP proposal comparison/evaluation. Government estimates and evaluations will be reviewed by the COR prior to being forwarded to the CO and MAJCOM AFE

FM.

3.5. CORs may periodically observe maintenance meetings conducted by the SP.

Section B - Performance Assessment.

4. Initial Contract Performance Review. The initial evaluation of contractor performance is a joint determination by the MFT that the contractor has successfully started performance, completed transition, is fully operational, and is within the estimated cost, schedule, and performance parameters of the contract. The initial performance review criteria shall be included in the QASP or similar documentation. The SDO may waive the initial evaluation for contractors that have continued performance under a successor contract award (prior incumbent), or for contractors that have otherwise demonstrated full compliance with contract start-up. Separate initial contract performance reviews are not required when they would duplicate existing reviews.

4.1.1. Scheduling. The review shall take place within 30 days after the contractor assumes full performance responsibility (i.e. after completion of transition/mobilization).

4.1.2. Reports. For acquisitions greater than or equal to $100M, results of the initial performance review shall be reported to the SDO. The report shall include an assessment of schedule, management, technical, and cost performance. Negative variations in cost, schedule, staffing, and performance shall be reported with an assessment of the root causes and corrective action plan. Significant modifications to the contract made since contract award shall be included in the initial performance report as special interest items.

5. CORs will accomplish inspections to measure the quality of contract performance and ensure quality maintenance is provided. Inspections will be accomplished by using the PWS, QASP, Air

Force, MAJCOM, Base, Wing instructions, as well as State and Federal regulations. Additionally, support equipment and technical orders will be used to accomplish these inspections. Surveillance will also include inspecting compliance with SP developed plans and regulations.

5.1. Services Summary. The contract service requirements are summarized in the objectives below. These objectives relate directly to mission essential items. The performance thresholds describe the minimum acceptable levels of service for each requirement and are critical to mission success. The performance objectives below are the key performance indicators for

Management Oversight of Services (MOS) reporting, as required.

Attachment 3: QASP FA3020-21-Q-0021 Page 5 of 14

No. Performance Objective

PWS

Para Performance Threshold

Surveillance

Method

1 Provide in-shop inspection, repair, repack, and modification of Aircrew Flight Equipment (AFE) aircraft installed parachutes.

Para

1.1.1

No more than two validated inspection failures per year.

Inspected

Monthly

2 Provide in-shop inspection, repair, repack, and modification of Aircrew Flight Equipment (AFE) flotation devices.

Para

1.1.1

No more than two validated inspection failures per year.

Inspected semi-annually

3 Provide in-shop repair and modification of

Aircrew Flight Equipment (AFE) anti-G garments, torso harnesses, and dual helmet visor snap fittings.

Para

1.1.2

No more than two validated inspection failures per year.

Inspected

Monthly

4 Create and provide management programs for

Time Change Forecasts, Munitions, Equipment

Management, Composite Tool Kits (CTK), and

Technical Order (TO) maintenance; AFTO forms documentation; Flight Equipment Records

Management System (FERMS) including all subsystems and any other automated system that contains AFE information; proper housekeeping;

supply procedures; physical security;

conservation of utilities; safety; fire prevention;

environmental protection; and facilities management as outlined in AFI 11-301v1 and all applicable supplements.

Para

1.1.7

No more than six validated inspection failures per year.

Inspected quarterly

5 Provide in-shop inspection, repair, repack, and modification of Aircrew Flight Equipment (AFE) aircraft installed parachutes and flotation equipment.

Para

1.1.1

Must complete each parachute assembly and each piece of equipment within five duty days of receipt.

Inspected

Monthly

6 Provide in-shop repair and modification of

Aircrew Flight Equipment (AFE) anti-G garments, torso harnesses, and dual helmet visor snap fittings.

Para

1.1.2

Must complete each piece of equipment within five duty days of receipt.

Inspected

Monthly

7 Provide in-shop repair and modification of

Aircrew Flight Equipment (AFE) anti-G garments and torso harnesses used for ground training.

Para

1.1.3

Must complete each piece of equipment within five duty days of receipt.

Inspected Monthly

8 Provide QCIs on at least 10 percent of each type of equipment repaired and 100 percent of all repacked parachute assemblies, life rafts and any items received from other supporting agencies.

Para

1.2.1

No more than two validated inspection failures per year.

Inspected

Monthly

5.2. There are two basic surveillance methods: Program Management Inspections and TIs.

Additionally, "as-observed" inspections will be documented for discrepancies noted outside scheduled surveillance activities.

Attachment 3: QASP FA3020-21-Q-0021 Page 6 of 14

5.3. Performance Feedback: Documentation is required to record, evaluate, and report contractor’s performance (see CPARS Guidance at: https://www.cpars.gov).

Performance Element Description

Quality Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety health standards).

Cost Control (Not required for Fixed

Price type contracts/orders)

Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract/order cost. If the contractor is experiencing cost growth or underrun, discuss the causes and contractor-proposed solutions for the cost overruns or underruns. For contracts/orders where task or contract sizing is based upon contractor-provided person hour estimates, the relationship of these estimates to ultimate task cost should be assessed. In addition, the extent to which the contractor demonstrates a sense of cost responsibility, through the efficient use of resources, in each work effort should be assessed.

Schedule Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements

(e.g., efforts that contribute to or effect the schedule variance).

Management Assess the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract/order, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification of issues in controversy), customer satisfaction, timely award and management of subcontracts. [Note esp. sub-factor Management of Key

Personnel: Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing, when necessary, key personnel]

Utilization of Small

Business

Assess whether the contractor provided maximum practicable opportunity for

Small Business to participate in contract/order performance consistent with efficient performance of the contract/order.

Regulatory

Compliance

Assess compliance with all terms and conditions in the contract/order relating to applicable regulations and codes. Consider aspects of performance such as compliance with financial, environmental (example: Clean Air Act, Clean

Water Act), safety, and labor regulations as well as any other reporting requirements in the contract.

Other Specify additional evaluation areas that are unique to the contract/order, or that cannot be captured elsewhere in the evaluation. More than one type of entry may be included, but should be separately labeled. If extra space is needed, use the Assessing Official Comments area.

5.3.1. Performance Ratings. Contractor ratings and criteria are described below:

Performance

Rating

Criteria

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many of the government’s benefits. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Attachment 3: QASP FA3020-21-Q-0021 Page 7 of 14

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some of the government benefits. The contractual performance element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

5.4. Follow-up surveillance may be performed concurrently or after SP QC TIs. Follow-up inspections will be rated the same as TIs. All discrepancies discovered during TIs or "as observed" will be documented and tracked in AFEQAP for trend analysis.

5.5. Inspections will be assigned a rating of "conforms" or "non-conforms." A "non-conforms" rating is assigned when a major discrepancy is identified or the AQL for minor discrepancies is exceeded. To ensure consistency when determining severity of discrepancies, CORs will use technical guidance and the PWS.

5.5.1. AQLs are established in attachment 1 of this OI for all TIs.

5.5.2. AQLs for Time Compliance Technical Orders (TCTO) will be locally determined using the following procedures:

5.5.2.1. The COR that attends the TCTO meeting will use his/her experience to evaluate the complexity of the TCTO and will recommend an AQL.

5.5.2.2. Once the AQL is determined, it will be added to AFEQAP as part of the inspection record.

5.6. Discrepancies Review:

5.6.1. The COR will review all discrepancies for accuracy. All AFEQAP inspection reports will be routed through the ACO to the SP with a 5- working day suspense for response. All responses shall include a cause, corrective/preventive action.

5.6.2. Requests for extensions to the 5-working day suspense must be in writing (email) and approved by the ACO.

5.7. PMI:

Attachment 3: QASP FA3020-21-Q-0021 Page 8 of 14

5.7.1. PMIs: To ensure complete and comprehensive surveillance, each area is covered by PMI guides. As a minimum, each work area inspection will include the following critical items: Time

Change Forecasts, Munitions, Equipment Management, Composite Tool Kits (CTK), and

Technical Order (TO) maintenance; AFTO forms documentation; Flight Equipment Records

Management System (FERMS) including all subsystems and any other automated system that contains AFE information; proper housekeeping; supply procedures; physical security;

conservation of utilities; safety; fire prevention; environmental protection; and facilities management.

5.7.1.1. Failure to perform timely required validations or reviews on the TCTO, time change, and special inspection program will be considered major discrepancies.

5.7.2. Changes, additions, and deletions to PMI guides will be accomplished as needed. Sources of material for changes will be current AF directives, noted weak/problem areas, major command inspection reports, etc. The COR will approve changes, additions, and/or deletions to the PMI guides and notify the ACO.

5.7.3. PMIs with subcategories will have the same frequency as their major category. Area of inspection is not limited to the content of the PMI guide.

5.7.4. Areas of concern resulting from a COR surveillance, as determined by the COR, will be briefed to the SP Program Manager by the COR.

5.7.5. SP Training Program: COR will also surveil the SP's training program to ensure training provided meets applicable qualification and training standards as prescribed in AFI 11-301. In addition to actually observing the training as it takes place, review training documentation, review master training plan, supervisor initial evaluation, personalized training records/Training Business

Area (TBA), Plan of Instruction, and SP's training plan, if applicable.

5.7.6. Special Inspections: Special inspections are scheduled TIs by the COR to reinforce special emphasis in areas of concern. These inspections may be equipment or procedurally oriented and will be selected/scheduled using the periodic inspection method.

5.8. Major and minor findings:

5.8.1. Major: A major finding is defined as a condition that could endanger personnel, jeopardize equipment or system reliability, affect safety of flight, or warrant discontinuing the process or equipment operation. Any major finding will result in a "non-conforms" rating.

5.8.2. Minor: A minor finding is defined as an unsatisfactory condition that requires repair or correction, but does not endanger personnel, affect safety of flight, jeopardize equipment reliability, or warrant discontinuing a process or equipment operation.

5.9. AFE Training Program: COR will also surveil the SP's training program to ensure training provided meets applicable qualification and training standards as prescribed in AFI 11-301.

Attachment 3: QASP FA3020-21-Q-0021 Page 9 of 14

5.9.1. COR may observe the training as it takes place, review training documentation, review master training plan, supervisor initial evaluation, personalized training records TBA and SP's training plan.

5.10. Environmental Compliance:

5.10.1. CORs will inspect/evaluate the SP's operations for proper identification, collection, segregation, storage, and disposition of hazardous and toxic materials/waste IAW the PWS, SAFB

Hazardous Waste Management Plan, SAFB Contaminated and Used Petroleum Management

Plan, and applicable SP regulations.

5.10.2. As a minimum, CORs will inspect those areas having the potential of generating hazardous waste during the performance of PMI and the Environmental Plans and Programs PMI.

6. Budget Monitoring:

6.1. CORs and the Resource Advisor (RA) assigned to the 80 FTW/CCR will monitor the SP's compliance with the PWS using the periodic inspection method, and during applicable PMI schedule.

6.2. Simplified Purchase Program: Simplified purchase summaries will be sampled, with assistance from the RA, during the budget PMIs. The RA will notify the COR of any abnormal expenditures or cost trends by the SP. Upon notification of any unusual expenditure, the COR will investigate to ensure proper ordering procedures were followed.

6.3. Acceptance of services will be accomplished utilizing Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) system. It is the 80 FTW RA's responsibility, along with the assistance of the COR, to validate the accuracy of financial figures submitted by the SP prior to the government paying for services. The

COR will review and check the inspection block and the RA will check the accepted block and forward for payment.

7. Safety Violations: The COR will document safety violations that pose a potential or immediate danger to government property or government personnel. They will be documented in

AFEQAP as part of the inspection being performed or "as observed," whichever is appropriate.

However, the COR will not document violations of OSHA or AFOSH standards that do not present the potential to damage government resources. Instead, the COR will notify the site supervisor and the ACO.

8. Phase-In/Phase-Out: CORs will ensure the SP meets all requirements outlined in the proposed transition plan and IAW the PWS.

9. SP Regulations: All SP regulations will be forwarded to the COR for review and to the FC and

ACO for acceptance prior to initial publication and anytime a revision is made.

10. Government-Furnished Equipment (GFE): GFE shall be assessed IAW provisions of

AFMAN23-122; AFI23-101, Para 1.2.2.9; and the PWS. Surveillance is normally accomplished during PMIs but can be inspected at any time during the reporting period.

Attachment 3: QASP FA3020-21-Q-0021 Page 10 of 14

Section C - Performance Assessment Results Analysis.

11. CORs will monitor and report SP performance, mission reports, higher headquarters logistic reports, AETC maintenance evaluation reports, and SS for possible indicators of negative/positive performance trends. The COR, with FC and ACO approval, may make adjustments to surveillance activities to commensurate with SP's performance and level of risk. Signatures on the monthly schedule by the ACO and FC indicate approval of the increase or decrease in frequency of inspections.

11.1. All inspections will be documented in AFEQAP and utilized for quarterly and yearly analysis.

11.1.1. The COR will review all analysis reports captured by AFEQAP to include SS, maintenance data and reports for accuracy and any adverse trends on a quarterly basis.

Section D - Performance Assessment Reporting.

12. If surveillance shows that the SP did not meet quarterly performance requirements in the SS, and it is determined that it is not caused by the government, the COR will initiate a Corrective

Action Request (CAR) in AFEQAP, a Performance Assessment Report (PAR), or a Letter of

Concern (LOC). In general, PARs/LOCs are issued quarterly, but may be issued at any time for serious infractions.

12.1. PARs/LOCs will be issued to the SP by the ACO. Each PAR/LOC will be entered into the

AFEQAP, assigned a control number, and list the nature of concern, date entered, and a suspense date for the corrective action.

12.1.1. The SP has 15 calendar days to respond to the ACO from the date of receipt as to cause, corrective action, and actions to prevent recurrence.

Section E - Performance Assessment Follow-up.

13. Follow-up inspections may be accomplished to validate the SP's corrective/preventative actions. Any SP response that includes an estimated completion date (ECD) will be entered into the AFEQAP for follow-up inspection. Only the ACO will authorize written requests (email) for extensions to ECDs.

13.1. Any PMI receiving a "non-conforms" rating may be rescheduled for a follow-up inspection at the COR discretion. CORs will re-inspect, but not be limited to, the area(s) that caused the

"non-conforms" rating and document any deficiencies "as observed."

13.2. The COR will conduct follow-up inspections on issues/problems identified following receipt of corrective actions from the SP. If corrective actions do not meet contractual or government directives, a non-concur notice will be issued to the SP in AFEQAP.

13.3. If any areas of non-conformance are not corrected through the use of CARs, PARs, or

LOCs, it's the responsibility of the FC to contact the ACO and MAJCOM AFE FM to initiate discussion with corporate headquarters or issue a cure notice. In extreme circumstances, a show

Attachment 3: QASP FA3020-21-Q-0021 Page 11 of 14 cause notice or notice of contract termination may be required as determined by the FC and

Procurement Contracting Officer.

Section F - Performance Assessment Report Closure.

14. If the SP's corrective/preventive actions are accepted by the government and no further action is required, the report will be closed. AFEQAP will be dated with the completion date and all documentation (CAR, PAR, and LOC) will be filed.

14.1. The COR and FC will complete a Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) using the electronic CPARS program annually.

14.2. The COR will ensure the inspection schedules and quarterly reports are maintained for the life of the contract.

15. Prescribing program: AFEQAP.

Exhibits:

1. Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) List

2. COR Inspections

3. Chief COR Personal Evaluation Guide

Attachment 3: QASP FA3020-21-Q-0021 Page 12 of 14

Exhibit 1

Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)

T-38 TECHNICAL INSPECTION AQL NOTES

TCTO (FIRST 2%) Determined locally based on complexity of the

TCTO

PWS

AFE Equipment 2

T-6 TECHNICAL INSPECTION AQL NOTES

AFE Equipment 2

TCTO (FIRST 2%) Determined locally based on complexity of the

TCTO

PWS

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

TECHNICAL INSPECTIONS

AQL NOTES

TMDE 1 PWS

INDUSTRIAL/TEST

EQUIP/SPECIAL TOOLS

1 PWS

OTHER TECHNICAL INSPECTIONS AQL NOTES

TRAINING (TASKS AND

RECURRING)

AFE Training 2

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

INSPECTION

AQL NOTES

Quality Control 6 minor discrepancies

Training Management 6 minor discrepancies

Fabric Shop 6 minor discrepancies

Attachment 3: QASP FA3020-21-Q-0021 Page 13 of 14

Exhibit 2

COR Inspections

(Frequencies, Quantities)

Inspections

Frequency

Minimum Qty.

1. T-38 Parachute (Repack) Monthly 1

2. T-6 Parachute (Repack) Monthly 1

3. Life Preserver LPU-38/P Semi-Annual 1

4. Life Raft LRU-16/P Semi-Annual 1

5. PMI Quarterly 2

6. QCI Monthly 1

Attachment 3: QASP FA3020-21-Q-0021 Page 14 of 14

Exhibit 3

Personal Evaluation Checklist

80 FTW/OSS Date:

Name of QAE: ________________________________________

Type of Surveillance: ___________________________________

Overall Rating: ( ) Satisfactory ( ) Unsatisfactory Inspection Area ________ P/A

# Item Yes No N/A

1 Did the QAE use the proper checklist?

2 Did the QAE know the location of the equipment?

3 Did the QAE check the aircraft/equipment forms?

4 Did the QAE check the general condition of equipment?

5 Did the QAE identify all discrepancies?

6 Did the QAE accomplish the inspection according to the checklist?

7 Did the QAE follow the requirements of the PWS/PP?

8 Did the QAE notify the section supervisor of the discrepancies and have him/her initial the appropriate forms?

9 Is the QAE knowledgeable of the Customer Complaint System and the use of the 80 FTW IMT 86?

10 Does the QAE have additional duties which may interfere with his/her surveillance?

11 Has the QAE completed or is he/she scheduled for required training?

12 Was the surveillance completed IAW the surveillance schedule? If not, is there documentation stating why and a plan to prevent recurrence?

13 Is the QAE knowledgeable fo the contract strike plan?

Type of Training Completed Frequency

Base QAE Training Annually

AETC QAE Training Once only

AETC Proficiency QAE Training Every three years

AETC Annual QAE Refresher CBT Training Annually

Initial Evaluation Once only

Chief/Superintendent of QAE Signature: __________________________________________