Attachment 2 - PPQ - Clinical Support Services.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Clinical Support Services for Human Studies Projects Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 12905B24Q0008
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire (PPQ) template for the solicitation number 12905B24Q0008 to provide clinical support services for human studies projects at the Western Human Nutrition Research Center in Davis, California. The PPQ is to be completed by the contractor's references and clients to assess the contractor's previous performance on five criteria using ratings of Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, or Poor. It also asks whether the client would use the contractor again and if the contractor proactively identified and responded to risks. Contractors are required to distribute the PPQ to at least three client references by December 21, 2023. A USDA representative may then contact the references for verification. The opportunity is seeking these clinical support services through the Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service located in the Pacific West Area.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amd 0001 QAs -Clinical Support Services for Human Studies Projects.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 -Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - QASP - Clinical Support Services.doc | DOC document | |
| RFQ - Terms and Conditions - Clinical Support Services for Human Studies.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 - Performance work Statement - Clinical Support Services.doc | DOC document | |
| RFQ - SAM Description Notice - Clinical Support Services for Human Studies.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2
Request For Proposal (RFQ) # 12905B24Q0008 Clinical Support Services for Human Studies Projects –WHNRC Davis, CA
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
The Contractor shall complete the company specific information on this form, contact their clients, forward this form to their clients and request that their clients complete it (verify/concur and score) and send it via email to tonya.purce@usda.gov and copy Michael.hassett@usda.gov. This will expedite the response from each referenced source.
Name of Contractor:
Name of client organization:
Project name and contract/task order number:
Brief description of support provided:
Total period of performance, dates, and total cost/price
Number of contractor personnel assigned to the project, by skill category:
SECTION 1:
Name and Title of Technical Point of Contact (POC):
E-mail Address of Technical POC:
Telephone number of Technical POC:
Date the Technical POC was contacted for this PPQ:
Did you inform your client that a past performance questionnaire must be completed and returned to USDA by December 21, and that a USDA representative may contact him/her sometime after that date?
Yes No
Please BOLD the rating your Technical POC indicated he/she would give your project if contacted:
1. Overall Technical Performance
| Excellent |
| Very Good |
| Good |
| Fair |
| Poor |
| N/A |
2. Quality of work
| Excellent |
| Very Good |
| Good |
| Fair |
| Poor |
| N/A |
3. Schedule Performance
| Excellent |
| Very Good |
| Good |
| Fair |
| Poor |
| N/A |
4. Cost Performance
| Excellent |
| Very Good |
| Good |
| Fair |
| Poor |
| N/A |
| 5. Did the contractor proactively identify risk areas, mitigate risks, and respond to emergency and critical situations? | Yes | No |
| 6. Would your Technical POC use your company again? | Yes | No |
SECTION 2:
Name and Title of Contracting Point of Contact (POC): Same as above Address of Contracting POC:
| Telephone number of Contracting POC: |
| Date the Contracting POC was contacted for this PPQ: |
Did you inform your client that a past performance questionnaire must be completed and returned to USDA by June 17, 2023, and that a USDA representative may contact him/her sometime after that date?
Yes No
Please BOLD the rating your Contracting POC indicated he/she would give your project if contacted:
1. Overall Contractual Performance
| Excellent |
| Very Good |
| Good |
| Fair |
| Poor |
| N/A |
2.Would your Contracting POC use your company again? Yes No
Employee(s) who made the contact with above-named client references:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .