Attachment 05 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 60 KB Posted

Attached to
LWS ATCT Elevator Modernization Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
697DCK-23-R-00431
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Southwestern Region

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for elevator modernization and maintenance services. The Federal Aviation Administration seeks proposals to modernize elevators and provide full service maintenance at the Airport Traffic Control Tower in Lewiston, Idaho. Offerors must have a valid SAM registration and submit a proposal in accordance with the solicitation instructions. Relevant experience must include completed modernization projects of at least $150,000 within the last three years for critical government facilities such as hospitals, FAA sites, or military bases. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by references for the prime contractor's prior work and aims to assess quality, timeliness, project management, compliance and overall performance on a scale of unsatisfactory to outstanding. Call back response times within the first six months and year after refurbishment are also requested.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to LWS ATCT Elevator Modernization, newest first.
File Type Posted
697DCK-23-R-00431-003.pdf PDF
Pre-Bid QA - Responses.pdf PDF
Attachment 03- SCA Wage Rates Revised.txt TXT text file
697DCK-23-R-00431-0002.pdf PDF
697DCK-23-R-00431-0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - LWS ATCT Elevator - PWS.pdf PDF
Attachment 03- SCA Wage Rates.txt TXT text file
Attachment 04 - Standardized Proposal Breakdown.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 02- Davis Bacon Wage Rates.txt TXT text file
697DCK-23-R-00431 Final.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE

EVALUATION SURVEY

A. Contractor’s name and address:

B. Contractor Point of Contact (Name and Title):

C. Phone number (including area code):

D. Contract No.:

E. Project Title:

Description of the Work Performed (Modernization, Full Service Maintenance, Multiple Elevators, etc.): NOTE THAT THE CONTRACT MUST INCLUDE COMPLETED MODERNIZATIONS TO BE CONSIDERED RELEVANT F. Description of Criticality (Hospital, FAA, Government Facility, Military Facility, etc.):

G. Project Award Date: ___________________ Completion Date (Modernization Must Be Completed within the last three years):_________________

H. Project Award Amount: __________________ Final Project Amount: _________________

(Must be at least $150K to be considered Relevant) I. Contractor being evaluated performed as the FORMCHECKBOX Prime Contractor FORMCHECKBOX Subcontractor

J. Respondent Information:

Name:

Organization:

Phone Number:

Email:

K. Authorization is hereby granted to the respondent listed above in section J to provide the information requested in Section B of this survey.

(Signature)

(Name & Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)

SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION (to be completed by the contractor requesting evaluation prior to mailing SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by respondent) *Note: The identity of individual(s) providing reference information shall not be disclosed.

LESS FAVORABLE

MORE FAVORABLE

U
M
S
A
O
Unsatisfactory (Negative)
Marginal (Negative)
Satisfactory
Above Average
Outstanding

EVALUATION AREAS

(Circle the appropriate response – if Not Applicable insert N/A next to the statement)

1. Quality

a. Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures which resulted in a quality performance.

b. Contractor completed all modernization work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications.

U
M
S
A
O

2. Timeliness of Performance

a. Contractor met established project schedules to complete the modernization on time, as scheduled.

b. The contractor met expected elevator maintenance response times.

U
M
S
A
O

3. Project Management

a. Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations

b. Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings as needed and maintained communication.

c. Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

U
M
S
A
O

4. Elevator Performance

a. Elevator performed/operated in accordance with the applicable Statement of Work, Drawings, and Specifications.

U
M
S
A
O

5. Compliance

a. Contractor’s performance was in accordance with all applicable Elevator, Safety, Health, and Security requirements and the requirements of the applicable Statement of Work, Drawings, and Specifications.

U
M
S
A
O

Overall Past Performance Rating

U
M
S
A
O

Call Backs: Please provide the number of unscheduled maintenance call-backs in the first six (6) months of refurbishment and in the first year of refurbishment, to assist the FAA in award evaluation.

· First Six (6) Months: ___________

· First Year: _________

Comments:

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature) (Date)

(Typed or Printed Name)

(Title)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .