Att H - Reference Check Form.docx

DOCX document 41 KB Posted

Attached to
RFS 26-87589 ISDA Soil Sampling ProgramBid Documents
Solicitation number
RFS 26-87589
Issued by
Indiana

About this file

This is a Reference Check Form issued by the State of Indiana for RFS 26-87589, designed to gather performance feedback from previous clients or partners of vendors responding to the solicitation. The form establishes a structured evaluation process whereby references are requested to provide detailed assessments of vendor performance across multiple dimensions. The reference check form must be completed and submitted to idoareferences@idoa.in.gov by July 29, 2026 at 3:00 PM Eastern Time, with the email subject line clearly identifying the RFS number and vendor company name.

The reference evaluation addresses thirteen specific performance criteria, including the duration of the working relationship, vendor communication with internal and external stakeholders, financial audit findings, corrective action requests, quality of services or work, business knowledge, staff quality, stakeholder engagement and communication, resource allocation and staffing availability, cost and schedule performance, and overall vendor rating. References are asked to rate vendor performance using a four-point scale consisting of poor, satisfactory, above average, and superior ratings, with written elaboration required for each assessment. The form also requests basic reference contact information including company name, contact person, title, mailing address, website, telephone, fax, email, and industry classification. References may decline to participate and provide explanatory comments regarding their decision.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Att G - Q and A Responses Soil Sample.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFS 26-87589 Addendum #1.docx DOCX document
Pre-Proposal Conference June 24 2026 Slides.pptx PPTX presentation
Att I - Pre-proposal Network Form.docx DOCX document
Att F- Technical Proposal Template.docx DOCX document
Att M - Infrastructure Overview.docx DOCX document
Att E - Business Proposal Template.docx DOCX document
Att L - Artificial Intelligence.docx DOCX document
Att J - Attestation Form.docx DOCX document
Att G - Q&A Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att B - Sample Contract.docx DOCX document
Att K - SOW.docx DOCX document
RFS 26-87589 Main Document.pdf PDF
Att C - Indiana Economic Impact Form.xls XLS spreadsheet
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment H Reference Check Form

RFS 26-87589

Reference Check Form Due Date:

July 29, 2026 @ 3:00 PM Eastern Time

INSTRUCTIONS: You have been asked by the vendor listed below to provide a reference as they are responding to the current solicitation with the state of Indiana. This is a standard form created by the State of Indiana and your input is very much appreciated. During this competitive process, a representative from the State of Indiana, may contact you directly for more detail. If you have any questions, please contact the State of Indiana contact listed in the box on the top left side of this form.

Please provide the information requested below and submit this reference check form to:

idoareferences@idoa.in.gov:

The subject line of the email submissions must clearly state the following:

RFS 26-87589 Reference – COMPANY NAME

VENDOR NAME

REFERENCE CONTACT INFORMATION

Reference Company Name

Contact Name

Contact Title

Company Mailing Address

Company City, State, Zip

Company Website Address

Contact Telephone Number

Contact Fax Number

Contact Email

Industry of Company

QUESTIONS: Please provide a response to each of the questions listed below regarding the vendor listed above.

1. If you decline to provide a reference, please indicate that below and provide any comments you would be willing to share regarding the reason.

2. How long did you/have you and/or members of your team worked with the vendor? Please provide the specific dates of service.

3. With what type of internal and external stakeholders did the vendor have to communicate with?

4. Has the vendor been cited for any financial audit issues? If you are able to, please describe the issue briefly, and any corrective actions required. Did the vendor ultimately address the issue(s) in a satisfactory manner?

5. Has the vendor been subject to any requests for corrective action to cure performance issues? If you are able to, please describe the issue briefly, and any corrective actions required. Did the vendor ultimately address the issue(s) in a satisfactory manner?

6. Would you rate your experience with the quality of services/work provided by vendor as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.

7. Would you rate the vendor's knowledge of your business as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.

8. Would you rate the overall quality of the vendor’s staff as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.

9. Would you describe the quality of the vendor’s engagement and communication with stakeholders (internal and external) throughout the project as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.

10. Would you rate the vendor’s ability to provide appropriate staff and resources for the project, as needed, at all times as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.

11. Would you rate the vendor's performance regarding cost and/or schedule overruns on the project as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.

12. Are there any other topics you believe Indiana should consider during its reference evaluation or comments you would like to share?

13. Would your overall rating of the vendor be poor, satisfactory, above average or superior?

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .