Appendix_A(South)_-_PIF_Drafts.pdf

Appendix A

Interior Region 1

National Park Service (NPS)

US Department of the Interior

Project Scoping Assessment ‐ Project Information Form (PIF)

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The goal of this program is to conduct Project Scoping Analyses (PSAs) for high priority National Park Service (NPS) facilities. The NPS Units chosen for this PSA effort have identified the need for assistance in developing sound facilities projects at specific locations within the NPS Unit. The locations were chosen based on previous review and assessment at the Unit‐level that yielded a solid understanding of the problem and possible solutions.

An Architecture and Engineering firm (A/E) contracted by NPS Region 1 will perform condition assessments, define/refine project scopes, develop cost estimates, and identify technical information to be compiled into a final report. This essential report will be used by the unit to develop Project Management Information System (PMIS) project submissions.

The PSA effort will yield high quality, high priority, design‐ready projects that will be able to be quickly executed upon authorization and funding identification. This work will support the NPS mission and reduce NPS’s deferred maintenance backlog.

This document will be used as a checklist for the region/park and A/E to coordinate throughout the lifecycle of the PSA. The information below will help all parties involved be successful.

A/E will submit PIF form with each level of effort/standard communication form to ensure alignment with agreed upon scope.

PARK INFORMATION

DOI Region: 1

Legacy Region: Northeast (NER)

Park: First State National Historic Park FRST

PROJECT INFORMATION

Project Title: Conduct comprehensive assessment of Ranger Station and Maintenance Complex.

Project Description: Provide full assessment of ranger station and Maintenance complex for complete rehabilitation to meet the current standard which includes, but not limited to building, parking, and site water erosion.

Problem Statement and Justification (How did the park identify the need for this work – assessment?) (Why does this work need to be done? Why is it priority? Why now?)

Ranger station and maintenance complex structures and site are in poor condition and requires extensive exterior envelope assessed for rehabilitation to address defer maintenance issues as well as safety concerns. Structures were built over the years by previous owner with various methods and materials and has been showing signs of poor craftsmanship and deterioration. Exterior envelope has been repaired multiple times to correct water intrusion over the years but wasn’t able to address as a permanent solution. The exterior equipment doors on the Maintenance Barn are past their life cycle. Both doors (the Hangar style and Overhead door) are failing and have been "piece‐meal" repaired, thus they require either complete restoration or replacement. Current parking and driveway conditions are poor and drainage concerns that causes safety issue. There are multiple cracks and potholes and due to settling, parking lot and driveway is not level which cause erosion issue and run off. Existing lighting over the parking area/maintenance yard is inadequate and does not provide sufficient illumination to all points of the parking area which causes safety and securing.

issue. Parking lot must accommodate large maintenance equipment parking load.

PSA Scope Statement (Park, Region, and A/E should discuss the limits of this work, what is included and not. Be as specific as possible/quantify as much as possible.

Assess existing conditions as indicated below, review and validate NPS‐provided scope, and provide a scope of work with a Class C cost estimate. The cost estimate should include design, permitting and compliance, purchase, and installation, as well as removal and appropriate disposal of old components or rehabilitation of disturbed areas. All quantities and scope provided here are preliminary and must be verified by the A/E team.

Assessments shall consider local environmental conditions and climate change projections to make recommendations to 1) reduce frequency of future maintenance, 2) increase the life expectancy of the assets/locations, and 3) increase overall sustainability and resilience of the assets/locations, including increased energy efficiency and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Assessments should address deferred maintenance solutions while suggesting improvements that will reduce the costs associated with operating and maintaining the park.

Assessments should note physical barriers to accessibility and observed accessibility concerns. A complete ABAAS Accessibility Assessment is not included.

For roof system inspections, the A/E Contractor is required to coordinate with the Interior Region 1 Safety Officer so that a safety plan for roof access can be developed prior to the first site visit. The A/E Contractor will be required to always adhere to this safety plan.

All design recommendations must include, where applicable, historically appropriate, code‐compliant materials and design techniques. All renovations shall follow procedures set forth in the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.

The scope of services for this project includes the assessments listed below (but not limited to):

Comprehensive rehabilitation assessment of exterior envelop.

- Windows and doors and it’s opening.

- Roofing system

- Exterior wall system

Comprehensive assessment of interior

- Interior structure, finishes, built‐in work surface, flooring.

- MEP

- Life Safety

Comprehensive site assessment

- Parking lot and driveway surface

- Water erosion control

- Site lighting

FMSS Locations for this PSA

Location

Location Description

Asset Code

OB API FCI CRV DM&R Ranking UM QTY YEAR

HISTORIC

STATUS

244528 Detached Garage

4100 3 25 0.419 108,536.62 45,512.70 POOR GSF 863.00 1900 N

248091 Barn 4100 1 40 1.050 646,054.15 678,354.73 SERIOUS GSF 1,380.00 1900 N

255932 Headquarters Parking Area

4100 2 90 .308 85,140.01 26,254.30 POOR GSF 5,164.00 1900 N

Existing PMIS Entries Related to this PSA for Reference

PMIS # Title & Description Status Budget Formulated Funded

252711

Rehabilitation of Ranger Station and

Maintenance facilities at 400 Ramsey Road

FY26

Requested $104,089.34 FY 26 N/A

Additional Data for Reference [Park Documents? eTic Documents?]

The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards—Technical Preservation Services, National Park Service (nps.gov)

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment (if available)

NPS Cultural Resources Climate Change Strategy (2016)

List of Maintenance Backlog Work Categories to be Evaluated under this PSA (not all work categories will be needed for each PSA – use only the categories that are needed based on PSA Scope Statement) Buildings and Ancillary Structures

1. Roofing and Stormwater Shedding Systems: Roof system, flashing, gutters, downspouts, venting, roofing features

2. Building Exterior Envelope (all): Siding, windows, doors, facia, trim, soffits, finishes, foundations, basement

3. Masonry: Foundation, chimney, steps, exterior veneers, driveway, concrete floors/ walks, basements

4. Interior Finishes: Paint, Drywall/plaster walls and ceilings, paint, trim, flooring and floor coverings, interior fixtures

5. Mechanical and Utility Systems: Electrical, emergency power generation, potable water supply, plumbing and piping, wastewater/sanitary sewer, storm sewer, HVAC, communications and IT signaling, lightning protection, fuel storage and supply (underground heating fuel tank size and age determination for life cycle replacement 50% usable life)

6. Life Safety Fire Detection/ Fire Suppression Systems: Standpipe, fire pump, system type, detection equipment, intrusion systems, size, and age determination for life cycle replacement 50% usable life.

7. Accessibility: Observed physical barriers, walkways, clearances, entrances, grade, slope (PSA is not an Accessibility Assessment)

8. Potential hazardous materials remediation issues interior and exterior: Observed mold, asbestos, lead (PSA is not an environmental assessment).

9. Vertical transportation systems of all types, interior and exterior

Maintained Landscapes

10. Grounds: Grades, drainage and stormwater management, vegetation, turf grass, walkways, signage, fence/gates, transportation routes, ingress/egress and parking, site lighting, trails, pedestrian and vehicular bridges, site furnishings

SCOPE SIGN‐OFF (By typing your name, you are agreeing to the above scope.)

Region: (COR/Project Manager)

Park: (Supt. Or Chief of Maintenance)

KEYS TO SUCCESS

Scope must be signed‐off on by all parties prior to visit. The A/E will not scope additional projects outside of the originally agreed upon scope once on site.

Park specific documents will be key to visit success. Many documents are not housed in Electronic Technical Information Center (eTIC). Provide A/E with as much project relevant information as you can prior to the visit.

Project tour Point of Contact (POC) must be briefed or very knowledgeable about project.

Work with A/E to establish report deadlines at closeout meeting.

Adhere to deadlines. Once A/E delivers report, the region/park will have 15 days to review/comment.

Final report will be produced 15 days after comments are submitted to A/E firm.

Create/modify PMIS Statement using Approved Final Report.

KEY PROJECT PERSONNEL NAME PHONE EMAIL

Park POC: FACILITY MGR or SUPT

A/E POC:

Region Project Mgr:

Project Specialist POC:

SCHEDULE

Pre‐Site Visit Telecon Date:

Site Visit Dates:

Out Brief Meeting Date/Time:

SITE LOGISTICS

Project Tour POC:

Site Visit Schedule (provide a general schedule for A/E):

Special access or equipment needs:

PARK ACTION ITEMS

☐Confirm description of PMIS Project is still accurate/valid.

☐Supporting Documentation – As‐Builts, drawings, maps, photos, previous conditions assessments, relevant studies: asbestos, lead‐based‐paint, HazMat, Geotech, Historic Structure Report, Cultural Landscape Report, FMSS Data – Asset Locations, Asset Details, and Work Orders etc. Any type of plan that has already been developed for the park, what is the driving master plan for the park.

☐Project Site Walk‐through – Devote time/personnel to walk the facility/site and meet with PSA team during assigned week.

☐Meeting Space (Outdoor, open air meeting space with enough room for a minimal staff PSA team).

Conference room or workspace to meet as a team with Supt, FM, appropriate personnel during site visit. Kick off and close out will be done online.

☐Lodging recommendations

☐Lunch recommendations – Will the team need to bring in?

REPORTS

Draft Report Delivery date: Enter a date

Park Report Review Comments Deadline: Enter a date

Final Report Delivery Date: Enter a date

The goal of this program is to conduct Project Scoping Analyses (PSAs) for high priority National Park Service (NPS) facilities. The NPS Units chosen for this PSA effort have identified the need for assistance in developing sound facilities projects at specific locations within the NPS Unit. The locations were chosen based on previous review and assessment at the Unit‐level that yielded a solid understanding of the problem and possible solutions.

An Architecture and Engineering firm (A/E) contracted by NPS Region 1 will perform condition assessments, define/refine project scopes, develop cost estimates, and identify technical information to be compiled into a final report. This essential report will be used by the unit to develop Project Management Information System (PMIS) project submissions.

The PSA effort will yield high quality, high priority, design‐ready projects that will be able to be quickly executed upon authorization and funding identification. This work will support the NPS mission and reduce NPS’s deferred maintenance backlog.

This document will be used as a checklist for the region/park and A/E to coordinate throughout the lifecycle of the PSA. The information below will help all parties involved be successful.

Park: Minute Man National Historic Park MIMA

Project Title: Assess Park Wide Wireless Structural Fire/Intrusion Alarm/Video Mesh NetworkAlarm/Video Mesh Network.

Project Description: Provide assessment of existing wireless mesh network at the park for rehabilitation to meet the federal data security standard which allows for the transmission of security alarm, fire alarm and video data to central station monitoring location via internet protocols.

Rehabilitation of the park wide system will provide data access points at 24 structures, 10 employee/visitor parking lots and North Bridge area.

Problem Statement and Justification (How did the park identify the need for this work – assessment?) (Why does this work need to be done? Why is it priority? Why now?)

The current System was installed in 2010 without proper engineering and installed by inadequate contractor with poor craftsmanship and used outdated equipment. Current outdated system is fragmented into 3 separate individual networks which causes frequent disruptions in service and not all location connections feeds back to a central location which is located at MIMA ranger station as well as OI network. Discontinue copper line support from Verizon and transfer of the lines to new smaller server have led to an increase in office system and increase in repair and troubleshooting house by MIMA staff. Park’s ultimate goal is to upgrade the system to a computer ‐controlled Mesh data network so that communicates through wireless and fiber optic technologies via internet protocols. New system must meet reliable and encompasses communication network that will allow remote security and fire alarm monitoring by Boston National Historic Park TOC and Centralized video monitoring, access, and storage.

PSA Scope Statement (Park, Region, and A/E should discuss the limits of this work, what is included and not. Be as specific as possible/quantify as much as possible.

Assess existing conditions as indicated below, review and validate NPS‐provided scope, and provide a scope of work with a Class C cost estimate. The cost estimate should include design, permitting and compliance, purchase, and installation, as well as removal and appropriate disposal of old components or rehabilitation of disturbed areas. All quantities and scope provided here are preliminary and must be verified by the A/E team.

Assessments shall consider local environmental conditions and climate change projections to make recommendations to 1) reduce frequency of future maintenance, 2) increase the life expectancy of the assets/locations, and 3) increase overall sustainability and resilience of the assets/locations, including increased energy efficiency and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Assessments should address deferred maintenance solutions while suggesting improvements that will reduce the costs associated with operating and maintaining the park.

Assessments should note physical barriers to accessibility and observed accessibility concerns. A complete ABAAS Accessibility Assessment is not included.

For roof system inspections, the A/E Contractor is required to coordinate with the Interior Region 1 Safety Officer so that a safety plan for roof access can be developed prior to the first site visit. The A/E Contractor will be required to always adhere to this safety plan.

All design recommendations must include, where applicable, historically appropriate, code‐compliant materials and design techniques. All renovations shall follow procedures set forth in the Secretary of

Comprehensive assessment of park wide communication line o Communication line from main source to individual locations o Security alarm and video communication line.

o Fire alarm communication line

Location # Location

Description Asset Code

OB API FCI CRV DM&R Ranking UM QTY YEAR

HISTORIC

STATUS

104955 Maintenance Vehicle Parking

1300 3 38 .561 $46,300.88 $25,980.45 SERIOUS GSF 1,893 1959 Not Evaluated

107107 Minute Man Visitor Center

Service Parking

1300 3 38 .201 $119,534.91 $24,0177 POOR GSF 8,421 1935 Not Evaluated

107110 Noah Brooks Paved Parking

1300 3 21 .120 $78,559 $9,440 FAIR GSF 3,339 1974 Not Evaluated

63671 Major John Buttrick House

4100 1 93 .391 $571,870 $287.66 POOR GSF 3,179 1715 Y

63675 Stedman Buttrick House

(ME)

4100 1 78 .126 $11,688,454.45 $1,473730 FAIR GSF 15,600 1911 y

63676 Buttrick Caretakers

Cottage (MS)

4100 3 73 .355 $1,915,810 $679,342 POOR GSF 3,556 1911 y

63961 North Bridge Visitor s Center

Parking

1300 3 48 .114 $570,589 $65,259 FAIR GSF 22,905 1967 Not Evaluated

63963 North Bridge Parking

1300 2 42 .120 $763,844.31 $91,760 FAIR SF 32,157 1929 Y

63971 Elisha Jones House

4100 1 85 .310 $1,759,830 $611,541 POOR GSF 8,510 1644 Y

63979 Wayside House 4100 1 93 .197 $2,953,190 $581,182 POOR GSF 7,126 1716 Y

63984 Wayside Parking

1300 3 48 .284 $$387,980 $110,268 POOR GSF 13,767 1971 Not Evaluated

64056 John Meriam House

4100 1 87 .137 $2,076,212 $284,445 FAIR GSF 4,978 1705 Y

64069 Meriam s Corner Parking

1300 3 35 .113 $308,142 $34,948 FAIR GSF 12,270 1998 Not Evaluated

64084 Farwell Jones House

4100 2 65 .559 $994,720 $556,297 SERIOUS GSF 4,662 1686 y

64102 Samuel Brooks House

4100 1 85 .362 $2,888,895 $1,046,270 POOR GSF 6,093 1692 y

64105 Noah Brooks Tavern

4100 2 75 .461 $3,577,511 $1,648,542 POOR GSF 7,606 1798 y

64108 Rogers Barn 4100 2 70 .367 2,217,739 814,105 POOR GSF 7,028 1937 y

64133 Joshua Brooks Jr. House

4100 2 83 .522 1,064,689 55,770 SERIOUS GSF 2,073 1780 y

64145 Rego House 4100 2 70 .373 2,191,113 817,649 POOR GSF 4,067 1890 y

64153 Ephraim Hartwell Tavern

4100 1 93 .318 2,847,735 905,424 POOR GSF 5,902 1733 Y

64172 Hartwell Parking

1300 4 48 .489 575,501 281,580 POOR SF 51,989 1999 Not Evaluated

64211 Captain William Smith

House

4100 1 87 .358 1,720,149 615,811 POOR GSF 3,562 1693 Y

64228 Minute Man Visitor Center

Parking

1300 3 42 .157 924,671 145,094 POOR SF 50,891 2006 Not Evaluated

64230 Minute Man Visitor Center

(ME)

4100 2 48 .412 3,406,933 1,403,365 POOR GSF 7,024 1976 Not Evaluated

64231 Jacob Whittemore

House

4100 1 93 .568 1,668,522 947,332 SERIOUS GSF 3,455 1717 Y

81641 Noah Brooks Unpaved Parking

1300 3 21 .209 245,989 51,331 POOR SF 49,548 2003 Not Evaluated

PMIS # Title & Description Status Budget Formulated Funded

321120

Rehabilitate Park wide Wireless Structural

Fire/intrusion alarm/video mesh network Completed $488,680 FY 20

FY19 (only for fire suppression)

(nps.gov)

Statement) Buildings and Ancillary Structures

1. Roofing and Stormwater Shedding Systems: Roof system, flashing, gutters, downspouts, venting, roofing features

2. Building Exterior Envelope (all): Siding, windows, doors, facia, trim, soffits, finishes, foundations, basement

3. Masonry: Foundation, chimney, steps, exterior veneers, driveway, concrete floors/ walks, basements

4. Interior Finishes: Paint, Drywall/plaster walls and ceilings, paint, trim, flooring and floor coverings, interior fixtures

5. Mechanical and Utility Systems: Electrical, emergency power generation, potable water supply, plumbing and piping, wastewater/sanitary sewer, storm sewer, HVAC, communications and IT signaling, lightning protection, fuel storage and supply (underground heating fuel tank size and age determination for life cycle replacement 50% usable life)

6. Life Safety Fire Detection/ Fire Suppression Systems: Standpipe, fire pump, system type, detection equipment, intrusion systems, size, and age determination for life cycle replacement 50% usable life.

7. Accessibility: Observed physical barriers, walkways, clearances, entrances, grade, slope (PSA is not an Accessibility Assessment)

8. Potential hazardous materials remediation issues interior and exterior: Observed mold, asbestos, lead (PSA is not an environmental assessment).

9. Vertical transportation systems of all types, interior and exterior

Maintained Landscapes

10. Grounds: Grades, drainage and stormwater management, vegetation, turf grass, walkways, Scope must be signed‐off on by all parties prior to visit. The A/E will not scope additional projects outside of the originally agreed upon scope once on site.

Park specific documents will be key to visit success. Many documents are not housed in Electronic Technical Information Center (eTIC). Provide A/E with as much project relevant information as you can prior to the visit.

Project tour Point of Contact (POC) must be briefed or very knowledgeable about project.

Work with A/E to establish report deadlines at closeout meeting.

Adhere to deadlines. Once A/E delivers report, the region/park will have 15 days to review/comment.

A/E POC:

Site Visit Dates:

☐Supporting Documentation – As‐Builts, drawings, maps, photos, previous conditions assessments, relevant studies: asbestos, lead‐based‐paint, HazMat, Geotech, Historic Structure Report, Cultural Landscape Report, FMSS Data – Asset Locations, Asset Details, and Work Orders etc. Any type of plan that has already been developed for the park, what is the driving master plan for the park.

☐Project Site Walk‐through – Devote time/personnel to walk the facility/site and meet with PSA team during assigned week.

☐Meeting Space (Outdoor, open air meeting space with enough room for a minimal staff PSA team).

Conference room or workspace to meet as a team with Supt, FM, appropriate personnel during site visit. Kick off and close out will be done online.

The goal of this program is to conduct Project Scoping Analyses (PSAs) for high priority National Park Service (NPS) facilities. The NPS Units chosen for this PSA effort have identified the need for assistance in developing sound facilities projects at specific locations within the NPS Unit. The locations were chosen based on previous review and assessment at the Unit‐level that yielded a solid understanding of the problem and possible solutions.

An Architecture and Engineering firm (A/E) contracted by NPS Region 1 will perform condition assessments, define/refine project scopes, develop cost estimates, and identify technical information to be compiled into a final report. This essential report will be used by the unit to develop Project Management Information System (PMIS) project submissions.

The PSA effort will yield high quality, high priority, design‐ready projects that will be able to be quickly executed upon authorization and funding identification. This work will support the NPS mission and reduce NPS’s deferred maintenance backlog.

This document will be used as a checklist for the region/park and A/E to coordinate throughout the lifecycle of the PSA. The information below will help all parties involved be successful.

Park: Shenandoah National Park SHEN

Project Title: Conduct exterior and interior plumbing and electrical assessment of 8 historic Buildings in the Big Meadows Developed Area

Project Description: Provide comprehensive exterior assessment of 8 historic buildings well as electrical and plumbing upgrades to meet current building code. Assessment shall include exterior envelope, loading docks and ramps, porch, plumbing fixtures and electrical panel and circuits upgrade.

Problem Statement and Justification (How did the park identify the need for this work – assessment?) (Why does this work need to be done? Why is it priority? Why now?)

All the buildings in Big Meadow development area are historic and is in poor conditions. Exterior envelope such as sidings and roof are failing, porch, and loading docks are deteriorating where it’s causing safety issues. Windows, louvers, and doors are also deteriorating due to it’s end of life cycle.

Electrical panels and circuits are outdated and needs replace to meet the current standard. Plumbing fixtures are also outdated needs to be upgraded to ABAAS compliance fixtures.

PSA Scope Statement (Park, Region, and A/E should discuss the limits of this work, what is included and not. Be as specific as possible/quantify as much as possible.

Assess existing conditions as indicated below, review and validate NPS‐provided scope, and provide a scope of work with a Class C cost estimate. The cost estimate should include design, permitting and compliance, purchase, and installation, as well as removal and appropriate disposal of old components or rehabilitation of disturbed areas. All quantities and scope provided here are preliminary and must be verified by the A/E team.

Assessments shall consider local environmental conditions and climate change projections to make recommendations to 1) reduce frequency of future maintenance, 2) increase the life expectancy of the assets/locations, and 3) increase overall sustainability and resilience of the assets/locations, including increased energy efficiency and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Assessments should address deferred maintenance solutions while suggesting improvements that will reduce the costs associated with operating and maintaining the park.

Assessments should note physical barriers to accessibility and observed accessibility concerns. A complete ABAAS Accessibility Assessment is not included.

For roof system inspections, the A/E Contractor is required to coordinate with the Interior Region 1 Safety Officer so that a safety plan for roof access can be developed prior to the first site visit. The A/E Contractor will be required to always adhere to this safety plan.

All design recommendations must include, where applicable, historically appropriate, code‐compliant materials and design techniques. All renovations shall follow procedures set forth in the Secretary of

Comprehensive rehabilitation assessment of exterior envelop.

Windows and doors and it’s opening.

Roofing system

Porch and railings, docks.

Plumbing fixtures

Electrical panels and circuits

Location # Location Description Asset Code

OB API FCI CRV DM&R Ranking UM QTY YEAR

HISTORIC

STATUS

002272 BM Vehicle/Equipment Storage bldg

4100 3 58 .313 1,154,971.94 361,937.04 POOR GSF 4,004.00 1939 Y

002274 BM Physical Fitness bldg 4100 4 52 .201 987,244.62 198,542.58 POOR GSF 2,220.00 1939 Y

002276 BM maintenance office 4100 3 55 0.703 1,600,937.22 212,410.45 FAIR GSF 3,600.00 1939 Y

002293 BM Meadows Campground Registration

Station

4100 2 75 .056 267,946.23 15,036.94 GOOD GSF 284 1937 Y

002296 BM Fire Cache bldg 4100 3 42 .062 853,833.18 52,975.29 GOOD GSF 2,134 1966 Not evaluated

002297 BM Pumphouse @ Lewis spring

4100 2 78 .034 71,152.77 2,441.34 GOOD GSF 160 1938 Not evaluated

PMIS # Title & Description Status Budget Formulated Funding Source

314557 B20‐PSA‐Exterior Enclosure Battery Storage Building Completed

313107 B20‐PSA‐Exterior Enclosure Pumphouse FY24 $43,822,695 FY24

188011

Paint Exterior Critical Components of

Buildings in the Central District FY23 $117,751 FY23 Cyclic

175057

Rehabilitate 8 Historic Buildings in the Big

Meadows Developed Area for Visitor

Enjoyment FY20 Request $214,501.29 ReRe

336339

Rehabilitation of Big Meadows

Campground Historic Registration Station FY26 Request $208099.84 No Cyclic

(nps.gov)

Statement) Buildings and Ancillary Structures

1. Roofing and Stormwater Shedding Systems: Roof system, flashing, gutters, downspouts, venting, roofing features

2. Building Exterior Envelope (all): Siding, windows, doors, facia, trim, soffits, finishes, foundations, basement

3. Masonry: Foundation, chimney, steps, exterior veneers, driveway, concrete floors/ walks, basements

4. Interior Finishes: Paint, Drywall/plaster walls and ceilings, paint, trim, flooring and floor coverings, interior fixtures

5. Mechanical and Utility Systems: Electrical, emergency power generation, potable water supply, plumbing and piping, wastewater/sanitary sewer, storm sewer, HVAC, communications and IT signaling, lightning protection, fuel storage and supply (underground heating fuel tank size and age determination for life cycle replacement 50% usable life)

6. Life Safety Fire Detection/ Fire Suppression Systems: Standpipe, fire pump, system type, detection equipment, intrusion systems, size, and age determination for life cycle replacement 50% usable life.

7. Accessibility: Observed physical barriers, walkways, clearances, entrances, grade, slope (PSA is not an Accessibility Assessment)

8. Potential hazardous materials remediation issues interior and exterior: Observed mold, asbestos, lead (PSA is not an environmental assessment).

9. Vertical transportation systems of all types, interior and exterior

Maintained Landscapes

10. Grounds: Grades, drainage and stormwater management, vegetation, turf grass, walkways, Scope must be signed‐off on by all parties prior to visit. The A/E will not scope additional projects outside of the originally agreed upon scope once on site.

Park specific documents will be key to visit success. Many documents are not housed in Electronic Technical Information Center (eTIC). Provide A/E with as much project relevant information as you can prior to the visit.

Project tour Point of Contact (POC) must be briefed or very knowledgeable about project.

Work with A/E to establish report deadlines at closeout meeting.

Adhere to deadlines. Once A/E delivers report, the region/park will have 15 days to review/comment.

A/E POC:

Site Visit Dates:

☐Supporting Documentation – As‐Builts, drawings, maps, photos, previous conditions assessments, relevant studies: asbestos, lead‐based‐paint, HazMat, Geotech, Historic Structure Report, Cultural Landscape Report, FMSS Data – Asset Locations, Asset Details, and Work Orders etc. Any type of plan that has already been developed for the park, what is the driving master plan for the park.

☐Project Site Walk‐through – Devote time/personnel to walk the facility/site and meet with PSA team during assigned week.

☐Meeting Space (Outdoor, open air meeting space with enough room for a minimal staff PSA team).

Conference room or workspace to meet as a team with Supt, FM, appropriate personnel during site visit. Kick off and close out will be done online.