AG-64R4-S-17-0001_Attachment_2_-_QASP.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Mark Twain Heritage Phase I Survey - MATOC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- AG-64R4-S-17-0001
About this file
Attachment 2 - QASP
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| AG-64R4-S-17-0001_Amendment_01_Q&A.docx | DOCX document | |
| AG-64R4-S-17-0001_Attachment_1_-_PWS_&_Exhibits.pdf | ||
| AG-64R4-S-17-0001_Combo_Synopsis_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| AG-64R4-S-17-0001_Attachment_3_-_WDs.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AG-64R4-S-17-0001
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN
| Contract Title: | Phase I Cultural Resource Survey – MATOC | |
| Mark Twain National Forest | ||
| Contract Number: | AG-64R4-C-17-00XX |
Contractor’s Name:
(hereafter referred to as the contractor)
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is a Government developed document used to ensure that systematic quality assurance methods are used in the administration of the Performance-based Acquisition (PBA) standards included in this Performance Work Statement (PWS). The intent is to ensure that the Contractor performs in accordance with the performance standards/acceptable quality levels contained in the PWS; that the Government receives the quality of services called for in the contract; and, that the Government only pays for the acceptable level of services received.
This QASP explains the following:
· What will be monitored.
· How monitoring will take place.
· Who will conduct the monitoring.
· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance. In addition, the QASP should recognize that unforeseen and uncontrollable situations may occur. This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Updates shall ensure that the QASP remains a valid, useful, and enforceable document. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities:
a. Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.
Assigned CO: Brittany Rohrer Telephone: 573-341-7470 Email: brohrer@fs.fed.us
c. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. At the conclusion of the contract or when requested by the CO, the COR shall provide documentation to the CO. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf. The contractor shall refer any changes that may affect contract price, terms, or conditions to the CO for action.
Assigned COR:
Telephone:
Email:
3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The following employee of the contractor serves as the contractor’s Program Manager for this contract.
a. Program Manager - <upon award, enter name> Telephone: <enter number> Email: <enter address>
4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.
The Performance Requirements Summary Matrix, included on the last page of the QASP, includes performance standards and explains how the Government shall use these standards to determine contractor performance and compare contractor performance to the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL).
5. METHODS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE
The goal of the QASP is to ensure that contractor performance is effectively monitored and documented. The COR’s contribution is their professional, non-adversarial relationships with the CO, PM and the contractor, which enables positive, open and timely communications. The foundation of this relationship is built upon objective, fair, and consistent COR evaluations of contractor performance against contract requirements. The COR uses the methods contained in this QASP to ensure the contractor is in compliance with contract requirements. Additionally, this QASP is based on the premise that the contractor, not the government, is responsible for management and QC/QA actions to successfully meet the terms of the contract.
The surveillance methods listed below shall be used in the administration of this QASP. The specific surveillance method for each performance standard and acceptable quality level is listed in the “Monitoring Method” column of the PRS.
COR Review – The COR will be responsible for monitoring the Contractor’s performance in meeting specific performance standards/acceptable quality levels. These COR Reviews will consist of periodic inspection, random sampling and 100% Inspection of all deliverables.
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
| Task / Critical Subtask |
| Quality / Performance Standards |
| Acceptable Quality Level |
| Means of Measurements |
| Penalties |
| Incentives |
| C.5.2 |
| Plan of Work |
| Must be 100% complete and accepted by the COR |
| Forest review |
| Rework at no cost to the Government to fix any errors found |
| Payment for first deliverable (C.5.12.1.a) and positive performance rating |
| C.5.3 |
| Pre-field Files Search |
| Must be 100% complete and accepted by the COR |
| Forest cultural resources inventory information, SHPO records |
| Rework at no cost to the Government to fix any errors found and 2 % deduction of total contract price if errors not corrected. |
| Payment for first deliverable (C.5.12.1.a) and positive performance rating |
| C.5.5 |
| Fieldwork |
| Must be 100% complete and accepted by the COR |
| Contractor records, SHPO guidelines, Forest inspections (C.5.6) |
| Rework at no cost to the Government to fix any errors found. |
Second payment upon completion of the first half of the fieldwork (C.5.12.1.b) and positive performance rating
| C.5.7 (Phase I) and C.5.8 |
| Interim Report(s) and Quality Control Inspection Documentation |
| Must be delivered to the COR within two weeks completion of every 1000 acres (approximately) of fieldwork and contain all information requested in C.5.7 |
| Contractor records and data, Forest inspections (C.5.6) |
| If not submitted on time (C.5.7), deduction of 1% of 3rd payment for every week past due. |
Rework at no cost to the Government to fix any errors found.
Payment for third deliverable upon receipt of final Interim Report (C.5.12.1.c) and positive performance rating
| C.5.5.1.d |
| Treatment of Human Remains |
| Must contact COR within 24 hours of discovery and provide reasonable short-term protection |
| Forest inspections (C.5.6) |
| 2 % deduction of total contract price if contact to COR is not prompt and remains are not protected for 48 hours |
| Positive performance rating |
| C.5.5.1.g |
| Submittal of Collected Materials |
| Collected materials must be submitted to the Forest and meet requirements outlined in C.5.5.1.g |
| Forest review |
| Do not receive fourth and final payment until collected materials are received and accepted |
| Payment for fourth deliverable (C.5.12.1.d.2) and positive performance rating |
| C.5.10.2.q |
| GPS and GIS Electronic Spatial Data |
| The data shall be delivered to the Forest on or before the last day of the performance time as defined in the task order |
| The metadata fields are complete and correct and data reflects the accuracy of site and survey locations documented in the final report. The metadata is correctly incorporated into the appropriate Geodatabase that was provided by the Forest Service. |
| Do not receive fourth and final payment until data and associated metadata have been accepted and successfully downloaded by the Forest |
| Payment for fourth deliverable (C.5.12.1.d.3) and positive performance rating |
| C.5.9 |
| Draft Report |
| Must be 100% complete and accepted by the COR |
| Contractor records, SHPO guidelines, Forest review |
| Rework at no cost to the Government to fix any errors found |
| Positive performance rating |
C.5.10.2.j C.5.10.2.k
| Site/IF/HF Forms |
| Must be 100% complete and accepted by the COR |
| Contractor records and data, SHPO guidelines, Forest review |
| Rework at no cost to the Government to fix any errors found |
| Positive performance rating |
| C.5.10 |
| Final Report |
| Final report received by the COR on or before the last day of the performance time as defined in the task order. Report 100% complete and accepted by the COR with all deficiencies corrected |
| Review of performance time and comparison to review of draft report, meets SHPO guidelines |
| Deduct 1% of total contract price from final payment for every week the report is late to a maximum 10 weeks (10%). If report continues to be late other contracting remedies may be employed as needed. Subtract 5% of final payment if Contractor fails or refuses to correct or re-perform any errors or deficiencies |
| Payment for fourth deliverable (C.5.12.1.d.1) and positive performance rating |
*Note – above Table is duplicated from the PWS and is reproduced here for convenient reference.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .