A03.pdf

(x)

AG-0112-S-14-0022

x x

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

PETERSBURG AK 99833

P O BOX 309

TONGASS NF PETERSBURG OFFICE

USDA FOREST SERVICE

08/26/2014000003

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

08/10/2014

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Sandy Beach Road Hardening NPOW

The purpose of this amendment is to issue the notes from the Pre-Proposal conference call and issue corrections to the current solicitation.

The pre-proposal conference notes are attached (3 pages)

CSI Supplemental Specifications, Section 0270 was issued with only page 2. Attached is the missing page 1 of this section.

To provide clarity to the technical evaluation criteria and measurements, a Table of

Evaluation Factors were created for the two criteria and are attached. (2 pages)

Continued ...

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

MICHAEL L. JOHNSON

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

2 8

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

AG-0112-S-14-0022/000003

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

Sponsored by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.110

AG-0112-S-14-0022

SANDY BEACH ROAD

PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

8/25/2014 VIA CONFERENCE CALL

Introductions:

Michael Johnson – Contracting Officer (CO)

Quentin Smith – Engineering

Molly Williams – Engineering

Wayne Benner – City Administrator for Thorn Bay

Kelly Nickerson – Southeast Roadbuilders

Jeff Dean – James Dean Construction

Preproposal Conference: (CO)

A preproposal conference is for informational purposes only. It may answer some offeror questions; we will post all written questions and answers via amendment on the Federal Business Opportunities website. Statements or representations made during this conference are not legally binding. Changes resulting from the conference are official only if issued through an amendment to the RFP.

Brief introduction of the project: (Quentin)

Shared that the traffic delay time/allowance is 60 minutes.

Indicated this project has some unique requirements around the school coordination. School will be in session and special events will be occurring in the evenings and weekends. The contractor will need to get with the school to set a plan for working with the school schedule. The school is anxious for this work to be accomplished and is willing to work with the contractor.

There is a church and residence adjacent to the project that will need to be considered but fortunately there is not a lot of work in that area.

City Comments:

School is in session as of today. Vacations will be listed on the school calendar and school is anticipated to end at the end of May. The administrator confirmed the school will be willing and able to collaborate on schedules for evening and weekend events.

Specifications: (CO)

The specifications were missing a page 1 which will be issued in the amendment with the notes of this conference.

Open to questions: (NOTE: This is a “raw” listing of the questions asked. Official responses will be in the next amendment)

The conference was opened to questions.

SE Roadbuilders – None

James Dean Construction:

1. 10702 – References to Osprey Nesting survey from years ago. Please clarify applicability to this project.

2. 15603 – References keeping open with no closure times. Conflicts with plans, please clarify.

a. Quentin made a comment about “Closed to start of bypass road. Provision for school, residence and church for the rest of the project location. 60 minute delay is allowed. (I looking for a clearer response than I have in notes)

3. 20402 – No references to sub-ex. Profile shows excavation and shows below grade. Is this roadway-ex or sub-ex?

a. Quentin mention cross sections will be coming?

4. Sheet J.1 detail #3. Select topping shown. Is there a pay item for this?

5. Sheet D-6. Looking at the cross pipes on the road and ditch it appears that the pipes will stick up. Please clarify.

6. Sheet D-5 station 22+50. Shows a water line. Is this part of the utility relocation?

7. Are there fees with the materials sources? (I’m asking you to validate/confirm responses here. mlj)

a. Sources on state land will have a fee associated with them. The contractor to coordinate this and costs with the state. Waste areas will be up to the state.

b. FS Land specified locations are available with no fee.

c. City rock pit – no fee associated with the materials going to this project.

Evaluation Criteria: (CO)

Questionnaire Submittal – Directly from the contractor’s project reference to the FS

Technical Forms – Forms and letters of intent from subcontractors.

Bonding Company Letter – Acceptable Surety in accordance with Department of Treasury Circular 570; 2014 Revision.

Final Comments: (City Admin)

City Administrator – The water plant and shop will work with the successful contractor in regards to schedules.

02720-1

PAINTED TRAFFIC MARKINGS

SECTION 02720

PAINTED TRAFFIC MARKINGS

PART 1 - GENERAL

1.01 DESCRIPTION

A. This section consists of furnishing all materials and labor and equipment necessary to paint lane lines, and traffic control markings as shown on the Drawings.

1.02 SUBMITTALS

A. The Contractor shall submit for approval manufacturer’s specifications, drawings, and recommendations for all materials incorporated into the project. The submittal shall include manufacturer’s published data, engineering data, letter of certification or certified test laboratory report indicating that each material complies with specified standards and other requirements.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.01 MARKING PAINT

A. Use a traffic line marking paint conforming to AASHTO M248, Type F; Federal

Specification TT-P-19D(1) or State of Alaska Maintenance Traffic Paint, unless otherwise acceptable to the Owner.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.01 MARKING

A. Unless otherwise shown on the Drawings, all lines shall be four inches wide. Color, spacing, and length shall be as shown on the Drawings.

B. Sweep surface with power broom supplemented by hand brooms to eliminate loose material and dust. Do not begin marking asphalt surfacing until the surface has been inspected and approved. The surface shall be thoroughly dry prior to and during application. Paint with mechanical equipment providing uniform straight edges. Apply evenly at the manufacturer’s recommended rates.

Sandy Beach Road Amendment 03

Sandy Beach Road AG-0112-S-14-0022 Amendment 03

TABLE OF EVALUATION FACTORS, CONTRACTOR SUBMITTALS, AND EVALUATION PROCESS

Factor 1 Proposed Prime Contractor Recent and Relevant Technical Experience. Projects submitted for this factor must contain the elements of the criteria and the contractor must have been the prime contractor for the project.

Criteria

Completed or more than 50% completed: Submit at LEAST one (1) but not more than three (3) contracts, as a prime contractor over the past three

(3) years that consists of Road Construction in excess of $1 million that includes culvert and material source requiring blasting.

Each contract submitted must have been satisfactorily completed, or if not yet completed, must be marked by satisfactory progress.

The Government will not consider a contract that is less than 50% complete or an effort that concluded more than 3 years ago.

Submittal

A brief narrative of at LEAST one (1) but not more than three (3) contracts, each on a separate Technical Evaluation Factor 1 form, for contract(s) that contain the specified criteria.

Contact Information – Submit name of the contracting agency, phone number, name of primary person responsible for the contract, address, and fax number. Failure to provide Point of Contacts for all of the above contracts may eliminate the offeror from further consideration.

Modification Synopsis – List the awarded contract price and the final contract price. If contract modification(s) occurred, briefly explain reason(s) for deviation(s) in cost and how the change/modification was initiated. Address only significant actions.

Complete the Past Performance questionnaires for each project.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires shall be faxed or emailed, by the agency/private sector company, directly to the following point of contact:

ATTN: Michael Johnson Fax: 907-772-5894 USFS AQM E-Mail: mljohnson02@fs.fed.us PO Box 309 Documents must be marked: “Source Selection Information. For Addressee Only”

Petersburg, AK 99833

Questionnaires received directly from the offeror will be not be evaluated.

Evaluation

Process

The recent and relevant technical experience information is critical in determining the contractors potential ability to successfully accomplish the tasks identified in the solicitation.

RATING

Technically Acceptable Technically Unacceptable

Based on the Offeror’s record, the contractor has the requisite technical experience AND

Has NO “Unsatisfactory” identifiers on their questionnaires; AND

Has no more than 3 “Marginal” ratings assigned on their questionnaires.

Based on the Offeror’s record, the contractor does not have the requisite technical experience OR.

Has 1 or more “Unsatisfactory” identifiers on their questionnaires; OR

Has 4 or more “Marginal” ratings assigned on their questionnaires.

Sandy Beach Road AG-0112-S-14-0022 Amendment 03

TABLE OF EVALUATION FACTORS, CONTRACTOR SUBMITTALS, AND EVALUATION PROCESS

Factor 2 Proposed Technical Experience of Prime Contractor or Subcontractor. Projects submitted for this factor must contain the elements of the criteria.

Criteria

Completed or more than 50% completed: Submit at LEAST one (1) but not more than three (3) contracts, over the past three (3) years that consists of asphalt paving in accordance with Alaska DOT or Federal Highway Administration specifications.

Each contract submitted must have been satisfactorily completed, or if not yet completed, must be marked by satisfactory progress.

The Government will not consider a contract that is less than 50% complete or an effort that concluded more than 3 years ago.

Submittal

A brief narrative of at LEAST one (1) but not more than three (3) contracts, each on a separate Technical Evaluation Factor 2 form, for contract(s) that contain the specified criteria.

Contact Information – Submit name of the contracting agency, phone number, name of primary person responsible for the contract, address, and fax number. Failure to provide Point of Contacts for all of the above contracts may eliminate the offeror from further consideration.

Modification Synopsis – List the awarded contract price and the final contract price. If contract modification(s) occurred, briefly explain reason(s) for deviation(s) in cost and how the change/modification was initiated. Address only significant actions.

Complete the Past Performance questionnaires for each project.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires shall be faxed or emailed, by the agency/private sector company, directly to the following point of contact:

ATTN: Michael Johnson Fax: 907-772-5894 USFS AQM E-Mail: mljohnson02@fs.fed.us PO Box 309 Documents must be marked: “Source Selection Information. For Addressee Only”

Petersburg, AK 99833

Questionnaires received directly from the offeror will be not be evaluated.

Evaluation

Process

The recent and relevant technical experience information is critical in determining the contractors potential ability to successfully accomplish the tasks identified in the solicitation.

RATING

Technically Acceptable Technically Unacceptable

Based on the Offeror’s record, the contractor, Subcontractor or an Individual has the requisite technical experience AND

Has NO “Unsatisfactory” identifiers on their questionnaires; AND

When using subcontractor or Individual to meet this criteria, letter of intent provided; AND

Has no more than 3 “Marginal” ratings assigned on their questionnaires.

Based on the Offeror’s record, the contractor does not have the requisite technical experience OR.

Has 1 or more “Unsatisfactory” identifiers on their questionnaires; OR

Subcontractor or individual being used with not letter of intent provided; OR

Has 4 or more “Marginal” ratings assigned on their questionnaires.