Addendum 1 RRHA-IFB-2026-27 Transcription Services.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- QQ-126788
- Issued by
- Richmond City, Roanoke City, Virginia
About this file
This is Addendum 1 to an Invitation for Bid (IFB) issued by the Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority (RRHA) for Professional Services for Transcription, with a contract period from October 1, 2026, to September 30, 2027. The solicitation, issued August 19, 2026, requests transcription services for RRHA-provided digital audio and video recordings of meetings. The contractor will deliver two primary deliverables for each meeting: verbatim transcriptions and edited/summarized minutes formatted according to RRHA's standard template. All transcription work must be performed remotely using recordings provided by RRHA; contractor attendance at meetings in person or virtually is not required. The addendum addresses 39 clarifying questions from prospective bidders regarding scope, deliverables, formatting, accessibility requirements, and operational logistics. Bids are due September 21, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. EST. RRHA will make a single award and will base invoicing on actual hours transcribed at the contractor's awarded hourly rate, multiplied by estimated hours per meeting type as outlined in the pricing sheet. Standard turnaround time is 3–7 business days; expedited service options may be added to the bid form with additional fees.
The pricing structure is based on hourly rates per meeting category rather than a fixed lump-sum amount, with no guaranteed minimum volume or contract value. Bidders may add separate line items for expedited services and accessibility format requirements (SRT and VTT files), which are provided only upon request. RRHA explicitly prohibits the use of AI-assisted or automated transcription tools and requires all work to be performed domestically within the United States. Remote transcriptionists are exempt from RRHA fingerprinting and background-check requirements; however, if bidders already conduct these for their personnel, RRHA will accept them. The incumbent vendor is TypesAll Transcription Services. A business license from the bidder's home state or locality is acceptable; Virginia-specific licensure is not required for bidding but may be mandated if awarded. Bid guarantees and Davis-Bacon certified payroll provisions do not apply to this professional services contract. Recordings are typically in English, may involve multiple speakers and varying audio quality, and will be provided in standard digital audio formats or video files with embedded audio, along with participant lists when available.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RRHA-IFB-2026-27 Professional Services Transcription Final.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
“Building Communities. Changing Lives.” is the vision of the Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority. RRHA is Virginia’s largest public housing authority serving over 10,000 residents and managing nearly 4,000 units through the public housing program. RRHA provides subsidized housing assistance to more than 3,000 families and is a catalyst for quality affordable housing and community revitalization. For more information about RRHA programs and objectives, visit rrha.com, or keep up with us on social media: Facebook , Twitter, Instagram or Linkedin.
ADDENDUM NO. 1
Reference: RRHA-IFB-2026-27
Commodity: Professional Services for Transcription
Addendum Issue Date: September 10, 2026
Solicitation Issue Date: August 19, 2026
Bids Due Date: September 21, 2026, 2:00pm (EST)
The above Invitation for Bid is hereby changed to read the inclusion of the following:
1. Attachment A indicates that RRHA will provide the contractor with digital audio or video recordings for transcription. Could you please confirm whether services under this contract are anticipated to be performed exclusively from RRHA-provided recordings, or whether the selected contractor may also be required to attend meetings in person or virtually during the contract term?
All transcription will be done via RRHA-provided recordings. In person attendance will not be required.
2. Additionally, Attachment J requests a unit price "Per Hour" for each meeting category. Could you please confirm whether the hourly unit price is intended to be based on each hour of recorded audio/video provided to the contractor?
The hourly unit price is intended for the transcription of the provided audio/video recordings.
3. Attachment A also references both verbatim transcription and edited/summarized minutes using RRHA's format. Could you please confirm whether both deliverables are expected for each meeting and whether both are to be included within the quoted hourly rate?
Yes, both verbatim transcription and edited/summarized minutes are expected for each meeting.
4. The Scope of Work further provides for expedited service when requested and notes that additional fees may apply. Since Attachment J does not appear to contain a separate pricing line for expedited service, should bidders include an expedited-service rate elsewhere in their bid, or would such pricing be established if and when expedited service is requested?
You can add a line to the bid form to include this fee.
5. Finally, with respect to the SRT and VTT accessibility formats referenced in Attachment A, are these formats expected as standard deliverables for each assignment, or only when specifically requested by
RRHA? If requested, should their preparation also be included in the hourly unit price?
These will be required only on request. You can add a line to the bid form for these charges.
6. AI-assisted transcription: Does the Authority place any restriction on the use of AI-assisted or automated transcription tools under this solicitation?
RRHA does not want AI-assisted or automated transcription tools used.
7. US-based vs. offshore personnel: Does the Authority have any requirement, preference, or restriction regarding whether transcription work is performed domestically within the United States versus by offshore or foreign-based personnel or subcontractors?
RRHA asks that all work be performed domestically within the US.
8. Bidder verification: How will the Authority verify the qualifications, references, and financial information presented in Attachment B? Will reference checks be conducted for all bidders, or only for the apparent low bidder as described in Section IV.G?
https://www.rrha.com/ https://www.facebook.com/pg/RichmondRedevelopmentAndHousingAuthority/posts/?ref=page_internal https://twitter.com/VibrantRRHA https://www.instagram.com/vibrantrrha/ https://www.linkedin.com/company/786350/admin/
RRHA will review qualifications, references, and financial information submitted in
Attachment B for the apparent low bidder. Reference checks are not required for all bidders; they are conducted only as part of the responsibility determination for the bidder in line for award.
9. Business licensing: Attachment H requires a bidder's Business License. Is a business license issued by the bidder's home state sufficient, or is a Virginia-specific business registration required?
RRHA accepts a business license issued by the bidder’s home state or locality. A
Virginia‑specific business license is not required solely for bidding. If awarded, the contractor must comply with any Virginia business registration requirements applicable to doing business in the
Commonwealth. In the event of a tie, preference will be given to a Virginia based business.
10. Virginia contractor licensing: The Bid Form (Attachment J) includes a certification that the bidder is licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia, State Board for Contractors. Since this is a non-construction professional services contract, does this requirement apply?
The certification regarding licensure by the Virginia State Board for Contractors is not applicable to transcription services. Bidders may indicate “Not Applicable” for this item.
11. Bid Guarantee and Davis-Bacon: Attachment H Section 9 and the Davis-Bacon certified payroll reference in Section III.H.3 appear scoped to construction contracts. Please confirm whether either applies to this transcription services solicitation.
The Bid Guarantee requirement and Davis-Bacon certified payroll provisions apply only to construction contracts. They do not apply to this transcription services IFB.
12. Security requirements: Section IV.I requires fingerprinting and background checks for Contractor employees working on the project. Since transcription work is performed off-site upon receipt of recorded files, please confirm whether this requirement extends to remote personnel who do not physically enter RRHA facilities.
Section IV.I applies to contractor employees who physically enter RRHA facilities or interact directly with RRHA staff onsite. Remote transcriptionists who work exclusively off-site from provided recordings are not required to undergo RRHA fingerprinting.
13. Volume commitment: Attachment A states the listed meeting counts and hours are estimates only. Is there a guaranteed minimum number of hours or dollar value under this contract?
Attachment A’s meeting counts and hours are estimates only. RRHA does not guarantee a minimum number of hours or a minimum contract value.
14. Pricing structure: Attachment J describes the award as a lump sum contract, while the Bid Form pricing is built on hourly rate multiplied by estimated hours per meeting type. Please confirm whether invoicing will be based on actual hours transcribed at the awarded hourly rate, or a fixed annual amount regardless of actual meeting volume.
Although Attachment J references a lump-sum award, the pricing structure is based on hourly rates multiplied by estimated hours. RRHA confirms that contractors will invoice based on actual hours transcribed, not a fixed annual amount.
15. We already fingerprint and background check our transcriptionists. Is this sufficient for your stated
RFP requirements?
If your transcriptionists already undergo fingerprinting and background checks, RRHA will accept those for remote personnel who do not enter RRHA facilities. Onsite personnel, if any, must comply with RRHA’s fingerprinting requirements.
16. Can work be performed remotely?
Yes
17. What are the expected source formats and recording channels/file types?
RRHA typically uses standard digital audio formats, and recordings may include single-channel audio, multitrack audio, or video files with embedded audio.
18. What is the baseline audio quality we should expect?
Audio quality may vary from clean single-speaker recordings to multi-speaker conversations with background noise.
19. How many speakers are typically present per recording, and will a speaker log be provided?
Recordings often include multiple speakers, and RRHA can provide a participant list when available.
20. What is the estimated monthly or annual volume, and what turnaround time is required?
The volume is outlined in the solicitation. Please refer to the pricing sheet. The turaround time is located in the Scope of Work ( 3-7 business days).
21. Are any foreign languages, regional accents, or heavy technical/legal jargon involved?
Recordings are generally in English, though some regional accents or technical terminology may appear.
22. Is there a specific transcript style or template required?
RRHA uses a preferred minutes format. (Attachment A)
23. Are timecodes required in the deliverable, and at what interval?
Timecodes are required only when specified, and RRHA will indicate the preferred interval.
24. What secure file transfer protocol or platform must be used to receive source audio?
RRHA will specify the secure transfer method, which may include an encrypted upload portal or secure file-sharing platform.
25. In what format should completed deliverables be submitted?
Deliverables should be submitted in the formats RRHA identifies, such as Word, PDF, or caption formats like SRT or VTT. PDF has been the preferred format.
26. Could you share the previous vendor’s contract number and award value?
RRHA has not issued a formal solicitation previously.
27. When requested, the Contractor shall provide transcripts compatible with accessibility requirements.
Could RRHA please clarify the specific accessibility requirements contemplated under this provision? For example, is RRHA seeking accessibility features such as descriptive notations of relevant non-verbal audio or visual events (e.g., “[applause]”), ADA-compliant formatting standards, captioning compliance requirements, or another specific accessibility standard?
RRHA will clarify the specific accessibility requirements as needed, and these may include descriptive notations for non-verbal sounds, ADA-compliant formatting, or caption-ready transcript standards.
28. The Scope of Work requires the Contractor to “provide edited and summarized minutes using RRHA’s format.” Could RRHA provide a sample of its preferred minutes format or further describe the expected level of detail? Specifically, are the minutes intended to be a lightly edited transcript, action-item summaries, meeting summaries, formal board minutes, or another format?
RRHA will provide its preferred minutes example (Attachment A). The minutes are expected to follow RRHA’s standard level of detail, which may range from meeting summaries to action-item-focused minutes.
29. For recordings involving multiple speakers, what level of speaker identification is expected? Will RRHA provide participant lists or meeting rosters to assist with speaker identification when requested?
RRHA expects speakers to be identified when possible, and participant lists or meeting rosters can be provided when available.
30. Could RRHA provide any estimate of the anticipated frequency of rush (24–48 hour) and emergency
(same-day) transcription requests? Since the pricing schedule does not contain separate line items for expedited services, understanding expected volumes would assist bidders in developing accurate pricing.
Additionally, would RRHA consider amending the pricing schedule to include separate pricing for standard, rush, and emergency turnaround requests, or otherwise permit bidders to identify differential pricing for expedited services?
RRHA does not anticipate emergency or expedited requests to occur. Bidders may add a line to the bid form to include expedited-service fees. The price sheet shall remain the same.
31. Are the transcription services able to be completed remotely using digital audio and video files, or would the contractor need to work onsite at an RRHA location? I’d also like to confirm whether the contractor would ever be required to attend meetings in person.
RRHA confirms that transcription services may be completed remotely using digital audio and video files, and the contractor is not required to work onsite or attend meetings in person unless
RRHA specifically requests it.
32. Our county business license (BPOL) application is being filed this week — however, the county may not issue the physical license certificate before the bid due date. Would proof of the filed BPOL application, together with our SCC Certificate of Organization, satisfy the business-license requirement at bid time, with the issued license certificate to follow?
RRHA accepts a business license issued by the bidder’s home state or locality. A
Virginia‑specific business license is not required solely for bidding. If awarded, the contractor must comply with any Virginia business registration requirements applicable to doing business in the
Commonwealth. In the event of a tie, preference will be given to a Virginia based business.
33. Will the transcription services be limited to English-to-English transcription, or will transcription in other languages be required?
RRHA expects transcription services to be English-to-English, and no additional languages are anticipated.
34. Could you please provide additional details regarding what is included under the accessibility requirements for transcription services, including caption file formats and standards?
RRHA will specify accessibility requirements when needed, and caption files may need to follow standard formats such as SRT or VTT and comply with ADA-related accessibility guidelines.
35. Will the meetings be recorded by RRHA or another vendor and then provided to the selected transcription vendor, and will the transcription vendor need to supply any recording equipment?
RRHA or its designated meeting host will provide the recordings, and the transcription vendor will not be required to supply recording equipment.
36. Is there currently an incumbent vendor providing these services, and if so, who is the incumbent?
RRHA currently uses TypesAll Transcription Services.
37. Will this be a single-award or multiple-award contract?
RRHA will issue a single award.
38. Could you provide an example or additional description of the edited and summarized meeting minutes expected under RRHA’s format?
RRHA will provide its preferred minutes format, and the edited and summarized minutes are expected to follow RRHA’s standard structure and level of detail
39. Are the transcription services able to be completed remotely using digital audio and video files, or would the contractor need to work onsite at an RRHA location?
Transcription services are performed remotely.
Please Note: Any bids submitted prior to the issuance of this Addendum will be accepted; however, bidders are required to sign and return this Addendum for previously submitted bids to remain valid.
Edythe West, VCA
Contract Specialist
Name of Firm
Signature Title Date
Attachment A Minutes Example
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF
RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY
HELD AT 600 EAST BROAD STREET, 5111 FLOOR BOARD ROOM
IN RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY l8 , 2026, AT 5:30 P.M.
Board of Commissioners
In Attendance ·Eddie Jackson, Jr. , Chair Harold Parker, Vice Chair Dyanne Broidy W. R. "Bill" Johnson - a/fended virtually due to medical reasons that prevented physical attendance pursuant lo Virginia Code §2.2-3708.J(BJ.
Commissioners Attending Virtuallv Barrett Hardiman Gregory Lewis Marika McCray Charlene Pitchford
Commissioners Absent Kyle Elliott.
Staff In Attendance Steven Nesmith, Chief Executive Officer Michael Kelly, Chief Operating Officer - virtual Patrick Baisi , Associate Counsel Sieglinde Chambliss, Senior Advisor to the CEO Jessica Clarke, Vice President of Human Resources Kim Cole, Chief of Staff Angela Fountain, Vice President of Communications and Public Relations Corey Franklin, Senior Vice President of Affordable Housing - virtual Sherrill Hampton, Senior Vice President of Real Estate and Community Development Reed Johnson, Deputy Director of Human Resources - virtual Jackie Salaam-Hicks, Vice President of Information Technology Colene Orsini, Vice President of Procurement and Contract Administration Ralph Stuckey, Vice President of Resident Services Tiana Parker, Assistant Vice President of Public Housing Operations Charles Williams, Vice President of Public Housing
Counsel Gerald Carter, Harrell & Chambliss, LLP
Call To Order
Counsel Gerald Carter called the meeting to order at 5:40 p.m. A quorum was not established. Commissioner Johnson 's attended virtually due to medical reasons that prevented physical attendance pursuant to Virginia Code §2.2-3708.3(8).
Approval of Minutes
A quorum was not established; therefore, the Minutes from the January 18, 2025, Regular
Board of" Commissioners Meeting were not voted on for approval.
Citizens' Comment Period
Cora Hayes signed up to address the Board of Commissioners during their February 18, 2026 regular board meeting regarding tenant councils. She urged the Board of Commissioners to investigate tenant councils in the public housing communities because she believes some are not meeting HUD's requirement of having five duly elected officers.
Tammy Williams signed up to address the Board of Commissioners during their February
18, 2026 regular board meeting. but did not respond when called upon to speak.
Sylvia Davis signed up to address the Board of Commissioners during their January 21 , 2026 regular board meeting, but did not respond when called upon to speak.
Chair Updates
Chair Eddie Jackson spoke about the 5-Year Strategic Plan Retreat. He commended
Chief Executive Officer Steven Nesmith and his staff for their hard work on putting together a very successful retreat. He said, "We are a very active housing authority, and you should commend yourselves/or the achievements that we have been able to accomplish". He looks forward to the second part of the retreat.
Vice Chair Harold Parker also complimented CEO Nesmith and staff on a very productive and we ll-run retreat.
Chief Executive Officer and Agency Updates
CEO Steven Nesmith thanked Chair Jackson and Vice Chair Parker for their compliments.
RRHA Staff and Resident Engagement. CEO Nesmith emphasized the importance of strong resident engagement and invited Ralph Stuckey, Vice President of Resident Services, to share updates on current community initiatives. Mr. Stuckey highlighted a successful coat drive held on February 11 , 2026, in the Whitcomb community, where nearly l 00 new and gently used coats were collected and distributed to residents. He also noted that health fairs are being organized across RRHA communities to support residents in maintaining healthier lifestyles.
Afier Action Snowstorm Report. Vice President Charles Williams reported that new plans are being developed to better prepare for severe weather and the challenges it creates, stressing the need for stronger readiness across RRHA communities. Commissioner Dyanne Broidy commended the maintenance staff on the great job they did during the recent snowstorm, particularly their efforts to keep residents safe.
Mr. Williams also reported that the hot water and boiler problems affecting the remaining residents at Creighton Court were resolved as quickly as possible, and staff are now reviewing properties to identify storm-related hazards and implement short-term safety improvements. He added that RRHA must also create a plan to manage power outages, and staff are updating the
Preventative Maintenance plan to address these concerns. Commissioner Broidy noted that heating issues have persisted for a long time without being addressed and raised concerns about the disrespectful behavior of some contractors toward residents. In response, Senior Vice
President of Affordable Housing Corey Franklin apologized and assured her that meaningful changes will be implemented to correct these contractor issues moving forward .
Save My Spot. The ' 'Save My Spot" campaign wi ll run from March 2, 2026 through
March 31 , 2026, using a broad mix of communication channels - including website updates, social media, flyers, posters, text messages, and radio announcements - to ensure residents are fully informed. These coordinated outreach efforts are designed to increase awareness, improve how information is shared, and help ensure available units are fi lled as efficiently as possible.
Town Hall Conversations with CEO and RRHA Staff" CEO Nesmith reported that he has been holding a series of Town Hall conversations with RRHA staff to better understand their challenges, gather suggestions, and hear ideas for improving workplace conditions. These sessions are intended to create an open forum for employees to share feedback directly with leadership and to support ongoing efforts to strengthen the overall work environment.
Board of Commissioners Second Retreat. The February 7, 2026 Board retreat was reported as highly successful and provided valuable guidance for the development ofRRHA's upcoming Five-Year Strategic Plan. A second retreat is being planned for Apri l 2026 to continue this work and further refine strategic priorities.
December 2025 Financials. Senior Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer, Sieglinde
Chambliss, provided an overview of RRHA 's financial performance for December 2025. Her report included a breakdown of the profit and loss statement, cash flow schedule, income for the reporting period, administrative and maintenance expenditures, housing assistance payments, and other non-operating items.
Board of Commissioner's New Standing Committee Meeting Schedule
Chief of Staff, Kim Cole reminded the Commissioners that there were no committee updates due to the recent restructuring of the committee meeting schedule. She noted that moving forward, committee meetings will be held during the last week of week of each month.
Resolution(s)
An in-person quorum of the Board of Commissioners was not established; therefore, the resolutions were not voted on during this meeting.
Resolution 2026-06 - Resolution and Public Hearing regarding the lssua11ce of Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds for the Acquisition, Construction and Equipping of the approximately 230-Unit Commerce Heights Ap·artments Multifamily Housing Facility to be located in the City of Richmond, Virginia.
WHEREAS, the Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority (the "Authority") is empowered, pursuant to the Virginia Housing Authorities Law, Chapter 1, Title 36 (the "Act") of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Virginia Code"), to issue its bonds for the purpose, among others, of financing housing projects located within the territorial boundaries of the City of Richmond, Virginia (the "City"); and
. WHEREAS, Commerce Heights, LLC (the "Borrower") has requested the Authority to agree to issue its multifamily residential rental housing revenue bonds under the Act in an expected maximum principal amount of $17,000,000 (the "Bonds"), the proceeds of which will be used to finance or refinance a portion of (a) the costs of acquiring, constructing and equipping a multifamily residential rental housing project consisting of approximately 230 units contained in two four-story garden-style residential buildings, totaling approximately 262,390 square feet of space, including a community room for resident programs, a fitness center, a leasing office and flexible outdoor amenity space in aggregate (the " Project") expected to be owned and used by the Borrower or a party related to the Borrower, (b) the funding of capitalized interest and reserve funds , in each case as permitted by applicable law and (c) the costs incurred in connection with the issuance of the Bonds ( collectively, _the "Plan of Finance"), as permitted under the Act;
and
WHEREAS, the Project shall be located at 1410 Ingram Avenue in the City of Richmond and established and maintained as a "qualified residential rental project" within the meaning of Section 142( d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"); and
WHEREAS, the Borrower has indicated that it will work in good faith with the Authority to endeavor to provide certain employment and/or contracting opportunities to the residents and businesses of the neighborhoods surrounding the Project and others (the "Borrower's Special Commitments") ; and •
WHEREAS, preliminary plans for the Plan of Finance have been described to the Authority and a public hearing (the "Public Hearing") has been held with respect to the Plan of Finance and the Bonds in accordance with Section 14 7(£) of the Code and Section 15.2-4906, as applicable to housing authorities, of the Virginia Code; and
WHEREAS., the Authority has determined that it is in the best interests of the Authority to issue its tax-exempt revenue bonds pursuant to the Act, in such amounts as may be necessary to finance or refinance the Plan of Finance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE RICHMOND
REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY THAT:
I. The foregoing recitals are approved by the Authority and are incorporated in, and deemed a part of, this resolution.
2. It is hereby found and determined that the Plan of Finance will further the public purposes of the Act by assisting in providing housing to low and moderate income persons in the City.
3. It is hereby found and determined that the Project will constitute "residential buildings" as that term is defined in the Act.
4. To induce the Borrower to undertake the Plan of Finance and maintain the Project as a "qualified residential rental project" within the meaning of Section 142( d) of the Code, the Authority hereby agrees, subject to approvals required by applicable law, to assist the Borrower in financing or refinancing the Plan of Finance by undertaking the issuance of (and hereby declares its official intent to issue) its multifamily housing revenue bonds therefor in an expected maximum principal stated amount of $17,000,000 for the Project upon the terms and conditions to be mutually agreed upon between the Authority and the Borrower. The Bonds shall be issued in forms and pursuant to terms to be set by the Authority. The Bonds may be issued in one or more series at one time or from time to time, and the Bonds of any such series may be either taxable or tax-exempt for purposes of federal income taxation.
5. All other acts of the officers of the Authority that are in conformity with the purposes and intent of this resolution and in furtherance of the issuance and sale of the Bonds and the undertaking of the Plan of Finance are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed.
6. The Authority hereby designates Haneberg Hurlbert PLC, Richmond, Virginia, to serve as bond counsel ("Bond Counsel") and hereby appoints such firm to supervise the proceedings and approve the issuance of the Bonds·.
7. The Borrower agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Authority, its officers, commissioners, employees and agents from and against all liabilities, obligations, claims, damages, penalties, losses, costs and expenses in any way connected with the issuance and sale of the Bonds.
8. All costs and expenses in connection with the financing and the Plan of Finance, including the fees and expenses of the Authority (including, without limitation, the Authority's application fee, origination fee and ongoing administrative fees) , Bond Counsel, counsel for the Authority and any placement agent or underwriter for the sale of the Bonds shall be paid from the proceeds of the Bonds (but only to the extent permitted by applicable law) or by the Borrower. lffor any reason such Bonds are not issued, it is understood that all such expenses shall be paid by th~ Borrower and that the Authority shall have no responsibility therefor.
9. The Bonds shall be limited obligations of the Authority and shall be payable solely out of revenues, receipts and payments spec ifically pledged therefor. Neither the commissioners, officers, agents or employees of the Authority, past, present and future, nor any person executing the Bonds, shall be liable personally on the Bonds by reason of the issuance thereof. The Bonds shall not be deemed to constitute a general obligation debt or a pledge of the faith and credit of the Commonwealth of Virginia or any political subdivisio11'thereof, including the Authority or the City (and the Bonds shall so state on their face), and neither the Commonwealth of Virginia nor any such political subdivision thereof shall be personally liable thereon, nor in any event shall the Bonds be payable out of any funds or properties other than the special funds and sources provided therefor.
Neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth of Virginia, or any political subdivision thereof, shall be pledged to the payment of the principal of the
. Bonds or the interest thereon or other costs incident thereto. The Bonds shall not constitute an indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction.
'I 0. The Authority (including its officers, commissioners, employees and agents) shall not be liable and hereby disclaims all liability to the Borrower and all other persons or entities for any damages, direct or consequential, resulting from the issuance of the Bonds or failure of the Authority to issue the Bonds for any reason. Any obligation of the Authority to exercise its powers in the City to issue the Bonds as requested by the Borrower is contingent upon the satisfaction of all legal requirements and the Authority shall not be liable and hereby disclaims all liability to the Borrower for any damages, direct or consequential, resulting from the Authority's failure to issue the Bonds for the Plan of Finance for any reason, including but not limited to, the failure of the City Council of the City (the "City Council") to approve the issuance of the Bonds.
11 . The Authority recommends that the City Council approve the issuance of the Bonds, in one or more series, at one time or from time to time, in an expected maximum stated principal amount of $17,000,000 for the purposes of undertaking the Plan of Finance, as required by Section 14 7(f) of the Code.
12. Each of the Chair, Vice Chair, Chief Executi ve Officer, Secretary and any Assistant Secretary of the Authority is authorized and directed to deliver to the City Council (I) a reasonably detailed summary of the comments, if any, expressed at the Public Hearing and (2) a copy of this resolution. •
13. Each of the Chair, Vice Chair, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of the Authority, or the designee of any of them, is hereby authorized to request one or more allocations of the State Ceiling (as defined in Section 15.2-5000 of the Virginia Code) in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Virginia Code and any regulations or executive orders issued thereunder. All costs incurred by the Authority, if any, in connection with such proceedings shall be paid for by the Borrower.
14. No Bonds may be issued pursuant to this resolution until such time as (a) the issuance of the Bonds has be_en approved by the City Council, and (b) the Bonds have received one or more allocations of the State Ceiling in accordance with the applicab le provisions of the Virginia Code and any regulations or executive orders issued thereunder.
15. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds does not constitute an endorsement to any prospective purchaser of the Bonds of the creditworthiness of the Plan of Finance or of the Borrower.
I 6. This resolution is a Declaration of Official Intent under U.S . Treasury Regulations
• for purposes of Sections I 03 and 141 to 150 of the Code. Based upon the representations of the Borrower, the Authority reasonably expects that certain costs of the Project may be reimbursed with the proceeds of the Bonds.
17. The issuance of the Bonds in the principal amount of up to $ 17,000,000 for the Project pursuant to definitive bond documents to be prepared o_r reviewed by Bond Counsel and Counsel to the Authority (the "Bond Documents") is hereby authorized and approved. The Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary, Chief Executive Officer and any other officer of the Authority, any of whom may act alone (the "Authorized Officials"), are each hereby authorized and directed to execute the Bonds, which shall bear interest at the rates (which may be variable or fixed) , shall mature on such dates and shall be subject to redemption at such times as are set forth in the Bond Documents . The Authorized Officials are hereby authorized to approve the final terms of the Bonds; provided, however, that the interest rates borne by the Bonds shall not exceed 15% per annum, the final maturity of the Bonds shall not be later than forty ( 40) years after the date of the initial issuances of the Bonds, and the principal amount of the Bonds shall not exceed $17,000,000. Such approvals shall be evidenced conclusively by the execution and delivery of the Bonds.
18. The Bond Documents shall be in substantially the same forms as prepared or reviewed by Bond Counsel and Counsel to the Authority and submitted to the Authority, with such completions, omissions, insertions and changes (including, without limitation, changes of the dates thereof and the captions of the Bonds) as may be approved by the Authorized Officials executing them, such executions to constitute conclusive evidence of the approvals of any such completions, omissions, insertions and changes. The Bond Documents shall contain upon their execution and delivery provisions obligating the Borrower to comply with the Borrower 's Special Commitments with respect to the Project. The execution, delivery and performance by the Authority of the Bond Documents are hereby authorized and directed.
19. The Authorized Officials are hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the Authority and to deliver the Bonds, the Bond Documents, the related documents to which the Authority is a party and such other agreements, certificates, documents and instruments (collectively, the "Documents"), and to do and perform such things and acts, as are authorized hereby or contemplated by the Documents, and, if required, the Secretary or any other officer of the Authority is authorized and directed to affix the seal of the Authority to the Bonds and the other Documents and to attest such seal. The signatures of the Authorized Officials and the seal of the Authority on the Bonds may be by facsimile.
20. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Discussion: Senior Vice President of Real Estate and Community Development, Sherrill
Hampton provided an overview of the resolution for the Commerce Heights development. She explained that the project will consist of a newly constructed four-level building with 230 one-, two-, and three-bedroom units. The developer is requesting up to $17,000,000 in Conduit Bond financing to support the project. Construction is anticipated to begin in the fourth quarter of2026 and is expected to take approximately 18 months to complete.
At 7:38 p.m., a Public Hearing was opened for Resolution 2026-06 concerning the issuance of
Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds for the Commerce Heights Apartments. No public comments were offered regarding the resolution. The Public Hearing was closed at 7:43 p.m.
Resolution 2026-07 - Resolution authorizing the Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority to sell the improved Real Property located at 2124 North 29th Street to Anna Julia Cooper Episcopal School and authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or His Designee, to execute and deliver any and all documentation required to consummate such sale on behalf of the Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority
WHEREAS, Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority ("RRHA") owns that certain improved real property located at 2 I 24 N . 29th Street (the "Property") and leases the Property to Anna Julia Cooper Episcopal School ("AJCES") for operation of a school ; and •
WHEREAS, AJCES has approached RRHA about purchasing the Property from RRHA for a purchase price of $150,000.00; and
WHEREAS, RRHA has determined that the sale of the Property to AJCES will not adversely affect its ability to carry out its housing and redevelopment programs, and that the Property is not needed for any current or foreseeab le operational purpose of RRHA;
and
WHEREAS, AJCES's continued operation of a school on the Property will provide a significant benefit to the community, including the expansion of educational opportunities for public housing chi ldren and youth; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Board of Commissioners ofRRHA (the "Board") to take appropriate official action to approve the sale of the Property by RRHA to AJCES and to authorize the Chief Executive Officer, or his designee, to execute and deliver any and all documentation required to consummate such sale on behalf of RRHA;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board as follows:
I . That the sale of the Property by RRHA to AJCES fo;. a purchase price of $150,000.00, on such terms and conditions as are agreed upon AJCES and acceptable to the Chief Executive Officer, is hereby approved; and
2. That the Chief Executive Officer, or his designee, is hereby authorized and directed to execute arid deliver any and all documentation required to consummate such sale on behalf of RRHA, including, without limitation, a Purchase and Sale Agreement, provided such documentation is in a form acceptable to the Chief Executive Officer.
Discussion: Chief Executive Office Nesmith stated that the Anna Julia Cooper (AJC) School provides a great opportuni ty for the children in the community. Commissioner Dyanne Broidy shared her positive personal experiences with AJC and the sfrong educational opportunities her children have received there. Mr. Mike Maruca with AJC addressed the Board a_nd provided
·background on how the school started and its mission. Mr. Garrett Sawyer, a current board member for AJC spoke aboL1t his longstanding involvement with the school , emphasizing its joyful learning environment and the meaningful impact it has on the students: He expressed enthusiasm for continued partnership with RRHA moving forward.
Adjournment
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:04 p.m.
Chief Executive Officer/Secretary
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .