Exhibit 2c-PastPerfQues_SEWP VI_Cat C 6.13.24.pdf
PDF 384 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amendment 14-SEWP VI Final RFP (6th Generation of Solutions for Enterprise-Wide Procurements) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80TECH24R001
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (Exhibit 2) for the NASA SEWP VI contract. It provides detailed instructions and forms for government evaluators to assess the past performance and relevant experience of offerors under the SEWP VI contract's various technical areas, including network services, cybersecurity, cloud, application development, and IT operations and maintenance.
The questionnaire outlines the evaluation criteria, definitions of performance ratings, and information to be provided by the offeror and evaluator. It covers contract details, description of services, evaluator information, and assessments of the contractor's technical, schedule, cost, and business/management performance. The document also includes instructions for completing Sections 1-6 and providing an overall performance rating. This questionnaire is a key component of the past performance evaluation for the SEWP VI solicitation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Amendment 14-SEWP VI Final RFP (6th Generation of Solutions for Enterprise-Wide Procurements) has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Instructions:
Very High
(VH)
High (H)
Moderate (M)
Low (L)
Very Low
(VL)
N/R
Section 6 Provides for an evaluation of the contractor’s management of cost and award/incentive fee history.
Not Rated
The Offeror’s relevant past performance is of exceptional merit; indicating exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) problems with no adverse effect on overall performance.
The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates very effective performance that would be fully responsive to contract requirements with contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner, for the most part with only minor problems with little identifiable effect on overall performance.
The Offeror’s relevant past performance meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.
The Offeror’s relevant past performance meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.
The Offeror’s relevant past performance does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; problems in one or more areas, which adversely affect overall performance.
The Offeror shall provide a questionnaire for each past performance reference submission and be submitted directly by the evaluator to Government Contracting Officer via email PastPerformance@sewp.nasa.gov.
Sections 1-4 are to be completed by the Offeror and verified by the evaluator. Sections 5 and 6 are completed by the evaluator.
Sections 1-3 Provide for contract-related descriptive information and identification of the evaluator.
Section 4 Lists the major work elements within SEWP VI Scope Description. Please provide your assessment of the “relevant experience” and “performance” associated with our SOW evidenced within the contract for which you are a reference. “Perform” means a contractor who has completed work in that specific Technical Area.
“Did Not Perform” means that the specific technical area was not performed under the contract.
Seection 5 Evaluates the contractor’s technical, schedule, and cost performance and management. (Additional pages may be used for comments if desired). If you cannot answer any questions, please circle “N/R” for Not Rated.
The following definitions are offered for your use in assigning a performance rating for each of the factors in Sections 5 and 6.
NASA- SEWP VI
EXHIBIT 2- PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
NASA- SEWP VI
EXHIBIT 2- PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Section l. Contract Information
A. Name of Company:
B. Address:
C. Contractor Cage Code and/or UEI number:
D. Contrnct Number:
E. Contract Type:
F. Period of Perfonnance (including options): From: To:
G. Total Contract Value:
H. Award Infonnation:
Competitive:
Basis of Selection:
Technical:
Cost/Price:
Other (Specify):
Yes
OYes OYes
Section 2: Description of Contract
No
B1iefly describe the se1vices provided under this contract:
During the contr y t y rfo1mance being evaluated, this company was the:
Prime Contractor __ Significant Subcontractor O_ Team Member 0 Other (desc1ibe)
Does a co1porate or business relationship exist between the fum being evaluated and your organization?
Yes No
If yes, please explain:
Section 3. Evaluator Information
Name:
Title:
Agency/Company:
Email Address:
Phone:
Section 4. Technical Area Relevance Ratings Please check the appropriate blocks for Relevance (Performed or Did Not Perform)
Category C- ITC/AV Mission-based Service Solutions
NASA- SEWP VI
EXHIBIT 2- PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Role in Program/Contract:
Length of Involvement in Program/Contract:
PERFORMED Did Not Perform
Manage a single end-to-end service provisioning organization that combines and streamlines LAN and WAN communications services for mission networks. Tasks, defined at the task order level, may include but are not limited to Providing continuity of service for legacy custom data network solutions for point-to-point network connections and point-to-point copper and fiber optic circuits; providing Corporate Network Services, Corporate Voice Services, Corporate Data Services, Corporate Collaboration Services, Corporate Management and Operations, Mission Services, Mission Management, and Operations, Customer Relationship Management, Service Management, Strategy Generation, Cybersecurity Support, Cable Plant Services, and Unified Communications and Collaboration (UCC).
2c. Innovation Services Mission specific Innovation Services that include both Innovation efforts of continuous improvement and innovation.
Continuous improvement is defined as the ongoing effort to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the IT services.
Innovation is defined as the process to identify and implement new ideas and break-through solutions that change and/or enhance the services and results in additional Business and/or IT value.
3c. Information and Data Analytics Services (IDAs) The Information and Data Analytics team is a virtually distributed, hybrid team of analysts, data scientists, developers, and technologists working together to rapidly prototype, develop and deploy solutions to address the most pressing analytic challenges. Provide support for IDAS, including Data Science, Data Modeling, Big Data and Advanced Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning Methods, and Practices to the Agency. Support improving the use, management, and application of data by rapidly prototyping, developing, deploying, and maintaining solutions to address the most pressing analytic challenges.
4c. Application Services/Software Development Perform assessment, planning, design, development, testing, integration, administration, maintenance, operational support, decommission, and documentation for new and existing applications defined at the order level for Mission specific Applications. Track current technologies and trends as they relate to the desktop (native), server, web, Cloud as a Service, and mobile application environment support. Application development may require expertise in various areas including, but not limited to agile development practices; front and back-end development; automated (unit/integration/end-to-end) testing; Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment; Application Programming Interface (API) development and documentation; Cloud deployment; Product management and strategy; Visual design;
Building and testing public-facing sites and tools; etc.
Technical Area
1c. Network Services
PERFORMED Did Not Perform
Identify training requirements, obtain, or develop training programs and conduct training for technologies, systems, applications, and products. This includes but is not limited to: IT workforce development and competency-based training; training for personnel to ensure proper operation, maintenance, and testing of systems, applications, and products; training and knowledge transfer to technicians and other staff about services and associated products within the functional scope of the SEWP Contracts.
This category includes but is not limited to Mission level Television and Broadcasting services; Mission website and social media operations; digital communications; institutional audiovisual support; publishing support; and foundational work in graphic, visual, electronic, and broadcast arts. Provide multimedia and communication products, systems, and services to support meeting institutional, programmatic, and mission requirements (e.g., still and motion imagery in support of center events; multimedia engineering, imagery acquisition, and video operations in support of engineering analysis; and mission operations).
8c. IT Operations and Maintenance / Help Desk/Call Center Support Support the operation and maintenance of IT systems. Operations and maintenance on IT systems include all software and hardware associated with mainframes, client/server, web-based applications, XYZ-as-a- Service, virtual desktop infrastructure, and networking. Operational Support includes Infrastructure Management Services (IMS) (Configuration Management; Network/Hardware Support; Resource Management; Backup and Recovery Management; Installation, Configuration, and Tuning; Electronic Software Licensing Services, including license: deployment, management, tracking, upgrading, etc.;
System Management; IT Operation and Maintenance Planning; Data Quality Management; Continual Service Improvement; IT Infrastructure Optimization; Hardware Asset Management; Software Management) Provide a full array of services, staff, and expertise to operate and maintain Service Desk/Help Desk/ Call Center functions. Provide software system administration and operational support onsite or remotely as required. Install new software releases to supported locations/facilities/sites as required. This may include, but is not limited to, individual computer and peripheral maintenance and desk-side services.
9c. Database Services Manage database applications and services including database administration, Database Management System (DBMS) software, and associated database tools both on-premises and in the cloud. Database services include but are not limited to: Database creation; Database Monitoring and Alerting; Performance Tuning and Optimization; Database Administration and Security; etc.
10c. 10. In-Scope Training
7c. Digital Multimedia and Technical Communications Services
5c. Cybersecurity Services Cybersecurity standards, architecture, and engineering include assisting in designing and developing cybersecurity architecture and engineering taking advantage of modern technologies such as the cloud, meeting Federal requirements, and enhancing the user experience. Cybersecurity and privacy services include providing services for continuous monitoring and threat detection, incident response and management, vulnerability management, cyber forensics, and analysis, implementation of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) risk management framework, and cybersecurity posture assessment.
6c. Cloud Services Evaluate, recommend, implement, and support at the Mission/Program level for the adoption of various cloud technologies such as cloud environments (e.g., AWS GovCloud, Azure Government Cloud, Salesforce Government Cloud); cloud services (e.g., Amazon Web Services, iSite, Snowflake); and cloud service models (e.g., IaaS, PaaS, SaaS). Examples of Cloud services include but are not limited to: Application Integration Services; Cloud Governance, Security, and Compliance; Cloud Strategy and Planning; Cloud Storage and Hosting; X as a Service (XaaS). Cloud Services is inclusive of all offerings and services associated with cloud services.
Technical Area
No.
1. VH H M L VL N/R
2. VH H M L VL N/R
3. VH H M L VL N/R
4. VH H M L VL N/R
5. VH H M L VL N/R
6. VH H M L VL N/R
7. VH H M L VL N/R
8. VH H M L VL N/R
9. VH H M L VL N/R
10. VH H M L VL N/R
11. VH H M L VL N/R
12. VH H M L VL N/R
13. VH H M L VL N/REffective and accurate productivity and task status reporting Comment:
Ability to effectively manage the contract including subcontractor performance, if applicable Ability to recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, including ability to fill key vacancies in a timely manner Adequacy of Contractor's system(s) for processing task orders and/or changes
COST
Ability to establish realistic cost estimates and adhere to estimated costs Ability to anticipate, identify and control cost growth
Comment:
BUSINESS/MANAGEMENT
Communicating/interfacing with Government and overall responsiveness to Government requests
SCHEDULE
Timeliness, quality, and accuracy of schedule estimates Ability to meet/exceed schedule milestones
Comment:
Demonstrated understanding and compliance with mission saftey requirements
SEWP VI Exhibit 2
PAST PERMORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
5. General Performance Survey
Comment:
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS PERFORMANCE RATING
(Please circle/Highlight)
QUALITY
Quality of services and support provided Accuracy and timliness of cost reporting Ability to identify and correct performance deficiencies in a timely
Initial Value
What are the total contract expenditures to date (cost/fees to date based on invoices, reports, etc)?
Therefore, the Average Annual Cost/Fee Incurred to Date: $18,669,528 ($43,500,000/2.33 years)
Was there a cost overrun? Yes No If yes, please explain.
If this was an award fee contract, what are the individual and/or average ratings of performance by your organization? Please attach any available award fee letters or database entries.
Please comment on particularly strong/weak points of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, and/or cost). If the Overall Contract Performance Rating below is less than Very High, please provide some explanation in this section on why a higher rating was not provided.
Total Value: $
What is the Annual Contract Value to Date (The current contract expenditures to date divided by the number of years of performance to date)?
For example (note, these example numbers may not relate to this specific procurement):
Assume your contract is a current five year contract, is still ongoing, and the latest cost report reflects a cost/fee of $43,500,000 through the first 2 years and 4 months (to date). In this example, current/total Contract Expenditures incurred to Date are $43,500,000 and associated period of performance for those expenditures, expressed in years, is 2.33 years.
Fee: $
SEWP VI Exhibit 2
PAST PERMORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Section 6:
What is the contract value?
Current Value
Estimated Cost: $
Please add any other comments you may feel are pretinent.
Rater's Signature Date
Overall Contract Performance Rating (circle one) Very High High Moderate Low Very Low
If less than Very High Performance Rating, please explain:
| Exhibit 2- Past Performance Questionnaire 2024 |
| Sheet1 |
| Exhibit 2 Performance Survey |
| Sheet1 |
| A Name of Company 1: |
| A Name of Company 2: |
| C Contractor Cage Code andor UEI number: |
| D Contract Number: |
| E Contract Type: |
| From: |
| To: |
| G Total Contract Value: |
| Yes: |
| No: |
| Other Specify: |
| Briefly describe the services provided under this contract: |
| Other describe: |
| Yes_2: |
| No_2: |
| If yes please explain: |
| undefined: |
| Length of Involvement in ProgramContract: |
| Comment: |
| Comment_2: |
| Comment_3: |
| Comment_4: |
| Check Box1: Off |
| Group3: Off |
| What is the contract value?: |
| Estimated Cost: |
| What are the total contract expenditures to date (cost/fees to date based on invoices, reports, etc)?: |
| What is the Annual Contract Value to Date (The current contract expenditures to date divided by the number of years of performance to date)?: |
| Was there a cost overrun? If yes, please explain: |
| Name: |
| 0: |
| Title: |
| Agency/Company: |
| Email Address: |
| Phone Number: |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Technical: Off |
| Cost/Price: Off |
| Current Value: |
| Initial Fee: |
| Current Fee: |
| Initial Total Value: |
| Current Total Value: |
| If this was an award fee contract, what are the individual and/or average ratings of performance by your organization? Please attach any available award fee letters or database entries: |
| Please comment on particularly strong/weak points of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, and/or cost): |
| If the Overall Contract Performance Rating below is less than Very High, please provide some explanation in this section on why a higher rating was not provided: |
| If less than Very High Performance Rating, please explain:: |
| Please add any other comments you may feel are pretinent: |
| Check Box7: |
| 5: |
| 0: |
| 1: |
| 5: |
| 1: |
| 0: Off |
| 1: Off |
| 2: Off |
| 3: Off |
| 4: |
| 0: Off |
| 1: Off |
| 1: |
| 1: |
| 5: |
| 1: |
| 0: Off |
| 1: Off |
| 2: Off |
| 3: Off |
| 4: |
| 0: Off |
| 1: Off |
Date:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .