Exhibit 2c-PastPerfQues_SEWP VI_Cat C 6.18.24.pdf

PDF 428 KB Posted

Attached to
Amendment 14-SEWP VI Final RFP (6th Generation of Solutions for Enterprise-Wide Procurements) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80TECH24R001
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for the SEWP VI solicitation, which is a Government-Wide Acquisition Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract for Information Technology (IT) Product and Service Solutions. The questionnaire is used to evaluate the relevant past performance and management of cost and award/incentive fee history for potential contractors. It includes sections for contract information, a description of the services provided, evaluator information, and technical area relevance ratings. The questionnaire also provides performance ratings across factors such as quality, schedule, cost, business/management, and compliance with safety requirements. The related federal contract opportunity is the SEWP VI solicitation, which is being issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Information Technology Procurement Office (ITPO). This competitive acquisition will result in a 10-year IDIQ contract with the ability to issue various contract types such as Firm Fixed Price, Time and Material, and Fixed Price Award Fee. The planned release date for the Final Request for Proposal (RFP) is on or about February 2024, with proposals due approximately 60 calendar days later and an anticipated contract award date of May 1, 2025.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Amendment 14-SEWP VI Final RFP (6th Generation of Solutions for Enterprise-Wide Procurements), newest first.
File Type Posted
80TECH24R0001 SF1449_Category C-02.19.25.pdf PDF
80TECH24R0001 SF1449_Category A-02.19.25.pdf PDF
SF 30 80TECH24R0001 Amendment 13.pdf PDF
Compare Report 80TECH24R0001 Request For Proposals Amendment 13.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT D- Contract Data Requirements List Amendment 12.pdf PDF
80TECH24R0001 SF1449_Category B-1.17.25.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT D- Contract Data Requirements List Amendment 11.pdf PDF
Exhibit 3a- Category A Solutions Spreadsheet Amendment 11.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit 5 C-SCRM Attestation Form Amendment 11.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SEWP VI Batch 8 Published 1.13.25.pdf PDF
Amendment 10-CHANGES_SEWP VI RFP 80TECH24R0001_12.16.24.pdf PDF
80TECH24R0001 Amendment 10 Request For Proposals.pdf PDF
80TECH24R0001 SF1449_Category A-12.16.24.pdf PDF
80TECH24R0001 SF1449_Category B-12.16.24.pdf PDF
Exhibit 3b- Category B Solutions Spreadsheet Amendment 9 11.21.24.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
80TECH24R0001 Amendment 08 Request For Proposals.pdf PDF
Amendment 08-Changes_SEWP VI RFP 80TECH24R0001_11.14.24.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT A-SEWP Scope Amendment 08.pdf PDF
Exhibit 1 - REP Template Amendment 08.pdf PDF
Exhibit 5 C-SCRM Attestation Form Amendment 08.pdf PDF
SEWP VI Batch 2 published 10.28.24.pdf PDF
SEWP VI Update - Batch 1 published 10.11.pdf PDF
SF30- Amendment 7-SEWP VI-9.20.24.pdf PDF
80TECH24R0001 SF1449_Category A-9.20.24.pdf PDF
80TECH24R0001 SF1449_Category C-9.20.24.pdf PDF
Amendment 6-CHANGES_SEWP VI RFP 80TECH24R0001_8.06.24.pdf PDF
SEWP VI RFP Q_ A 7.24.24.pdf PDF
SF30- Amendment 5-SEWP VI-7.22.24.pdf PDF
Amendment 5-SEWP VI RFP 80TECH24R0001_7.22.24.pdf PDF
SF30- Amendment 4-SEWP VI-7.18.24.pdf PDF
Amendment4-SEWP VI RFP 80TECH24R0001_7.18.24.pdf PDF
80TECH24R0001 SF1449_Category A-7.18.24.pdf PDF
Exhibit 3c- Category C Solutions Spreadsheet 7.18.24.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
80TECH24R0001 SF1449_Category C-7.18.24.pdf PDF
Exhibit 2c-PastPerfQues_SEWP VI_Cat C 7.18.24.pdf PDF
SF30- Amendment 3-SEWP VI-6.24.24.pdf PDF
SF30- Amendment 2-SEWP VI-6.18.24.pdf PDF
SF30- Amendment 1-SEWP VI-6.13.24.pdf PDF
Amendment1_SEWP VI RFP 80TECH24R0001_6.13.24.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT A-SEWP Scope-6.13.24.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT D- Contract Data Requirements List 6.13.24.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT J- C_SCRM Attestation Form 6.13.24.pdf PDF
Exhibit 1- Relevant Experience Project Table 6.13.24.pdf PDF
Enclosure 2 - UNSPSC Codes 6.13.24.pdf PDF
Enclosure 1- SEWP VI Providers.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT B- PROGRAM PERFORMANCE.pdf PDF
Exhibit 1- Relevant Experience Project Table.pdf PDF
80TECH24R0001 SF1449_Category A.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT D- Contract Data Requirements List.pdf PDF
Exhibit 3b- Category B Solutions Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 50

Amendment 14-SEWP VI Final RFP (6th Generation of Solutions for Enterprise-Wide Procurements) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Instructions:

Very High

(VH)

High (H)

Moderate (M)

Low (L)

Very Low

(VL)

N/R

Section 6 Provides for an evaluation of the contractor’s management of cost and award/incentive fee history.

Not Rated

The Offeror’s relevant past performance is of exceptional merit; indicating exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) problems with no adverse effect on overall performance.

The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates very effective performance that would be fully responsive to contract requirements with contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner, for the most part with only minor problems with little identifiable effect on overall performance.

The Offeror’s relevant past performance meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.

The Offeror’s relevant past performance meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.

The Offeror’s relevant past performance does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; problems in one or more areas, which adversely affect overall performance.

The Offeror shall provide a questionnaire for each past performance reference submission and be submitted directly by the evaluator to Government Contracting Officer via email PastPerformance@sewp.nasa.gov.

Sections 1-4 are to be completed by the Offeror and verified by the evaluator. Sections 5 and 6 are completed by the

Sections 1-3 Provide for contract-related descriptive information and identification of the evaluator.

Section 4 Lists the major work elements within SEWP VI Scope Description. Please provide your assessment of the “relevant experience” and “performance” associated with our SOW evidenced within the contract for which you are a reference. “Perform” means a contractor who has completed work in that specific Technical Area.

“Did Not Perform” means that the specific technical area was not performed under the contract.

Seection 5 Evaluates the contractor’s technical, schedule, and cost performance and management. (Additional pages may be used for comments if desired). If you cannot answer any questions, please circle “N/R” for Not Rated.

The following definitions are offered for your use in assigning a performance rating for each of the factors in Sections 5 and 6.

NASA- SEWP VI

EXHIBIT 2- PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Section l. Contract Information

A. Name of Company:

B. Address:

C. Contractor Cage Code and/or UEI number:

D. Contrnct Number:

E. Contract Type:

F. Period of Perfonnance (including options): From: To:

G. Total Contract Value:

H. Award Infonnation:

Competitive:

Basis of Selection:

Technical:

Cost/Price:

Other (Specify):

Yes

OYes OYes

Section 2: Description of Contract

No

B1iefly describe the se1vices provided under this contract:

During the contr y t y rfo1mance being evaluated, this company was the:

Prime Contractor __ Significant Subcontractor O_ Team Member 0 Other (desc1ibe)

Does a co1porate or business relationship exist between the fum being evaluated and your organization?

Yes No

If yes, please explain:

The Information and Data Analytics team is a virtually distributed, hybrid team of analysts, data scientists, developers, and technologists working together to rapidly prototype, develop and deploy solutions to address the most pressing analytic challenges. Provide support for IDAS, including Data Science, Data Modeling, Big Data and Advanced Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning Methods, and Practices to the Agency. Support improving the use, management, and application of data by rapidly prototyping, developing, deploying, and maintaining solutions to address the most pressing analytic challenges.

Section 3. Evaluator Information

Name:

Title:

Agency/Company:

Email Address:

Phone:

Role in Program/Contract Length of Involvement in Program/Contract:

Section 4. Technical Area Relevance Ratings

Please check the appropriate blocks for Relevance (Performed or Did Not Perform)

Category C- ITC/AV Mission-based Service Solutions

TECHNICAL AREA PERFORMED DID NOT PERFORM

1c. INNOVATION SERVICES

Mission specific Innovation Services that include both Innovation efforts of continuous improvement and innovation. Continuous improvement is defined as the ongoing effort to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the IT services. Innovation is defined as the process to identify and implement new ideas and break-through solutions that change and/or enhance the services and results in additional Business and/or IT value.

2c. INFORMATION AND DATA ANALYTICS SERVICES (IDAS)

4c. CYBERSECURITY SERVICES

Cybersecurity standards, architecture, and engineering include assisting in designing and developing cybersecurity architecture and engineering taking advantage of modern technologies such as the cloud, meeting Federal requirements, and enhancing the user experience. Cybersecurity and privacy services include providing services for continuous monitoring and threat detection, incident response and management, vulnerability management, cyber forensics, and analysis, implementation of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) risk management framework, and cybersecurity posture assessment.

6c. DIGITAL MULTIMEDIA AND TECHNICAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES

This category includes but is not limited to Mission level Television and Broadcasting services; Mission website and social media operations; digital communications; institutional audiovisual support; publishing support; and foundational work in graphic, visual, electronic, and broadcast arts. Provide multimedia and communication products, systems, and services to support meeting institutional, programmatic, and mission requirements (e.g., still and motion imagery in support of center events; multimedia engineering, imagery acquisition, and video operations in support of engineering analysis; and mission operations).

5c. CLOUD SERVICES

Evaluate, recommend, implement, and support at the Mission/Program level for the adoption of various cloud technologies such as cloud environments (e.g., AWS GovCloud, Azure Government Cloud, Salesforce Government Cloud); cloud services (e.g., Amazon Web Services, iSite, Snowflake); and cloud service models (e.g., IaaS, PaaS, SaaS). Examples of Cloud services include but are not limited to: Application Integration Services; Cloud Governance, Security, and Compliance; Cloud Strategy and Planning; Cloud Storage and Hosting; X as a Service (XaaS). Cloud Services is inclusive of all offerings and services associated with cloud services.

3c. APPLICATION SERVICES/SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

Perform assessment, planning, design, development, testing, integration, administration, maintenance, operational support, decommission, and documentation for new and existing applications defined at the order level for Mission specific Applications. Track current technologies and trends as they relate to the desktop (native), server, web, Cloud as a Service, and mobile application environment support. Application development may require expertise in various areas including, but not limited to agile development practices;

front and back-end development; automated (unit/integration/end-to-end) testing; Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment; Application Programming Interface (API) development and documentation; Cloud deployment; Product management and strategy; Visual design; Building and testing public-facing sites and tools; etc.

10c. IN-SCOPE TRAINING

Identify training requirements, obtain, or develop training programs and conduct training for technologies, systems, applications, and products. This includes but is not limited to: IT workforce development and competency-based training; training for personnel to ensure proper operation, maintenance, and testing of systems, applications, and products; training and knowledge transfer to technicians and other staff about services and associated products within the functional scope of the SEWP Contracts.

Manage a single end-to-end service provisioning organization that combines and streamlines LAN and WAN communications services for mission networks. Tasks, defined at the task order level, may include but are not limited to Providing continuity of service for legacy custom data network solutions for point-to-point network connections and point-to-point copper and fiber optic circuits; providing Corporate Network Services, Corporate Voice Services, Corporate Data Services, Corporate Collaboration Services, Corporate Management and Operations, Mission Services, Mission Management, and Operations, Customer Relationship Management, Service Management, Strategy Generation, Cybersecurity Support, Cable Plant Services, and Unified Communications and Collaboration (UCC).Manage a single end-to-end service provisioning organization that combines and streamlines LAN and WAN communications services for mission networks. Tasks, defined at the task order level, may include but are not limited to Providing continuity of service for legacy custom data network solutions for point-to-point network connections and point-to-point copper and fiber optic circuits; providing Corporate Network Services, Corporate Voice Services, Corporate Data Services, Corporate Collaboration Services, Corporate Management and Operations, Mission Services, Mission Management, and Operations, Customer Relationship Management, Service Management, Strategy Generation, Cybersecurity Support, Cable Plant Services, and Unified Communications and Collaboration (UCC).

9c. DATABASE SERVICES

Manage database applications and services including database administration, Database Management System (DBMS) software, and associated database tools both on-premises and in the cloud. Database services include but are not limited to: Database creation; Database Monitoring and Alerting; Performance Tuning and Optimization;

Database Administration and Security; etc.

TECHNICAL AREA PERFORMED

Support the operation and maintenance of IT systems. Operations and maintenance on IT systems include all software and hardware associated with mainframes, client/server, web-based applications, XYZ-as-a-Service, virtual desktop infrastructure, and networking. Operational Support includes Infrastructure Management Services (IMS) (Configuration Management; Network/Hardware Support; Resource Management; Backup and Recovery Management; Installation, Configuration, and Tuning; Electronic Software Licensing Services, including license:

deployment, management, tracking, upgrading, etc.; System Management; IT Operation and Maintenance Planning;

Data Quality Management; Continual Service Improvement; IT Infrastructure Optimization; Hardware Asset Management; Software Management) Provide a full array of services, staff, and expertise to operate and maintain Service Desk/Help Desk/ Call Center functions. Provide software system administration and operational support onsite or remotely as required. Install new software releases to supported locations/facilities/sites as required. This may include, but is not limited to, individual computer and peripheral maintenance and desk-side services.

8c. NETWORK SERVICES

DID NOT PERFORM

7c. IT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE / HELP DESK/CALL CENTER SUPPORT

No.

1. VH H M L VL N/R

2. VH H M L VL N/R

3. VH H M L VL N/R

4. VH H M L VL N/R

5. VH H M L VL N/R

6. VH H M L VL N/R

7. VH H M L VL N/R

8. VH H M L VL N/R

9. VH H M L VL N/R

10. VH H M L VL N/R

11. VH H M L VL N/R

12. VH H M L VL N/R

13. VH H M L VL N/REffective and accurate productivity and task status reporting Comment:

Ability to effectively manage the contract including subcontractor performance, if applicable Ability to recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, including ability to fill key vacancies in a timely manner Adequacy of Contractor's system(s) for processing task orders and/or changes

COST

Ability to establish realistic cost estimates and adhere to estimated costs Ability to anticipate, identify and control cost growth

Comment:

BUSINESS/MANAGEMENT

Communicating/interfacing with Government and overall responsiveness to Government requests

SCHEDULE

Timeliness, quality, and accuracy of schedule estimates Ability to meet/exceed schedule milestones

Comment:

Demonstrated understanding and compliance with mission saftey requirements

SEWP VI Exhibit 2

PAST PERMORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

5. General Performance Survey

Comment:

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS PERFORMANCE RATING

(Please circle/Highlight)

QUALITY

Quality of services and support provided Accuracy and timliness of cost reporting Ability to identify and correct performance deficiencies in a timely

Initial Value

What are the total contract expenditures to date (cost/fees to date based on invoices, reports, etc)?

Therefore, the Average Annual Cost/Fee Incurred to Date: $18,669,528 ($43,500,000/2.33 years)

Was there a cost overrun? Yes No If yes, please explain.

If this was an award fee contract, what are the individual and/or average ratings of performance by your organization? Please attach any available award fee letters or database entries.

Please comment on particularly strong/weak points of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, and/or cost). If the Overall Contract Performance Rating below is less than Very High, please provide some explanation in this section on why a higher rating was not provided.

Total Value: $

What is the Annual Contract Value to Date (The current contract expenditures to date divided by the number of years of performance to date)?

For example (note, these example numbers may not relate to this specific procurement):

Assume your contract is a current five year contract, is still ongoing, and the latest cost report reflects a cost/fee of $43,500,000 through the first 2 years and 4 months (to date). In this example, current/total Contract Expenditures incurred to Date are $43,500,000 and associated period of performance for those expenditures, expressed in years, is 2.33 years.

Fee: $

SEWP VI Exhibit 2

PAST PERMORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Section 6:

What is the contract value?

Current Value

Estimated Cost: $

Please add any other comments you may feel are pretinent.

Rater's Signature Date

Overall Contract Performance Rating (circle one) Very High High Moderate Low Very Low

If less than Very High Performance Rating, please explain:

Exhibit 2- Past Performance Questionnaire 2024
Sheet1
Exhibit 2 Performance Survey
Sheet1
A Name of Company 1:
A Name of Company 2:
C Contractor Cage Code andor UEI number:
D Contract Number:
E Contract Type:
From:
To:
G Total Contract Value:
Yes:
No:
Other Specify:
Briefly describe the services provided under this contract:
Other describe:
Yes_2:
No_2:
If yes please explain:
Comment:
Comment_2:
Comment_3:
Comment_4:
Check Box1: Off
Group3: Off
What is the contract value?:
Estimated Cost:
What are the total contract expenditures to date (cost/fees to date based on invoices, reports, etc)?:
What is the Annual Contract Value to Date (The current contract expenditures to date divided by the number of years of performance to date)?:
Was there a cost overrun? If yes, please explain:
Check Box2: Off
Check Box3: Off
Technical: Off
Cost/Price: Off
Current Value:
Initial Fee:
Current Fee:
Initial Total Value:
Current Total Value:
If this was an award fee contract, what are the individual and/or average ratings of performance by your organization? Please attach any available award fee letters or database entries:
Please comment on particularly strong/weak points of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, and/or cost):
If the Overall Contract Performance Rating below is less than Very High, please provide some explanation in this section on why a higher rating was not provided:
If less than Very High Performance Rating, please explain::
Please add any other comments you may feel are pretinent:
Date:
Name:
0:
Title:
Agency/Company:
Email Address:
Phone:
Role in Program/Contract:
Length of Involvement in:
Check Box4:
0:
0: Off
1: Off
1:
0: Off
1: Off
2:
0: Off
1: Off
3:
0: Off
1: Off
4:
0: Off
1: Off
5:
0: Off
1: Off
6:
0: Off
1: Off
7:
0: Off
1: Off
8:
0: Off
1: Off
9:
0: Off
1: Off

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .