att_C_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_v.pdf

PDF 138 KB Posted

Attached to
ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
73351018R0011
Issued by
Small Business Administration Office of Performance Management and the Chief Financial Officer

About this file

This document includes a past performance questionnaire and notice of a federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is a template for evaluating contractors' performance on prior contracts and includes sections for identifying the contract and customer, evaluating performance across factors such as quality and timeliness, and providing a narrative summary.

The federal contract opportunity is a combined synopsis and solicitation notice seeking proposals for engineering and information technology support services contracts. The Small Business Administration is seeking these services through multiple-award IDIQ contracts with 8(a) set-aside eligibility. Offerors must submit proposals by July 31st, 2018 addressing technical approach, management approach, experience, past performance, and price. The base period of performance is 12 months with four 12-month option periods. Evaluation will consider technical and price factors and result in awards to responsible offerors with advantageous proposals.

Attachment C - Past Performance Questionnair

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFQ 73351018R0011 SBA Engineering Support Services

ATTACHMENT C

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: ____________________________________________________________________

B. Contract number: _______________________________________

C. Contract type: ______________________________

D. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

E. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

F. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

G. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

H. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

I. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other

Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name and title:

B. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

C. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

E EXCELLENT – Very Low Risk - The contractor has substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements.

VG VERY GOOD – Low Risk - There are no, or very minimal issues and the contractor has met the contract requirements.

S Satisfactory – Moderate Risk - Overall compliance requires minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.

P POOR/UNACCEPTABLE – High Risk - Overall compliance requires significant agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

Quality of Product or Service E VG S P N

Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements

Effectiveness of assigned personnel in terms of the appropriate mix of education and experience to accomplish the requirement.

Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program

Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

Program Management, Timeliness of Performance & Business Relations

E VG S P N

Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations

Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

Transition/Phase-in & Employee Retention/Attraction E VG S P N

Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

Cost Control E VG S P N

Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

Government Contracts Only: has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes______ Default______ Convenience______ Pending Terminations______ No _____

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

Would you hire this contractor in the future to perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Email Address: toni.hoskinson@sba.gov Attention: Toni Hoskinson Due No Later Than 1:00 PM MDT, Friday, June 1, 2018

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .