Atch 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire August 2020.docx

DOCX document 60 KB Posted Apr 14, 2022

Attached to: RFP - Armed Protective Security Officer Services - Northern California
Solicitation number: 70RFPW21RW9000004
Issued by: Department of Homeland Security Office of Procurement Operations

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Exhibit 13 - AM0002.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	May 24, 2022
Amendment 0002.pdf	PDF	May 20, 2022
Amedment 0001.pdf	PDF	Apr 22, 2022
Atch 8 - Field Level Supervision Exhibit.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 14, 2022
Atch 3 - Past Project Form August 2020.doc	DOC document	Apr 14, 2022
Atch 6 Price Element Breakdown August 2020 Revision.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 14, 2022
RFP - 70RFPW21RW9000004.pdf	PDF	Apr 14, 2022
Exhibit 13 - Post Exhibit.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 14, 2022

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Protective Service 701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19106

ATTACHMENT 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation: 70RFPW21RW9000004, PSO Services for Northern California

NAME OF CONTRACTOR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE: __________________

The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information regarding the quality of the above named Contractor’s past performance relative to a contract, completed or in progress, at your company/agency. The Federal Protective Service is considering this Contractor for Protective Security Officer services in Northern California. We would greatly appreciate your input regarding the quality of the Contractor’s past performance.

Handwritten responses are sufficient. It is requested that the individual(s) responsible for the administrative oversight of the project (e.g. security specialist, COR, COTR, etc.) respond to this questionnaire. More than one copy of the questionnaire may be submitted if responses from more than one individual are appropriate.

Upon completion of the survey, please email to Kelly.m.minturn@fps.dhs.gov. If you have any questions, please contact Kelly Minturn at Kelly.m.minturn@fps.dhs.gov. We appreciate your efforts on our behalf.

CONTRACT NO. OR PROJECT TITLE: _____________________________________

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE TO

INCLUDE ALL OPTION PERIODS:_________________________________________

TOTAL PROJECT VALUE TO

INCLUDE ALL OPTION PERIODS: _________________________________________

ANNUAL NO. OF PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER HOURS (Note: If ID/IQ contract, provide the maximum post hours available for the most recent one year ordering period):_________________________________________

If ID/IQ ACTUAL NO. OF PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER HOURS PERFORMED FOR THE MOST RECENT ONE YEAR ORDERING PERIOD: ________________________________________________________

Please provide a brief description of the scope of this project so that we determine any similarities to this contract:

QUESTIONS

PERFORMANCE:

Please provide your comments on the Contractor’s performance in the following areas:

1. How consistent is the Contractor in providing required staffing at each post of duty?

Comments: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. How consistent is the Contractor in providing employees who report to duty properly groomed, uniformed, and equipped?

3. How consistent is the Contractor in keeping training records, certifications, and related documentation complete, accurate, and current?

4. Discuss the overall level of professionalism, attentiveness, and bearing of the Contractor's workforce.

5. How effective is the Contractor in identifying potential problems and resolving them on his own?

6. How effectively does the Contractor respond to problems presented to him by owner and tenant representatives?

7. Discuss the Contractor’s quality control of the project.

8. Discuss the Contractor’s overall management of the project

9. Discuss the Contractor’s ability to seamlessly transition or phase-in under a newly awarded contract (if applicable):

Comments:

10. Discuss the Contactor’s ability to provide the level of supervision sufficient to ensure effective performance by the productive Protective Security Officers over the course of the Contract.

Comments:

11. Did this contract require the contractor to submit a subcontracting plan? If so, has the contractor been making a good faith effort to meet the subcontracting goals contained within the plan? (NOTE: The individual completing this questionnaire may need to contact the cognizant contracting officer in order to ascertain whether the contractor is meeting subcontracting goals.)

12. If you had a choice, would you hire this Contractor again? Why or why not?

13. In summary, would you describe the quality of the Contractor's services and overall performance as:

a. _____	Highly Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is substantially less than the level expected from a competent vendor.
b. _____	Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is no more than the level expected from a competent vendor.
c. _____	Unacceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is greater than the level normally expected from a competent vendor.

Your Name:		______________________________
Your Position:	______________________________
Company:		______________________________
Telephone No:	______________________________
Fax:			______________________________
E-mail address:	______________________________

August 2020 Version image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Apr 14, 2022.