7.10_JA_Redaction_N0010426PX098.pdf

5. Rationale Justifying Use of Cited Authority

6. Description of Efforts Made To Solicit Offers From as Many Offerors as Practicable

7. Determination of Fair And Reasonable Cost

8. Actions to Remove Barriers to Future Competition

9. Any Other Facts Supporting Other Than Full & Open Competition

History

A/RMC 1

Suitable for competitive acquisition for the second or subsequent time.

A/RMSC R

The Government does not own the data or the rights to the data needed to purchase / contract repair of this part from additional sources. It has been determined to be uneconomical to buy the data or rights to the data. It is uneconomical to reverse engineer the part. This code is used when the Government did not initially purchase the data and/or rights. If only one source has the rights or data to manufacture/repair this item, A/RMCs 3, 4, or 5 are valid. If two or more sources have the rights or data to manufacture/repair this item, A/RMCs 1 or 2 are valid.

This acquisition will be solicited to

RAYTHEON CO - (15090) & GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS INC - (05606). The repair of the items listed above will be negotiated with RAYTHEON CO - (15090) & GENERAL DYNAMICS- OTS because they're the only source with the technical data required to repair, test and certify these items prior to unit delivery. In the absence of any technical data, it is imperative that the Government deal strictly with RAYTHEON CO - (15090) & GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS for repair of these items. The Government does not physically have in its possession any engineering or technical data to contract for repairs with other than RAYTHEON CO - (15090) & GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS at this time.

15 MAR 2019 Class Waiver of the Requirement to Post a Request for Information or Sources Sought Notice applies to this requirement

The proposed contract action was synopsized on the government-wide point of entry on 11/26/2025 and as a result no other vendors expressed interest in this requirement.

Market research was conducted in accordance with far part 10. The results of the market research conducted (or the reason(s) market research was not conducted) are as follows

A technical review, which consisted of searching several Government databases including ITIMP, FLIS and ERP, has been completed on this item. Search criteria included Part Number, Design Control Activity, Cage Code, NSN, Nomenclature, AMC/AMSC, AAC, Criticality Coding, recorded approved sources of supply, historical sources of supply and past contracts. Based on this market research the contracting officer has determined that the only known procurement sources are RAYTHEON CO - (15090) & GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS INC - (05606). If a company other than the ones listed believes they have a compatible product, they can submit the item to the Engineering Program Office, to include research and development, drawings and test specifications. The program office may test and evaluate the item at the company’s expense, when appropriate. Upon qualification, the approved company will be able to participate in current or future solicitations. ITIMP- Reviewed award history and other potential sources of supply, AMC/AMSC code, part number, CAGE code. ERP- Search criteria included part number, design control activity, Cage code, NSN, Nomenclature, AMC/AMSC, AAC, Criticality Coding which all matched with ITIMP

The contracting officer determines that the anticipated cost to the Government of the supplies covered by this J&A will be fair and reasonable.

To promote competition, NAVSUP WSS will continue to encourage vendors with the expertise to manufacture/repair the subject item to submit a complete technical data package for review and source approval by the appropriate engineering source approval authority per the (WSS) guidelines. Also, future requirements will be advertised on the government-wide point of entry.

For reasons set forth in Paragraph (5 & 6), NAVSUP WSS has no plans at this time to compete future contracts for the subject item covered by this document. If another potential manufacturing source emerges, NAVSUP WSS will assess whether competition for future requirements is feasible. Also, future requirements will be advertised on the government-wide point of entry.

Previous J&A No Previous J&A - Previously awarded under the SAT

N/A

Created By Andrew Baker

BAKER.ANDREW.LEROY

Work Function Reprocurement Technician

Created Date 11/20/2025

20-NOV-25

I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance which are included in this J&A are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief

4/22/26, 8:30 AM WorkflowPro https://mynavsup.nag.navy.mil/apps/ops$workflow_pro.j_and_a_edit?p_id=30376# 2/3

Requirements Cognizance Signature

Lisa Buckingham

BUCKINGHAM.LISA.ANNE.1

Work Function Logistics Management Specialist

Requirements Cognizance Signature Date

11/20/2025

I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance which are included in this J&A are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief

Technical Cognizance Signature

Andrew Baker

BAKER.ANDREW.LEROY

Work Function Reprocurement Technician

Technical Cognizance Signature Date

11/20/2025

As of this date, I confirm KO has reviewed the information contained in this J&A and determined sufficient for purposes of processing/ completing Small Business Coordination Record

DD2579

KO Review for Small Business Concurrence

Matthew Takach

TAKACH.MATTHEW.B

Work Function Contract Specialist KO Review for Small Business Concurrence Date

11/26/2025

I certify that this J&A is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief

Contracting Officer Certification Signature

Matthew Takach

TAKACH.MATTHEW.B

Work Function Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer Certification Signature Date

12/17/2025

I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance which are included in this J&A are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief

Competition Advocacy Review And Concurrence Signature

Adam Johnson

JOHNSON.ADAM.LEE

Work Function Competition Advocate Competition Advocacy Review And Concurrence Signature Date

12/18/2025

I certify that this J&A is legally sufficient to the best of my knowledge and belief

Legal Sufficiency Review Signature

Susan Whitley Newburg

WHITLEY

NEWBURG.SUSAN.E

Work Function Attorney Legal Sufficiency Review Signature Date

12/18/2025

I certify that this J&A is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief

Approval Required By Far 6.304 Signature

John Sweeney

SWEENEY.JOHN.J.JR

Work Function Competition Advocate Approval Required By Far 6.304 Signature Date

12/19/2025

4/22/26, 8:30 AM WorkflowPro https://mynavsup.nag.navy.mil/apps/ops$workflow_pro.j_and_a_edit?p_id=30376# 3/3