Amendment 1_RFQ_SOW PATT Oversight.pdf

PDF 344 KB Posted

Attached to
Post-Accident Toxicological Testing (PATT) Oversight
Solicitation number
693JJ620Q000003
Issued by

About this file

This combined synopsis and solicitation requests quotations for scientific and technical consulting services to support the Federal Railroad Administration's Post-Accident Toxicological Testing oversight program. Services include technical monitoring of the designated post-accident testing laboratory, administering proficiency testing programs, providing expert consultation, assisting with Part 219 compliance reviews of railroads and service providers, and other advisory tasks. The period of performance is one base year with two one-year option periods. Quotes are due by May 1, 2020 and shall include technical and price proposals along with past performance information. The solicitation is set aside for small businesses and will be awarded on a best value basis considering technical factors like personnel qualifications and past performance to be more important than price. The North American Industry Classification System code is 541690.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT 1: COMBINED SYNOPSIS/SOLICITATION NOTICE FOR REQUEST

FOR QUOTATION (RFQ)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

OFFICE OF ACQUISITION SERVICES

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590

This is an amended combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 12.6 and under the authority of FAR Part 13, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; quotes are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. This Request for Quotation (RFQ) is issued under RFQ No.

693JJ620Q000003 and includes incorporated provisions and clauses in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2020-04. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code for this procurement is 541690 “Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services”. This is a small business set-aside procurement.

NOTE 1: The work under this RFQ was previously performed under contract number DTFR5314C00029 by Healthwest, LLC.

NOTE 2: The period of performance for this order should be one-year from date of award and two one-year option periods.

The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) solicits your quotations for services to provide FRA support in Post-Accident Toxicological Testing (PATT) oversight - all technical and scientific areas which relate to the detection and deterrence of drug and alcohol use in the railroad industry. Please provide a labor-hour quote in accordance with Statement of Work (SOW) below.

QUOTE REQUIREMENTS

Each quote shall be legible, single-spaced, typewritten Times New Roman font (or comparable), no smaller than 11-point type-size, no less than 1 inch margins, which can be printed on 8 ½ x 11-inch paper. Regarding page limitations, this does not include a cover/title page or table of contents. Regarding callout boxes, graphics, and tables, these may be smaller and any font type provided these are legible if printed.

In responding to this RFQ, your quotation SHALL include the following:

1. Quote Cover Letter: An authorized official who can obligate the Contractor. Provide the name, title, telephone number and e-mail address of the company/division point of contact.

a. Company Name

b. Business Size (Small, Woman-Owned, Disadvantaged, Hub-Zone, Large, Non-

Profit, etc.)

c. DUNS and CAGE Code

d. Proposed Payment Terms (Government Standard is NET 30)

e. Government Discount/Savings provided (if applicable)

f. Remittance Address (if different than Mailing Address)

2. Submit a separate written technical quotation, a price quotation, and a past performance matrix.

3. The technical quotation shall be submitted in a PDF format. This shall include key personnel resumes who will be performing the tasks as required in the SOW. Proposed key personnel shall clearly demonstrate evident possession of requisite background and expertise to complete contract requirements, showing acumen in government regulated industry drug and alcohol testing programs, forensic toxicology, and transportation safety and human factors. Key personnel shall demonstrate successful completion and experience with services that are directly relevant to the requirements described in the SOW.

All key personnel quoted shall be available to begin work immediately at contract award.

Key personnel resumes shall:

a. Be no more than three (3) pages per resume.

b. Be in chronological order with the latest dates of employment first and will identify the company or agency, period of employment, title and job description of the individual, and level of responsibility.

c. Include employee’s education (including name of school, length of time and degree/certificate), and specific experiences that are directly related to the requirements of this SOW.

d. Include any relevant certifications and/or recognitions relevant to the SOW.

Substitution of key personnel during contract performance shall meet the qualifications of the original key personnel and shall be approved in advance by the FRA Subject Matter Expert (SME) and Contracting Officer.

4. The price quotation shall be submitted in a separate PDF format or Excel document using the following Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) table. The period of performance for this order should be one-year from date of award and two one-year option periods. Provide fair and reasonable labor rates for each applicable labor category in relation to the SOW requirements, and provide pricing for three years outlined in the CLIN table:

CLIN 0001: Base Year - Laboratory Compliance Inspections and Proficiency Testing (QA-QC)

Description Quantity Unit Proposed

Labor Hourly Rate

Total Proposed Cost

1 Contract Lead 144 Hour 2 Senior Forensic Toxicologist 288 Hour

Total Hours and Cost

CLIN 0002: Base Year - Class 1 Railroad Part 219 - Compliance Review Services 3 Contract Lead 240 Hour

4 Subject Matter Expert – Railroad Substance Abuse 240 Hour

CLIN 0003: Base Year - Class 1 Railroad Part 219 Compliance - Expert Consultation 5 Contract Lead 450 Hour 6 Senior Forensic Toxicologist 50 Hour

Total Hours and Cost CLIN 0004: Base Year - Travel - Direct and Indirect Cost

CLIN Description Total

Proposed Cost

7 Laboratory Compliance Inspections and Proficiency Testing (QA-QC)

This includes rental car, lodging, airfare, per diem and miscellaneous - three inspections

Class 1 Railroad Part 219 - Compliance Review Services (e.g. travel for meetings, special audit, others)

This includes rental car, lodging, airfare, per diem and miscellaneous - eight trips

9 Class 1 Railroad Part 219 Compliance - Expert Consultation

This includes rental car, lodging, miscellaneous - five trips

Travel (Cost Reimbursable) Total Cost

TOTAL COST FOR BASE YEAR

CLIN 1001: Option Year 1 - Laboratory Compliance Inspections and Proficiency Testing (QA-QC)

Proposed

Labor Hourly Rate

Total Proposed

Cost 10 Contract Lead 144 Hour

11 Senior Forensic Toxicologist 288 Hour

CLIN 1002: Option Year 1 - Class 1 Railroad Part 219 - Compliance Review Services 12 Contract Lead 240 Hour

13 Subject Matter Expert – Railroad Substance

CLIN 1003: Option Year 1 - Class 1 Railroad Part 219 Compliance - Expert Consultation

14 Contract Lead 450 Hour 15 Senior Forensic Toxicologist 50 Hour

Total Hours and Cost CLIN 1004: Option Year 1 - Travel - Direct and Indirect Cost

CLIN Description Total

Proposed Cost

16 Laboratory Compliance Inspections and Proficiency Testing (QA-QC)

This includes rental car, lodging, airfare, per diem and

Review Services (e.g. travel for meetings, special audit, others)

This includes rental car, lodging, 18 Class 1 Railroad Part 219 Compliance -

This includes rental car, lodging, TOTAL COST FOR OPTION YEAR 1

CLIN 2001: Option Year 2 - Laboratory Compliance Inspections and Proficiency Testing (QA-QC)

Proposed

Labor Hourly Rate

Total Proposed

Cost 19 Contract Lead 144 Hour

20 Senior Forensic Toxicologist 288 Hour

CLIN 2002: Option Year 2 - Class 1 Railroad Part 219 - Compliance Review Services 21 Contract Lead 240 Hour

22 Subject Matter Expert – Railroad Substance

2002: Option Year 2 - Class 1 Railroad Part 219 Compliance - Expert Consultation 23 Contract Lead 450 Hour 24 Senior Forensic Toxicologist 50 Hour

Total Hours and Cost 2003: Option Year 2 - Travel - Direct and Indirect Cost

CLIN Description Total

Proposed Cost

25 Laboratory Compliance Inspections and Proficiency Testing (QA-QC)

This includes rental car, lodging, Review Services (e.g. travel for meetings, special audit, others)

This includes rental car, lodging, 27 Class 1 Railroad Part 219 Compliance -

This includes rental car, lodging, TOTAL COST FOR OPTION YEAR 2

TOTAL COST FOR BASE YEAR AND TWO ONE-YEAR OPTIONS

5. The past performance matrix shall be provided in a separate PDF or Excel document. This shall include recent, relevant past performance (within the last three (3) years) of providing high quality services of similar nature in size, scope, complexity, technical difficulty, and dollar value in a manner that ensures maximum accuracy throughout, cost effectiveness and overall client satisfaction.

Each project experience shall include the following:

a. Narrative. Your narrative shall clearly demonstrate the Offeror’s knowledge of, experience in, technical understanding, and successful completion of the functions of tasks outlined in the SOW. Each example shall provide a thorough explanation of how each project is relevant to the SOW. Relevant project experience demonstrates the relevancy of what you have done as it relates to the SOW.

i. Each project experience example shall be no more than two (2) pages each.

ii. A minimum of 2 (two) relevant project experience examples are required.

The maximum number of relevant project experience examples is five (5).

b. Monetary Award Value. The Contractor shall include at least one project they completed for a Federal Agency with a value no less than $1 million.

c. Dates of Work Performance.

d. Name of Client, Contact Phone Number and Email Address, so a reference check can be conducted if necessary. There shall be a minimum of three references.

The following provisions and clauses apply to the solicitation The FAR Clause at 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Items (Oct 2018). Each offeror is required to submit their RFQ as specified in FAR Provision 52.212-1, Evaluation-Commercial Items (Oct 2018), 52.212-2 (Oct 2014); 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications—Commercial Items (Dec 2019); 52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions - Commercial Items (Oct 2018), 52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders - Commercial Items (Jan 2020) (applicable clauses included as an attachment); 52.203-18 Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality

Agreements or Statements-Representation (Jan 2017) and 52.203-19 Prohibition on Requiring Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements (Jan 2017). Interested vendors are reminded that award can only be made to a contractor who is registered in accordance with FAR 52.204-7.

Offerors shall submit a quote response in accordance with the instructions set forth in this document. Failure to comply with any and/or all the instructions may result in the Offeror’s quote not being considered.

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD

The Offerors will be evaluated using the following criteria:

Technical Factors:

Factor 1: Personnel

Factor 2: Past Performance

Non-Technical

Factor 3: Price

Technical Factors 1 and 2 are of equal importance and are more important than Factor 3. As the technical factors become more equal, the non-technical factor will become substantially more important in the best value trade-off analysis. The Contracting Officer will determine what tradeoffs promise the greatest value to the Government, all evaluation factors and price considered.

In other words, the Government is willing to pay more for a quotation highly rated on Past Performance and Personnel, as opposed to a quotation with the best price.

The quotation shall demonstrate capabilities of the prospective Contractor that will successfully accomplish the tasks as outlined in the SOW to the Government’s satisfaction. Each quote shall document the feasibility of successful implementation of requirements of the RFQ. Quotation information provided for one factor may be used to assess other factors if the Government deems it appropriate.

In addition, FRA will rate more favorably quotes that demonstrate specific experience with government regulated industry drug and alcohol testing programs, forensic toxicology, and transportation safety specifically human factors.

The labor hour contract will be awarded on a best value basis consisting of a tradeoff of the technical and non-technical factors. The Government reserves the right to make award to the Contractor’s whose quote is the most advantageous and provides the best overall value to the Government.

The Government reserves the right to obtain information from other sources (e.g., additional PPIRS/CPARS reports) to assess Contractor’s performance risk for completing similar type requirements. The Government may consider positive and negative information not mentioned by the Offeror, but found during assessing resumes for personnel qualifications/experience.

Failure to furnish all information required above may result in your quotation being considered non-responsive and eliminated from further consideration.

SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS

Questions regarding this combined synopsis/solicitation and RFQ shall be submitted any time before and no later than Friday, April 3, 2020 at 1:00 PM EDT to the email address mentioned below. Include “Questions for PATT Oversight RFQ 693JJ620Q000003” in the subject of the email to ensure response.

Quotations shall be submitted any time before and no later than Friday, May 1, 2020 at 1:00 PM EDT to the email address mentioned below. Include “Submission for PATT Oversight RFQ 693JJ620Q000003” in the subject of the email.

Interested offerors shall e-mail the Contract Specialist, Christie Ong at christie.ong@dot.gov.

No late responses will be accepted. No telephone inquiries will be accepted.

mailto:christie.ong@dot.gov

SECTION C

STATEMENT OF WORK for

POST-ACCIDENT TOXICOLOGICAL TESTING (PATT) OVERSIGHT

C.1 BACKGROUND

The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) was created by the Department of Transportation (DOT) Act of 1966. It is one of ten agencies within the DOT concerned with intermodal transportation. FRA’s mission is to enable the safe, reliable, and efficient movement of people and goods for a strong America, now and in the future.

FRA’s Office of Safety promotes and regulates safety throughout the Nation's railroad industry.

The office executes its regulatory and inspection responsibilities through a diverse staff of railroad safety experts. Other functionalities that FRA’s Office of Safety provides are railroad safety and customer training (including State safety inspectors), accident and employee fatality investigations and reporting, partnerships between labor, management, and the agency that address systemic initiatives, and development and implementation of safety rules and standards.

Details on FRA of Safety’s mission, role, and responsibilities are available at https://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0010 .

C.2 SCOPE

a. The objective of the effort is to provide FRA support in all technical and scientific areas which relate to the detection and deterrence of drug and alcohol use in the railroad industry.

b. One principal focus of this requirement is to provide the FRA with ongoing technical evaluation and scientific review of laboratory Post-Accident Toxicological Testing (PATT) procedures and protocols. The collection and analysis of whole blood and urine samples, including tissue samples in post-mortem cases, is performed by a laboratory under a separate contract with FRA.

Effective November 1985, the FRA Post Accident Toxicological Testing Program (PATT) was implemented pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Subpart C of Part 219 (49 CFR Part 219 Subpart C), which constitutes the final rule and is titled “Control of Alcohol and Drug Use.”

Accuracy and credibility in mandatory PATT has been identified as a critical element in the nationwide FRA railroad safety alcohol and drug control program.

For this element, the Technical Oversight Contractor (Contractor) shall provide technical and scientific oversight specializing in forensic toxicology, laboratory testing procedures and protocols, and inspections of the designated FRA post-https://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0010 accident laboratory. In addition, the Contractor shall perform and administer comprehensive proficiency testing of laboratory procedures and quality assurance methods which promote continuing public confidence in the forensic integrity and scientific credibility of the FRA PATT Program. These tests shall be legally defensible with an unblemished or at a minimum corrected chain of custody. The Contractor shall further provide FRA, upon request, with advice and comment on issues related either directly or corollary to FRA’s PATT Program, including the interpretation and meaning of post-accident analytical findings in human urine, blood, and tissue.

c. As an additional principal focus of this contract, the Contractor shall provide technical assistance to FRA, upon request, in matters relating to all compliance aspects (technical, scientific, and policy) of drug and alcohol testing programs conducted by rail carriers striving to be in compliance with 49 CFR Part 219, and the Department’s testing procedural regulation, 49 CFR Part 40 titled, “Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug Testing Programs,” as amended. The contractor shall also assist the FRA Alcohol and Drug Program Manager in appropriate subject matter expertise and training program support for the internal FRA workforce and railroad management including “service providers” such as urine and breath collection sites, medical review officers (MRO), and third party administrators (TPA). These service providers assist the railroads in complying in the requirements and are reviewed by FRA HQ-led Class I compliance audits and FRA Region-led compliance audits of Class II and passenger railroads. The contractor will assist with rail labor issues as well and provide subject matter consultation and advice to the FRA for the enhancement of the total FRA effort to reduce the adverse effects of substance abuse in the railroad industry.

For Information purposes:

49 CFR Part 40 may be accessed electronically at the Department of Transportation, Drug and Alcohol Regulations web page - Internet address:

https://www.transportation.gov/odapc

49 CFR Part 219 may be accessed electronically at the FRA, Office of Safety, Drug and Alcohol home page - http://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0345

C.2 TASK 1- TECHNICAL AND SCIENTIFIC MONITORING OF

DESIGNATED FRA POST ACCIDENT LABORATORY

C.2.1 Subtask-Inspection

a. FRA designates one laboratory to conduct FRA post-accident toxicology, currently located in Tucker, GA. This location may be subject to change during the life of this requirement.

https://www.transportation.gov/odapc http://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0345

The designated, FRA contracted Post-Accident Testing Laboratory (LAB) will be subject to comprehensive monitoring by the Oversight Contractor on behalf of FRA. The Contractor shall inspect the laboratory tri-annually, and/or as directed by FRA, for compliance with:

(1) Requirements imposed by FRA (through regulation, contractual terms, established approved protocols and any amendments) and any requirements applicable to the FRA Post Accident Toxicology Program (PATP) that may be incorporated in Mandatory Guidelines issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), as amended, or other applicable Federal standards and regulations; and

(2) Established (published) forensic toxicology guidelines and principles and national standards of practice promulgated by reputable forensic toxicology boards, related scientific organizations, or laboratory certifying bodies (e.g., the College of American Pathologists (CAP), the Society of Forensic Toxicologists (SOFT), the American Board of Forensic Toxicology (ABFT), or the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS)).

b. As part of their tri-annual inspections of the laboratory, the Contract Lead shall coordinate the review the designated laboratory protocols, operating procedures, qualification of personnel, equipment, physical security, and facilities to determine if the laboratory operations meet or exceed all applicable scientific and forensic standards.

The Contractor shall identify any concerns/deficiencies during the tri-annual review(s) so that the FRA-contracted laboratory can discuss resolution during the review.

Each area of laboratory operations should be rated by the Contractor, coordinated and reported out by the Contract Lead in the report provided to the FRA SME and COR as in compliance, as requiring a recommendation, as a deficiency, or as a discrepancy.

Each reviewed area shall be rated by the Inspection Team and the ratings are defined as follows:

"In Compliance" - The evaluation area was considered to be in direct compliance with both the contract with the FRA (either meeting or exceeding FRA requirements) and with accepted scientific and forensic laboratory practices. Unless otherwise stated in this Report, areas of consideration were considered to be in compliance.

"Recommendations Offered" - The evaluation area was considered to be in general compliance with accepted forensic laboratory practices, but some level of action by the Laboratory would be required to either remediate an administrative, technical, or scientific concern by the Inspection Team or to enhance an existing procedure or protocol. The Laboratory has full discretion to incorporate an alternative system, method, or procedure of its choice in order to resolve the issue.

"Deficiencies Noted" - The evaluation area was not considered to be in general compliance with accepted forensic laboratory practices or FRA requirements and should be reconciled to the satisfaction of the FRA Subject Matter Expert (SME) and

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) by the next Inspection. A problem in this area should be considered serious, but does not indicate a discrepancy, which necessarily impacts on the integrity or credibility of FRA testing. Nonetheless, it dictates resolution. For the purposes of this Inspection Report, the Inspection Team considers "not in compliance with accepted forensic laboratory practices" to describe an evaluation area vulnerable to question or challenge by outside forensic experts or inspecting toxicologists using Department of Health and Human Services-Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration (DHHS/SAMHSA), College of American Pathologists (CAP), Center for Disease Control (CDC), or other relevant guidelines.

"Discrepancies Identified" - The evaluation area was not considered to be in compliance with accepted forensic laboratory practices (as defined above) or FRA requirements to the extent that the integrity and credibility of FRA testing was considered to be in jeopardy. A problem in this area should be considered extremely serious, and may demonstrate default or material breach of the contract.

These definitions are subject to change by FRA SME and COR throughout the course of this contract.

If the inspection concern/deficiency is such that it cannot be resolved immediately, it will be debriefed as a concern/deficiency which will also be part of the review report compiled by the Contract Lead which will require resolution before the next tri-annual review.

The Contract Lead shall provide the FRA laboratory with a draft of the tri-annual review report, not later than 30 working days after the review. The draft report shall include a detailed narrative addressing concerns/deficiencies identified; discussion of isolated or systemic causes contributing to the concerns/deficiencies (to include recommended remedial actions); action taken by the laboratory to rectify situations or conditions identified in previous inspections; and reports or specific cases relevant to the review. FRA will provide past samples of laboratory tri-annual review reports for format at the program orientation. The tri-annual reports should include analysis and results of any proficiency testing (Subtask C.2.2) that occurred in the previous four-month period.

After the laboratory has provided its own internal review of the Contractor’s draft report to ensure there are no errors of fact, the Contract Lead shall finalize the report and provide the final report to both the FRA SME and COR, and the laboratory not later than 10 working days after submission of the draft report. The Contract Lead shall continue to confer with the laboratory and discuss and resolve any ongoing issues developed during the inspection and subsequently noted in the final report.

Supplemental reports from the Contract Lead to the FRA may be required to address specific concerns raised during discussions between the Oversight Contractor and the laboratory.

c. The Contractor shall maintain laboratory inspection procedures approved by the FRA

SME and COR that incorporate applicable standards and procedures as they apply to the primary laboratory. The Contractor shall independently verify the ability of the laboratory to provide consistently reliable, forensically sound, and scientifically defensible methods for the detection and confirmation of alcohol and drugs as specified in the laboratory’s contract with FRA, to include required internal quality assurance for proper chain of custody of samples and complete documentation of all assays performed on FRA samples.

The Contractor’s inspection shall include every aspect of laboratory operations which impacts the testing of FRA post-accident specimens. Areas to be covered include, but are not necessarily limited to, analytical and laboratory protocols, laboratory administration and staffing, facilities, training, case turnaround time, specimen receiving/aliquoting/ sample preservation, screening, extractions, confirmations, specimen custody and control, data and record review protocols, laboratory security, laboratory safety, specimen and record storage, reports, and quality assurance/quality control. The Contractor will also be asked to judge the laboratory’s response and provide a recommendation to the Contractor’s previous report.

d. In performing these reviews, the Contract Lead shall advise FRA SME and COR on the acceptability of standing laboratory procedures and analytical protocols or revisions thereto. The Contractor shall review all post-accident cases (and findings) of samples reported positive, and review all or a representative number of cases (and findings) reported negative (a minimum of 50 percent) which were received and analyzed by the laboratory during the time frame under review. In reviewing these cases, the Contractor shall determine the extent to which reported results are forensically sound and scientifically defensible, the Contractor should also ascertain if testing and analyses were conducted in a manner fully consistent with the procedures and protocols approved under the designated laboratory’s contract with FRA. The Contract Lead shall include these abovementioned details in the report to the FRA SME and COR.

e. Inspection of the designated FRA laboratory will require a team of two or three members. The Contract Lead shall confer with the FRA COR and SME at least 30 days in advance to allow for travel scheduling and coordination of the laboratory reviews.

When conducting an inspection of the FRA designated toxicology laboratory, each Contractor team member shall be fully qualified to perform these inspections as experts in the forensic toxicology field. Qualification will be defined as holding a credential as a Fellow of the American Board of Forensic Toxicology (F-ABFT), a Diplomate of the American Board of Forensic Toxicology (D-ABFT-FT, D-ABFT-FA, or D-ABFT-FD), or another equivalent credential acceptable to the FRA SME and COR.

At least the lead laboratory inspector for every FRA post-accident laboratory inspection shall hold the F-ABFT credential or another equivalent credential acceptable to the FRA SME and COR.

All personnel proposed by the Contract Lead to provide forensic toxicology laboratory inspection services shall be approved by the FRA SME and COR.

Team members shall have a strong working knowledge and/or experience in all ranges of blood and urine screening and confirmation methodologies (including EIA, ELISA, GC/MS and LC/MS/MS). At least one team member shall have demonstrated experience in post-mortem toxicology.

Historically, these sub tasks (C.2.1 & C.2.2) have been staffed by 3 personnel. Two (2) primaries and one (1) alternate.

C.2.2 Subtask- FRA Post Accident Laboratory Proficiency Testing

a. The Contractor (can be Contract Lead or other technical expert) shall collaborate with the

FRA SME and COR regarding the design of, or modification to an open and blind proficiency testing program for the designated FRA post-accident laboratory. The Contractor shall design, implement, and operate a program that has been submitted by the Contract Lead and has been approved by the FRA SME and COR.

The proficiency testing program requires that the Contractor arrange for preparation of human whole blood and urine samples and retain services of one or more referee laboratories to provide analyses of the samples to be used in determining the capabilities and credibility of the designated FRA toxicology laboratory.

b. The Contractor shall arrange for the presentation of these samples to the designated

FRA laboratory so that the open and blind sampling methodologies employed are acceptable to the FRA SME and COR. The Contractor shall prepare and furnish the FRA SME and COR reports within 40 working days detailing the steps and findings and subsequent actions taken for all proficiency tests conducted.

c. The Contractor shall arrange for a minimum of one (1) and preferably two (2) reference laboratories to analyze blank and spiked samples as needed.

d. Proficiency testing for the designated FRA laboratory will include full identification and quantification of FRA-required analytes based on the then current FRA testing protocols for drugs and for alcohol. Generally, drugs are first screened for in urine and presumptive positives or dilute specimens are confirmed in blood or urine. In some circumstances, the blood is screened instead and presumptive positives are confirmed in both blood and urine. Alcohol is first screened in blood and presumptive positives are confirmed in blood and urine. This also means that the Contractor’s proficiency testing challenges shall be prepared to cover the full range of analytes and cutoffs the laboratory is testing for under FRA requirements at the time of the challenge.

FRA estimates the 12-month total volume for the proficiency testing program to include 23 sample sets. (Note: a set includes both blood and urine representing the specimens from one railroad employee.) The submissions should be spread over a 12-month period and coordinated with the FRA SME and COR in an effort to spread the blind testing so as not to detract from or to minimize its impact on actual event testing.

The samples should comprise approximately 20 sample sets for open testing (which should be coordinated/scheduled with the FRA laboratory during the quarterly review).

Generally, open sample sets should contain no more than 10% negatives. The remainder should contain between one and three drug groups.

The Contractor should be prepared to submit 3 sample sets for blind testing in no less than one (1) “mock” qualifying events each year. Blind testing should constitute between 2-3% of the total volume of employees tested and FRA qualifying events in a particular year. FRA may modify the blind testing requirements to accommodate changes in testing volumes and qualifying testing events. The distribution of blind positives should be reflective of the types of drugs and concentrations expected in an accident situation. Generally, blind testing events should contain one or more positives in a significant majority of mock crews, but should not be obvious blind challenges based on the Contractor’s design.

e. For the blind phase of the proficiency testing program, standard FRA toxicology shipment boxes (which include kits with plastic bottles, blood vacuum tubes, and other required materials for shipment) will be provided to the Contractor by the FRA or by FRA approved selected rail carriers. The FRA Program Manager/COR will help the Contractor coordinate with appropriate railroads the time and location to enter the blind. The Contractor may either travel to the railroad site to submit this blind submission or coordinate and send the appropriate material to the railroad site for their submission.

The Contractor shall deposit the specimens in the proper containers to create an appearance of ordinary FRA post-accident specimens, coordinate with the carrier to prepare accompanying paperwork reflecting fictitious entries, and otherwise prepare the post-accident kits in a manner resembling what would be prepared by carriers involved in an actual test triggering railroad accident/incident. When an onsite visit is warranted or directed by FRA, typically once per contract year, the Contractor is expected to treat this event at the railroad as an opportunity to provide technical assistance to the railroad and refresher training for the railroad in proper 49 CFR Part 219 post accident procedures.

C.3 TASK 2- RAILROAD PART 219 COMPLIANCE REVIEW

SERVICES

a. As directed by the FRA, the Contractor shall provide expert advice and/or program support services related to the detection and deterrence of drug and alcohol use in the railroad industry. This may include, but not be limited to, technical assistance visits and participation in FRA 49 CFR Part 219 compliance audits of rail carriers. The Contractor shall be responsible for providing FRA with one (1) or more acceptable technical experts for Part 219 compliance audits of both rail carriers and their service providers (MRO, SAP, BAT, etc.) at various designated locations throughout the country. These locations vary from CSX – Jacksonville, FL; Norfolk Southern –

Norfolk, VA; UP – Omaha, NE; BNSF – Fort Worth, TX; CN – Hammond, IL; CP – Minneapolis, MN; AMTRAK – Wilmington, DE; KCS – Kansas City, MO. The contractor may also be call upon to provide assistance with large Class II and passenger railroads to assist FRA Region-led compliance audits. The technical experts shall have demonstrated experience and expertise in 49 CFR Part 40 and/or Part 219 regulations, guidance, and regulatory interpretations. The Contractor should also have working knowledge and experience working with all of the other DOT agency regulations (including FMCSA’ 49 CFR Part 382). The Contract Lead shall provide resumes of proposed auditors for FRA approval no later than 30 days prior to the task start date and to also be included in the proposal.

b. Contractor technical experts shall be prepared to act as senior adjunct members of a team of FRA inspectors auditing all drug and alcohol requirements of the applicable federal rules (both Part 219 and Part 40). Special expertise is required in urine, blood, tissue, and breath specimen collection; collection chain-of-custody and documentation;

laboratory procedures, analysis, and test result documentation; Medical Review Officer (MRO) procedures and documentation; Substance Abuse Professional (SAP) procedures and documentation; Breath Alcohol Technician (BAT) procedures and documentation; and all types of federal testing with particular emphasis in random testing requirements and allowances, and other requirements of the rules.

c. Contractor technical experts shall be prepared, qualified, and to the extent needed, credentialed to conduct interviews and assess documents and records with railroad officials and vendor representatives (MRO, SAP, BAT etc.); make written recommendations and identify noncompliance or deficiencies with respect to Parts 40 Part 219; provide appropriate, relevant operational guidance; and write reports of findings for use by FRA. The Contract Lead shall coordinate and provide these reports to FRA. FRA will provide past samples of railroad compliance review reports for format at the program orientation.

Typically, the FRA SME and COR will request five such compliance audits each year, extending from 3-5 days each for carriers or 1-3 days each for carrier service providers.

The FRA SME/program manager will determine and schedule industry program reviews depending on need. Whenever possible, the Contract Lead will be notified up to a year in advance, however FRA may have a shorten lead time up to two (2) months prior for Contractor technical assistance and audit support services.

C.5 TASK 3- EXPERT CONSULTATION SERVICES

a. Contractor (may be Contract Lead, technical expert, or forensic toxicologist as needed) shall be prepared to provide FRA expert consultation services to support the entire Part 219 and Part 40 program. The Contractor shall be available on a seven-day per week/extended hour basis by at least telephone to respond to FRA requests for expert scientific, technical, and program. The FRA SME will expect immediate verbal advice to inquiries from an individual designated as a key person by the Contractor, to be followed by appropriate, timely (no more than 24 hours), written advice, as required and these shall be documented on all of the below requirements by the Contract Lead for the FRA COR.

The Contractor should additionally expect regular, routine telephone and face-to-face interface with the FRA SME and COR during contract performance relative to administrative case management. These discussions can be initiated by either party, and may occur daily or more often during the processing of high visibility accidents or with a heavy onboard FRA caseload. This interface is most often with the Contractor official (subject matter expert/program manager) responsible for the day-to-day operations of the FRA technical oversight program, and it may be more extensive than in the normal private client contract for technical oversight services.

There may also be need to provide consultation to the FRA SME and COR on support service during competitive procurement for a post-accident laboratory or replacement if the laboratory should lose certification.

In addition, as required by the FRA SME and COR, the Contractor shall be prepared to consult in providing appropriate Part 219 and Part 40 subject matter training to the FRA inspector workforce and the railroad industry (including carrier personnel, rail labor, and program service providers) in areas requiring technical, scientific, and policy expertise including regulatory changes.

Furthermore, the FRA SME and COR will require the Contractor to interpret the post-accident testing results and render an opinion on the influence of an identified drug or alcohol on the cause of a train accident.

b. The Contractor shall keep the FRA SME and COR informed on drugs of abuse/patterns of usage that may have an impact on FRA post-accident toxicological testing results and/or carrier alcohol and drug programs. In addition, the Contractor shall also keep the FRA SME and COR informed on developments in drug and alcohol testing/laboratory methodologies which might impact FRA post-accident toxicological testing. All information conveyed to the FRA SME and COR pertaining to new developments, updates and the like, shall be documented and retained by the Contractor with subject matter date and time, and shall be shared with the FRA SME and COR on an on-going basis.

c. The Contractor shall be prepared to provide technical and scientific expertise to FRA

SME and COR in assessing and reviewing substance abatement programs in Canada and Mexico for employers who have operations which could adversely affect safety in the United States. As part of a joint FRA and Transport Canada (TC) working group, the Contractor will act as a consultant in analyzing compatibility of programs and suggesting alternative strategies to ensure safety in cross border operations subject to any limitations imposed or conditions exacted by the host Government. The Contractor will be expected to travel as needed with the joint team to subject foreign countries and to support the team for up to five days on two or three occasions over the life of the contract, inclusive of options.

C.6 TASK 4 – DELIVERABLES

a. Laboratory Inspection Reports: (as per Section C.2.1 a – b) including QC/QA results if they occurred in the review period (Three Inspection Reports per year)

b. Class 1 Railroad Part 219 Compliance Reviews: (as per Section C.3 a – c) Medical

Review Officer (MRO) and Substance Abuse Professional (SAP) Services Sections for inclusion in Overall Audit Summary (Five MRO Compliance Reviews per year)

The contractor, as coordinated by the Contract Lead, shall include an electronic copy to the FRA SME and to the COR as the tri-annual Laboratory Inspection Report and the Railroad Compliance Reviews are part of the deliverables and the services that the COR will be verifying on the invoices.

The Contractor, as coordinated by the Contract Lead, shall include the COR on all deliverables or services provided. These include, communication through emails, reports, travel notification and any other if applicable.

AMENDMENT 1: COMBINED SYNOPSIS/SOLICITATION NOTICE FOR REQUEST FOR QUOTATION (RFQ)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)
OFFICE OF ACQUISITION SERVICES
1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590
This is an amended combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 12.6 and under the authority of FAR Part 13, as supplemented with additional information incl...
NOTE 1: The work under this RFQ was previously performed under contract number DTFR5314C00029 by Healthwest, LLC.
NOTE 2: The period of performance for this order should be one-year from date of award and two one-year option periods.
The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) solicits your quotations for services to provide FRA support in Post-Accident Toxicological Testing (PATT) oversight - all technical and scientific areas which relate to the detection and deterrence of drug an...
QUOTE REQUIREMENTS
Each quote shall be legible, single-spaced, typewritten Times New Roman font (or comparable), no smaller than 11-point type-size, no less than 1 inch margins, which can be printed on 8 ½ x 11-inch paper. Regarding page limitations, this does not inclu...
In responding to this RFQ, your quotation SHALL include the following:
1. Quote Cover Letter: An authorized official who can obligate the Contractor. Provide the name, title, telephone number and e-mail address of the company/division point of contact.
a. Company Name
b. Business Size (Small, Woman-Owned, Disadvantaged, Hub-Zone, Large, Non-Profit, etc.)
c. DUNS and CAGE Code
d. Proposed Payment Terms (Government Standard is NET 30)
e. Government Discount/Savings provided (if applicable)
f. Remittance Address (if different than Mailing Address)
2. Submit a separate written technical quotation, a price quotation, and a past performance matrix.
3. The technical quotation shall be submitted in a PDF format. This shall include key personnel resumes who will be performing the tasks as required in the SOW. Proposed key personnel shall clearly demonstrate evident possession of requisite backgroun...
All key personnel quoted shall be available to begin work immediately at contract award.
Key personnel resumes shall:
a. Be no more than three (3) pages per resume.
b. Be in chronological order with the latest dates of employment first and will identify the company or agency, period of employment, title and job description of the individual, and level of responsibility.
c. Include employee’s education (including name of school, length of time and degree/certificate), and specific experiences that are directly related to the requirements of this SOW.
d. Include any relevant certifications and/or recognitions relevant to the SOW.
Substitution of key personnel during contract performance shall meet the qualifications of the original key personnel and shall be approved in advance by the FRA Subject Matter Expert (SME) and Contracting Officer.
4. The price quotation shall be submitted in a separate PDF format or Excel document using the following Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) table. The period of performance for this order should be one-year from date of award and two one-year option per...
5. The past performance matrix shall be provided in a separate PDF or Excel document. This shall include recent, relevant past performance (within the last three (3) years) of providing high quality services of similar nature in size, scope, complexit...
Each project experience shall include the following:
a. Narrative. Your narrative shall clearly demonstrate the Offeror’s knowledge of, experience in, technical understanding, and successful completion of the functions of tasks outlined in the SOW. Each example shall provide a thorough explanation of ho...
i. Each project experience example shall be no more than two (2) pages each.
ii. A minimum of 2 (two) relevant project experience examples are required. The maximum number of relevant project experience examples is five (5).
b. Monetary Award Value. The Contractor shall include at least one project they completed for a Federal Agency with a value no less than $1 million.
c. Dates of Work Performance.
d. Name of Client, Contact Phone Number and Email Address, so a reference check can be conducted if necessary. There shall be a minimum of three references.
The following provisions and clauses apply to the solicitation The FAR Clause at 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Items (Oct 2018). Each offeror is required to submit their RFQ as specified in FAR Provision 52.212-1, Evaluation-Commerci...
Offerors shall submit a quote response in accordance with the instructions set forth in this document. Failure to comply with any and/or all the instructions may result in the Offeror’s quote not being considered.
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD
The Offerors will be evaluated using the following criteria:
Technical Factors:
Factor 1: Personnel
Factor 2: Past Performance
Non-Technical
Factor 3: Price
Technical Factors 1 and 2 are of equal importance and are more important than Factor 3. As the technical factors become more equal, the non-technical factor will become substantially more important in the best value trade-off analysis. The Contracting...
In other words, the Government is willing to pay more for a quotation highly rated on Past Performance and Personnel, as opposed to a quotation with the best price.
The quotation shall demonstrate capabilities of the prospective Contractor that will successfully accomplish the tasks as outlined in the SOW to the Government’s satisfaction. Each quote shall document the feasibility of successful implementation of r...
In addition, FRA will rate more favorably quotes that demonstrate specific experience with government regulated industry drug and alcohol testing programs, forensic toxicology, and transportation safety specifically human factors.
The labor hour contract will be awarded on a best value basis consisting of a tradeoff of the technical and non-technical factors. The Government reserves the right to make award to the Contractor’s whose quote is the most advantageous and provides th...
The Government reserves the right to obtain information from other sources (e.g., additional PPIRS/CPARS reports) to assess Contractor’s performance risk for completing similar type requirements. The Government may consider positive and negative info...
Failure to furnish all information required above may result in your quotation being considered non-responsive and eliminated from further consideration.
SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .