69056718Q000025_A01.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or

(c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT:

Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

In consideration of the modification agreed to herein as complete equitable adjustments for the changes detailed herein, the contractor hereby releases the government from any and all liability under this contract attributable to the facts or circumstances giving rise to, arising from, or relating to, this modification.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force a nd effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

This form was electronically produced by Elite Federal Forms, Inc.

( ) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

1 8

0001 5/02/2018

Federal Highway Administration Western Federal Lands Highway Division 610 E 5th Street Vancouver, WA 98661

Federal Highway Administration Western Federal Lands Highway Division 610 E 5th Street Vancouver, WA 98661

69056718Q000025

4/16/2018 one (1)

This amendment changes the list of items to be included with quotes and extends the solicitation.

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 is amended to alter paragraphs 1.a, 1.b and 2c. Attachment C.002 is amended to extended the receipt date until Thursday, 5/10/2018, at 4:00pm Pacific Time

All amendments are indicated by red and/or lined-through text on the attached pages. All other stipulations remain unchanged.

N/A

69056718Q000025 April 16, 2018

SECTION D – SOLICITATION PROVISIONS

D.1 Incorporated by Reference

D.1.1 Federal Acquisitions Regulation (FAR)

52.252-1 -- Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference (Feb 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at https://www.acquisition.gov/?q=browsefar

52.203-18 -- Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements-Representation (Jan 2017) 52.204-7 -- System for Award Management (Oct 2016) 52.204-16 -- Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting (Jul 2016) 52.204-22 -- Alternative Line Item Proposal (Jan 2017) 52.212-1 -- Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Items (Jan 2017)

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL

ITEMS (Jan 2017)

1. Instructions

a. Questions regarding this requirement shall be submitted no later than Wednesday, 5/02/20185/09/2018, at 4:00 pm Pacific Time to Doug Taylor at WFL.Purchasing@dot.gov.

b. Response to this RFQ shall be submitted no later than Friday, 5/04/20185/11/2018, at 2:00 pm Pacific Time. All submissions shall in PDF and shall be submitted via email to WFL.Purchasing@dot.gov. Quotes received in any other method or format shall not be accepted or reviewed. Quotes received after the above noted time will not be reviewed or accepted.

c. The Government reserves the right to request such additional information as may be necessary to determine the offeror’s qualifications for award or to clarify any aspects of the technical and/or cost/price submissions. Such information shall be furnished promptly upon the Government’s request.

d. Offerors shall not be reimbursed the costs of developing a quote for this RFQ.

https://www.acquisition.gov/?q=browsefar mailto:WFL.Purchasing@dot.gov mailto:WFL.Purchasing@dot.gov

69056718Q000025 April 16, 2018

2. Quote

a. The Contractor shall address an understanding of logistics, schedule, and any other miscellaneous issues of which the Government should be aware.

b. The Contractor shall indicate if any technical assumptions have been made, conditions have been stipulated or exceptions have been taken with the Government Description of Requirement as written. If technical assumptions are not noted, it will be assumed that the vendor’s quote reflects no technical assumptions for award and agrees to comply with all of the terms and conditions set forth herein.

c. The quote MUST include the following information:

• A completed copy of Section A or the same information on a similar vendor-generated price quote sheet which includes your Unique Entity Identifier (DUNS);

and

• A completed copy of the representations and certifications at FAR 52.212-3 -or- a statement on the quote confirming the provision is complete, current, accurate, posted in www.SAM.gov and is applicable to this solicitation; and

• A list of three (3) references in the past five (5) years for the completion of similar work. Include summary of job type, point of contact with company or government agency, with customer phone, and email, and personnel who performed the work from contractor.

o Contractor shall provide Attachment C.002 to all prospective references for return directly to the government o• Acknowledgement of all amendments to the solicitation, if any.

The Contractor agrees to hold the price in its quotation firm for no less than thirty (30) calendar days from the date specified for receipt of quotes or as requested in any subsequent amendment.

3. Evaluation Method and Basis for Award

The Government intends to evaluate quotations and make award without discussions. This acquisition will utilize the Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) procedure to make a best value award. A decision on the technical acceptability of each offeror’s quotations will be made. For those offerors which are determined to be technically acceptable, award will be made to that Contractor with the lowest overall price. This is a competitive LPTA evaluation in which price is considered the most important factor. By submission of its offer, the Offeror accepts all RFQ requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. All Offerors determined technically unacceptable will not be considered for award, and no further evaluation will be conducted. Failure to meet a requirement may result http://www.sam.gov/

Attachment C.002 Page 1 of 4

When filled in this document is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

<This section is to be completed by the offeror and provided to the reference with instructions to submit the completed questionnaire directly to the government Point of Contact identified in section IV.>

Contractor:

Contract Number:

Contract Name:

Rater Name:

Rater Telephone:

Rater E-Mail Address:

Rater’s Role in Relation to the Contract (program/project manager, contracting officer, major end user, etc.):

Rating Definitions

Rating Definition Note

Exceptional (E)

Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

To justify an “exceptional” rating, identify multiple significant events and state how they were of benefit to the government. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone merits an “exceptional” rating. Also, there should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

Very Good

(VG)

Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems

To justify a “very good” rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government.

There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

Attachment C.002 Page 2 of 4 for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory (S)

Performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appeared to be or were satisfactory.

To justify a “satisfactory” rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract/order.

There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. A fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be evaluated with a rating lower than “satisfactory” solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract/order.

Marginal (M)

Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflected a serious problem for which the contractor did not identify corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions were only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

To justify a “marginal” performance rating, identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it affected the government. A “marginal” rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency report or letter).

Unsatisfactory (U)

Performance did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery was not accomplished in a timely manner.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contained a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

To justify an “unsatisfactory” rating, identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it affected the government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone merits an “unsatisfactory” rating. An “unsatisfactory” rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency report or letter.

INDEX

Section I – Ratings Section II – Additional Narrative Justification Section III – Signature of Rater Section IV – Return Instructions and Contact Information

Attachment C.002 Page 3 of 4

Please provide any relevant information to support the above ratings.

<Note: When completing this questionnaire by e-mail, please do not use a color, such as red, to select the rating in section I of this questionnaire.

Color fonts do not show well when printed. Please bold it, underline it, or increase the font size in black.>

Section I - Contractor Performance

1. How would you rate the quality of the contractor’s products/services provided? Supporting narrative:

<see above criteria>

Response

E VG S M U N/A

2. How would you rate the contractor’s timeliness of the products/services delivered? Supporting narrative: <see above criteria>

E VG S M U N/A

3. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to meet special needs (such as expedited delivery or crisis support) for delivery requirements? Supporting narrative: <see above criteria>

E VG S M U N/A

4. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to effectively manage, coordinate, and integrate subcontractors? Supporting narrative: <see above criteria>

E VG S M U N/A

Attachment C.002 Page 4 of 4

5. How would you rate the performance of the contractor’s warranty/maintenance? Supporting narrative: <see above criteria>

E VG S M U N/A

6. How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the contractor’s performance? Supporting narrative: <see above criteria>

E VG S M U N/A

Section II - Additional Supporting Narrative, if required: <Include the number of the question to which this supporting narrative applies.

Additional pages may be used.>

Section III

Signature of rater: _______________________________________

Date: __________________________________________________

<Signature of rater is required, if faxed. It is not required if sent via e-mail directly from rater.>

Section IV Please return the completed questionnaire via e-mail to WFL.Purchasing@dot.gov or by fax to 360-619-7855.

Please include “RFQ 69056718Q000025 Past Performance” in the subject line.

Please return the completed questionnaire no later than Thursday, 5/10/2018, at 4:00pm Pacific.

mailto:WFL.Purchasing@dot.gov