36C26318Q9896-002.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Provide Staffing for 6 Temporary SPS Tech Sterile Processing VAMC Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Solicitation number
- 36C26318Q9896
About this file
36C26318Q9896 SPS - QASP-Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.docx
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C26318Q9896-003.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26318Q9896-001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26318Q9896-000.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN
Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) in 2F Specialty Clinic
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN
Sterile Processing Technician – Sterile Processing Services (SPS)
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
· What will be monitored.
· How monitoring will take place.
· Who will conduct the monitoring.
· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
a. Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.
· Assigned CO: TBD
· Organization or Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs, Minneapolis VA HCS
b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.
Assigned COR: Sharon Skoblik, 612-467-5273
c. Other Key Government Personnel - As Assigned
3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager for this contract.
a. Program Manager – As assigned by facility
b. Other Contractor Personnel - As assigned by facility
4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.
See attached QASP measurement
5. INCENTIVES
Incentives shall be based on exceeding, meeting, or not meeting performance standards.
6. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE
Various methods exist to monitor performance.
a. Direct Observation
b. Periodic Inspection
c. User Survey
d. Validated User/Customer Complaints
e. Inspection
f. Periodic Sampling
g. Random Sampling
h. Progress or Status Meetings
i. Analysis of Contractor's Progress Reports
7. RATINGS
Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used:
See QASP measurement below:
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN
Nursing Care for Patients
| ID |
| Loca-tion in SOW |
| Indicator |
| Stan-dard |
| Accept-able Quality Level |
| Method of Surveil-lance |
| Incentive |
| 1 |
| Items |
Sterile Processing Technicians to perform the following function:
· 1. decontamination of surgical instruments and other clinical items.
· 2. assemble surgical and clinical instrument trays, sets, kits and small packages.
· 3.sterilize surgical and clinical instrument trays, sets, kits and small packages in various sterilization mediums, such as but not limited to gas, hydrogen peroxide, and steam
· 4. OR case cart assembly with reusable and disposable sterilized product.
| 100% |
| 100% |
| Competency for each task performed – conducted by supervisor |
| Exercise of Option Period and past performance |
| 2 |
| Items |
B G I K
Employee quality checks
· B. Perform quality control checks and operator maintenance for a variety of surgical instrument trays, set and kits..
· G. Communicate pertinent information to the appropriate department or service line.
· I. Recognize emergency situations and initiate appropriate measures.
· K. Assess department standard operating procedure knowledge level, implement plan of instructions for use and demonstrated level of understanding.
| 95% |
| 95 - 100% |
| Periodic reviews – conducted by the SPS QA Coordinator |
| Exercise of Option Period and Past performance |
| 3 |
| Items |
N
Customer Service
· N. Respond to telephone inquiries regarding ward services and/or follow-up to request.
| 95% |
| 95% - 100% |
| Periodic Reviews and spot checks – conducted by Supervisor |
| Exercise of Option Period and past performance |
8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE
a. ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE
The Government shall document positive performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action.
b. UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE
When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file. In order to assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract the COR will work with the contractor to increase performance to an acceptable level.
When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), and present it to the contractor's program manager.
The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COR. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.
Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.
9. FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT
a. Frequency of Measurement.
During contract performance, the COR will periodically analyze whether the negotiated frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed.
b. Frequency of Performance Assessment Meetings.
The COR shall meet with the contractor as needed to assess performance and shall provide a written assessment.
After award, both the contractor’s Program Manager and the COR shall sign this document.
Signature – Contractor Program Manager
Signature – Contracting Officer’s Representative
File details come from the government source that posted it.